-
Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002)
0.03
0.033393115 = product of:
0.06122071 = sum of:
0.0054389704 = product of:
0.010877941 = sum of:
0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010877941 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046860883 = score(doc=54,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019311246 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.018895645 = weight(_text_:u in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018895645 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.010805541 = product of:
0.021611081 = sum of:
0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021611081 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.54545456 = coord(6/11)
- Abstract
- Extensive literatures exist on information searching theory and techniques, as well as on the Bradford Distribution. This distribution, also known as "Bradford's Law of Scattering," tells us that information on a subject is dispersed in a characteristic and robust pattern that appears consistently across many different environments. This pattern may be expected to have important implications for information searching theory and techniques. Yet these two research literatures are rarely considered in relation to each other. It is the purpose of this article to distinguish three Bradford regions and speculate on the optimum searching techniques for each region. In the process, browsing, directed searching in databases, and the pursuit of various forms of links will all be considered. Implications of growth in size of a literature for optimal information organization and searching will also be addressed.
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
- Pages
- S.137-150
- Source
- Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? (1990)
0.02
0.01696139 = product of:
0.062191762 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055552567 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
0.05038839 = weight(_text_:u in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05038839 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.57884544 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.575-591
- Theme
- Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006)
0.01
0.0068539637 = product of:
0.0251312 = sum of:
0.003865826 = weight(_text_:a in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003865826 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00343714 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.017828234 = product of:
0.035656467 = sum of:
0.035656467 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035656467 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Content
- Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:15:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.8, S.1033-1045
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students (1996)
0.01
0.005538839 = product of:
0.020309076 = sum of:
0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031240587 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
0.014407388 = product of:
0.028814776 = sum of:
0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028814776 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Date
- 14. 4.1997 20:22:55
- Source
- Library trends. 45(1996) no.2, S.155-164
- Type
- a
-
Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013)
0.00
0.003994284 = product of:
0.014645709 = sum of:
0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039050733 = score(doc=1003,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.009004618 = product of:
0.018009236 = sum of:
0.018009236 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018009236 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1590-1607
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986)
0.00
0.002289546 = product of:
0.012592502 = sum of:
0.007731652 = weight(_text_:a in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007731652 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048608496 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.357-367
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment (1989)
0.00
0.002146068 = product of:
0.011803374 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055552567 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 33(1989), S.400-412
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: System meets user : problems in matching subject search terms (1977)
0.00
0.002146068 = product of:
0.011803374 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055552567 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 13(1977), S.367-375
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Factors affecting subject catalog search success (1977)
0.00
0.002146068 = product of:
0.011803374 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055552567 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 28(1977), S.161-169
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use information search tactics online (1987)
0.00
0.002146068 = product of:
0.011803374 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055552567 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Online. 11(1987), S.47-54
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Search techniques (1981)
0.00
0.002146068 = product of:
0.011803374 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055552567 = score(doc=288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 16(1981), S.139-170
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The design of browsing and berrypicking : techniques for the online search interface (1989)
0.00
0.0018778095 = product of:
0.010327952 = sum of:
0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005467103 = score(doc=2228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048608496 = score(doc=2228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Online review. 13(1989) no.5, S.407-424
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Document familiarity, relevance, and Bradford's law : the Getty Online Searching Project report; no.5 (1996)
0.00
0.0017751341 = product of:
0.009763237 = sum of:
0.0069856085 = weight(_text_:a in 6978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0069856085 = score(doc=6978,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 6978, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6978)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 6978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=6978,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6978, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6978)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- The Getty Online Searching Project studied the end user searching behaviour of 27 humanities scholars over a 2 year period. A number of scholars anticipated that they were already familiar with a percentage of records their searches retrieved. High document familiarity can be a significant factor in searching: Draws implications regarding the impact of high document familiarity on relevance and information retrieval theory. Makes speculations regarding high document familiarity and Bradford's law
- Source
- Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.6, S.697-707
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Information science at the University of California at Berkeley in the 1960s : a memoir of student days (2004)
0.00
0.0016410447 = product of:
0.009025746 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 7246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=7246,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7246, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7246)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 7246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=7246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 7246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7246)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- The author's experiences as a master's and doctoral student at the University of California at Berkeley School of Library and Information Studies during a formative period in the history of information science, 1966-71, are described. The relationship between documentation and information science as experienced in that program is discussed, as well as the various influences, both social and intellectual, that shaped the author's understanding of information science at that time.
- Source
- Library trends. 52(2004) no.4, S.683-701
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬A tour of information science through the pages of JASIS (1999)
0.00
0.0016353898 = product of:
0.008994644 = sum of:
0.0055226083 = weight(_text_:a in 4316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055226083 = score(doc=4316,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4316, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4316)
0.0034720355 = weight(_text_:s in 4316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034720355 = score(doc=4316,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4316, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4316)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.11, S.975-993
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬An explanatory paradigm for online information retrieval (1986)
0.00
0.001609551 = product of:
0.00885253 = sum of:
0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046860883 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041664424 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Pages
- S.91-99
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2020)
0.00
0.001609551 = product of:
0.00885253 = sum of:
0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046860883 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041664424 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.5, S.616
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Hjoerland's critique of Bates' work on defining information (2008)
0.00
0.0015705386 = product of:
0.008637962 = sum of:
0.0051659266 = weight(_text_:a in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0051659266 = score(doc=4773,freq=14.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
0.0034720355 = weight(_text_:s in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034720355 = score(doc=4773,freq=8.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- In a recent article, Birger Hjørland (2007) critiqued the author's efforts in defining and conceptualizing information as a core concept in information science (Bates, 2005, 2006). It is argued that Hjørland has seriously misrepresented and confused the actual line of argument in those articles. Specifics of that case are presented, and the reader is urged to return to the original Bates articles to understand her claims. In those articles, Bates attempted to develop a broad conception of information, as well as a number of subtypes of information, for use in the field of information science. The development of information was related to evolutionary processes, with emergence as a significant theme.
- Content
- Bezugnahme auf: Hjoerland, B.: Information: Objective or subjective/situational? In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2007) no.10, S.1448-1456. - Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643. Vgl. auch: Bates, M.J.: Birger Hjørland's Manichean misconstruction of Marcia Bates' work. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.2038-2044.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.5, S.842-844
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
0.0015532422 = product of:
0.008542832 = sum of:
0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006112407 = score(doc=2883,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=2883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
- Pages
- S. -
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
0.0015532422 = product of:
0.008542832 = sum of:
0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006112407 = score(doc=207,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=207,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
- Source
- Online. 11(1988), S.45-56
- Type
- a
