Search (137 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. BID / Dienstleistungskommission: Standards der Informationskompetenz für Studierende (2010) 0.05 
    0.04769266 = product of:
  0.09538532 = sum of:
    0.006866273 = weight(_text_:information in 3486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006866273 = score(doc=3486,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3486, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3486)
    0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 3486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.088519044 = score(doc=3486,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 3486, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3486)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    "Präambel Wissen und Information sind zu zentralen Ressourcen gesellschaftlicher und wirtschaftlicher Entwicklung geworden. Nach dem Grundprinzip des lebenslangen Lernens ist die Informationskompetenz eine wesentliche Schlüsselqualifikation und Voraussetzung für die aktive Teilhabe an der Wissensgesellschaft. Informationskompetenz ist unabhängig von Lebensalter, Bildungsstand, Fachrichtung oder beruflichem Umfeld zu verstehen als eine komplexe Fähigkeit, Informationen selbstorganisiert und problemlösungsorientiert effizient zu suchen, zu finden, zu bewerten und effektiv zu nutzen. Auch Bibliotheken sehen ihre Rolle auch in der aktiven Unterstützung bei der Entwicklung von Informationskompetenz: Informationskompetente Nutzer können u.a. ihre riesigen Informationssammlungen zielgerichteter ausschöpfen. Orientiert an den jeweiligen Zielgruppen gestalten Bibliotheken vielfältige Angebote: Informationskompetenz wird in unterschiedlichen Lernszenarien, an verschiedenen Lernorten und in digitalen Lernwelten erworben. Die Hochschulbibliotheken stehen vor einer besonderen Herausforderung: Der Bologna-Prozess hat die Rolle der Schlüsselqualifikationen in der Hochschullehre gestärkt, und speziell die Informationskompetenz wird in ihrer Bedeutung für ein erfolgreiches Studium und die Vorbereitung auf das Berufsleben allgemein anerkannt. Die Hochschulbibliotheken haben es übernommen, die Studierenden in eigenen Lehrveranstaltungen und durch Hilfestellungen zum Selbststudium bei der Entwicklung ihrer Informationskompetenz zu betreuen und anzuleiten. Sie betrachten die Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz als eine ihrer Kernaufgaben.
    Um die Zusammenarbeit von Bibliothekaren und Hochschullehrern nachhaltig sinnvoll zu gestalten, ist ein Konsens herzustellen, was unter Informationskompetenz im Studium verstanden wird und an welchen Indikatoren dies festzumachen ist. Diese Definition und Strukturierung des Gegenstands soll mit den hier vorgelegten Standards geleistet werden. Sie sollen sowohl den Studierenden als auch den Lehrenden der Studienfächer Orientierung geben und die Koordinierung erleichtern. Dabei hängt jedoch die konkrete Bewältigung von Informationsproblemen von vielerlei Faktoren ab. Fachliche Anforderungen, lokale und regionale Bedingungen sowie Wissen, Fertigkeiten, fachliche Qualifikationen und persönliche Einstellungen des Informationssuchenden spielen hier u.a. eine Rolle. Aus diesem Grund wird die Ausgestaltung der Standards mit Lehrinhalten und didaktischen Konzepten bewusst nicht in die abstrakt formulierten Standards aufgenommen. Auch die Formulierung konkreter Kriterien zur Beurteilung von Informationskompetenz ist vom jeweiligen Einsatzkontext abhängig und wird daher ausgeklarnrnert. Angesichts der dynamischen Entwicklung der Informationstechnik und der Suchräume sind diese Inhalte zudem kontinuierlich zu aktualisieren und neu zu gewichten.
  2. Yurt, M.; Simon, P.: Stand der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz an deutschen Bibliotheken : eine exemplarische Untersuchung (2015) 0.04 
    0.040477425 = product of:
  0.08095485 = sum of:
    0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014565565 = score(doc=2239,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
    0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066389285 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Der Begriff Informationskompetenz definiert Techniken und Methoden der Recherche, Beurteilung und Nutzung von Informationen und gilt in der modernen Informa­tionsgesellschaft als Schlüsselkompetenz. Die deutsche Übersetzung des aus dem angloamerikanischen Raum stammenden "Information Literacy" hat sich in den vergangenen Jahren auch in Deutschland etabliert. Auf Basis einer exemplarischen Untersuchung wird der Stand der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz an Bibliotheken in vier deutschen Millionenstädten beschrieben. Für die Untersuchung wurden nach vorangegangenen Online-Recherchen Kriterien festgelegt, nach denen die Auswahl der untersuchten Bibliotheken erfolgte. Die Untersuchung erfolgte mit einem Fragebogen, dessen Fragen die Bereiche "Allgemein", "Personal", "Bildungsan­gebot" und "Methodik" hinsichtlich der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz durch Bibliotheken abdecken. Die Sondierung erfolgte im September und Oktober 2014 durch die schriftliche Beantwortung der Fragebögen durch die zuständigen Bibliothekare. Die Ergebnisse dieser exemplarischen Befragung offenbaren, dass Informationskompetenz an allen fünf untersuchten Bibliotheken aktiv in Form von Schulungen bzw. Kursen vermittelt wird und dabei unterschiedliche Schwerpunkte gesetzt werden. Auffällige Gemeinsamkeit der Befragung sind die fehlende einheitliche Definition von Informationskompetenz und das Fehlen von Standards zur Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.4, S.242-254
  3. Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015) 0.03 
    0.03194248 = product of:
  0.06388496 = sum of:
    0.029731836 = weight(_text_:information in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029731836 = score(doc=3341,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
    0.03415312 = product of:
      0.06830624 = sum of:
        0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06830624 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:45:48
    LCSH
    Information behavior
    Subject
    Information behavior
  4. Smith, C.L.; Matteson, M.L.: Information literacy in the age of machines that learn : desiderata for machines that teach (2018) 0.03 
    0.026530731 = product of:
  0.053061463 = sum of:
    0.032569595 = weight(_text_:information in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032569595 = score(doc=4954,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.36800325 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
    0.02049187 = product of:
      0.04098374 = sum of:
        0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 4954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098374 = score(doc=4954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4954)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    With the use of machine learning and other advances, modern information search systems make it easy for searchers to access information to meet their most frequent information needs. Building from Kuhlthau's concepts of exploration and differentiating, this article argues that along with the benefits of greater accessibility, these advances impede the development of information literacy, conceptualized as processes for planning, accessing, judging and communicating information. It is argued that information literacy emerges during interaction with search systems and modern system designs hide or render unworkable the contextual information needed for the judgment processes of information literacy. In response to these concerns, the article contributes desiderata for new designs that facilitate the discovery, navigation and use of context information.
    Date
    16. 3.2019 14:33:22
  5. Knoll, A.: Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen (2016) 0.02 
    0.023870774 = product of:
  0.047741547 = sum of:
    0.027249675 = weight(_text_:information in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027249675 = score(doc=3069,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
    0.02049187 = product of:
      0.04098374 = sum of:
        0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098374 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Zielsetzung - Information Professionals sind in Unternehmen für den professionellen und strategischen Umgang mit Informationen verantwortlich. Da es keine allgemeingültige Definition für diese Berufsgruppe gibt, wird in der vorliegenden Arbeit eine Begriffsbestimmung unternommen. Methode - Mit Hilfe dreier Methoden - einer Auswertung von relevanter Fachliteratur, der Untersuchung von einschlägigen Stellenausschreibungen und dem Führen von Experteninterviews - wird ein Kompetenzprofil für Information Professionals erstellt. Ergebnisse - Die 16 wichtigsten Kompetenzen in den Bereichen Fach-, Methoden-, Sozial- und persönliche Kompetenzen sind IT-Kenntnisse, Sprachkenntnisse, Quellenkenntnisse, Recherchekenntnisse, Projektmanagement, Darstellungskompetenz, Problemlösungskompetenz, selbständiges Arbeiten, Kommunikationsfähigkeit, Teamfähigkeit, Servicementalität, Interkulturelle Kompetenz, Analytische Fähigkeiten, Eigenmarketing, Veränderungsbereitschaft und Stressresistenz. Schlussfolgerung - Die Kompetenzen geben eine Orientierung über vorhandene Fähigkeiten dieser Berufsgruppe für Personalfachleute, Vorgesetzte und Information Professionals selbst. Ein Kompetenzrad kann als Visualisierung dienen.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://yis.univie.ac.at/index.php/yis/article/view/1324/1234. Diesem Beitrag liegt folgende Abschlussarbeit zugrunde: Lamparter, Anna: Kompetenzprofil für Information Professionals in Unternehmen. Masterarbeit (M.A.), Hochschule Hannover, 2015. Volltext: https://serwiss.bib.hs-hannover.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/528 Vgl. auch: (geb. Lamparter): Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen. In:
    Date
    28. 7.2016 16:22:54
    Source
    Young information scientists. 1(2016), S.1-11
  6. Chew, S.W.; Khoo, K.S.G.: Comparison of drug information on consumer drug review sites versus authoritative health information websites (2016) 0.02 
    0.02277131 = product of:
  0.04554262 = sum of:
    0.028466063 = weight(_text_:information in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028466063 = score(doc=2643,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
    0.01707656 = product of:
      0.03415312 = sum of:
        0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03415312 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Large amounts of health-related information of different types are available on the web. In addition to authoritative health information sites maintained by government health departments and healthcare institutions, there are many social media sites carrying user-contributed information. This study sought to identify the types of drug information available on consumer-contributed drug review sites when compared with authoritative drug information websites. Content analysis was performed on the information available for nine drugs on three authoritative sites (RxList, eMC, and PDRhealth) as well as three drug review sites (WebMD, RateADrug, and PatientsLikeMe). The types of information found on authoritative sites but rarely on drug review sites include pharmacology, special population considerations, contraindications, and drug interactions. Types of information found only on drug review sites include drug efficacy, drug resistance experienced by long-term users, cost of drug in relation to insurance coverage, availability of generic forms, comparison with other similar drugs and with other versions of the drug, difficulty in using the drug, and advice on coping with side effects. Drug efficacy ratings by users were found to be different across the three sites. Side effects were vividly described in context, with user assessment of severity based on discomfort and effect on their lives.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:24:05
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.333-349
  7. Pontis, S.; Blandford, A.; Greifeneder, E.; Attalla, H.; Neal, D.: Keeping up to date : an academic researcher's information journey (2017) 0.02 
    0.02277131 = product of:
  0.04554262 = sum of:
    0.028466063 = weight(_text_:information in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028466063 = score(doc=3340,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
    0.01707656 = product of:
      0.03415312 = sum of:
        0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03415312 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Keeping up to date with research developments is a central activity of academic researchers, but researchers face difficulties in managing the rapid growth of available scientific information. This study examined how researchers stay up to date, using the information journey model as a framework for analysis and investigating which dimensions influence information behaviors. We designed a 2-round study involving semistructured interviews and prototype testing with 61 researchers with 3 levels of seniority (PhD student to professor). Data were analyzed following a semistructured qualitative approach. Five key dimensions that influence information behaviors were identified: level of seniority, information sources, state of the project, level of familiarity, and how well defined the relevant community is. These dimensions are interrelated and their values determine the flow of the information journey. Across all levels of professional expertise, researchers used similar hard (formal) sources to access content, while soft (interpersonal) sources were used to filter information. An important "pain point" that future information tools should address is helping researchers filter information at the point of need.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35
  8. Verein Deutscher Bibliothekare: Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken in Deutschland unterstützen die neuen Studiengänge durch die nachhaltige Förderung von Informations- und Medienkompetenz : Hamburger Erklärung des Vereins Deutscher Bibliothekare e.V. (VDB) (2010) 0.02 
    0.021057097 = product of:
  0.042114194 = sum of:
    0.008919551 = weight(_text_:information in 3497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008919551 = score(doc=3497,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.10078184 = fieldWeight in 3497, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3497)
    0.033194643 = weight(_text_:standards in 3497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033194643 = score(doc=3497,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.14772856 = fieldWeight in 3497, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3497)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    4. Hauptsächliche Zielgruppen der Bibliothekskurse/-veranstaltungen und des Lernorts Bibliothek sind Studienanfänger/-innen, Studierende im Grund- und im Hauptstudium, Examenssemester und Wissenschaftler/-innen. Außerdem bieten die wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken Programme für Schüler(innen) der gymnasialen Oberstufe im Rahmen der Seminarkurse und des Seminarfachunterrichts als Beitrag zur Förderung der Studierfähigkeit an. Im Jahr 2008 führten laut Deutscher Bibliotheksstatistik (DBS) die 236 wissenschaftlichen Universal- und Hochschulbibliotheken insgesamt über 44.000 Schulungsstunden für rund 394.000 Personen durch. 5. Die Leitlinien für die inhaltliche Ausgestaltung der Kursangebote bilden die vom Deutschen Bibliotheksverband verabschiedeten "Standards der Informationskompetenz für Studierende". Diese setzen folgende Schwerpunkte: - Bibliotheks- und Ressourcenkenntnis (Medientypen) - Fähigkeiten und Fertigkeiten im eigenständigen Umgang mit Katalogen, Datenbanken, digitalen Volltextsammlungen, Internetsuchmaschinen, neuen Medien - jeweils unter Berücksichtigung des Fachbezugs - Fähigkeiten und Fertigkeiten der fundierten Literatursuche, insbesondere der gezielten Auswahl von wissenschaftlich relevanten Informations- und Medienressourcen, der Bewertung und Auswahl sowie der Verarbeitung von Informationen (Literaturverwaltungssysteme) - Kenntnisse rechtlicher Grundlagen (Urheberrechte/Copyright usw.) und ethischer Implikationen (Zitieren, Plagiarismus usw.) - weitere für das Studium wichtige grundlegende methodische Kenntnisse, Fähigkeiten und Fertigkeiten, die nach Absprache mit den Fachbereichen und Instituten von Bibliothekar(inn)en vermittelt werden können (Lern-und Schreibstrategien, Präsentationstechniken u.ä.). Diese Kompetenzen sollten Eingang finden in die entsprechenden Module der Bachelor- und Master-Studiengänge.
    6. Die von den Universitäts- und Hochschulbibliotheken durchgeführten Schulungen und Kurse zur Informations- und Medienkompetenz unterliegen der laufenden Evaluation und Lernerfolgskontrolle, die auch im Rahmen von mündlichen und/oder schriftlichen Prüfungen vorgenommen wird. 7. Die Universitäts- und Hochschulbibliotheken können die mit der Vermittlung von Informations- und Medienkompetenz verbundenen Aufgaben langfristig und verlässlich nur wahrnehmen, wenn sie in ausreichendem Umfang über - didaktisch geschultes - Bibliotheks-Lehrpersonal, über die notwendige, lernförderliche räumliche und technische Infrastruktur, einschließlich der für die virtuelle Lernunterstützung unabdingbaren Softwarelizenzen, verfügen und mit den erforderlichen Lehr- und Prüfungsberechtigungen sowie der Berechtigung zur Vergabe von ECTS-Punkten ausgestattet sind. Die Universitäts- und Hochschulbibliotheken gelten in diesem Sinne als anerkannte Lehr-Lernorte für Informations- und Medienkompetenz zur Unterstützung der Hochschullehre und des von den Studierenden der Bachelor- und Master-Studiengänge verstärkt geforderten selbstständigen Lernens. 8. Um die in diesem Grundsatzpapier aufgeführten Ziele der Universitäts- und Hochschulbibliotheken auf dem Gebiet der nachhaltigen Förderung von Informations- und Medienkompetenz verwirklichen zu können, setzt sich der Verein Deutscher Bibliothekare e.V. (VDB) für ein gemeinsames, abgestimmtes Handeln des Dachverbandes Bibliothek Information Deutschland (BID), des Deutschen Bibliotheksverbandes (DBV), des Berufsverbandes Information Bibliothek (BIB), der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI) und der unter www.informationskompetenz.de zusammengeschlossenen regionalen Arbeitsgemeinschaften und Netzwerke (zur Zeit: Baden-Württemberg, Bayern, Bremen, Hamburg, Hessen, Niedersachsen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Rheinland-Pfalz und Saarland, Sachsen, Schleswig-Holstein, Thüringen) ein. Da es auf europäischer und auch auf internationaler Ebene seit längerem breite Bestrebungen zur Vermittlung von Informations- und Medienkompetenz durch Bibliotheken gibt, soll auf entsprechende Aktivitäten seitens des deutschen Bibliotheks- und Informationswesens im Rahmen der IFLA und des European Network for Information Literacy (EnIL) Bezug genommen werden."
  9. Meier, F.: Informationsverhalten in Social Media (2015) 0.02 
    0.02052752 = product of:
  0.04105504 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
    0.027322493 = product of:
      0.054644987 = sum of:
        0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054644987 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.1, S.22-28
  10. LaBarre, K.A.; Tilley, C.L.: ¬The elusive tale : leveraging the study of information seeking and knowledge organization to improve access to and discovery of folktales (2012) 0.02 
    0.018446784 = product of:
  0.03689357 = sum of:
    0.019191816 = weight(_text_:information in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019191816 = score(doc=48,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
    0.017701752 = product of:
      0.035403505 = sum of:
        0.035403505 = weight(_text_:organization in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035403505 = score(doc=48,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The "Folktales and Facets" project proposes ways to enhance access to folktales-in written and audiovisual formats-through the systematic and rigorous development of user-focused and task-focused models of information representation. Methods used include cognitive task analysis and facet analysis to better understand the information-seeking and information-use practices of people working with folktales and the intellectual dimensions of the domain. Interviews were conducted with 9 informants, representing scholars, storytellers, and teachers who rely on folktales in their professional lives to determine common tasks across user groups. Four tasks were identified: collect, create, instruct, and study. Facet analysis was conducted on the transcripts of these interviews, and a representative set of literature that included subject indexing material and a random stratified set of document surrogates drawn from a collection of folktales, including bibliographic records, introductions, reviews, tables of contents, and bibliographies. Eight facets were identified as most salient for this group of users: agent, association, context, documentation, location, subject, time, and viewpoint. Implications include the need for systems designers to devise methods for harvesting and integrating extant contextual material into search and discovery systems, and to take into account user-desired features in the development of enhanced services for digital repositories.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.4, S.687-701
  11. Cole, C.; Behesthi, J.; Large, A.; Lamoureux, I.; Abuhimed, D.; AlGhamdi, M.: Seeking information for a middle school history project : the concept of implicit knowledge in the students' transition from Kuhlthau's Stage 3 to Stage 4 (2013) 0.02 
    0.018134188 = product of:
  0.036268376 = sum of:
    0.019191816 = weight(_text_:information in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019191816 = score(doc=667,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
    0.01707656 = product of:
      0.03415312 = sum of:
        0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03415312 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The article reports the findings of a content analysis study of 16 student-group proposals for a grade eight history project. The students listed their topic and thesis in the proposal, and information in support of their thesis. The study's focus is this topic-to-thesis transition. The study's conceptual framework is Kuhlthau's six stage ISP Model's transition from exploring information in Stage 3 to formulating a focus or personal perspective on the assignment topic in Stage 4. Our study coding scheme identifies elements of the students' implicit knowledge in the 16 proposals. To validate implicit knowledge as a predictor of successful student performance, implicit knowledge was coded, scored, and then the correlation coefficient was established between the score and the students' instructors' marks. In Part 2 of the study we found strong and significant association between the McGill coding scores and the instructors' marks for the 16 proposals. This study is a first step in identifying, operationalizing, and testing user-centered implicit knowledge elements for future implementation in interactive information systems designed for middle school students researching a thesis-objective history assignment.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:41:17
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.558-573
  12. Hütte, M.: Inhalte und Methoden der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz (2010) 0.02 
    0.016597321 = product of:
  0.066389285 = sum of:
    0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 4079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066389285 = score(doc=4079,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 4079, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4079)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Der in Definitionen, Modellen und Standards dargelegte umfassende Anspruch an Konzepte zur Vermittlung von lnformationskompetenz für Schüler und Studierende lässt sich in der Praxis einer Hochschulbibliothek aufgrund des Zeitbedarfs nur in mehrtägigen Kompaktkursen bzw. semesterbegleitenden Veranstaltungen vermitteln. Sofern nicht curricular verankert, lässt sich der Aufwand für solche Veranstaltungen allerdings in den wenigsten Fällen rechtfertigen. Die meisten Bibliotheken, die sich als Teaching Libraries verstehen, versuchen deshalb Informationskompetenz im Rahmen eines modularen Gesamtkonzepts schrittweise zu vermitteln. Zu "klassischen" bibliotheks- und literaturbezogenen Inhalten treten dabei neue wie Wissenschaftliches Zitieren oder Elektronisches Publizieren. Auch hinsichtlich der didaktischen Methodik hat es Veränderungen in den Veranstaltungskonzepten vieler Bibliotheken gegeben. Konstruktivistische Methoden, bei denen die Lehrkraft stärker als Partner und Coach des Lernenden agiert, haben vielerorts die rein instruktionalen Formen abgelöst bzw. ergänzt. Es lohnt sich daher, mögliche Themen und Vermittlungsformen zu betrachten, um einen Überblick sowie Anregungen für die eigene Schulungspraxis zu gewinnen.
  13. Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: Question types and intermediary elicitations (2016) 0.02 
    0.01597124 = product of:
  0.03194248 = sum of:
    0.014865918 = weight(_text_:information in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014865918 = score(doc=2638,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
    0.01707656 = product of:
      0.03415312 = sum of:
        0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03415312 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In the context of online question-answering services, an intermediary clarifies the user's needs by eliciting additional information. This research proposes that these elicitations will depend on the type of question. In particular, this research explores the relationship between three constructs: question types, elicitations, and the fee that is paid for the answer. These relationships are explored for a few different question typologies, including a new kind of question type that we call Identity. It is found that the kinds of clarifications that intermediaries elicit depend on the type of question in systematic ways. A practical implication is that interactive question-answering services-whether human or automated-can be steered to focus attention on the kinds of clarification that are evidently most needed for that question type. Further, it is found that certain question types, as well as the number of elicitations, are associated with higher fees. This means that it may be possible to define a pricing structure for question-answering services based on objective and predictable characteristics of the question, which would help to establish a rational market for this type of information service. The newly introduced Identity question type was found to be especially reliable in predicting elicitations and fees.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:58:25
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.289-304
  14. Plieninger, J.: Informationskompetenz online vermitteln : eTeaching für OPLs (2011) 0.01 
    0.013093097 = product of:
  0.026186194 = sum of:
    0.006866273 = weight(_text_:information in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006866273 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
    0.019319922 = product of:
      0.038639843 = sum of:
        0.038639843 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038639843 = score(doc=166,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In den letzten Jahren wurde die Vermittlung von lnformationskompetenz (und manchmal darüber hinausgehend die Medienkompetenz) als ein neuer zentraler Baustein des Berufsbildes der Bibliothekarin/des Bibliothekars entwickelt. Ausgehend von den Führungen durch die Bibliothek und Schulungen in der Handhabung des Katalogs gehören mittlerweile neben der Katalogrecherche zur Informationskompetenzvermittlung auch die Datenbankrecherche und die Recherche in Suchdiensten nach frei im Netz verfügbaren Informationen. Aber nicht nur die Suchdienste, auch die recherchierbaren Inhalte haben sich erweitert. Ebenso hat man didaktisch konzeptionell viele Überlegungen angestellt und diese pädagogisch auf der Höhe der Zeit in einem stimmigen Konzept zusammengefasst, der Teaching Library. Hierzu gehören beispielsweise Grundsätze wie - Verschlankung des zu vermittelnden Inhalts - zusätzliche Visualisierung der Information ist besser als alleinige Übermittlung durch Sprache - selbst Ausprobieren bringt den Teilnehmern/Teilnehmerinnen mehr Lernerfolge als Inhalte und Lösungen lediglich vorgeführt zu bekommen Darüber hinaus bemühen sich viele Bibliotheken, die Inhalte von Schulungen zusätzlich in Tutorials und Selbstlernkursen auf der Homepage der Bibliothek anzubieten und auch sonst Anleitungstexte dort zu platzieren, wo Benutzer Defizite in der Handhabung von Suchdiensten und des Wissens über Fachrecherche haben könnten, beispielsweise direkt beim Online-Katalog (OPAC). Das macht Sinn, erreicht man doch durch Präsenzveranstaltungen aus verschiedenen Gründen nur einen Bruchteil der Benutzer und vermittelt nur teilweise die notwendigen Schlüsselqualifikationen zur Recherche, die für ein solides und effektives wissenschaftliches Arbeiten vonnöten wären. Online-Kurse und -Informationen zur Recherche sind hochverfügbar, die Benutzer können sie durcharbeiten oder abrufen, wann immer sie das Bedürfnis verspüren, Wissenslücken über die Recherche auszugleichen. Aber stimmt dieses positive Bild mit der Realität überein? Erreichen die Online-Tutorials ihre Zielgruppen? Werden die richtigen Methoden zur Umsetzung der Inhalte gewählt, so dass dieses eLearning effektiver ist als eine Vermittlung in der Face-to-face-Situation einer Schulung? Welche Anforderungen, welche Möglichkeiten, welche Hemmnisse gibt es hier? Diese Checkliste soll zumindest das Feld der Möglichkeiten und Widrigkeiten umreißen und Umsetzungsmöglichkeiten aufzeigen, wie man - angemessen an die jeweiligen Zielgruppen - Informationskompetenz als Schlüsselqualifikation online vermitteln kann.
    Date
    29. 5.2012 14:20:22
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  15. Lercher, A.: Efficiency of scientific communication : a survey of world science (2010) 0.01 
    0.0128297005 = product of:
  0.025659401 = sum of:
    0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008582841 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
    0.01707656 = product of:
      0.03415312 = sum of:
        0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03415312 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The aim of this study was to measure the efficiency of the system by which scientists worldwide communicate results to each other, providing one measure of the degree to which the system, including all media, functions well. A randomly selected and representative sample of 246 active research scientists worldwide was surveyed. The main measure was the reported rate of "late finds": scientific literature that would have been useful to scientists' projects if it had been found at the beginning of these projects. The main result was that 46% of the sample reported late finds (±6.25%, p0.05). Among respondents from European Union countries or other countries classified as "high income" by the World Bank, 42% reported late finds. Among respondents from low- and middle-income countries, 56% reported late finds. The 42% rate in high-income countries in 2009 can be compared with results of earlier surveys by Martyn (1964a, b, 1987). These earlier surveys found a rate of 22% late finds in 1963-1964 and a rate of 27% in 1985-1986. Respondents were also queried about search habits, but this study failed to support any explanations for this increase in the rate of late finds. This study also permits a crude estimate of the cost in time and money of the increase in late finds.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2049-2060
  16. Jaskolla, L.; Rugel, M.: Smart questions : steps towards an ontology of questions and answers (2014) 0.01 
    0.0128297005 = product of:
  0.025659401 = sum of:
    0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008582841 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
    0.01707656 = product of:
      0.03415312 = sum of:
        0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03415312 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    9. 2.2017 19:22:59
    Source
    Philosophy, computing and information science. Eds.: R. Hagengruber u. U.V. Riss
  17. Pinto, M.: Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies (2016) 0.01 
    0.01277699 = product of:
  0.02555398 = sum of:
    0.011892734 = weight(_text_:information in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011892734 = score(doc=2963,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
    0.013661247 = product of:
      0.027322493 = sum of:
        0.027322493 = weight(_text_:22 in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027322493 = score(doc=2963,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Uncovering faculty members' conceptions of Information Literacy (IL), as well as exploring their perceptions with regard to the importance given to a previously defined set of core IL competences grouped into four categories: searching, evaluation, processing and communication and dissemination. Ascertaining the possible differences among the five knowledge branches (arts and humanities, sciences, social and legal sciences, health sciences, and technical disciplines); and understanding the importance granted to a set of learning improvement initiatives by the faculty. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The survey was completed by a set of faculty members from the University of Granada (Spain). Data were collected using the IL-HUMASS survey. The research is based on subjective data, first approached from a descriptive point of view. Later, data correlation, analysis and non-parametric tests were used with the goal of finding significant differences of faculty perceptions among the relevant academic areas. Findings - Results suggest that more than half of the surveyed faculty have what the authors define as an Academic Concept of IL. The IL categories of communica\tion and dissemination and searching were graded in significance by the staff as being "very important," while those of evaluation and processing were assigned a slightly lesser rating of "important." Results suggest that IL awareness falls into two broad groups differentiated by subject discipline: those from health sciences, social and legal sciences and arts and humanities representing the first group, and sciences and technical disciplines the other. Research limitations/implications - This approach address the subjective status of faculty concepts in a single university, but also in all knowledge branches. Future research is needed. Originality/value - This is one of the few papers regarding faculty perceptions of IL.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 68(2016) no.2, S.227-247
  18. Caidi, N.; Allard, D.; Quirke, L.: Information practices of information (2010) 0.01 
    0.010406143 = product of:
  0.041624572 = sum of:
    0.041624572 = weight(_text_:information in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041624572 = score(doc=4204,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.47031528 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010), S.xxx-xxx
  19. Fidel, R: Human information interaction : an ecological approach to information behavior (2012) 0.01 
    0.009011983 = product of:
  0.03604793 = sum of:
    0.03604793 = weight(_text_:information in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03604793 = score(doc=538,freq=72.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.40730494 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
          8.485281 = tf(freq=72.0), with freq of:
            72.0 = termFreq=72.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Human information interaction (HII) is an emerging area of study that investigates how people interact with information; its subfield human information behavior (HIB) is a flourishing, active discipline. Yet despite their obvious relevance to the design of information systems, these research areas have had almost no impact on systems design. One issue may be the contextual complexity of human interaction with information; another may be the difficulty in translating real-life and unstructured HII complexity into formal, linear structures necessary for systems design. In this book, Raya Fidel proposes a research approach that bridges the study of human information interaction and the design of information systems: cognitive work analysis (CWA). Developed by Jens Rasmussen and his colleagues, CWA embraces complexity and provides a conceptual framework and analytical tools that can harness it to create design requirements. CWA offers an ecological approach to design, analyzing the forces in the environment that shape human interaction with information. Fidel reviews research in HIB, focusing on its contribution to systems design, and then presents the CWA framework. She shows that CWA, with its ecological approach, can be used to overcome design challenges and lead to the development of effective systems. Researchers and designers who use CWA can increase the diversity of their analytical tools, providing them with an alternative approach when they plan research and design projects. The CWA framework enables a collaboration between design and HII that can create information systems tailored to fit human lives. Human Information Interaction constructs an elegant argument for an ecological approach to information behavior. Professor Raya Fidel's cogent exposition of foundational theoretical concepts including cognitive work analysis delivers thoughtful guidance for future work in information interaction. Raya Fidel provides the human information interaction field with a manifesto for studying human information behavior from a holistic perspective, arguing that context dominates human action and we are obligated to study it. She provides a tutorial on cognitive work analysis as a technique for such study. This book is an important contribution to the Information field. Raya Fidel presents a nuanced picture of research on human information interaction, and advocates for Cognitive Work Analysis as the holistic approach to the study and evaluation of human information interaction.
    Content
    Inhalt: Basic concepts -- What is human information interaction? -- Theoretical constructs and models in information seeking behavior -- The information need -- The search strategy -- Two generations of research -- In-context -- Theoretical traditions in human information behavior -- Interlude : models and their contribution to design -- Human information behavior and information retrieval : is collaboration possible? -- Cognitive work analysis : dimensions for analysis -- Cognitive work analysis : harnessing complexity -- Enhancing the impact of research in human information interaction.
    LCSH
    Information behavior
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information retrieval
    RSWK
    Anthropologie / Information Retrieval / Informationsverhalten (BVB)
    Informationsverhalten / Information Retrieval / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation
    Subject
    Anthropologie / Information Retrieval / Informationsverhalten (BVB)
    Informationsverhalten / Information Retrieval / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation
    Information behavior
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information retrieval
  20. Spiranec, S.; Zorica, M.B.: Information Literacy 2.0 : hype or discourse refinement? (2010) 0.01 
    0.00884699 = product of:
  0.03538796 = sum of:
    0.03538796 = weight(_text_:information in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03538796 = score(doc=3621,freq=34.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.39984792 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
          5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
            34.0 = termFreq=34.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce the term Information Literacy 2.0 as a subset of information literacy, to describe its development and significance and give an outline of its underlying theoretical assumptions. Design/methodology/approach - The paper first examines the grounds for the possible re-conceptualizations in the field of information literacy and identifies the current developments in the information universe as the principal drive for perception shifts. Based on a literature review and a descriptive analysis of contrasting features of library user education, information literacy and Information literacy 2.0, the paper highlights the main foci of paradigm shifts. Findings - The paper found that the new meaning and understanding of the central conceptions in information literacy are shifting the focus of classical information literacy towards Information literacy 2.0. Many of the aspects of current information literacy practices originate from a print-based culture, which is incongruent with the transient and hybrid nature of digital environments. These radically changing environments are causing the appearance of anomalies in the information literacy paradigm, which could effectively be resolved through the introduction of a sub-concept of information literacy. Practical implications - The article specifies the possibilities for putting theoretical conceptualizations of Information literacy 2.0 into practice by determining the range of shifts in information literacy activities and identifying how new practices differ from the earlier approaches. Originality/value - The study attempts to advance the research field of information literacy by proposing a new outlook on information literacy through the integration of its underlying theoretical conceptions and practical applications.

Authors

Languages

  • e 98
  • d 37

Types

  • a 122
  • m 11
  • x 3
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications