Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Vision"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Liew, C.L.; Foo, S.; Chennupati, K.R.: ¬A proposed integrated environment for enhanced user interaction and value-adding of electronic documents : an empirical evaluation (2001) 0.02 
    0.023371622 = product of:
  0.046743244 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 5196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=5196,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5196, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5196)
    0.027322493 = product of:
      0.054644987 = sum of:
        0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054644987 = score(doc=5196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Still the Frontier: Information Science at the Millenium
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.1, S.22-35
  2. Gastinger, A.: Von der "electronic library" zur "enhanced library" : ein Bericht von der 9. International Bielefed Konferenz 2009 (2009) 0.02 
    0.02291292 = product of:
  0.04582584 = sum of:
    0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 3017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012015978 = score(doc=3017,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3017, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3017)
    0.033809863 = product of:
      0.067619726 = sum of:
        0.067619726 = weight(_text_:22 in 3017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067619726 = score(doc=3017,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3017, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3017)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld hat vom 3. bis 5. Februar fast 400 Informationsexperten aus 30 Ländern zur 9. Internationalen Bielefeld Konferenz willkommen geheißen. »Up-grading the eLibrary: Enhanced Information Services Driven by Technology and Economics« lautete das Thema der diesjährigen Konferenz. Im Mittelpunkt stand das Thema »eLibrary«. Geänderte Modelle wissenschaftlicher Zusammenarbeit, neue Technologien, die Anforderungen der Nutzer, aber auch ökonomische Entwicklungen erfordern eine Weiterentwicklung der »electronic library« zur »enhanced library«. Diese Entwicklung birgt neue Herausforderungen, eröffnet aber auch neue Möglichkeiten für eine Optimierung wissenschaftlicher Informationsdienste.
    Date
    22. 7.2009 13:22:50
  3. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.02 
    0.015395639 = product of:
  0.030791279 = sum of:
    0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01029941 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
    0.02049187 = product of:
      0.04098374 = sum of:
        0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098374 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
  4. Rosemann, U.: Auf dem Weg zu dem Kompetenzzentrum für Literaturversorgung : TIB zum Start von GetInfo (2002) 0.01 
    0.010245935 = product of:
  0.04098374 = sum of:
    0.04098374 = product of:
      0.08196748 = sum of:
        0.08196748 = weight(_text_:22 in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08196748 = score(doc=4204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 12:25:38
  5. Scammell, A.: Visions of the information future (2000) 0.01 
    0.009710376 = product of:
  0.038841505 = sum of:
    0.038841505 = weight(_text_:information in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038841505 = score(doc=714,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    A synthesis of some of the themes and ideas developed in a recently published book about the future of information: i in the sky: visions of the information future. Common themes included: problems in defining information and defining future time-scales, the ubiquity of information, accessibility, privacy censorship and control, customisation ofinformation products, the development of the World Wide Web, artificial intelligence and cybernetics, changes in working roles and structures of organisations, information literacy, information overload and the organisation and retrieval of information.
  6. Degkwitz, A.: Bologna, University 2.0 : Akademisches Leben als Web-Version? (2008) 0.01 
    0.008452466 = product of:
  0.033809863 = sum of:
    0.033809863 = product of:
      0.067619726 = sum of:
        0.067619726 = weight(_text_:22 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067619726 = score(doc=1423,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 2.2008 13:28:00
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 55(2008) H.1, S.18-22
  7. Mindlin, A.: ¬The pursuit of knowledge, from Babel to Google (2004) 0.01 
    0.008298661 = product of:
  0.033194643 = sum of:
    0.033194643 = weight(_text_:standards in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033194643 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.14772856 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    If Babel symbolized our incommensurate ambition, the Library of Alexandria showed how this Ambition might be achieved. Set up by Ptolemy I in the third century B.C., it was meant to hold every book an every imaginable subject. To ensure that no title escaped its vast catalog. a royal decree ordered that any book brought into the City was to be confiscated and copied; only then would the original (sometimes the copy) be returned. A curious document from the second century B.C., the perhaps apocryphal "Letter of Aristeas," recounts the library's origins. To assemble a universal library (says the letter), King Ptolemy wrote "to all the sovereigns and governors an earth" begging them to send to him every kind of book by every kind of author, "poets and prose writers, rhetoricians and sophists, doctors and soothsayers, historians and all others, too." The king's librarians calculated that they required 500.000 scrolls if they were to collect in Alexandria "all the books of all the peoples of the world." But even this (by our standards) modest stock of a half-million books was too much for any reader. The librarians of Alexandria devised a system of annotated catalogs for which they chose works, they deemed especially important, and appended a brief description to each title - one of the earliest "recommended reading" lists. In Alexandria, it became clear that the greater your ambition, the narrower your scope. But our ambition persists recently, the most popular Internet search service. Google, announced that it had concluded agreements with several leading research libraries to make some of their books available online to researchers.
  8. Albrecht, C.: Begrabt die Bibliotheken! : Unser Kulturauftrag ist die Digitalisierung (2002) 0.01 
    0.008183185 = product of:
  0.01636637 = sum of:
    0.0042914203 = weight(_text_:information in 524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0042914203 = score(doc=524,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.048488684 = fieldWeight in 524, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=524)
    0.01207495 = product of:
      0.0241499 = sum of:
        0.0241499 = weight(_text_:22 in 524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0241499 = score(doc=524,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 524, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=524)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Es gibt das öffentliche Gut "Informationsinfrastruktur" und das private Gut "Information". Für bestimmte Teile des Informationsmarktes werden Intermediäre wie Buchhändler und Bibliotheken überflüssig. Dies gilt vor allem für den Bereich naturwissenschaftlicher, medizinischer und technischer Literatur. Dieser Bereich ist teuer und ineffizient, weil zwei Funktionen miteinander vermischt sind. Zum einen geht es um die Versorgung mit Informationen darüber, was die Wissenschaft bereits geleistet hat und was nicht ein zweites Mal erarbeitet werden muß. Zum anderen geht es darum zu wissen: Wer hat was geleistet, wer wird auf seinem Fachgebiet künftig Herausragendes leisten. Es geht um Vergangenheit und um karriererelevantes Prestige. Gemessen wird das daran, wie oft jemand in Zeitschriften mit hoher Reputation veröffentlicht und wie häufig er zitiert wird. Diese doppelte Nachfrage treibt die Preise für wis-' senschaftliche Zeitschriften. In diesem System gegenseitiger, Begünstigung dienen die Bibliotheken nur noch als Parkplätze, auf denen Geldkoffer den Besitzer wechseln - wobei uns die Parkplatzwächterweismachen wollen, die Koffer seien zu klein. Ein Teil der Lösung wird im Direktbezug einzelner Aufsätze oder Informationen liegen, unter mehr oder weniger großer finanzieller Selbstbeteiligung der Wissenschaftler. Die Bibliothekare werden überflüssig wie Versicherungsmakler, sobald die Kun den ihre Versicherungen per Internet di rekt abschließen. Die strukturell bedingte Korruption je doch wird erst beendet sein, wenn das System der Informationsversorgung vom System der Prestigemessung getrennt sein wird. Die Herausgeber und Gutachter der wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften, außerdem die übrigen Fachgelehrten und lesenden Wissensarbeiter sollten ihre Bewertungen von prestigeheischenden Beiträgen deshalb direkt in eine zentrale nationale oder besser internationale Datenbank eingeben, deren Inhalt öffentlich einsehbar ist und Auswertungen gestattet, beispielsweise wenn Stellen zu besetzen sind. Der Internetbuchhändler Amazon liefert mit seinen Leserbewertungen ein primitives Modell, das man beliebig verfeinern könnte. Und die Geisteswissenschaften? Bleiben sie nicht auf der Strecke, ebenso wie die Bibliotheken und ihr sogenannter "Kulturauftrag"? Am Beispiel der Bibliotheken zeigt sich vielmehr, daß wir die Digitalisierung der Gesellschaft, ihre Differenzierung nach funktionalen Gesichtspunkten selbst als unseren Kulturauftrag betrachten müssen. Einer künftigen Differenzierung in stark verschulte Lehramts- und "Bachelor"-Studiengänge einerseits und wissenschaftliche Master- und Promotionsstudiengänge andererseits entspräche eine Einteilung in möglichst virtualisierte Lehrstoffsammlungen und spezialisierte, um Archive oder Themenschwerpunkteherum organisierte Präsenzbibliotheken. Ihren tiefer als bisher verstandenen Kulturauftrag- den Bibliotheken - pathetisch gesprochen - als Friedhöfe des Geistes, als Mausoleen identitätstiftender Kulturdenkmäler, mit der Wissenschaft als begleitendem Totenamt. Wer liegt nicht lieber auf dem Père-Lachaise als auf dem Stadtfriedhof von Vechta? Das Internet könnte also bei der nationalen Reorganisation und Konzentration der geisteswissenschaftlichen Forschungsbibliotheken als Börse dienen, in der Dauerleihgaben getauscht und zu .zeitlich begrenzten Sammlungen zusammengeführt werden können. Die Bibliothekare müßten jedoch auch hier ihre Fixierung auf stets wachsende Bestände lösen und die Differenz von unveräußerlichem Eigentum und befristetem Besitz - der "Nutzung" - lernen. In der Bibel steht nicht, was mit der Mutter und ihrem Kind weiter geschah. Sicher ist nur, daß sie nicht heimgingen, um gemeinsam eine "hybride Bibliothek", oder andere Ungeheuer auszubrüten, an die sogar der weise Wissenschaftsrat glaubt."
    Date
    26. 4.2002 11:22:22
  9. Schmiede, R.: Upgrading academic scholarship (2009) 0.01 
    0.0073582535 = product of:
  0.029433014 = sum of:
    0.029433014 = weight(_text_:information in 2807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029433014 = score(doc=2807,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 2807, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2807)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Digital information and the increasing amount and availability of its basis, data, is changing scholarship to a more or less dramatic extent. New areas of research and knowledge have been created by machine-produced data, calculations, and simulations in various academic disciplines. However, no adequate infrastructure for digital information has emerged yet. Whereas in the field of scientific information providers (libraries, document centers, publishers etc.) new services, arrangements and business models are being experimented, the scholarly disciplines are, by and large, lagging behind these developments, as are most scientific work practices. To sum up: An information infrastructure of scholarly information has been developed, but not one for scholarly information, yet. What this means, and some ideas of what could be done about it, shall be discussed in the talk.
  10. Garfield, E.: ¬A retrospective and prospective view of information retrieval and artificial intelligence in the 21st century (2001) 0.01 
    0.006866273 = product of:
  0.027465092 = sum of:
    0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 5194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027465092 = score(doc=5194,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5194, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5194)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Information tends to define community. Garfield reminisces about the reprint-sharing culture of science in the 1950s, and anticipates the digital full-text documents of the future.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Still the Frontier: Information Science at the Millenium
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.1, S.18-21
  11. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.01 
    0.0059767957 = product of:
  0.023907183 = sum of:
    0.023907183 = product of:
      0.047814365 = sum of:
        0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047814365 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Blaschke, S.: Gedanken zur Suche nach einem besseren System der Fachkommunikation : Die Informationsexplosion und ihre Bewältigung (2003) 0.01 
    0.0052030715 = product of:
  0.020812286 = sum of:
    0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020812286 = score(doc=1959,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Die Informationsexplosion ist zu einer Desinformationsexplosion geworden. Der Artikel beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, wie das System der Fachkommunikation geändert werden muss und welche Konsequenzen das haben wird. Die elektronische Publikation kann eine Abhilfe verschaffen, aber nur unter ganz bestimmten Bedingungen. Es ist notwendig, einen freien Zugang zur wissenschaftlichen Information zu gewähren und ein elektronisches, universelles Nachweissystem aufzubauen. Als Folge davon wird die Duplizität von Information überflüssig, um so viele Leser wie möglich zu erreichen. Das System der Fachkommunikation wird sich erheblich verändern. Eine Folge wird das Verschwinden der Zeitschrift sein, eine andere das der Monographie.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 54(2003) H.6, S.329-334
  13. Münch, V.: Wie wird es sein im Evernet? : Das allgegenwärtige Netz der Zukunft war Thema eines wissenschaftlichen Symposiums an der Universität Karlsruhe (2001) 0.01 
    0.005149705 = product of:
  0.02059882 = sum of:
    0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 6924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02059882 = score(doc=6924,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 6924, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6924)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.8, S.463-466
  14. Ball, R.: ¬Die Zukunft der Spezialbibliotheken oder die Spezialbibliothek der Zukunft (2002) 0.00 
    0.004855188 = product of:
  0.019420752 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 1116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=1116,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1116, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1116)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Information Overload und Information Overkill sind Schlagworte, die die Diskussion bestimmen, wenn es um die Neuorientierung von Bibliotheken geht. Wie gehen Spezialbibliotheken damit um, und haben sie nicht von Hause aus bessere Voraussetzungen, wenn es darum geht, die Datenflut beherrschbar zu gestalten? Doch Bibliotheken stellen sich noch weit größere Herausforderungen: Die Konkurrenz zu anderen Informationsanbietern verlangt nach neuen Formen der Kundengewinnung und Kundenbindung. »Mehrwerte« schaffen und gezielt darstellen, wird in diesem Zusammenhang wichtig.
  15. Ratzek, W.: Informationsutopien - Proaktive Zukunftsgestaltung : Ein Essay (2004) 0.00 
    0.0044597755 = product of:
  0.017839102 = sum of:
    0.017839102 = weight(_text_:information in 2911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017839102 = score(doc=2911,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2911, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2911)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    "Informationsutopien" - was soll das heißen? Wo ansetzen? Bei Gutenberg (Buchdruck mit beweglichen Lettern), bei Daniel Bell (nachindustrielle Gesellschaft), beim Weinberg-Report (Lit. 25; Rolle von Informationsspezialisten), bei McLuhan (Gutenberg-Galaxis) oder bei Simon Nora und Alan Minc (L'informatisation de la société/Telematik)? Vielleicht sollten wir umwälzende Ereignisse zum Ausgangspunkt nehmen, wie den Sputnik-Schock von 1957 oder den Terroranschlag auf das World Trade Center vom 11. September 2001? Denn obwohl 44 Jahre zwischen beiden Ereignissen liegen, die Bundesregierung mit Millionenbeträgen zahlreiche Förderprogramme finanziert hat, die Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie eine rasante Entwicklung genommen hat, viele spezifische Studiengänge ins Leben gerufen worden sind, ist uns eines immer noch nicht gelungen: Daten, Information und Wissen zu so managen, dass Katastrophen, Pleiten oder Flops vermieden werden können. Wie dem auch sei, auf jeden Fall sollten wir uns erst einmal darüber verständigen, was wir unter "Utopie", "Information" und "Informationsutopie" verstehen wollen. Dann hätten wir eine Basis für einen Diskurs.
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
  16. Baruchson-Arbib, S.; Bronstein, J.: ¬A view to the future of the library and information science profession : a delphi study (2002) 0.00 
    0.0044597755 = product of:
  0.017839102 = sum of:
    0.017839102 = weight(_text_:information in 5207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017839102 = score(doc=5207,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5207, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5207)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Baruchson-Arbib and Bronstein present the results of a Delphi study held in Israel from 1998 to 2000. One hundred and twenty directors of large public and academic libraries, heads of LIS departments, and of corporate information centers in the USA, Canada, Europe, and Israel participated, using a 47 statement website as a base. Consensus on most points was reached in the first round. A second round included only 26 participants whose responses fell outside the group consensus. Seventy seven percent believe the traditional model of the library will not be replaced in their lifetimes. A user centered approach is highly favored, as is more assertive behavior including marketing and promotion. Less than 8% believe the profession will disappear.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.5, S.397-408
  17. Kaku, M.: Zukunftsvisionen : Wie Wissenschaft und Technik des 21. Jahrhunderts unser Leben revolutionieren (2000) 0.00 
    0.0042914203 = product of:
  0.017165681 = sum of:
    0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 5742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017165681 = score(doc=5742,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5742, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5742)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Theme
    Information
  18. Kuhlen, R.: Wie viel Virtualität soll es denn sein? : Zu einigen Konsequenzen der fortschreitenden Telemediatisierung und Kommodifizierung der Wissensmärkte für die Bereitstellung von Wissen und Information durch Bibliotheken (2002) 0.00 
    0.0042914203 = product of:
  0.017165681 = sum of:
    0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017165681 = score(doc=1115,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  19. Boone, M.D.: Taking FLITE : how new libraries are visioning their way into the future (2002) 0.00 
    0.00424829 = product of:
  0.01699316 = sum of:
    0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 4788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01699316 = score(doc=4788,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4788, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4788)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The author takes on the assertion posed in recent educational articles that technology is driving down book circulation and contributing to the decline of reading-center learning. In his interview with Richard Cochran, Dean of the Ferris State University Library for Information, Technology, and Education, the two discuss the importance of incorporating technology to support all types of learning, and using faculty buy-in to insure that as many media as possible are integrated into the final building design.
    Content
    Part of a Special Issue: Accessibility of web-based information resources for people with disabilities: part 2. Vgl. auch unter: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/07378830210452668.
  20. Murray, I.: Is the future of the document inextricably linked with the future of the librarian? (2005) 0.00 
    0.0038383633 = product of:
  0.015353453 = sum of:
    0.015353453 = weight(_text_:information in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015353453 = score(doc=3000,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1734784 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the ontology of the document and questions whether or not our understanding of the concept of a document has changed now that more and more information is transmitted through increasingly digital means. Moreover, the argument is advanced that the identity of librarians is bound up with the future of the document. Not merely should librarians be changing their roles as a reaction to new technologies but they need to be proactive in embracing change and not in any way resisting it. The paper focuses on the theory of the ontology of documents. A number of ideas will be discussed including the thoughts of Michael Buckland in his seminal paper 'What is a Document' (1997), and further discussion will draw on the work of Michel Foucault (1972), Ludwig Wittgenstein (1958, 1969) and more recently Ziming Liu (2004) among others. Is the concept of a document essentially the same or has the transformation of document to e-document brought about a fundamental change in its nature. The paper goes on to discuss the more practical nature of documents and the role of the librarian. There follows a brief review of a range of types of document, including: E-journals, E-books, and considers the prospect that Extensible Markup Language (XML) offers a technological vehicle for the advent of an E-collection - this being an aggregation of different document mediums. The notion of the delivery of this information to the user (consumer) is then considered and with it the role of librarian. Waaijers (2002) has argued that a consequence of digitisation has brought with it issues of ownership and responsibility, and refers to XML as offering the possibility of "anatomising the internal structure of the document." In the concluding part to this paper some speculative thoughts are advanced on what might be possible outcomes regarding the changing perceptions of what a document might be. Could the Modern Librarian's identity and function be inextricably linked to the concept of the document? Finally it is suggested that further research to gather empirical evidence could involve a comparative study of the providers of information and the users of information focussing on their respective concepts of a document.
    Source
    Librarianship in the information age: Proceedings of the 13th BOBCATSSS Symposium, 31 January - 2 February 2005 in Budapest, Hungary. Eds.: Marte Langeland u.a

Authors

Languages

  • e 17
  • d 15

Types

  • a 28
  • el 3
  • b 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes