-
Buckley, C.; Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval system evaluation (2005)
0.03
0.027088352 = product of:
0.09480923 = sum of:
0.03383316 = product of:
0.06766632 = sum of:
0.06766632 = weight(_text_:c in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06766632 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.060976066 = weight(_text_:u in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060976066 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
-
Buckley, C.: ¬The SMART Project at TREC (2005)
0.02
0.023218585 = product of:
0.08126505 = sum of:
0.028999854 = product of:
0.057999708 = sum of:
0.057999708 = weight(_text_:c in 5088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057999708 = score(doc=5088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 5088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.052265197 = weight(_text_:u in 5088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052265197 = score(doc=5088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 5088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5088)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
-
¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003)
0.02
0.015648238 = product of:
0.05476883 = sum of:
0.034843467 = weight(_text_:u in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034843467 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
0.019925361 = product of:
0.039850723 = sum of:
0.039850723 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039850723 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
- Editor
- Voorhees, E.M. u. D.K. Harman
-
Kluck, M.; Winter, M.: Topic-Entwicklung und Relevanzbewertung bei GIRT : ein Werkstattbericht (2006)
0.02
0.015479059 = product of:
0.054176703 = sum of:
0.019333236 = product of:
0.03866647 = sum of:
0.03866647 = weight(_text_:c in 5967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03866647 = score(doc=5967,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 5967, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.034843467 = weight(_text_:u in 5967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034843467 = score(doc=5967,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 5967, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5967)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005. Hrsg.: T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
-
Mandl, T.: Neue Entwicklungen bei den Evaluierungsinitiativen im Information Retrieval (2006)
0.02
0.015479059 = product of:
0.054176703 = sum of:
0.019333236 = product of:
0.03866647 = sum of:
0.03866647 = weight(_text_:c in 5975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03866647 = score(doc=5975,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 5975, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5975)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.034843467 = weight(_text_:u in 5975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034843467 = score(doc=5975,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 5975, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5975)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005. Hrsg.: T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
-
Ferret, O.; Grau, B.; Hurault-Plantet, M.; Illouz, G.; Jacquemin, C.; Monceaux, L.; Robba, I.; Vilnat, A.: How NLP can improve question answering (2002)
0.01
0.01396661 = product of:
0.048883133 = sum of:
0.014499927 = product of:
0.028999854 = sum of:
0.028999854 = weight(_text_:c in 1850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028999854 = score(doc=1850,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1850, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1850)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.034383208 = weight(_text_:g in 1850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034383208 = score(doc=1850,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 1850, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1850)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Blandford, A.; Adams, A.; Attfield, S.; Buchanan, G.; Gow, J.; Makri, S.; Rimmer, J.; Warwick, C.: ¬The PRET A Rapporter framework : evaluating digital libraries from the perspective of information work (2008)
0.01
0.01396661 = product of:
0.048883133 = sum of:
0.014499927 = product of:
0.028999854 = sum of:
0.028999854 = weight(_text_:c in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028999854 = score(doc=2021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.034383208 = weight(_text_:g in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034383208 = score(doc=2021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Lioma, C.; Ounis, I.: ¬A syntactically-based query reformulation technique for information retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.011332919 = product of:
0.039665215 = sum of:
0.016743075 = product of:
0.03348615 = sum of:
0.03348615 = weight(_text_:c in 2031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03348615 = score(doc=2031,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.26404008 = fieldWeight in 2031, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2031)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02292214 = weight(_text_:g in 2031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02292214 = score(doc=2031,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.165991 = fieldWeight in 2031, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2031)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Whereas in language words of high frequency are generally associated with low content [Bookstein, A., & Swanson, D. (1974). Probabilistic models for automatic indexing. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 25(5), 312-318; Damerau, F. J. (1965). An experiment in automatic indexing. American Documentation, 16, 283-289; Harter, S. P. (1974). A probabilistic approach to automatic keyword indexing. PhD thesis, University of Chicago; Sparck-Jones, K. (1972). A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 28, 11-21; Yu, C., & Salton, G. (1976). Precision weighting - an effective automatic indexing method. Journal of the Association for Computer Machinery (ACM), 23(1), 76-88], shallow syntactic fragments of high frequency generally correspond to lexical fragments of high content [Lioma, C., & Ounis, I. (2006). Examining the content load of part of speech blocks for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the international committee on computational linguistics and the association for computational linguistics (COLING/ACL 2006), Sydney, Australia]. We implement this finding to Information Retrieval, as follows. We present a novel automatic query reformulation technique, which is based on shallow syntactic evidence induced from various language samples, and used to enhance the performance of an Information Retrieval system. Firstly, we draw shallow syntactic evidence from language samples of varying size, and compare the effect of language sample size upon retrieval performance, when using our syntactically-based query reformulation (SQR) technique. Secondly, we compare SQR to a state-of-the-art probabilistic pseudo-relevance feedback technique. Additionally, we combine both techniques and evaluate their compatibility. We evaluate our proposed technique across two standard Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) English test collections, and three statistically different weighting models. Experimental results suggest that SQR markedly enhances retrieval performance, and is at least comparable to pseudo-relevance feedback. Notably, the combination of SQR and pseudo-relevance feedback further enhances retrieval performance considerably. These collective experimental results confirm the tenet that high frequency shallow syntactic fragments correspond to content-bearing lexical fragments.
