Search (61 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  1. Franci, L.; Lucarelli, A.; Motta, M.; Rolle, M.: ¬The Nuovo Soggettario Thesaurus : structural features and Web application projects (2011) 0.06
    0.062773064 = product of:
      0.12554613 = sum of:
        0.08499941 = weight(_text_:et in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08499941 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
        0.04054671 = product of:
          0.08109342 = sum of:
            0.08109342 = weight(_text_:al in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08109342 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
  2. Jahns, Y.: 20 years SWD : German subject authority data prepared for the future (2011) 0.05
    0.047079798 = product of:
      0.094159596 = sum of:
        0.06374956 = weight(_text_:et in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06374956 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
        0.030410035 = product of:
          0.06082007 = sum of:
            0.06082007 = weight(_text_:al in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06082007 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
  3. Bélair, J.-A.; Bourdon, F.; Mingam, M.: ¬Le Répertoire de vedettes-matière et RAMEAU : deux langages d'indexation en français : un luxe nécessaire (2005) 0.04
    0.04216637 = product of:
      0.16866548 = sum of:
        0.16866548 = weight(_text_:et in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16866548 = score(doc=4359,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.82293165 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Deux langages d'indexation (le RVM Laval et Rameau) pour une seule langue (le français) : n'y a-t-il pas là un paradoxe et, d'une certaine manière, un luxe inutile ? Nous allons nous efforcer de démontrer le contraire en présentant les deux types de raisons qui expliquent cette nécessité, raisons d'ordre linguistique et culturel, d'une part, et raisons d'ordre administratif et de gestion, d'autre part. Cette autonomie assumée des deux langages ne signifie pas cependant qu'ils s'ignorent, tout au contraire. L'esprit de collaboration qui anime les deux institutions est soutenu par une coopération officialisée ainsi que par une coopération de tous les jours.
    Series
    139 SI - Classification et Indexation avec Catalogage ; 145-F
  4. Steeg, F.; Pohl, A.: ¬Ein Protokoll für den Datenabgleich im Web am Beispiel von OpenRefine und der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) (2021) 0.04
    0.039233167 = product of:
      0.07846633 = sum of:
        0.053124636 = weight(_text_:et in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053124636 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.025341695 = product of:
          0.05068339 = sum of:
            0.05068339 = weight(_text_:al in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05068339 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Normdaten spielen speziell im Hinblick auf die Qualität der Inhaltserschließung bibliografischer und archivalischer Ressourcen eine wichtige Rolle. Ein konkretes Ziel der Inhaltserschließung ist z. B., dass alle Werke über Hermann Hesse einheitlich zu finden sind. Hier bieten Normdaten eine Lösung, indem z. B. bei der Erschließung einheitlich die GND-Nummer 11855042X für Hermann Hesse verwendet wird. Das Ergebnis ist eine höhere Qualität der Inhaltserschließung vor allem im Sinne von Einheitlichkeit und Eindeutigkeit und, daraus resultierend, eine bessere Auffindbarkeit. Werden solche Entitäten miteinander verknüpft, z. B. Hermann Hesse mit einem seiner Werke, entsteht ein Knowledge Graph, wie ihn etwa Google bei der Inhaltserschließung des Web verwendet (Singhal 2012). Die Entwicklung des Google Knowledge Graph und das hier vorgestellte Protokoll sind historisch miteinander verbunden: OpenRefine wurde ursprünglich als Google Refine entwickelt, und die Funktionalität zum Abgleich mit externen Datenquellen (Reconciliation) wurde ursprünglich zur Einbindung von Freebase entwickelt, einer der Datenquellen des Google Knowledge Graph. Freebase wurde später in Wikidata integriert. Schon Google Refine wurde zum Abgleich mit Normdaten verwendet, etwa den Library of Congress Subject Headings (Hooland et al. 2013).
  5. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.03
    0.033960227 = product of:
      0.067920454 = sum of:
        0.053124636 = weight(_text_:et in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053124636 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.01479582 = product of:
          0.02959164 = sum of:
            0.02959164 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02959164 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Beschäftigt man sich mit Inhaltserschließung, so sind zunächst zwei Dimensionen zu unterscheiden - die Wissensorganisationssysteme selbst (z. B. Normdateien, Thesauri, Schlagwortsprachen, Klassifikationen und Ontologien) und die Metadaten für Dokumente, die mit diesen Wissensorganisationssystemen erschlossen sind. Beides steht in einer Wechselwirkung zueinander: Die Wissensorganisationssysteme sind die Werkzeuge für die Erschließungsarbeit und bilden die Grundlage für die Erstellung konkreter Erschließungsmetadaten. Die praktische Anwendung der Wissensorganisationssysteme in der Erschließung wiederum ist die Basis für deren Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Zugleich haben Wissensorganisationssysteme auch einen Eigenwert unabhängig von den Erschließungsmetadaten für einzelne Dokumente, indem sie bestimmte Bereiche von Welt- oder Fachwissen modellartig abbilden. Will man nun Aussagen über die Qualität von inhaltlicher Erschließung treffen, so genügt es nicht, den Input - also die Wissensorganisationssysteme und die damit generierten Metadaten - zu betrachten. Man muss auch den Output betrachten, also das, was die Recherchewerkzeuge daraus machen und was folglich bei den Nutzer:innen konkret ankommt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Überlegungen zur Qualität von Recherchewerkzeugen in diesem Bereich angestellt - gewissermaßen als Fortsetzung und Vertiefung der dazu im Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) gegebenen Hinweise. Im Zentrum steht die verbale Erschließung nach den Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung (RSWK), wie sie sich in Bibliothekskatalogen manifestiert - gleich, ob es sich dabei um herkömmliche Kataloge oder um Resource-Discovery-Systeme (RDS) handelt.
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
  6. DiLauro, T.; Choudhury, G.S.; Patton, M.; Warner, J.W.; Brown, E.W.: Automated name authority control and enhanced searching in the Levy collection (2001) 0.03
    0.031386532 = product of:
      0.062773064 = sum of:
        0.042499706 = weight(_text_:et in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042499706 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
        0.020273356 = product of:
          0.04054671 = sum of:
            0.04054671 = weight(_text_:al in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04054671 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is the second in a series in D-Lib Magazine and describes a workflow management system being developed by the Digital Knowledge Center (DKC) at the Milton S. Eisenhower Library (MSEL) of The Johns Hopkins University. Based on experience from digitizing the Lester S. Levy Collection of Sheet Music, it was apparent that large-scale digitization efforts require a significant amount of human labor that is both time-consuming and costly. Consequently, this workflow management system aims to reduce the amount of human labor and time for large-scale digitization projects. The mission of this second phase of the project ("Levy II") can be summarized as follows: * Reduce costs for large collection ingestion by creating a suite of open-source processes, tools, and interfaces for workflow management * Increase access capabilities by providing a suite of research tools * Demonstrate utility of tools and processes with a subset of the online Levy Collection The cornerstones of the workflow management system include optical music recognition (OMR) software and an automated name authority control system (ANAC). The OMR software generates a logical representation of the score for sound generation, music searching, and musicological research. The ANAC disambiguates names, associating each name with an individual (e.g., the composer Septimus Winner also published under the pseudonyms Alice Hawthorne and Apsley Street, among others). Complementing the workflow tools, a suite of research tools focuses upon enhanced searching capabilities through the development and application of a fast, disk-based search engine for lyrics and music and the incorporation of an XML structure for metadata. The first paper (Choudhury et al. 2001) described the OMR software and musical components of Levy II. This paper focuses on the metadata and intellectual access components that include automated name authority control and the aforementioned search engine.
  7. Rinn, R.: ¬Die Personennamendatei (PND) (1993) 0.02
    0.021154014 = product of:
      0.08461606 = sum of:
        0.08461606 = weight(_text_:r in 4356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08461606 = score(doc=4356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 4356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4356)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Rinn, R.: ¬Das Projekt Personennamendatei : PND-Projekt (1994) 0.02
    0.021154014 = product of:
      0.08461606 = sum of:
        0.08461606 = weight(_text_:r in 6568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08461606 = score(doc=6568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 6568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6568)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Behrens-Neumann, R.: Aus der 56. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 23. April 2009 in Wien : ein Bericht (2009) 0.02
    0.020619169 = product of:
      0.041238338 = sum of:
        0.026442517 = weight(_text_:r in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026442517 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
        0.01479582 = product of:
          0.02959164 = sum of:
            0.02959164 = weight(_text_:22 in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02959164 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043682147 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 13:11:01
  10. Wiechmann, B.: Normdaten (2015) 0.02
    0.018509762 = product of:
      0.07403905 = sum of:
        0.07403905 = weight(_text_:r in 3345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07403905 = score(doc=3345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 3345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3345)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Praxishandbuch Bibliotheksmanagement. Hrsg.: R. Griebel, u.a. Bd.1
  11. Hoyer, R.: Möglichkeiten der Norm- und Fremddatennutzung in Kunst- und Museumsbibliotheken (1996) 0.02
    0.018509762 = product of:
      0.07403905 = sum of:
        0.07403905 = weight(_text_:r in 5817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07403905 = score(doc=5817,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 5817, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5817)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  12. Hoyer, R.: AKMB-Arbeitsgruppe Schlagwortnormdatei : Vorbereitungstreffen (1997) 0.02
    0.018509762 = product of:
      0.07403905 = sum of:
        0.07403905 = weight(_text_:r in 5818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07403905 = score(doc=5818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 5818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5818)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. Hoyer, R.: SWD und RSWK in Kunst- und Museumsbibliotheken (1997) 0.02
    0.018509762 = product of:
      0.07403905 = sum of:
        0.07403905 = weight(_text_:r in 5821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07403905 = score(doc=5821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 5821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5821)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Gömpel, R.: Standardisierungsarbeit für Bibliotheken : Konzept der Deutschen Bibliothek (2001) 0.02
    0.018509762 = product of:
      0.07403905 = sum of:
        0.07403905 = weight(_text_:r in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07403905 = score(doc=6128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  15. Kohls, R.: ¬Die Normdaten-CD-ROM aus Nutzersicht (2002) 0.02
    0.018509762 = product of:
      0.07403905 = sum of:
        0.07403905 = weight(_text_:r in 6988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07403905 = score(doc=6988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 6988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6988)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Gömpel, R.: Öffentliche verfahren bei der Standardisierungsarbeit für Bibliotheken (2001) 0.02
    0.018509762 = product of:
      0.07403905 = sum of:
        0.07403905 = weight(_text_:r in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07403905 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Behrens-Neumann, R.; Pfeifer, B.: ¬Die Gemeinsame Normdatei - ein Kooperationsprojekt (2011) 0.02
    0.018509762 = product of:
      0.07403905 = sum of:
        0.07403905 = weight(_text_:r in 2331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07403905 = score(doc=2331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 2331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2331)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  18. Gömpel, R.: Standardisierungsarbeit für Bibliotheken (2001) 0.02
    0.015865512 = product of:
      0.06346205 = sum of:
        0.06346205 = weight(_text_:r in 5680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06346205 = score(doc=5680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 5680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5680)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  19. Hoyer, R.: Nutzung von Normdaten im Verbund : SWD, PND und GKD im Kunstbibliothekenverbund Florenz, München, Rom (1998) 0.02
    0.015865512 = product of:
      0.06346205 = sum of:
        0.06346205 = weight(_text_:r in 5822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06346205 = score(doc=5822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 5822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5822)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  20. Wolf, S.: Normdaten-Kooperation? In Bibliotheken, über Verbünde oder - wie und wo eigentlich? : Eine Erwiderung zu "Normdaten-Kooperation im Kunstbibliotheken-Fachverbund Florenz-München-Rom von R. Hoyer (2001) 0.02
    0.015865512 = product of:
      0.06346205 = sum of:
        0.06346205 = weight(_text_:r in 6916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06346205 = score(doc=6916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 6916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6916)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    

Years

Languages

  • d 35
  • e 24
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 51
  • el 11
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…