Search (100 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Vision"
  1. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.10
    0.10032304 = product of:
      0.1755653 = sum of:
        0.018832127 = weight(_text_:of in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018832127 = score(doc=5920,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.09367418 = weight(_text_:congress in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09367418 = score(doc=5920,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045211717 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.017847266 = product of:
          0.035694532 = sum of:
            0.035694532 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035694532 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  2. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2005) 0.09
    0.093590565 = product of:
      0.21837798 = sum of:
        0.023607321 = weight(_text_:of in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023607321 = score(doc=1086,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
        0.09367418 = weight(_text_:congress in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09367418 = score(doc=1086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
        0.10109647 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10109647 = score(doc=1086,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.5841992 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This thought piece on the future of cataloging is long on musings and short on predictions. But that isn't to denigrate it, only to clarify it's role given the possible connotations of the title. Rather than coming up with solutions or predictions, Marcum ponders the proper role of cataloging in a Google age. Marcum cites the Google project to digitize much or all of the contents of a selected set of major research libraries as evidence that the world of cataloging is changing dramatically, and she briefly identifies ways in which the Library of Congress is responding to this new environment. But, Marcum cautions, "the future of cataloging is not something that the Library of Congress, or even the small library group with which we will meet, can or expects to resolve alone." She then poses some specific questions that should be considered, including how we can massively change our current MARC/AACR2 system without creating chaos
  3. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.06
    0.064504966 = product of:
      0.1505116 = sum of:
        0.011743895 = weight(_text_:of in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011743895 = score(doc=114,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
        0.11794589 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11794589 = score(doc=114,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
        0.02082181 = product of:
          0.04164362 = sum of:
            0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04164362 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Herzinger, S.: What is the future for cataloging? (1994) 0.06
    0.05928362 = product of:
      0.13832845 = sum of:
        0.008304187 = weight(_text_:of in 4019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008304187 = score(doc=4019,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 4019, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4019)
        0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 4019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07727726 = score(doc=4019,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 4019, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4019)
        0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052747004 = score(doc=4019,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 4019, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4019)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Notes that the trends in US cataloguing all involve change. They include providing library users with better and deeper access to the materials owned by the library and to resources available through online gateways. Outsourcing is a viable cataloguing alternative for the future, but must be compared to doing the work in house. Greater cooperation with the Library of Congress and other libraries will occur. Cataloguing units and cataloguing time will be downsized and will require 'doing more with less'. Eventually, users may be able to obtain their information anywhere. However, there will still be a need for a cataloguer's organizational and analytical skills in order to make information accessible
  5. Batt, C.: ¬The libraries of the future : public libraries and the Internet (1996) 0.05
    0.04845131 = product of:
      0.16957957 = sum of:
        0.021221403 = weight(_text_:of in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021221403 = score(doc=4862,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
        0.14835817 = sum of:
          0.10076547 = weight(_text_:service in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10076547 = score(doc=4862,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043909185 = queryNorm
              0.5355909 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
          0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047592707 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043909185 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the possible potential for service development in public libraries offered by the Internet and describes the traditional models of network access and their lack of relevance to public libraries. Describes 2 current research projects currently being undertaken by public libraries to assess the value of the Internet to their services; ITPOINT, a project being conducted at Chelmsley Wood Library, Solihull, UK; and CLIP, the Croydon Libraries Internet peoject. Presents a range of new service paradigms and suggests that public libraries will become even more central to people's lives than they are today
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-30
  6. Steinhagen, E.N.; Hanson, M.E.; Moynahan, S.A.: Quo vadis, cataloging? (2007) 0.04
    0.039976202 = product of:
      0.1399167 = sum of:
        0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021970814 = score(doc=262,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
        0.11794589 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11794589 = score(doc=262,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.68156576 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Under the leadership of Ruth Carter's generation, cooperative, shared cataloging grew and flourished among academic and research libraries. The authors provide an overview of trends and challenges from a golden age of expanding budgets and international cooperation during the 1970's and 1980's and later responses to the economic retrenchment and demographic changes of the 1990's and early 2000's. Responses to current challenges, including the impact of outsourced cataloging, increasing complexity of cataloging rules, and emerging technological options, are discussed.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Cataloger, Editor, and Scholar: Essays in Honor of Ruth C. Carter
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.271-280
  7. Hildreth, C.R.: Preserving what we really want to access, the message, not the medium : challenges and opportunities in the digital age (1996) 0.03
    0.03378018 = product of:
      0.11823062 = sum of:
        0.016608374 = weight(_text_:of in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016608374 = score(doc=4946,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
        0.101622246 = weight(_text_:distribution in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101622246 = score(doc=4946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.42307585 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Digital image formats are now seen not only as feasible alternatives to print and microfilm formats for traditional preservation purposes, but also as the technology bearing the portential for unlimited access and distribution. Examines the requirements for browsing and exploration in the digital library of the future; and whether the open bookshelf model of a classified physical collection is suitable for the universal virtual library or whether new models of explanation are needed
    Source
    Electronic documents and information: from preservation to access; Festschrift in honor of Patricia Battin. 18th International Symposium, 23.-26.10.1995. Ed.: A.H. Helal et al
  8. Boydston, J.M.K.; Leysen, J.M.: ARL cataloger librarian roles and responsibilities : now and in the future (2014) 0.03
    0.03140835 = product of:
      0.10992922 = sum of:
        0.018568728 = weight(_text_:of in 1966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018568728 = score(doc=1966,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 1966, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1966)
        0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09136049 = score(doc=1966,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 1966, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1966)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article details the results of a 2011 study of cataloger librarians' changing roles and responsibilities at academic Association of Research Libraries. The study participants, cataloging department heads, report that cataloger librarian roles are expanding to include cataloging more electronic resources and local hidden collections in addition to print materials. They are also creating non-MARC metadata. The increased usage of vendor products and services is also affecting the roles of cataloger librarians at some institutions. The article explores what skills cataloger librarians will need in the future and how libraries are providing training for that future.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.2, S.229-250
  9. Cerbo II, M.A.: Is there a future for library catalogers? (2011) 0.03
    0.029780868 = product of:
      0.104233034 = sum of:
        0.018981 = weight(_text_:of in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018981 = score(doc=1892,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
        0.08525203 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08525203 = score(doc=1892,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Is there a future for the library cataloger? For the past thirty years this debate has increased with the continued growth of online resources and greater access to the World Wide Web. Many are concerned that library administrators believe budgetary resources would be better spent on other matters, leaving library users with an overabundance of electronic information to muddle through on their own. This article focuses on the future of the cataloging profession and its importance to the needs of library patrons.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 49(2011) no.4, S.323-327
  10. Miller, R.R.: Principia bibliographica? : balancing principles, practice, and pragmatics in a changing digital environment (2007) 0.03
    0.029458396 = product of:
      0.10310438 = sum of:
        0.011743895 = weight(_text_:of in 259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011743895 = score(doc=259,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 259, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=259)
        0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09136049 = score(doc=259,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 259, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=259)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the emphasis on control in cataloging versus the chaos found on the Web. It delves into adversarial relationships between catalogers and technologists. It seeks commonalities and suggests that new alternatives addressing both perspectives might offer superior and more satisfying results. A series of examples juxtapose current practices, enrichment possibilities, and flaws in current digital solutions to suggest potential opportunities where catalogers might excel. Speculation on ways to promote cataloging principles and values via more direct participation in the unruly digital environment hints at a more promising future for our profession.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Cataloger, Editor, and Scholar: Essays in Honor of Ruth C. Carter
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.281-305
  11. Lancaster, F.W.: Trends in subject indexing from 1957 to 2000 (1980) 0.03
    0.027384568 = product of:
      0.09584598 = sum of:
        0.018568728 = weight(_text_:of in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018568728 = score(doc=208,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
        0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07727726 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Computer have been used in 2 areas of printed index production: to sort entries and fromat printed indexes, and to derive a series of index entries from a minimum intellectual input. Computer indexing enables more indexing terms to be used as well as weighted terms, links and roles. Interest in automatic indexing peaked in the mid-1960s and has since declined. Interest in machine-aided indexing concentrates on using the computer for on-line display or for indexing by extraction. Computers have also made possible the implementation of retrieval systems without indexing-free text systems. Considers future prospects and needs
    Source
    New trends in documentation and information: proceedings of the 39th FID Congress, University of Edinburgh, 25-28 Sept 1978. Ed.: P.J. Taylor
  12. Walker, T.D.: ¬L'¬apparition du computer : epistemology and the impact of networked computers on society (1996) 0.03
    0.025669994 = product of:
      0.08984497 = sum of:
        0.023607321 = weight(_text_:of in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023607321 = score(doc=5188,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
        0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06623765 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    If we are to learn about the impact of computers and networks on society, it will be necessary to address issues from broad cultural-historical perspectives, such as has been done for print culture by those in the 'histoire du livre' tradition. There are paradoxes faced by users of the Internet that have direct implications on their conceptions of the organization of knowledge. Perceptions of knowledge structures may play roles in searching habits or in deciding about he overall appropriateness of a Net search. The Net has been compared to a world brain and is here placed in the context of an early conception of a world brain
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
  13. Barker, P.: Electronic libraries of the future (1997) 0.02
    0.021267397 = product of:
      0.07443589 = sum of:
        0.026843186 = weight(_text_:of in 7201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026843186 = score(doc=7201,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 7201, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7201)
        0.047592707 = product of:
          0.095185414 = sum of:
            0.095185414 = weight(_text_:22 in 7201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095185414 = score(doc=7201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  14. Akeroyd, J.: ¬The future of academic libraries (2001) 0.02
    0.018407404 = product of:
      0.064425915 = sum of:
        0.02034102 = weight(_text_:of in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02034102 = score(doc=704,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
        0.04408489 = product of:
          0.08816978 = sum of:
            0.08816978 = weight(_text_:service in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08816978 = score(doc=704,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.46864203 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    A review of the future of academic libraries that draws initially on a generic model to describe the components of all library systems. Touches upon some economic changes and looks for evidence in statistical trends derived from United Kingdom reportage. From this extrapolates scenarios relating to the function of libraries as a collection of resources, as a physical place, its role in organising information and its service function. Library collections will continue to exist but described in different ways, whilst physical collections will mutate into multi-functional spaces. Knowledge management will become increasingly important and the overriding shift will be towards a service and support role. The librarian's role is also discussed and changes summarised.
  15. MacDonald, A.H.: ¬The survival of libraries in the electronic age (1994) 0.02
    0.015277627 = product of:
      0.053471692 = sum of:
        0.02372625 = weight(_text_:of in 8645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02372625 = score(doc=8645,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 8645, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8645)
        0.029745443 = product of:
          0.059490886 = sum of:
            0.059490886 = weight(_text_:22 in 8645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059490886 = score(doc=8645,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 8645, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8645)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the likely future for libraries in an environment of increasing availability of information in electronic form via networks, particularly the Internet. The concept of the library will survive and thrive, but that the library as a place is an endangered species, and that librarians are facing the greatest challenge in a century
    Source
    Feliciter. 40(1994) no.1, S.18-22
  16. Noble, C.: Reflecting on our future : what will the role of the virtual librarian be? (1998) 0.02
    0.015183869 = product of:
      0.05314354 = sum of:
        0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 1728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021970814 = score(doc=1728,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 1728, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1728)
        0.031172724 = product of:
          0.06234545 = sum of:
            0.06234545 = weight(_text_:service in 1728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06234545 = score(doc=1728,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.33137995 = fieldWeight in 1728, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the implications of several recent trends in the development of distributed networking systems for the design and implementation of virtual library services and the role of the virtual librarian. Considers the role of librarians in end-user instruction; staff training and professional development for librarians; database design and user interfaces for virtual library services; the implications for cataloguing departments of the various initiatives for indexing and cataloguing documents on the Internet including metadata and metatagging; and the need for librarians to face organizational change, offer proactive service and embrace collaboration
  17. Gordon, T.J.; Helmer-Hirschberg, O.: Report on a long-range forecasting study (1964) 0.01
    0.014311759 = product of:
      0.050091155 = sum of:
        0.016438028 = weight(_text_:of in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016438028 = score(doc=4204,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
        0.03365313 = product of:
          0.06730626 = sum of:
            0.06730626 = weight(_text_:22 in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06730626 = score(doc=4204,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Description of an experimental trend-predicting exercise covering a time period as far as 50 years into the future. The Delphi technique is used in soliciting the opinions of experts in six areas: scientific breakthroughs, population growth, automation, space progress, probability and prevention of war, and future weapon systems. Possible objections to the approach are also discussed.
    Date
    22. 6.2018 13:24:08
    22. 6.2018 13:54:52
  18. Information for a new age : redefining the librarian (1995) 0.01
    0.014265795 = product of:
      0.049930282 = sum of:
        0.01423575 = weight(_text_:of in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01423575 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
        0.035694532 = product of:
          0.071389064 = sum of:
            0.071389064 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071389064 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.2, S.147 (A. Schultis)
  19. Batt, C.: ¬The four paradigms (1996) 0.01
    0.014013591 = product of:
      0.049047567 = sum of:
        0.013421593 = weight(_text_:of in 6371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013421593 = score(doc=6371,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 6371, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6371)
        0.03562597 = product of:
          0.07125194 = sum of:
            0.07125194 = weight(_text_:service in 6371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07125194 = score(doc=6371,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.37871996 = fieldWeight in 6371, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6371)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Considers whether the growing power of IT and networking can be harnessed by public librarians to make fundamental changes to the opportunities facing them, rather than merely delivering existing services more effectively or cheaply. Presents 4 paradigms as a means of raising questions about what can and should be done to make the public library the central agency in the information (or learning) society. They comprise: the public library as an agent for community computing; as the community university; as the local service in a global network; and as the personal virtual library
  20. Matson, L.D.; Bonski, D.J.: Do digital libraries need librarians? (1997) 0.01
    0.012222101 = product of:
      0.042777352 = sum of:
        0.018981 = weight(_text_:of in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018981 = score(doc=1737,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Defines digital libraries and discusses the effects of new technology on librarians. Examines the different viewpoints of librarians and information technologists on digital libraries. Describes the development of a digital library at the National Drug Intelligence Center, USA, which was carried out in collaboration with information technology experts. The system is based on Web enabled search technology to find information, data visualization and data mining to visualize it and use of SGML as an information standard to store it
    Date
    22.11.1998 18:57:22

Years

Languages

  • e 80
  • d 18
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 84
  • el 8
  • m 8
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…