Search (302 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Schmierer, H.F.: Bibliographic standards (1975) 0.10 
    0.10225159 = product of:
  0.20450318 = sum of:
    0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027465092 = score(doc=264,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 264, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=264)
    0.17703809 = weight(_text_:standards in 264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17703809 = score(doc=264,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 264, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=264)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 10(1975), S.105-138
  2. Park, M.K.: Bibliographic and information processing standards (1977) 0.09 
    0.09444732 = product of:
  0.18889464 = sum of:
    0.03398632 = weight(_text_:information in 3848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03398632 = score(doc=3848,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3848, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3848)
    0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 3848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15490833 = score(doc=3848,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 3848, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3848)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 12(1977), S.59-80
  3. ¬The preparation of indexes to books, periodicals and other publications (1976) 0.06 
    0.06259242 = product of:
  0.25036967 = sum of:
    0.25036967 = weight(_text_:standards in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25036967 = score(doc=485,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        1.1142386 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Editor
    British Standards Institution
    Imprint
    London : British Standards Institution
  4. Prywes, N.S.; Smith, D.P.: Organization of information (1972) 0.05 
    0.047743555 = product of:
  0.09548711 = sum of:
    0.038841505 = weight(_text_:information in 2002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038841505 = score(doc=2002,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 2002, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2002)
    0.056645606 = product of:
      0.11329121 = sum of:
        0.11329121 = weight(_text_:organization in 2002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11329121 = score(doc=2002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 2002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 7(1972), S.103-158
  5. Standards for public libraries (1977) 0.04 
    0.044259522 = product of:
  0.17703809 = sum of:
    0.17703809 = weight(_text_:standards in 5190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17703809 = score(doc=5190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 5190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5190)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  6. Meadow, C.T.; Meadow, H.R.: Organization, maintenance and search of machine files (1970) 0.04 
    0.04205535 = product of:
  0.0841107 = sum of:
    0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027465092 = score(doc=246,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 246, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=246)
    0.056645606 = product of:
      0.11329121 = sum of:
        0.11329121 = weight(_text_:organization in 246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11329121 = score(doc=246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=246)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 5(1970), S.169-192
  7. Artandi, S.: Document retrieval and the concept of sets (1971) 0.04 
    0.04105504 = product of:
  0.08211008 = sum of:
    0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027465092 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
    0.054644987 = product of:
      0.109289974 = sum of:
        0.109289974 = weight(_text_:22 in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109289974 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 22(1971) no.4, S.289-290
  8. Standards for reference services in public libraries (1970) 0.04 
    0.038727082 = product of:
  0.15490833 = sum of:
    0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 64) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15490833 = score(doc=64,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 64, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=64)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  9. UNISIST: Study report on the feasibility of a world science information system by the United Nation Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the International Council of Scientific Unions (1971) 0.04 
    0.036798432 = product of:
  0.073596865 = sum of:
    0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 7843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024031956 = score(doc=7843,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 7843, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7843)
    0.049564905 = product of:
      0.09912981 = sum of:
        0.09912981 = weight(_text_:organization in 7843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09912981 = score(doc=7843,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 7843, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7843)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
  10. Meincke, P.P.M.; Atherton, P.: Knowledge space : a conceptual basis for the organization of knowledge (1976) 0.03 
    0.029539818 = product of:
  0.059079636 = sum of:
    0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024031956 = score(doc=78,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
    0.03504768 = product of:
      0.07009536 = sum of:
        0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07009536 = score(doc=78,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    We propose a new conceptual basis for visualizing the organization of information, or knowledge, which differentiates between the concept 'vectors' for a field of knowledge represented in a multidimensional space, and the state 'vectors' for a person based on his understanding of these concepts, and the representational 'vectors' for information items which might be in a retrieval system which covers a subspace of knowledge. This accomodates the notion of search volume in which the user of a retrieval system can expand or reduce the subspace he searches for relevant information items which have representational vectors with components on basic concept vectors similar to his state vector. The benefits of such a new conceptual framework are explored in this article
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976) no.1, S.18-24
  11. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.03 
    0.026691135 = product of:
  0.10676454 = sum of:
    0.10676454 = product of:
      0.3202936 = sum of:
        0.3202936 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3202936 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42742437 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  12. Mazur, Z.: Inverted file organization in the information retrieval system based on thesaurus with weights (1979) 0.03 
    0.026054136 = product of:
  0.052108273 = sum of:
    0.023785468 = weight(_text_:information in 5494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023785468 = score(doc=5494,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 5494, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5494)
    0.028322803 = product of:
      0.056645606 = sum of:
        0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 5494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056645606 = score(doc=5494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 5494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The inverted file structure is often used to organize data in the information retrieval system. When the hierarchy relation on the set descriptors and weights of descriptors in document description would be taken into account, the conventional concept of the inverted file may be extended. Properties and operations on inverted files, which are used in systems based on thesaurus with weights, are studied in this paper
    Source
    Information processing and management. 15(1979), S.227-234
  13. Svenonius, E.: Facet definition: a case study (1978) 0.03 
    0.026020419 = product of:
  0.052040838 = sum of:
    0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01699316 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
    0.03504768 = product of:
      0.07009536 = sum of:
        0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07009536 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Historical account of the sophisticated method of indexing developed by J.O. Kaiser (1896/97), a librarian at the Philadelphia Commercial Museum who established his index on cards (a novelty then) and distinguished his items according to the categories 'concrete', 'process', and 'country'. He also introduced "statement indexing" and rules to this end in order to permit the supply of "complete information" on a subject in a document. In summarizing these findings, the author stresses the necessitiy of establishing well-defined categories if an organization of terms is to serve e.g. information retrieval.
    Footnote
    Wiederabdruck in: Knowledge organization 43(2016) no.6, S.462-473.
  14. Analyses of bibliographies (1973) 0.03 
    0.025659401 = product of:
  0.051318802 = sum of:
    0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017165681 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
    0.03415312 = product of:
      0.06830624 = sum of:
        0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06830624 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    SIMON, H.R.: Introduction: why analyze bibliographies?; MARTYN, J.: Secondary services and the rising tide of paper; BROOKES, B.C.: Numerical methods of bibliographic analysis; THOMPSON, L.S.: The humanities: a state of the art report; BOTTLE, R.T.: Information obtainable from analyses of scientific bibliographies; SIMON, H.R.: Outlook: the analyses of bibliographies in the future
    Source
    Library trends. 22(1973), no.1
  15. Bookstein, A.; Cooper, W.: ¬A general mathematical model for information retrieval systems (1976) 0.02 
    0.022797368 = product of:
  0.045594737 = sum of:
    0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 5461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020812286 = score(doc=5461,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5461, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5461)
    0.024782453 = product of:
      0.049564905 = sum of:
        0.049564905 = weight(_text_:organization in 5461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049564905 = score(doc=5461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 5461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5461)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper presents a mathematical model of an information retrieval system thought to be general enough to serve as an abstract representation of most document and reference retrieval systems. The model is made up of four components that, in one form or another, appear in every functioning system. It is proved that the basic organization of documents that the system provides for a user on receipt of a request follows from the properties and interrelations of the four components. Each component is then discussed in turn and it is seen that much of the existing theory regarding information systems can be viewed as an elaboration of this model
  16. Hutchins, W.J.: ¬The concept of 'aboutness' in subject indexing (1978) 0.02 
    0.020887807 = product of:
  0.041775614 = sum of:
    0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01699316 = score(doc=1961,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
    0.024782453 = product of:
      0.049564905 = sum of:
        0.049564905 = weight(_text_:organization in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049564905 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The common view of the 'aboutness' of documents is that the index entries (or classifications) assigned to documents represent or indicate in some way the total contents of documents; indexing and classifying are seen as processes involving the 'summerization' of the texts of documents. In this paper an alternative concept of 'aboutness' is proposed based on an analysis of the linguistic organization of texts, which is felt to be more appropriate in many indexing environments (particularly in non-specialized libraries and information services) and which has implications for the evaluation of the effectiveness of indexing systems
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.93-97.
  17. Rodriguez, R.D.: Geographic names in subject cataloging (1978) 0.02 
    0.02052752 = product of:
  0.04105504 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=5555,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
    0.027322493 = product of:
      0.054644987 = sum of:
        0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054644987 = score(doc=5555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Bibliographical problems caused by geographic names in subject vataloging are examnied with a view toward determining procedures for establishing correct headings when changes of name occur and deciding upon the type of provisions to be made in subject catalog maintenance. Examples of typical changes of geographic names in Africa and suggested information cards for the subject catalog are provided
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 22(1978), S.409-414
  18. ISO 999: Index of a publication (1975) 0.02 
    0.020027246 = product of:
  0.080108985 = sum of:
    0.080108985 = product of:
      0.16021797 = sum of:
        0.16021797 = weight(_text_:organization in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16021797 = score(doc=486,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.8913391 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Editor
    International Organization for Standardization
    Imprint
    Geneva : International Organization of Standardization
  19. Ordering systems for global information networks : Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay, 1975 (1979) 0.02 
    0.016709741 = product of:
  0.033419482 = sum of:
    0.015895644 = weight(_text_:information in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015895644 = score(doc=3431,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1796046 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
    0.01752384 = product of:
      0.03504768 = sum of:
        0.03504768 = weight(_text_:organization in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03504768 = score(doc=3431,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19498043 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: HENRIKSEN, T.: A linguistic description model for indexing languages; MONTGOMERY, C.A.: Toward a natural language communications inferface; SPANG-HANSSEN, H.: Are classification systems similar to natural languages; LANCASTER, F.W.: Vocabulary control for on-line interactive retrieval systems: requirements and possible approaches; DAHLBERG, I.: On the theory of the concept; GROLIER, E. de: In search of an objective basis for the organization of knowledge; BELING, G.: Towards a set theoretical foundation of classification; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Fundamenbtal of subject indexing languages; CAVALCANTI, C.R.: Universal integrated media for information processing; DESAI, A.R.: Theory of integrative levels, general systems theory, theory of classification, theory of wvolution, and theory of pattern recognition (abstract); GOPINATH, M.A. u. S. SEETHARAMA: Interdisciplinary subjects and their classification; IMMROTH, J.P.: A lexical essay toward the developments of the theory of indexes to classification schemes; KOCHEN, M.: Organising knowledge for coping with needs; KURBAKOV, K.I. u. V.G. BOLDOV: Problem of compatibility of information classification systems and some probable methods of its solution; MAIXNER, V.: Classification systems and retrieval languages; MEINCKE, P.P.M. u. P. ATHERTON: Knowledge space: a conceptual basis for the organization of knowledge; NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Absolute syntax and structure of an indexing and switching language; NEILL, S.D. MacLuhan and classification; RICHMOND, P.A. u. N.J. WILLIAMSON: Three dimensional physical models in classification; SVENONIUS, E.: Translation between hierarchical structures: an exercise in abstract classification; BORKO, H.: Changing roles of and developments in automated classification; DREESE, M.J.: Comparison of document retrieval using UDC - notation given by UDC - expert with catch-words taken from title by clerk, stored in computer memory; GARFIELD, E., MALIN, M.V. u. H. SMALL: A system for automatic classification of scientific literature (abstract); HEAPS, H.S. u. K.V. LEuNG: Automatic document classification based on a theory of relevance; HOYLE, W.G.: A measure of overlap in classification systems; KLESZCZ: Method of information retrieval and subject index compilation for abstracting periodicals with the use of a thesaurus enlarged with machine part classification; SCHNEIDER, J.H.: AUTOCLASS: a computer system for facilitating the creation and updating of hierarchical classifications; JANOS, J.: Information systems with automated indexing based an the analysis of texts; RIGBY, M.: Advances since Elsinore in the use of automated equipment for vocabulary, classification schedule and information or data control on a universal scale; TOMAN, J.: Trend of the future: two ordering system used together? TOMAN, J. u. G.A. Lloyd: Introduction to the Subject-field Reference Code (SRC) or Broad System of Ordering (BSO) for UNISIST purposes; AUSTIN, D.: Differences between library classifications and machine-based subject retrieval systems; some inferences drawn from research in Britain, 1963-1973; JACHOWICZ, R.L.: Application of classification as basis for the formulation of thesaurus; KOFNOVEC, L. u. D. SIMANDL: Quantitative structure of world scientific and technical literature and its use for optimizing general classifications; RAJAN, T.N. u. B. GUHA: A comparative study of subject heading structuring according to POPSI and PRECIS; ROLLING, L.N.: Computer management of multi-lingual thesauri; SOKOLOV, A.V.: Compound indexing languages; VILENSKAYA, S.C.: Systems approach as a principle of thesaurus building on the basis of the subject headings language; WAHLIN, E.: Special classification systems used together with a common reference system; the AR-complex; WERSIG, G.: Experiences in compatibility research in documentary languages; WOLFF-TERROINE, M.: A macrothesaurus. Why? How? SAMUELSON, K.: Information ordering in worldwise communications; SHEPHERD, M. u. C. WATTERS: Hierarchical retrieval from structured text
  20. Reader in classification and descriptive cataloging (1972) 0.02 
    0.015770756 = product of:
  0.03154151 = sum of:
    0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01029941 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
    0.021242103 = product of:
      0.042484205 = sum of:
        0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042484205 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Enthält die u.a. die Beiträge: DEWEY, M.: Catalogs and cataloging; BLISS, H.E.: Principles and definitions; LaMONTAGNE, L.E.: Historical background of classification; RICHARDSON, E.C.: Classification: theoretical and practical; RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Library classification as a discipline; SHARP, J.: Classification; SHERA, J.H. Classification: current functions and applications to the subject analysis of library materials; SAYERS, W.C.B.: The nature and purpose of classification; DEWEY, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index; MILLS, J.: Classification as an indexing device; RICHMOND, P.A.: The future of generalized systems of classification; PAINTER, A.F.: Modern classification theory; VICKERY,: Faceted classification schemes; BORKO, H.: Research in automatic generations of classification systems; FARRADANE, J.: Classification and mechanical selection; RICHMOND, P.A.: Some aspects of basic research in classification; RICHMOND, P.A.: Transformation and organization of information content: aspects of recent research in the art and science of classification; STROUT, R.F.: Development of the catalog and cataloging codes; CUTTER, C.A.: Library catalogs; CUTTER, C.A.: Rules for a dictionary catalog; LUBETSKY, S.: Design for a code; JOLLEY, L.: The function of the catalog; WEBER, D.C.: The changing character of the catalog in America; COOPER, W.S.: The potential usefulness of the catalog access points other than author, title and subject

Authors

Types

  • a 241
  • m 40
  • s 10
  • b 5
  • ? 3
  • d 2
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications