Search (549 results, page 1 of 28)

0.17043129 = product of:
  0.22724171 = sum of:
    0.003238169 = weight(_text_:a in 4257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003238169 = score(doc=4257,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 4257, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4257)
    0.15165876 = weight(_text_:et in 4257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15165876 = score(doc=4257,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.7331258 = fieldWeight in 4257, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4257)
    0.07234478 = product of:
      0.14468956 = sum of:
        0.14468956 = weight(_text_:al in 4257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14468956 = score(doc=4257,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.716083 = fieldWeight in 4257, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4257)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Der Einsatz von semantischen Technologien ist mittlerweile ein etabliertes Mittel zur Optimierung von Information-Retrieval-Systemen. Obwohl der Einsatz von Ontologien für verschiedene Anwendungsbereiche wie beispielsweise zur Query-Expansion (Bhogal et al. 2007), zur Strukturierung von Benutzeroberflächen bzw. zur Dialoggestaltung (z. B. Garcia & Sicilia 2003; Liu et al. 2005; Lopez et al. 2006; Paulheim 2009; Paulheim & Probst 2010), in Recommendersystemen (z. B. Taehee et al. 2006; Cantador et al. 2008; Middleton et al. 2001; Middleton et al. 2009) usw. rege erforscht wird, gibt es noch kaum Bestrebungen, die einzelnen Abfragemethodiken für Ontologien systematisch zu untersuchen. Bei der Abfrage von Ontologien geht es in erster Linie darum, Zusammenhänge zwischen Begriffen zu ermitteln, indem hierarchische (Classes und Individuals), semantische (Object Properties) und ergänzende (Datatype Properties) Beziehungen abgefragt oder logische Verknüpfungen abgeleitet werden. Hierbei werden sogenannte Reasoner für die Ableitungen und als Abfragesprache SPARQL (seltener auch XPath) eingesetzt. Ein weiterer, weniger oft eingesetzter, vielversprechender Ansatz findet sich bei Hoser et al. (2006) und Weng & Chang (2008), die Techniken der Sozialen Netzwerkanalyse zur Auswertung von Ontologien miteinsetzen (Semantic Network Analysis). Um die Abfrage von Ontologien sowie Kombinationen der unterschiedlichen Abfragemöglichkeiten systematisch untersuchen zu können, wurde am SII eine entsprechende Testumgebung entwickelt, die in diesem Beitrag genauer vorgestellt werden soll.

Type

a

0.16058668 = product of:
  0.21411559 = sum of:
    0.004579463 = weight(_text_:a in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004579463 = score(doc=3934,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
    0.14186378 = weight(_text_:et in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14186378 = score(doc=3934,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.6857764 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
    0.06767235 = product of:
      0.1353447 = sum of:
        0.1353447 = weight(_text_:al in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1353447 = score(doc=3934,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.6698343 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Content

Neumaier, Sebastian (et al.): Data Integration for Open Data on the Web - Stamou, Giorgos (et al.): Ontological Query Answering over Semantic Data - Calì, Andrea: Ontology Querying: Datalog Strikes Back - Sequeda, Juan F.: Integrating Relational Databases with the Semantic Web: A Reflection - Rousset, Marie-Christine (et al.): Datalog Revisited for Reasoning in Linked Data - Kaminski, Roland (et al.): A Tutorial on Hybrid Answer Set Solving with clingo - Eiter, Thomas (et al.): Answer Set Programming with External Source Access - Lukasiewicz, Thomas: Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web - Calvanese, Diego (et al.): OBDA for Log Extraction in Process Mining

Editor

Ianni, G. et al.

0.1270067 = product of:
  0.16934226 = sum of:
    0.007771606 = weight(_text_:a in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007771606 = score(doc=2230,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
    0.097227305 = sum of:
      0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06138658 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044089027 = queryNorm
          0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.035840724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035840724 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044089027 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

We present a deductive data model for concept-based query expansion. It is based on three abstraction levels: the conceptual, linguistic and occurrence levels. Concepts and relationships among them are represented at the conceptual level. The expression level represents natural language expressions for concepts. Each expression has one or more matching models at the occurrence level. Each model specifies the matching of the expression in database indices built in varying ways. The data model supports a concept-based query expansion and formulation tool, the ExpansionTool, for environments providing heterogeneous IR systems. Expansion is controlled by adjustable matching reliability.

