Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

0.17639837 = product of:
  0.35279673 = sum of:
    0.15025917 = weight(_text_:et in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15025917 = score(doc=2755,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.7331258 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
    0.20253757 = sum of:
      0.14335428 = weight(_text_:al in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14335428 = score(doc=2755,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043682147 = queryNorm
          0.716083 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
      0.05918328 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05918328 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043682147 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

Source

Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al

0.09441796 = product of:
  0.12589061 = sum of:
    0.031731024 = weight(_text_:r in 3867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031731024 = score(doc=3867,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3867, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3867)
    0.06374956 = weight(_text_:et in 3867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06374956 = score(doc=3867,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 3867, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3867)
    0.030410035 = product of:
      0.06082007 = sum of:
        0.06082007 = weight(_text_:al in 3867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06082007 = score(doc=3867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 3867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3867)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

An event is a specific occurrence involving participants, which is a typed, n-ary association of entities or other events, each identified as a participant in a specific semantic role in the event (Pyysalo et al. 2012; Linguistic Data Consortium 2005). Event types may vary across domains. Representing relationships between events can facilitate the understanding of knowledge in complex systems (such as economic systems, human body, social systems). In the simplest form, an event can be represented as Entity A <Relation> Entity B. This paper evaluates several knowledge organization and visualization models and tools, such as concept maps (Cmap), topic maps (Ontopia), network analysis models (Gephi), and ontology (Protégé), then proposes an event relationship model that aims to integrate the strengths of these models, and can represent complex knowledge expressed in events and their relationships.

0.07868163 = product of:
  0.10490885 = sum of:
    0.026442517 = weight(_text_:r in 2382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026442517 = score(doc=2382,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2382, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2382)
    0.053124636 = weight(_text_:et in 2382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053124636 = score(doc=2382,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 2382, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2382)
    0.025341695 = product of:
      0.05068339 = sum of:
        0.05068339 = weight(_text_:al in 2382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05068339 = score(doc=2382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 2382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2382)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

In der folgenden Studie wird eine Komponente für eine visuelle Benutzerschnittstelle zu Textdatenbanken entworfen. Mit Hilfe einer Terminologievisualisierung wird dem Benutzer eine Hilfestellung bei der Relevanzbewertung von Dokumenten und bei der Erweiterung seiner visuellen Anfrage an das Retrieval-System gegeben. Dazu werden zuerst die grundlegenden Information-Retrieval-Modelle eingehender vorgestellt, d.h., generelle Retrieval-Modelle, Retrievaloperationen und spezielle Retrieval-Modelle wie Text-Retrieval werden erläutert. Die Funktionalität eines Text-Retrieval-Systems wird vorgestellt. Darüber hinaus werden bereits existierende Implementierungen visueller Information-Retrieval-Benutzerschnittstellen vorgestellt. Im weiteren Verlauf der Arbeit werden mögliche Visualisierungen der mit Hilfe eines Text-Retrieval-Systems gefundenen Dokumente aufgezeigt. Es werden mehrere Vorschläge zur Visualisierung von Thesauri diskutiert. Es wird gezeigt, wie neuronale Netze zur Kartierung eines Eingabebereiches benutzt werden können. Klassifikationsebenen einer objekt-orientierten Annäherung eines Information-Retrieval-Systems werden vorgestellt. In diesem Zusammenhang werden auch die Eigenschaften von Thesauri sowie die Architektur und Funktion eines Parsersystems erläutert. Mit diesen Voraussetzung wird die Implementierung einer visuellen Terminologierunterstützung realisiert. Abschließend wird ein Fazit zur vorgestellten Realisierung basierend auf einem Drei-Schichten-Modell von [Agosti et al. 1990] gezogen.

Type

r

0.047079798 = product of:
  0.094159596 = sum of:
    0.06374956 = weight(_text_:et in 1576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06374956 = score(doc=1576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1576)
    0.030410035 = product of:
      0.06082007 = sum of:
        0.06082007 = weight(_text_:al in 1576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06082007 = score(doc=1576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al

0.041878484 = product of:
  0.08375697 = sum of:
    0.03680583 = weight(_text_:et in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03680583 = score(doc=1789,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.17957842 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
    0.04695114 = sum of:
      0.035114486 = weight(_text_:al in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035114486 = score(doc=1789,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043682147 = queryNorm
          0.1754038 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
      0.011836656 = weight(_text_:22 in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011836656 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043682147 = queryNorm
          0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

23. 3.2008 19:10:22

Editor

Fayyad, U. et al.

Footnote

With contributors almost exclusively from the computer science field, the intended audience of this work is heavily slanted towards a computer science perspective. However, it is highly readable and provides introductory material that would be useful to information scientists from a variety of domains. Yet, much interesting work in information visualization from other fields could have been included giving the work more of an interdisciplinary perspective to complement their goals of integrating work in this area. Unfortunately, many of the application chapters are these, shallow, and lack complementary illustrations of visualization techniques or user interfaces used. However, they do provide insight into the many applications being developed in this rapidly expanding field. The authors have successfully put together a highly useful reference text for the data mining and information visualization communities. Those interested in a good introduction and overview of complementary research areas in these fields will be satisfied with this collection of papers. The focus upon integrating data visualization with data mining complements texts in each of these fields, such as Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Fayyad et al., MIT Press) and Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think (Card et. al., Morgan Kauffman). This unique work is a good starting point for future interaction between researchers in the fields of data visualization and data mining and makes a good accompaniment for a course focused an integrating these areas or to the main reference texts in these fields."

0.039233167 = product of:
  0.07846633 = sum of:
    0.053124636 = weight(_text_:et in 5454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053124636 = score(doc=5454,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 5454, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5454)
    0.025341695 = product of:
      0.05068339 = sum of:
        0.05068339 = weight(_text_:al in 5454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05068339 = score(doc=5454,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 5454, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5454)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This research takes the academic articles in the Web of Science's core collection database as a corpus to draw a series of knowledge maps, to explore the relationships, connectivity, dis-tribution, and evolution among their keywords with respect to smart cities in the last decade. Beyond just drawing a text cloud or measuring their sizes, we further explore their texture by iden-tifying the hottest keywords in academic articles, construct links between and among them that share common keywords, identify islands, rocks, reefs that are formed by connected articles-a metaphor inspired by Ong et al. (2005)-and analyze trends in their evolution. We found the following phenomena: 1) "Internet of Things" is the most frequently mentioned keyword in recent research articles; 2) the numbers of islands and reefs are increas-ing; 3) the evolutions of the numbers of weighted links have frac-tal-like structure; and, 4) the coverage of the largest rock, formed by articles that share a common keyword, in the largest island is converging into around 10% to 20%. These phenomena imply that a common interest in the technology of smart cities has been emerging among researchers. However, the administrative, social, economic, and cultural issues need more attention in academia in the future.

0.031386532 = product of:
  0.062773064 = sum of:
    0.042499706 = weight(_text_:et in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042499706 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
    0.020273356 = product of:
      0.04054671 = sum of:
        0.04054671 = weight(_text_:al in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04054671 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

1. Introduction Web search engines and digital libraries usually expect the users to use search terms that most accurately represent their information needs. Finding the most appropriate search terms to represent an information need is an age old problem in information retrieval. Keyword or phrase search may produce good search results as long as the search terms or phrase(s) match those used by the authors and have been chosen for indexing by the concerned information retrieval system. Since this does not always happen, a large number of false drops are produced by information retrieval systems. The retrieval results become worse in very large systems that deal with millions of records, such as the Web search engines and digital libraries. Vocabulary control tools are used to improve the performance of text retrieval systems. Thesauri, the most common type of vocabulary control tool used in information retrieval, appeared in the late fifties, designed for use with the emerging post-coordinate indexing systems of that time. They are used to exert terminology control in indexing, and to aid in searching by allowing the searcher to select appropriate search terms. A large volume of literature exists describing the design features, and experiments with the use, of thesauri in various types of information retrieval systems (see for example, Furnas et.al., 1987; Bates, 1986, 1998; Milstead, 1997, and Shiri et al., 2002).

0.031386532 = product of:
  0.062773064 = sum of:
    0.042499706 = weight(_text_:et in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042499706 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
    0.020273356 = product of:
      0.04054671 = sum of:
        0.04054671 = weight(_text_:al in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04054671 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al

0.031386532 = product of:
  0.062773064 = sum of:
    0.042499706 = weight(_text_:et in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042499706 = score(doc=3543,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
    0.020273356 = product of:
      0.04054671 = sum of:
        0.04054671 = weight(_text_:al in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04054671 = score(doc=3543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Editor

Coopmans, C. et al.

0.031386532 = product of:
  0.062773064 = sum of:
    0.042499706 = weight(_text_:et in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042499706 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20495686 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
    0.020273356 = product of:
      0.04054671 = sum of:
        0.04054671 = weight(_text_:al in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04054671 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20019227 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Data visualization and knowledge engineering. Eds. J. Hemanth, et al

0.021154014 = product of:
  0.08461606 = sum of:
    0.08461606 = weight(_text_:r in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08461606 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.015865512 = product of:
  0.06346205 = sum of:
    0.06346205 = weight(_text_:r in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06346205 = score(doc=6564,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Wissen in Aktion: Der Primat der Pragmatik als Motto der Konstanzer Informationswissenschaft. Festschrift für Rainer Kuhlen. Hrsg. R. Hammwöhner, u.a

0.015865512 = product of:
  0.06346205 = sum of:
    0.06346205 = weight(_text_:r in 2386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06346205 = score(doc=2386,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 2386, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2386)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Type

r

0.013221258 = product of:
  0.052885033 = sum of:
    0.052885033 = weight(_text_:r in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052885033 = score(doc=714,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried

0.010577007 = product of:
  0.04230803 = sum of:
    0.04230803 = weight(_text_:r in 4743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04230803 = score(doc=4743,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 4743, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4743)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Type

r

0.010577007 = product of:
  0.04230803 = sum of:
    0.04230803 = weight(_text_:r in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04230803 = score(doc=580,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

A dentograph is a visualization of a library's collection built on the idea that a classification scheme is a mathematical function mapping one set of things (books or the universe of knowledge) onto another (a set of numbers and letters). Dentographs can visualize aspects of just one collection or can be used to compare two or more collections. This article describes how to build them, with examples and code using Ruby and R, and discusses some problems and future directions.

0.009254881 = product of:
  0.037019525 = sum of:
    0.037019525 = weight(_text_:r in 5794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037019525 = score(doc=5794,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 5794, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5794)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.007932756 = product of:
  0.031731024 = sum of:
    0.031731024 = weight(_text_:r in 3230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031731024 = score(doc=3230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3230)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.00739791 = product of:
  0.02959164 = sum of:
    0.02959164 = product of:
      0.05918328 = sum of:
        0.05918328 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05918328 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15296744 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043682147 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

30. 5.2010 16:22:35

0.006610629 = product of:
  0.026442517 = sum of:
    0.026442517 = weight(_text_:r in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026442517 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1445992 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043682147 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)