Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"p"
  1. McGarry, D.: Report from the section on classification and indexing : 1991-1992 (1992) 0.12
    0.11520548 = product of:
      0.2880137 = sum of:
        0.24538466 = weight(_text_:section in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24538466 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.9328315 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
        0.04262902 = weight(_text_:on in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04262902 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  2. Beall, J.: French Dewey : Potential influence on development of the DDC (1998) 0.09
    0.08640411 = product of:
      0.21601026 = sum of:
        0.18403849 = weight(_text_:section in 3482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18403849 = score(doc=3482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.69962364 = fieldWeight in 3482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3482)
        0.031971764 = weight(_text_:on in 3482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031971764 = score(doc=3482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 3482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3482)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Vortrag, IFLA Classification Section Workshop, Amsterdam, 20.8.1998
  3. McIlwaine, I.C.: Section on Classification and Indexing : review of activities 1999-2000 (2000) 0.09
    0.08640411 = product of:
      0.21601026 = sum of:
        0.18403849 = weight(_text_:section in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18403849 = score(doc=5409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.69962364 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
        0.031971764 = weight(_text_:on in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031971764 = score(doc=5409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  4. Béguet, B.; Jouguelet, S.; Naudi, M.: French translation of Dewey Decimal Classification : Assessment and perspectives from the scientific contribution by the Bibliothèque Nationale de France (1998) 0.04
    0.036807697 = product of:
      0.18403849 = sum of:
        0.18403849 = weight(_text_:section in 3480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18403849 = score(doc=3480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.69962364 = fieldWeight in 3480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3480)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Vortrag, IFLA Classification Section Workshop, Amsterdam, 20.8.1998
  5. Couture-Lafleur, R.: ¬The French translation of the Dewey Decimal Classification : The making of a DDC translation (1998) 0.04
    0.036807697 = product of:
      0.18403849 = sum of:
        0.18403849 = weight(_text_:section in 3481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18403849 = score(doc=3481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.69962364 = fieldWeight in 3481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3481)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Vortrag, IFLA Classification Section Workshop, Amsterdam, 20.8.1998
  6. Cabral, L.: ¬Le développement des partenariats : la réalisation de la 21e édition, en langue francaise, de la Classification Décimale Dewey (1998) 0.04
    0.036807697 = product of:
      0.18403849 = sum of:
        0.18403849 = weight(_text_:section in 3485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18403849 = score(doc=3485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26305357 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.69962364 = fieldWeight in 3485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.276892 = idf(docFreq=613, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3485)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Vortrag, IFLA Classification Section Workshop, Amsterdam, 20.8.1998
  7. Pejtersen, A.M.; Jensen, H.; Speck, P.; Villumsen, S.; Weber, S.: Catalogs for children : the Book House project on visualization of database retrieval and classification (1993) 0.04
    0.03572678 = product of:
      0.05954463 = sum of:
        0.032631043 = weight(_text_:on in 6232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032631043 = score(doc=6232,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.29761705 = fieldWeight in 6232, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6232)
        0.014699157 = weight(_text_:information in 6232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014699157 = score(doc=6232,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 6232, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6232)
        0.012214432 = product of:
          0.024428863 = sum of:
            0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 6232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024428863 = score(doc=6232,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 6232, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6232)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes the Book House system which is designed to support children's information retrieval in libraries as part of their education. It is a shareware program available on CD-ROM and discs, and comprises functionality for database searching as well as for the classification and storage of book information in the database. The system concept is based on an understanding of children's domain structures and their capabilities for categorization of information needs in connection with their activities in public libraries, in school libraries or in schools. These structures are visualized in the interface by using metaphors and multimedia technology. Through the use of text, images and animation, the Book House supports children - even at a very early age - to learn by doing in an enjoyable way which plays on their previous experiences with computer games. Both words and pictures can be used for searching; this makes the system suitable for all age groups. Even children who have not yet learned to read properly can by selecting pictures search for and find books they would like to have read aloud. Thus at the very beginning of their school period, they can learn to search for books on their own. For the library community itself, such a system will provide an extended service which will increase the number of children's own searches and also improve the relevance, quality and utilization of the collections in the libraries. A market research on the need for an annual indexing service for books in the Book House format is in preparation by the Danish Library Center
  8. Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023) 0.03
    0.026526663 = product of:
      0.044211105 = sum of:
        0.018839544 = weight(_text_:on in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018839544 = score(doc=1171,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.0084865615 = weight(_text_:information in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0084865615 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.016885 = product of:
          0.03377 = sum of:
            0.03377 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03377 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Logical rules are essential for uncovering the logical connections between relations, which could improve the reasoning performance and provide interpretable results on knowledge graphs (KGs). Although there have been many efforts to mine meaningful logical rules over KGs, existing methods suffer from the computationally intensive searches over the rule space and a lack of scalability for large-scale KGs. Besides, they often ignore the semantics of relations which is crucial for uncovering logical connections. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in the field of natural language processing and various applications, owing to their emergent ability and generalizability. In this paper, we propose a novel framework, ChatRule, unleashing the power of large language models for mining logical rules over knowledge graphs. Specifically, the framework is initiated with an LLM-based rule generator, leveraging both the semantic and structural information of KGs to prompt LLMs to generate logical rules. To refine the generated rules, a rule ranking module estimates the rule quality by incorporating facts from existing KGs. Last, a rule validator harnesses the reasoning ability of LLMs to validate the logical correctness of ranked rules through chain-of-thought reasoning. ChatRule is evaluated on four large-scale KGs, w.r.t. different rule quality metrics and downstream tasks, showing the effectiveness and scalability of our method.
    Date
    23.11.2023 19:07:22
  9. Robertson, S.E.: OKAPI at TREC-1 (1994) 0.02
    0.021860885 = product of:
      0.05465221 = sum of:
        0.037679087 = weight(_text_:on in 7953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037679087 = score(doc=7953,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.3436586 = fieldWeight in 7953, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7953)
        0.016973123 = weight(_text_:information in 7953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016973123 = score(doc=7953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 7953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7953)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the work carried out on the TREC-2 project following the results of the TREC-1 project. Experiments were conducted on the OKAPI experimental text information retrieval system which investigated a number of alternative probabilistic term weighting functions in place of the 'standard' Robertson Sparck Jones weighting functions used in TREC-1
  10. Lund, B.D.: ¬A brief review of ChatGPT : its value and the underlying GPT technology (2023) 0.02
    0.01919787 = product of:
      0.047994673 = sum of:
        0.022607451 = weight(_text_:on in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022607451 = score(doc=873,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
        0.025387222 = product of:
          0.050774444 = sum of:
            0.050774444 = weight(_text_:technology in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050774444 = score(doc=873,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.34197792 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this review paper, ChatGPT, a public tool developed by OpenAI that utilizes GPT technology to fulfill a range of text-based requests is examined. ChatGPT is a sophisticated chatbot capable of understanding and interpreting user requests, generating appropriate responses in nearly natural human language, and completing advanced tasks such as writing thank you letters and addressing productivity issues. The details of how ChatGPT works, as well as the potential impacts of this technology on various industries, are discussed. The concept of Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT), the language model on which ChatGPT is based, is also explored, as well as the process of unsupervised pretraining and supervised fine-tuning that is used to refine the GPT algorithm. A letter written by ChatGPT to a colleague from Iran is presented as an example of the chatbot's capabilities.
  11. Wormell, I.: Multifunctional information work : new demands for training? (1995) 0.02
    0.017933264 = product of:
      0.04483316 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=3371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
        0.023518652 = weight(_text_:information in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023518652 = score(doc=3371,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The paper calls for an integrated approach to information science education where disciplinary interaction is predicated on the forgoing of formal, informal and sustainable links with researchers and pracitioners in other fields. The modern information profession, in order to promote its creativity and to strengthen its development, has to go beyond the traditional roles and functions and should extend the professions' horizons. Thus the LIS education and training programmes must aim to foster professionals who, one day, will create new jobs and not just fill the old ones
  12. Tramullas, J.; Garrido-Picazo, P.; Sánchez-Casabón, A.I.: Use of Wikipedia categories on information retrieval research : a brief review (2020) 0.02
    0.017190082 = product of:
      0.042975202 = sum of:
        0.022607451 = weight(_text_:on in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022607451 = score(doc=5365,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
        0.020367749 = weight(_text_:information in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020367749 = score(doc=5365,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Wikipedia categories, a classification scheme built for organizing and describing Wikpedia articles, are being applied in computer science research. This paper adopts a systematic literature review approach, in order to identify different approaches and uses of Wikipedia categories in information retrieval research. Several types of work are identified, depending on the intrinsic study of the categories structure, or its use as a tool for the processing and analysis of other documentary corpus different to Wikipedia. Information retrieval is identified as one of the major areas of use, in particular its application in the refinement and improvement of search expressions, and the construction of textual corpus. However, the set of available works shows that in many cases research approaches applied and results obtained can be integrated into a comprehensive and inclusive concept of information retrieval.
  13. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.02
    0.015835034 = product of:
      0.07917517 = sum of:
        0.07917517 = product of:
          0.2375255 = sum of:
            0.2375255 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2375255 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42262965 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  14. Aydin, Ö.; Karaarslan, E.: OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: : digital twin in healthcare (2022) 0.01
    0.013994279 = product of:
      0.0349857 = sum of:
        0.028196448 = weight(_text_:on in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028196448 = score(doc=851,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.25717056 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
        0.0067892494 = weight(_text_:information in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067892494 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Literature review articles are essential to summarize the related work in the selected field. However, covering all related studies takes too much time and effort. This study questions how Artificial Intelligence can be used in this process. We used ChatGPT to create a literature review article to show the stage of the OpenAI ChatGPT artificial intelligence application. As the subject, the applications of Digital Twin in the health field were chosen. Abstracts of the last three years (2020, 2021 and 2022) papers were obtained from the keyword "Digital twin in healthcare" search results on Google Scholar and paraphrased by ChatGPT. Later on, we asked ChatGPT questions. The results are promising; however, the paraphrased parts had significant matches when checked with the Ithenticate tool. This article is the first attempt to show the compilation and expression of knowledge will be accelerated with the help of artificial intelligence. We are still at the beginning of such advances. The future academic publishing process will require less human effort, which in turn will allow academics to focus on their studies. In future studies, we will monitor citations to this study to evaluate the academic validity of the content produced by the ChatGPT. 1. Introduction OpenAI ChatGPT (ChatGPT, 2022) is a chatbot based on the OpenAI GPT-3 language model. It is designed to generate human-like text responses to user input in a conversational context. OpenAI ChatGPT is trained on a large dataset of human conversations and can be used to create responses to a wide range of topics and prompts. The chatbot can be used for customer service, content creation, and language translation tasks, creating replies in multiple languages. OpenAI ChatGPT is available through the OpenAI API, which allows developers to access and integrate the chatbot into their applications and systems. OpenAI ChatGPT is a variant of the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) language model developed by OpenAI. It is designed to generate human-like text, allowing it to engage in conversation with users naturally and intuitively. OpenAI ChatGPT is trained on a large dataset of human conversations, allowing it to understand and respond to a wide range of topics and contexts. It can be used in various applications, such as chatbots, customer service agents, and language translation systems. OpenAI ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art language model able to generate coherent and natural text that can be indistinguishable from text written by a human. As an artificial intelligence, ChatGPT may need help to change academic writing practices. However, it can provide information and guidance on ways to improve people's academic writing skills.
  15. Jaenecke, P.: Knowledge organization due to theory formation (1995) 0.01
    0.013957202 = product of:
      0.034893006 = sum of:
        0.02131451 = weight(_text_:on in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02131451 = score(doc=3751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=3751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Vortrag, anläßlich der Tagung 'EOCONSID '95: 2nd Meeting on Knowledge Organization in Information and Documentation Systems', Madrid, Nov. 16-17, 1995
  16. Jansen, B.; Browne, G.M.: Navigating information spaces : index / mind map / topic map? (2021) 0.01
    0.013248636 = product of:
      0.03312159 = sum of:
        0.013578499 = weight(_text_:information in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013578499 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08751074 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
        0.01954309 = product of:
          0.03908618 = sum of:
            0.03908618 = weight(_text_:technology in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03908618 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the use of wiki technology to provide a navigation structure for a collection of newspaper clippings. We overview the architecture of the wiki, discuss the navigation structure and pose the question: is the navigation structure an index, and if so, what type, or is it just a linkage structure or topic map. Does such a distinction really matter? Are these definitions in reality function based?
  17. Lange, C.; Ion, P.; Dimou, A.; Bratsas, C.; Sperber, W.; Kohlhasel, M.; Antoniou, I.: Getting mathematics towards the Web of Data : the case of the Mathematics Subject Classification (2012) 0.01
    0.01242159 = product of:
      0.031053975 = sum of:
        0.018839544 = weight(_text_:on in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018839544 = score(doc=111,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
        0.012214432 = product of:
          0.024428863 = sum of:
            0.024428863 = weight(_text_:technology in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024428863 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14847288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC), maintained by the American Mathematical Society's Mathematical Reviews (MR) and FIZ Karlsruhe's Zentralblatt für Mathematik (Zbl), is a scheme for classifying publications in mathematics according to their subjects. While it is widely used, its traditional, idiosyncratic conceptualization and representation requires custom implementations of search, query and annotation support. This did not encourage people to create and explore connections of mathematics to subjects of related domains (e.g. science), and it made the scheme hard to maintain. We have reimplemented the current version of MSC2010 as a Linked Open Dataset using SKOS and our focus is concentrated on turning it into the new MSC authority. This paper explains the motivation, and details of our design considerations and how we realized them in the implementation. We present in-the-field use cases and point out how e-science applications can take advantage of the MSC LOD set. We conclude with a roadmap for bootstrapping the presence of mathematical and mathematics-based science, technology, and engineering knowledge on the Web of Data, where it has been noticeably underrepresented so far, starting from MSC/SKOS as a seed.
  18. Großjohann, K.: Gathering-, Harvesting-, Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.01
    0.011461918 = product of:
      0.05730959 = sum of:
        0.05730959 = product of:
          0.11461918 = sum of:
            0.11461918 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11461918 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 2.1996 22:38:41
    Pages
    22 S
  19. Butcher, J.E.; Trotter, R.: Building on PRECIS : strategies for online subject access in the British Library (1989) 0.01
    0.0074600778 = product of:
      0.03730039 = sum of:
        0.03730039 = weight(_text_:on in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03730039 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109641045 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049850095 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  20. Wätjen, H.-J.: Mensch oder Maschine? : Auswahl und Erschließung vonm Informationsressourcen im Internet (1996) 0.01
    0.0067539997 = product of:
      0.03377 = sum of:
        0.03377 = product of:
          0.06754 = sum of:
            0.06754 = weight(_text_:22 in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06754 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17456654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049850095 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 2.1996 15:40:22

Years

Languages

  • e 29
  • d 4

Types