Search (194 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Taylor, P.: Perception and change in records management : rethinking the fundamentals (1997) 0.16 
    0.16419898 = product of:
  0.21893197 = sum of:
    0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012015978 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
    0.10953673 = weight(_text_:standards in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10953673 = score(doc=2787,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.4874794 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
    0.09737927 = sum of:
      0.049564905 = weight(_text_:organization in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049564905 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050415643 = queryNorm
          0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
      0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047814365 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050415643 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Identifies some of the fundamental issues for the future records management, and assesses their relevance for the future. Considers traditional records management and suggests a new record keeping approach which impacts directly upon the organization by ensuring records are properly created according to the organization's needs. Stresses the importance of making better use of new technologies. Important issues are: the myth of the information manager, implementation of records management standards, replacing the life cycle approach with one of a records continuum, new relationships between the archival and records management community, and development of competency based standards
    Date
    24. 1.1999 12:22:46
  2. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.11 
    0.106603324 = product of:
  0.14213777 = sum of:
    0.0800734 = product of:
      0.2402202 = sum of:
        0.2402202 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2402202 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42742437 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014565565 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.047498792 = product of:
      0.094997585 = sum of:
        0.094997585 = weight(_text_:organization in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094997585 = score(doc=2918,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.5284991 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  3. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.10 
    0.09635921 = product of:
  0.19271842 = sum of:
    0.02427594 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02427594 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.16844247 = sum of:
      0.100136235 = weight(_text_:organization in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.100136235 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050415643 = queryNorm
          0.55708694 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06830624 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050415643 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  4. Haynes, D.: Retention and control of electronic records (1994) 0.06 
    0.06390724 = product of:
  0.12781449 = sum of:
    0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017165681 = score(doc=981,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 981, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=981)
    0.1106488 = weight(_text_:standards in 981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1106488 = score(doc=981,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.49242854 = fieldWeight in 981, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=981)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    With the proliferation of electronic data one of the key problems is identifying and organizing electronic records for retention and retrieval. Defines electronic records and sets out strategies for management of electronic records. Covers: policy, information and assett analysis, retention scheduling, inactive records, indexing and retrieval, version control, standards, and electronic mail
  5. Bikson, T.K.; Law, S.A.: Electronic information media and records management methods : a survey of practices in UN organizations (1993) 0.06 
    0.059612975 = product of:
  0.11922595 = sum of:
    0.030706907 = weight(_text_:information in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030706907 = score(doc=983,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
    0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.088519044 = score(doc=983,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Reports on an investigation of electronic records management practices emerging within UN organizations as the use of electronic information and communication technologies grows. A survey examined: the role of telex, facsimile and electronic mail in organizational information handling systems; the properties of computer-based information exchange among organizations that have introduced electronic mail; associated technology options and constraints as well as standards that have been adopted or are being considered: policies, guidelines, training programmes, and plans UN organizations are implementing with respect to electronic records management issues
    Source
    Information society. 9(1993) no.2, S.125-144
  6. Kampffmeyer, U.; Wasniewski, A.: MoReq2010 - Der europäische Records-Management-Standard (2011) 0.05 
    0.051125795 = product of:
  0.10225159 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 4904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=4904,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4904, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4904)
    0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 4904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.088519044 = score(doc=4904,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 4904, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4904)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Am 8. Juni 2011 veröffentlichte das DLM Forum die Core Services und Plug-in-Module für die Modular Requirements for Record Systems (MoReq2010®)-Spezifikation für elektronische Records-Management- Systeme (ERMS). Kaum veröffentlicht, spalten sich die Meinungen hinsichtlich Funktionalität und Nützlichkeit des neuen Standards. Ist eine Neu-Vermessung der ERM-Systeme notwendig oder wird mit MoReq2010 lediglich ein weiterer Records Management-Standard übers Knie gebrochen?
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.6/7, S.289-294
  7. Meer, K. van der: Document information systems (2009) 0.05 
    0.04681948 = product of:
  0.09363896 = sum of:
    0.027249675 = weight(_text_:information in 3771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027249675 = score(doc=3771,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 3771, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3771)
    0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 3771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066389285 = score(doc=3771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 3771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3771)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    From characteristics of information, documents and document information systems (document IS), motives to use document IS are described. A few cases are presented. The functional aspects of document IS are described, derived from ISO standard 15489 on records management and the Sarbanes-Oxley law, and made operational in MoReq and DoD standard 5015.2. Explicit attention is given to related subjects from a viewpoint of document management: information sharing (workflow, knowledge management), and interoperability of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools; authenticity because of the possible evidential value of documents; and digital longevity because of the possible long-time function of archival documents. The technical aspects answer functional demands; important information science standards, and standard components for 12 characteristics of document IS are described, among others ODMA, the XML family, OAIS, and metadata schemes. The design methodological aspects answer functional demands and technical possibilities. Models are introduced and the way of working of, e.g., a digitization project is described.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  8. Brumm, E.K.: ¬The marriage of quality standards and records management (1996) 0.04 
    0.044259522 = product of:
  0.17703809 = sum of:
    0.17703809 = weight(_text_:standards in 7484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17703809 = score(doc=7484,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 7484, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7484)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Focuses on the critical importance of ISO 9000 standard to the records management profession. Describes the ISO 9000 standards, defines the quality operations included in the standards, and emphasizes the benefits that can accrue to record managers in a broader context by educating themselves about international quality standards
  9. Mummenthey, I.; Kotte, J.; Brüdegam, J.: Schriftgutverwaltung Records Management und Records Preservation : Selbstverständnis des Staatsarchivs Hamburg in einer modernen Verwaltung (2009) 0.04 
    0.040477425 = product of:
  0.08095485 = sum of:
    0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 3135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014565565 = score(doc=3135,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3135, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3135)
    0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 3135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066389285 = score(doc=3135,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 3135, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3135)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Was hat ein Staatsarchiv mit Schriftgutverwaltung zu tun? Ist Schriftgutverwaltung nur ein altbackener Begriff für das moderne Records Management? Was ist Records Preservation? Und wo ist der Bezug zu Orwells Roman "1984"? Diese Fragen will der Beitrag beantworten. Im ersten Teil beschreibt Irmgard Mummenthey zunächst die Aufgaben des Staatsarchivs der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg und erläutert Begrifflichkeiten. Sie geht dann auf Records Management als strategische Aufgabe des Staatsarchivs ein und skizziert die Bedeutung sowohl einer vertrauenswürdigen Überlieferung als auch eines Archivs selbst in einem demokratischen Rechtsstaat. Jenny Kotte stellt dann im zweiten Teil die wichtigsten Standards vor. Diese sind maßgebliche Instrumente, um den Stellenwert von Schriftgutverwaltung bzw. Records Management und damit seine Qualität zu sichern. Julia Brüdegam berichtet im dritten Teil, wie das Staatsarchiv seinen gesetzlichen Auftrag, die hamburgische Verwaltung zu beraten, praktisch umsetzt. Da die drei Autorinnen sich in ihrer täglichen Arbeit auf die öffentliche Verwaltung konzentrieren (müssen), liegt dort auch unweigerlich der Schwerpunkt dieses Beitrags.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Recordsmanagement kein Thema für Information Professionals?"
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.6/7, S.369-382
  10. Cox, R.J.: Access in the digital information age and the archival mission : the United States (1998) 0.04 
    0.03592316 = product of:
  0.07184632 = sum of:
    0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024031956 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
    0.047814365 = product of:
      0.09562873 = sum of:
        0.09562873 = weight(_text_:22 in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09562873 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    2. 3.1999 9:22:24
  11. Szulc, J.: Document management in the the Polish central catalogues (2017) 0.04 
    0.035188597 = product of:
  0.07037719 = sum of:
    0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 3512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020812286 = score(doc=3512,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3512, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3512)
    0.049564905 = product of:
      0.09912981 = sum of:
        0.09912981 = weight(_text_:organization in 3512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09912981 = score(doc=3512,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 3512, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3512)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  12. Vijlenbroek, J.J.M.: Potential workflow applications : information management impact (1995) 0.03 
    0.034867436 = product of:
  0.06973487 = sum of:
    0.034331363 = weight(_text_:information in 3401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034331363 = score(doc=3401,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 3401, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3401)
    0.035403505 = product of:
      0.07080701 = sum of:
        0.07080701 = weight(_text_:organization in 3401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07080701 = score(doc=3401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 3401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3401)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Defines and describes workflow management, examines workflow management from an organizational and a technological perspective, and discusses its relationship with documentary information systems. Considers the consequences of the introduction of workflow management and documentary information systems on the documentary information function within organization
  13. Simpson, H.: ¬The management of electronic information resources in a corporate environment (1993) 0.03 
    0.034516998 = product of:
  0.069033995 = sum of:
    0.03398632 = weight(_text_:information in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03398632 = score(doc=986,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
    0.03504768 = product of:
      0.07009536 = sum of:
        0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07009536 = score(doc=986,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Large multinational corporations produce and acquire vast volumes of information in the course of their business. Information management strategies are being developed in many large organizations to manage this assett effectively, enabling the organization to achieve crucial business abjectives in addition to controlling costs. Electronic systems are being used to store the increasing volumes of information. Raises issues about the management of this information such as how the culture, organization and pace of change within the company affect the management of information, particularly this availability for use by third parties in the longer term
    Source
    Electronic information resources and historians: European perspectives. Proceedings of the workshop organized by the British Library, Research and Development Department, British Academy, and the International Association for History and Computing, 25-26 June 1993. Ed.: R. Ross et al
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  14. Rosman, G.; Meer, K.v.d.; Sol, H.G.: ¬The design of document information systems (1996) 0.03 
    0.034242243 = product of:
  0.068484485 = sum of:
    0.034331363 = weight(_text_:information in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034331363 = score(doc=7750,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
    0.03415312 = product of:
      0.06830624 = sum of:
        0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06830624 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the costs and benefits of documents information systems (involving text and images) and some design methodological aspects that arise from the documentary nature of the data. Reports details of a case study involving a specific document information system introduced at Press Ltd, a company in the Netherlands
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297
  15. Henttonen, P.: Diversity of knowledge organization in records and archives management (2012) 0.03 
    0.033715617 = product of:
  0.067431234 = sum of:
    0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012015978 = score(doc=849,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 849, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=849)
    0.055415254 = product of:
      0.11083051 = sum of:
        0.11083051 = weight(_text_:organization in 849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11083051 = score(doc=849,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.6165823 = fieldWeight in 849, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=849)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Different cultural, administrative and linguistic areas make knowledge organization diverse in records and archives management. The paper suggests that there are four salient differences: what knowledge organization systems (KOS) there are to achieve the goals of records and archives management, what is the moment when they are applied to organize information,what is the granularity of actions that the KOS supports and how the KOS is combined with organizational work and records processes.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.13