-
Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001)
0.01
0.009823774 = product of:
0.068766415 = sum of:
0.068766415 = weight(_text_:g in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068766415 = score(doc=6386,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
-
Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC test collections (2005)
0.01
0.008710867 = product of:
0.060976066 = sum of:
0.060976066 = weight(_text_:u in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060976066 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
-
Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC ad hoc experiments (2005)
0.01
0.008710867 = product of:
0.060976066 = sum of:
0.060976066 = weight(_text_:u in 5711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060976066 = score(doc=5711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 5711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5711)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
-
Robertson, S.; Callan, J.: Routing and filtering (2005)
0.01
0.008710867 = product of:
0.060976066 = sum of:
0.060976066 = weight(_text_:u in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060976066 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
-
Harman, D.K.: Beyond English (2005)
0.01
0.008710867 = product of:
0.060976066 = sum of:
0.060976066 = weight(_text_:u in 4850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060976066 = score(doc=4850,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4850, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4850)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
-
Voorhees, E.M.; Garofolo, J.S.: Retrieving noisy text (2005)
0.01
0.008710867 = product of:
0.060976066 = sum of:
0.060976066 = weight(_text_:u in 5084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060976066 = score(doc=5084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 5084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5084)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
-
Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001)
0.01
0.008186478 = product of:
0.057305347 = sum of:
0.057305347 = weight(_text_:g in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057305347 = score(doc=5863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
-
Kazai, G.; Lalmas, M.: ¬The overlap problem in content-oriented XML retrieval evaluation (2004)
0.01
0.008186478 = product of:
0.057305347 = sum of:
0.057305347 = weight(_text_:g in 4083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057305347 = score(doc=4083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 4083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4083)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Womser-Hacker, C.: Theorie des Information Retrieval III : Evaluierung (2004)
0.01
0.0077395295 = product of:
0.027088352 = sum of:
0.009666618 = product of:
0.019333236 = sum of:
0.019333236 = weight(_text_:c in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019333236 = score(doc=2919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017421734 = weight(_text_:u in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017421734 = score(doc=2919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Question answering in TREC (2005)
0.01
0.007466457 = product of:
0.052265197 = sum of:
0.052265197 = weight(_text_:u in 6487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052265197 = score(doc=6487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 6487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6487)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
-
Cormack, G.V.; Clarke, C.L.A.; Palmer, C.R.; Lynam, T.R.: MultiText experiments for TREC (2005)
0.01
0.007466457 = product of:
0.052265197 = sum of:
0.052265197 = weight(_text_:u in 4298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052265197 = score(doc=4298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 4298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4298)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
-
Dumais, S.T.; Belkin, N.J.: ¬The TREC interactive tracks : putting the user into search (2005)
0.01
0.007466457 = product of:
0.052265197 = sum of:
0.052265197 = weight(_text_:u in 5081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052265197 = score(doc=5081,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.036766402 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 5081, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5081)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