Source

Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al

Type

a

0.12365307 = product of:
  0.16487075 = sum of:
    0.006476338 = weight(_text_:a in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006476338 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
    0.10723893 = weight(_text_:et in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10723893 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
    0.051155485 = product of:
      0.10231097 = sum of:
        0.10231097 = weight(_text_:al in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10231097 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.5063471 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Source

Knowledge Organization at the Interface. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International ISKO Conference, 2020 Aalborg, Denmark. Ed.: M. Lykke et al

Type

a

0.12365307 = product of:
  0.16487075 = sum of:
    0.006476338 = weight(_text_:a in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006476338 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
    0.10723893 = weight(_text_:et in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10723893 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
    0.051155485 = product of:
      0.10231097 = sum of:
        0.10231097 = weight(_text_:al in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10231097 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.5063471 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Source

Knowledge Organization at the Interface. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International ISKO Conference, 2020 Aalborg, Denmark. Ed.: M. Lykke et al

Type

a

0.10731828 = product of:
  0.14309104 = sum of:
    0.00868892 = weight(_text_:a in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00868892 = score(doc=3379,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
    0.09099525 = weight(_text_:et in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09099525 = score(doc=3379,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.43987548 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
    0.043406866 = product of:
      0.08681373 = sum of:
        0.08681373 = weight(_text_:al in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08681373 = score(doc=3379,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.42964977 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Domain Ontology learning has been introduced as a technology that aims at reducing the bottleneck of knowledge acquisition in the construction of domain ontologies. However, the discovery and the labelling of non-taxonomic relations have been identified as one of the most difficult problems in this learning process. In this paper, we propose OntologyLine, a new system for discovering non-taxonomic relations and building domain ontology from scratch. The proposed system is based on adapting Open Information Extraction algorithms to extract and label relations between domain concepts. OntologyLine was tested in two different domains: the financial and cancer domains. It was evaluated against gold standard ontology and was compared to state-of-the-art ontology learning algorithm. The experimental results show that OntologyLine is more effective for acquiring non-taxonomic relations and gives better results in terms of precision, recall and F-measure.

Source

Knowledge discovery, knowledge engineering and knowledge management: 7th International Joint Conference, IC3K 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, November 12-14, 2015, Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: A. Fred et al

Type

a

0.09641631 = product of:
  0.12855507 = sum of:
    0.003926072 = weight(_text_:a in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003926072 = score(doc=1633,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.07722905 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
    0.053080566 = weight(_text_:et in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053080566 = score(doc=1633,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.25659403 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
    0.07154844 = sum of:
      0.050641347 = weight(_text_:al in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050641347 = score(doc=1633,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044089027 = queryNorm
          0.25062904 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
      0.020907091 = weight(_text_:22 in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.020907091 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044089027 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to improve the conceptual-based search by incorporating structural ontological information such as concepts and relations. Generally, Semantic-based information retrieval aims to identify relevant information based on the meanings of the query terms or on the context of the terms and the performance of semantic information retrieval is carried out through standard measures-precision and recall. Higher precision leads to the (meaningful) relevant documents obtained and lower recall leads to the less coverage of the concepts. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper, the authors enhance the existing ontology-based indexing proposed by Kohler et al., by incorporating sibling information to the index. The index designed by Kohler et al., contains only super and sub-concepts from the ontology. In addition, in our approach, we focus on two tasks; query expansion and ranking of the expanded queries, to improve the efficiency of the ontology-based search. The aforementioned tasks make use of ontological concepts, and relations existing between those concepts so as to obtain semantically more relevant search results for a given query. Findings - The proposed ontology-based indexing technique is investigated by analysing the coverage of concepts that are being populated in the index. Here, we introduce a new measure called index enhancement measure, to estimate the coverage of ontological concepts being indexed. We have evaluated the ontology-based search for the tourism domain with the tourism documents and tourism-specific ontology. The comparison of search results based on the use of ontology "with and without query expansion" is examined to estimate the efficiency of the proposed query expansion task. The ranking is compared with the ORank system to evaluate the performance of our ontology-based search. From these analyses, the ontology-based search results shows better recall when compared to the other concept-based search systems. The mean average precision of the ontology-based search is found to be 0.79 and the recall is found to be 0.65, the ORank system has the mean average precision of 0.62 and the recall is found to be 0.51, while the concept-based search has the mean average precision of 0.56 and the recall is found to be 0.42. Practical implications - When the concept is not present in the domain-specific ontology, the concept cannot be indexed. When the given query term is not available in the ontology then the term-based results are retrieved. Originality/value - In addition to super and sub-concepts, we incorporate the concepts present in same level (siblings) to the ontological index. The structural information from the ontology is determined for the query expansion. The ranking of the documents depends on the type of the query (single concept query, multiple concept queries and concept with relation queries) and the ontological relations that exists in the query and the documents. With this ontological structural information, the search results showed us better coverage of concepts with respect to the query.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Type

a

0.08904618 = product of:
  0.118728235 = sum of:
    0.007852144 = weight(_text_:a in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007852144 = score(doc=1565,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
    0.07506725 = weight(_text_:et in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07506725 = score(doc=1565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
    0.03580884 = product of:
      0.07161768 = sum of:
        0.07161768 = weight(_text_:al in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07161768 = score(doc=1565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Faceted arrangement of entities and typed relations for representing different associations between the entities are established tools in knowledge representation. In this paper, a proposal is being discussed combining both tools to draw inferences along relational paths. This approach may yield new benefit for information retrieval processes, especially when modeled for heterogeneous environments in the Semantic Web. Faceted arrangement can be used as a selection tool for the semantic knowledge modeled within the knowledge representation. Typed relations between the entities of different facets can be used as restrictions for selecting them across the facets.

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al

Type

a

0.08904618 = product of:
  0.118728235 = sum of:
    0.007852144 = weight(_text_:a in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007852144 = score(doc=4471,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
    0.07506725 = weight(_text_:et in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07506725 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
    0.03580884 = product of:
      0.07161768 = sum of:
        0.07161768 = weight(_text_:al in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07161768 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

We present an Information Retrieval System for scientific publications that provides the possibility to filter results according to semantic facets. We use sentence-level semantic annotations that identify specific semantic relations in texts, such as methods, definitions, hypotheses, that correspond to common information needs related to scientific literature. The semantic annotations are obtained using a rule-based method that identifies linguistic clues organized into a linguistic ontology. The system is implemented using Solr Search Server and offers efficient search and navigation in scientific papers.

Source

Semantic Web Evaluation Challenge. SemWebEval 2014 at ESWC 2014, Anissaras, Crete, Greece, May 25-29, 2014, Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: V. Presutti et al

Type

a

0.0879655 = product of:
  0.11728734 = sum of:
    0.0064112484 = weight(_text_:a in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0064112484 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.07506725 = weight(_text_:et in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07506725 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.03580884 = product of:
      0.07161768 = sum of:
        0.07161768 = weight(_text_:al in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07161768 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Nowadays, eHealth and pHealth solutions have to meet advanced interoperability challenges. Enabling pervasive computing and even autonomic computing, pHealth system architectures cover many domains, scientifically managed by specialized disciplines using their specific ontologies. Therefore, semantic interoperability has to advance from a communication protocol to an ontology coordination challenge including semantic integration, bringing knowledge representation and artificial intelligence on the table. The resulting solutions comprehensively support multi-lingual and multi-jurisdictional environments.

Source

E-Health Across Borders Without Boundaries. E-salus trans confinia sine finibus; Proceedings of the ERMI Special Topic Conference 14-15 April 2011 Lasko, Slovenia. Eds.: L. Stoicu-Tivadar, Bernd Blobel et al

Type

a

0.08655715 = product of:
  0.11540953 = sum of:
    0.004533437 = weight(_text_:a in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004533437 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
    0.07506725 = weight(_text_:et in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07506725 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
    0.03580884 = product of:
      0.07161768 = sum of:
        0.07161768 = weight(_text_:al in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07161768 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Source

Reasoning Web: Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures. Eds.: Ianni, G. et al

Type

a

0.079520516 = product of:
  0.10602736 = sum of:
    0.010990711 = weight(_text_:a in 1572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010990711 = score(doc=1572,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1572, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1572)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 1572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=1572,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1572, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1572)
    0.03069329 = product of:
      0.06138658 = sum of:
        0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 1572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06138658 = score(doc=1572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to the analysis, design and development of Knowledge Based Systems based on the Knowledge Artifact concept. Knowledge Artifacts can be meant as means to acquire, represent and maintain knowledge involved in complex problem solving activities. A complex problem is typically made of a huge number of parts that are put together according to a first set of constraints (i.e. the procedural knowledge), dependable on the functional properties it must satisfy, and a second set of rules, dependable on what the expert thinks about the problem and how he/she would represent it. The paper illustrates a way to unify both types of knowledge into a Knowledge Artifact, exploiting Ontologies, Influence Nets and Task Structures formalisms and metadata paradigm.

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al

Type

a

0.079520516 = product of:
  0.10602736 = sum of:
    0.010990711 = weight(_text_:a in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010990711 = score(doc=1577,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=1577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
    0.03069329 = product of:
      0.06138658 = sum of:
        0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06138658 = score(doc=1577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Ontology alignment became a very important problem to ensure semantic interoperability for different sources of information heterogeneous and distributed. Instance-based ontology alignment represents a very promising technique to find semantic correspondences between entities of different ontologies when they contain a lot of instances. In this paper, we describe a new approach to manage ontologies that do not share common instances.This approach extracts the argument and event structures from a set of instances of the concept of the source ontology and compared them with other semantic features extracted from a set of instances of the concept of the target ontology using Generative Lexicon Theory. We show that it is theoretically powerful because it is based on linguistic semantics and useful in practice. We present the experimental results obtained by running our approach on Biblio test of Benchmark series of OAEI 2011. The results show the good performance of our approach.

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al

Type

a

0.078988135 = product of:
  0.10531752 = sum of:
    0.010280869 = weight(_text_:a in 1812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010280869 = score(doc=1812,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 1812, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1812)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 1812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=1812,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1812, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1812)
    0.03069329 = product of:
      0.06138658 = sum of:
        0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 1812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06138658 = score(doc=1812,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1812, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1812)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

The paper presents the theoretical foundation of Italian indexing system. A consistent integration of vocabulary control through a thesaurus (semantics) and of role analysis to construct subject strings (syntax) allows to represent the full theme of a work, even if complex, in one string. The conceptual model produces a binary scheme: each aspect (entities, relationships, etc.) consists of a couple of elements, drawing the two lines of semantics and syntax. The meaning of 'concept' and 'theme' is analysed, also in comparison with the FRBR and FRSAD models, with the proposal of an en riched model. A double existence of concepts is suggested: document-independent adn document-dependent.

Source

Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al

Type

a

0.07841616 = product of:
  0.104554884 = sum of:
    0.009518234 = weight(_text_:a in 2176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518234 = score(doc=2176,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2176, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2176)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 2176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=2176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 2176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2176)
    0.03069329 = product of:
      0.06138658 = sum of:
        0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 2176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06138658 = score(doc=2176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 2176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

The ISO 2788 guidelines for monolingual thesauri contain a differentiation of "the hierarchical relationship" into "generic", "partitive", and "instance", which, for purposes of document retrieval, was deemed adequate. However, ontologies, designed as language inventories for a wider scope of knowledge representation, are based on all these and some more logical differentiations. Rereading the ISO 2788 standard and inspecting the published Cyc Upper Ontology, it is argued that the adoption of the document-retrieval definition of subsumption generally prevents the conception or use of a thesaurus as a substructure of an ontology of the new kind as constructed for AI applications. When a thesaurus is used for fact description and inference on fact descriptions, the instance-of relationship too should be reconsidered: It may also link concepts and metaconcepts, and then its distinction from subsumption is needed. The treatment of the instance-of relationship in thesauri, the Cyc Upper Ontology, and WordNet is described from this perspective

Source

Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al

Type

a

0.07841616 = product of:
  0.104554884 = sum of:
    0.009518234 = weight(_text_:a in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518234 = score(doc=2424,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=2424,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
    0.03069329 = product of:
      0.06138658 = sum of:
        0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06138658 = score(doc=2424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

In this paper we present an approach to question answering over heterogeneous knowledge sources that makes use of different ontology management components within the scenario of a digital library application. We present a principled framework for integrating structured metadata and unstructured resource content in a seamless manner which can then be flexibly queried using structured queries expressed in natural language. The novelty of the approach lies in the combination of different semantic technologies providing a clear benefit for the application scenario considered. The resulting system is implemented as part of the digital library of British Telecommunications (BT). The original contribution of our paper lies in the architecture we present allowing for the non-straightforward integration of the different components we consider.

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 11th European conference, ECDL 2007 / Budapest, Hungary, September 16-21, 2007, proceedings. Eds.: L. Kovacs et al

Type

a

0.07710619 = product of:
  0.10280825 = sum of:
    0.007771606 = weight(_text_:a in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007771606 = score(doc=2186,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
    0.03069329 = product of:
      0.06138658 = sum of:
        0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06138658 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Topic Maps are a standardized modelling approach for the semantic annotation and description of WWW resources. They enable an improved search and navigational access on information objects stored in semi-structured information spaces like the WWW. However, the according standards ISO 13250 and XTM (XML Topic Maps) lack formal semantics, several questions concerning e.g. subclassing, inheritance or merging of topics are left open. The proposed TMUML meta model, directly derived from the well known UML meta model, is a meta model for Topic Maps which enables semantic constraints to be formulated in OCL (object constraint language) in order to answer such open questions and overcome possible inconsistencies in Topic Map repositories. We will examine the XTM merging conditions and show, in several examples, how the TMUML meta model enables semantic constraints for Topic Map merging to be formulated in OCL. Finally, we will show how the TM validation process, i.e., checking if a Topic Map is well formed, includes our merging conditions.

Source

The Semantic Web - ISWC 2003. Eds. D. Fensel et al

Type

a

0.07632529 = product of:
  0.101767056 = sum of:
    0.0067304084 = weight(_text_:a in 4834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0067304084 = score(doc=4834,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4834, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4834)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 4834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=4834,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 4834, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4834)
    0.03069329 = product of:
      0.06138658 = sum of:
        0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 4834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06138658 = score(doc=4834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 4834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4834)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

In Linked Data, the use of owl:sameAs is ubiquitous in 'inter-linking' data-sets. However, there is a lurking suspicion within the Linked Data community that this use of owl:sameAs may be somehow incorrect, in particular with regards to its interactions with inference. In fact, owl:sameAs can be considered just one type of 'identity link', a link that declares two items to be identical in some fashion. After reviewing the definitions and history of the problem of identity in philosophy and knowledge representation, we outline four alternative readings of owl:sameAs, showing with examples how it is being (ab)used on the Web of data. Then we present possible solutions to this problem by introducing alternative identity links that rely on named graphs.

Source

Linked Data on the Web (LDOW2010). Proceedings of the WWW2010 Workshop on Linked Data on the Web. Raleigh, USA, April 27, 2010. Edited by Christian Bizer et al

Type

a

0.07632529 = product of:
  0.101767056 = sum of:
    0.0067304084 = weight(_text_:a in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0067304084 = score(doc=1593,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
    0.03069329 = product of:
      0.06138658 = sum of:
        0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06138658 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Sources like thesauri or taxonomies are already used as input in ontology development process. Some of them are also published on the LOD using the SKOS format. Reusing this type of sources to build an ontology is not an easy task. The ontology developer has to face different syntax and different modelling goals. We propose in this paper a new methodology to transform several non-ontological sources into a single ontology. We take into account: the redundancy of the knowledge extracted from sources in order to discover the consensual knowledge and Ontology Design Patterns (ODPs) to guide the transformation process. We have evaluated our methodology by creating an ontology on wheat taxonomy from three sources: Agrovoc thesaurus, TaxRef taxonomy, NCBI taxonomy.

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al

Type

a

0.075399004 = product of:
  0.100532 = sum of:
    0.0054953555 = weight(_text_:a in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0054953555 = score(doc=4703,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=4703,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
    0.03069329 = product of:
      0.06138658 = sum of:
        0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 4703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06138658 = score(doc=4703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 4703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

In Linked Data, the use of owl:sameAs is ubiquitous in interlinking data-sets. There is however, ongoing discussion about its use, and potential misuse, particularly with regards to interactions with inference. In fact, owl:sameAs can be viewed as encoding only one point on a scale of similarity, one that is often too strong for many of its current uses. We describe how referentially opaque contexts that do not allow inference exist, and then outline some varieties of referentially-opaque alternatives to owl:sameAs. Finally, we report on an empirical experiment over randomly selected owl:sameAs statements from the Web of data. This theoretical apparatus and experiment shed light upon how owl:sameAs is being used (and misused) on the Web of data.

Source

The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010. 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Eds.: Peter F. Patel-Schneider et al

Type

a