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
  16. Linczak, G.; Fournier, C. von; Südkamp, N.: Von der Insellösung zum Klinikinformationssystem : Kooperation, Kommunikation, Standards im Virchow-Klinikum (1996) 0.03 
    0.033194643 = product of:
  0.13277857 = sum of:
    0.13277857 = weight(_text_:standards in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13277857 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.59091425 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  17. Tappenbeck, I.: Infrastrukturen für die Archivierung digitaler Dokumente : Ein Tagungsbericht (2001) 0.03 
    0.03195362 = product of:
  0.06390724 = sum of:
    0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008582841 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
    0.0553244 = weight(_text_:standards in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0553244 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Mit der Entstehung digitaler Medien haben sich auch neue Formen der Produktion, Publikation und Distribution wissenschaftlicher Information entwickelt: Elektronische Sekundärveröffentlichungen, aber auch genuin elektronische Publikationen, Publishing-on-Demand sowie die Möglichkeit des Zugriffs auf Dokumente im Pay-per-View-Verfahren sind nur einige Beispiele für diese Veränderungen. Mit der steigenden Anzahl und Relevanz digitaler Ressourcen nimmt aber auch die Frage nach den Möglichkeiten und Bedingungen ihrer zuverlässigen Archivierung an Dringlichkeit zu. Dies betrifft sowohl die Sicherung der Datenspeicherung als auch den zukünftigen Zugriff auf die in ihnen enthaltenen Informationen. Die Faktoren, die einer einfachen Lösung dieser Aufgabe entgegenstehen, sind vielfältig: Der rasante Technologiewechsel im IT-Bereich erschwert den Zugriff auf ältere Datenformate und erfordert eine Emulation der ursprünglichen technischen Umgebung eines Dokuments bzw. die Migration der Daten selbst. Vor allem aber fehlen Standards für die Archivierung digitaler Ressourcen, die vorgeben, welche Informationen für die Langzeitarchivierung erforderlich sind, und die einen Rahmen für die Erstellung und Pflege dieser Informationen bereitstellen. Um sich einer Lösung dieser Probleme zu nähern, trafen sich Vertreter internationaler Institutionen aus dem Archiv-, Bibliotheks- und IT-Bereich vom 6. bis zum 8. Dezember 2000 in York anlässlich der von Cedars ausgerichteten Konferenz "Preservation 2000" und des dieser Konferenz vorausgehenden eintägigen Workshops jnformation Infrastructures for Digital Preservation". Im folgenden soll ein Überblick über die Inhalte der im Rahmen beider Veranstaltungen gehaltenen Vorträge gegeben werden
  18. Stephens, D.O.: ISO 9000 and international records management (1996) 0.03 
    0.03129621 = product of:
  0.12518483 = sum of:
    0.12518483 = weight(_text_:standards in 6781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12518483 = score(doc=6781,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.5571193 = fieldWeight in 6781, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6781)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Considers ISO 9000 quality standards records management provisions in its international context. Discusses the importance of ISO 9000 to multinational businesses. Outlines the general record keeping provisions of the standards, and sets out a 10 step plan for compliance. Internal quality records audits should be carried out to ensure the required level is maintained once certification has been granted
  19. Mounier, E.; Paganelli, C.: Text structure and information retrieval in large documents (1998) 0.03 
    0.029737622 = product of:
  0.059475243 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=66,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
    0.040054493 = product of:
      0.080108985 = sum of:
        0.080108985 = weight(_text_:organization in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080108985 = score(doc=66,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.44566956 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper deals with information retrieval from large textual documents. We are particularly interested in the indexing of this kind of document and have concentrated on two issues: partitioning the document into components, and indexing methods to be applied to these components. Several experiments enabled us to study these issues as they relate to the overall document structure
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  20. Cory, K.A.: ¬The imaging industry wants us! (1992) 0.03 
    0.027929984 = product of:
  0.055859968 = sum of:
    0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020812286 = score(doc=535,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
    0.03504768 = product of:
      0.07009536 = sum of:
        0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07009536 = score(doc=535,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Paper-based manual filing systems are inadequate to handle the flood of information found in most commercial offices and government agencies. Examples are included to delineate the dimensions of the problem. In response, imaging technology, which converts information in paper format to computer-readable binary format, is creating a multitude of electronic databases. However, imaging vendors are minimizing the difficulties of database organization. The author, drawing on personal experience, recounts instances of inadequate database organization. Because classification and indexing principles are only imparted in schools of library and/or information science, the imaging industry is highly dependent upon expertise possessed by library science graduates. In order to take advantage of this new job market, recommendations for library science students and faculty are included.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 126
  • d 60
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 160
  • m 17
  • x 9
  • s 6
  • r 3
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications