-
Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999)
0.05
0.045886163 = product of:
0.10706771 = sum of:
0.057740733 = weight(_text_:g in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057740733 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.043885246 = weight(_text_:u in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043885246 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.0054417336 = weight(_text_:a in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054417336 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Footnote
- Zuerst publiziert in: Kommunikation statt Markt: Zu einer alternativen Theorie der Informationsgesellschaft. Hrsg.: J. Becker u. W. Göhring. Sankt Augustin: GMD. (GMD Report; 61) S.27-38.
- Type
- a
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.03
0.028501425 = product of:
0.06650332 = sum of:
0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040418513 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.008517661 = weight(_text_:a in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008517661 = score(doc=5269,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.017567152 = product of:
0.035134304 = sum of:
0.035134304 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035134304 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This comparative case study of the diffusion and nondiffusion over time of eight theories in the social sciences uses citation analysis, citation context analysis, content analysis, surveys of editorial review boards, and personal interviews with theorists to develop a model of the theory functions that facilitate theory diffusion throughout specific intellectual communities. Unlike previous work on the diffusion of theories as innovations, this theory functions model differs in several important respects from the findings of previous studies that employed Everett Rogers's classic typology of innovation characteristics that promote diffusion. The model is also presented as a contribution to a more integrated theory of citation.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
- Type
- a
-
Daquino, M.; Peroni, S.; Shotton, D.; Colavizza, G.; Ghavimi, B.; Lauscher, A.; Mayr, P.; Romanello, M.; Zumstein, P.: ¬The OpenCitations Data Model (2020)
0.03
0.027597647 = product of:
0.06439451 = sum of:
0.022449218 = product of:
0.044898435 = sum of:
0.044898435 = weight(_text_:p in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044898435 = score(doc=38,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03464444 = score(doc=38,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
0.007300853 = weight(_text_:a in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007300853 = score(doc=38,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- A variety of schemas and ontologies are currently used for the machine-readable description of bibliographic entities and citations. This diversity, and the reuse of the same ontology terms with different nuances, generates inconsistencies in data. Adoption of a single data model would facilitate data integration tasks regardless of the data supplier or context application. In this paper we present the OpenCitations Data Model (OCDM), a generic data model for describing bibliographic entities and citations, developed using Semantic Web technologies. We also evaluate the effective reusability of OCDM according to ontology evaluation practices, mention existing users of OCDM, and discuss the use and impact of OCDM in the wider open science community.
- Type
- a
-
Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis : a study (2006)
0.03
0.025275255 = product of:
0.058975592 = sum of:
0.028870367 = weight(_text_:g in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028870367 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
0.021942623 = weight(_text_:u in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021942623 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
0.008162601 = weight(_text_:a in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008162601 = score(doc=225,freq=18.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Citation-chasing is proposed as a method of discovering additional terms to enhance subjectsearch retrieval. Subjects attached to OCLC records for cited works are compared to those attached to original citing sources. Citing sources were produced via a subject-list search in a library catalog using the LCSH "Language and languages-Origin." A subject-search was employed to avoid subjectivity in choosing sources. References from the sources were searched in OCLC where applicable, and the subject headings were retrieved. The subjects were ranked by citation-frequency and tiered into 3 groups in a Bradford-like distribution. Highly cited subjects were produced that were not revealed through the original search. A difference in relative importance among the subjects was also revealed. Broad extra-linguistic topics like evolution are more prominent than specific linguistic topics like phonology. There are exceptions, which appear somewhat predictable by the amount of imbalance in citation-representation among the 2 sources. Citation leaders were also produced for authors and secondary-source titles.
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
- Type
- a
-
Safder, I.; Ali, M.; Aljohani, N.R.; Nawaz, R.; Hassan, S.-U.: Neural machine translation for in-text citation classification (2023)
0.02
0.024384443 = product of:
0.056897033 = sum of:
0.028870367 = weight(_text_:g in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028870367 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
0.021942623 = weight(_text_:u in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021942623 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
0.0060840435 = weight(_text_:a in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060840435 = score(doc=1053,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The quality of scientific publications can be measured by quantitative indices such as the h-index, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, or g-index. However, these measures lack to explain the function or reasons for citations and the context of citations from citing publication to cited publication. We argue that citation context may be considered while calculating the impact of research work. However, mining citation context from unstructured full-text publications is a challenging task. In this paper, we compiled a data set comprising 9,518 citations context. We developed a deep learning-based architecture for citation context classification. Unlike feature-based state-of-the-art models, our proposed focal-loss and class-weight-aware BiLSTM model with pretrained GloVe embedding vectors use citation context as input to outperform them in multiclass citation context classification tasks. Our model improves on the baseline state-of-the-art by achieving an F1 score of 0.80 with an accuracy of 0.81 for citation context classification. Moreover, we delve into the effects of using different word embeddings on the performance of the classification model and draw a comparison between fastText, GloVe, and spaCy pretrained word embeddings.
- Type
- a
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.02
0.023724519 = product of:
0.05535721 = sum of:
0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03464444 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.005655216 = weight(_text_:a in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005655216 = score(doc=1521,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.015057558 = product of:
0.030115116 = sum of:
0.030115116 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030115116 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Traditional citation analysis has been widely applied to detect patterns of scientific collaboration, map the landscapes of scholarly disciplines, assess the impact of research outputs, and observe knowledge transfer across domains. It is, however, limited, as it assumes all citations are of similar value and weights each equally. Content-based citation analysis (CCA) addresses a citation's value by interpreting each one based on its context at both the syntactic and semantic levels. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of CAA research in terms of its theoretical foundations, methodical approaches, and example applications. In addition, we highlight how increased computational capabilities and publicly available full-text resources have opened this area of research to vast possibilities, which enable deeper citation analysis, more accurate citation prediction, and increased knowledge discovery.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
- Type
- a
-
Malanga, G.: Classifying and screening journal literature with citation data (1982)
0.02
0.018052135 = product of:
0.063182466 = sum of:
0.057740733 = weight(_text_:g in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057740733 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
0.0054417336 = weight(_text_:a in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054417336 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Type
- a
-
Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980)
0.02
0.016912106 = product of:
0.05919237 = sum of:
0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05266229 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006530081 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
- Type
- a
-
Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980)
0.02
0.016912106 = product of:
0.05919237 = sum of:
0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05266229 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006530081 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
- Type
- a
-
Vinkler, P.: ¬A quasi-quantitative citation model (1987)
0.02
0.01561254 = product of:
0.054643888 = sum of:
0.04233065 = product of:
0.0846613 = sum of:
0.0846613 = weight(_text_:p in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0846613 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.012313238 = weight(_text_:a in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012313238 = score(doc=2299,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Type
- a
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.01
0.014956917 = product of:
0.052349206 = sum of:
0.046192586 = weight(_text_:g in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046192586 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.006156619 = weight(_text_:a in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006156619 = score(doc=1064,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Type
- a
-
Moravcsik, M.J.; Murugesan, P.: Some results on the function and quality of citations (1975)
0.01
0.014582122 = product of:
0.051037423 = sum of:
0.04233065 = product of:
0.0846613 = sum of:
0.0846613 = weight(_text_:p in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0846613 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008706774 = weight(_text_:a in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008706774 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Type
- a
-
Thelwall, M.; Harries, G.: ¬The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its Web pages : an investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university (2003)
0.01
0.014214042 = product of:
0.049749143 = sum of:
0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040418513 = score(doc=1676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
0.009330629 = weight(_text_:a in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009330629 = score(doc=1676,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Results from recent advances in link metrics have demonstrated that the hyperlink structure of national university systems can be strongly related to the research productivity of the individual institutions. This paper uses a page categorization to show that restricting the metrics to subsets more closely related to the research of the host university can produce even stronger associations. A partial overlap was also found between the effects of applying advanced document models and separating page types, but the best results were achieved through a combination of the two.
- Type
- a
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.0139600765 = product of:
0.048860267 = sum of:
0.008706774 = weight(_text_:a in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008706774 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.040153492 = product of:
0.080306984 = sum of:
0.080306984 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080306984 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Type
- a
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.01
0.0139600765 = product of:
0.048860267 = sum of:
0.008706774 = weight(_text_:a in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008706774 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.040153492 = product of:
0.080306984 = sum of:
0.080306984 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080306984 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
- Type
- a
-
Morris, S.A.; Yen, G.; Wu, Z.; Asnake, B.: Time line visualization of research fronts (2003)
0.01
0.013433219 = product of:
0.047016263 = sum of:
0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040418513 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
0.0065977518 = weight(_text_:a in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065977518 = score(doc=1452,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Research fronts, defined as clusters of documents that tend to cite a fixed, time invariant set of base documents, are plotted as time lines for visualization and exploration. Using a set of documents related to the subject of anthrax research, this article illustrates the construction, exploration, and interpretation of time lines for the purpose of identifying and visualizing temporal changes in research activity through journal articles. Such information is useful for presentation to meinbers of expert panels used for technology forecasting.
- Type
- a
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.01
0.012696078 = product of:
0.02962418 = sum of:
0.013228328 = product of:
0.026456656 = sum of:
0.026456656 = weight(_text_:p in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026456656 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.003847887 = weight(_text_:a in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003847887 = score(doc=1934,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.012547966 = product of:
0.025095932 = sum of:
0.025095932 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025095932 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Um sich einer Antwort auf die Frage anzunähern, welche Bedeutung der Nachlass eines Wissenschaftlers wie jener Paul F. Lazarsfelds (mit zahlreichen noch unveröffentlichten Schriften) für die aktuelle Forschung haben könne, kann untersucht werden, wie häufig dieser Wissenschaftler zitiert wird. Wenn ein Autor zitiert wird, wird er auch genutzt. Wird er über einen langen Zeitraum oft genutzt, ist vermutlich auch die Auseinandersetzung mit seinem Nachlass von Nutzen. Außerdem kann aufgrund der Zitierungen festgestellt werden, was aus dem Lebenswerk eines Wissenschaftlers für die aktuelle Forschung relevant erscheint. Daraus können die vordringlichen Fragestellungen in der Bearbeitung des Nachlasses abgeleitet werden. Die Aufgabe für die folgende Untersuchung lautete daher: Wie oft wird Paul F. Lazarsfeld zitiert? Dabei interessierte auch: Wer zitiert wo? Die Untersuchung wurde mit Hilfe der Meta-Datenbank "ISI Web of Knowledge" durchgeführt. In dieser wurde im "Web of Science" mit dem Werkzeug "Cited Reference Search" nach dem zitierten Autor (Cited Author) "Lazarsfeld P*" gesucht. Diese Suche ergab 1535 Referenzen (References). Werden alle Referenzen gewählt, führt dies zu 4839 Ergebnissen (Results). Dabei wurden die Datenbanken SCI-Expanded, SSCI und A&HCI verwendet. Bei dieser Suche wurden die Publikationsjahre 1941-2008 analysiert. Vor 1956 wurden allerdings nur sehr wenige Zitate gefunden: 1946 fünf, ansonsten maximal drei, 1942-1944 und 1949 überhaupt keines. Zudem ist das Jahr 2008 noch lange nicht zu Ende. (Es gab jedoch schon vor Ende März 24 Zitate!)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
- Type
- a
-
Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Milojevic, S.: Citation content analysis (CCA) : a framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content (2013)
0.01
0.01198437 = product of:
0.041945294 = sum of:
0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03464444 = score(doc=975,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 975, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=975)
0.007300853 = weight(_text_:a in 975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007300853 = score(doc=975,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 975, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=975)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This study proposes a new framework for citation content analysis (CCA), for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content that can be used to better analyze the rich sociocultural context of research behavior. This framework could be considered the next generation of citation analysis. The authors briefly review the history and features of content analysis in traditional social sciences and its previous application in library and information science (LIS). Based on critical discussion of the theoretical necessity of a new method as well as the limits of citation analysis, the nature and purposes of CCA are discussed, and potential procedures to conduct CCA, including principles to identify the reference scope, a two-dimensional (citing and cited) and two-module (syntactic and semantic) codebook, are provided and described. Future work and implications are also suggested.
- Type
- a
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.011695069 = product of:
0.04093274 = sum of:
0.0054417336 = weight(_text_:a in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054417336 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.03549101 = product of:
0.07098202 = sum of:
0.07098202 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07098202 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Type
- a
-
Korwitz, U.: Welchen 'Rang' hat ein Wissenschaftler? (1995)
0.01
0.011274738 = product of:
0.039461583 = sum of:
0.035108197 = weight(_text_:u in 2318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035108197 = score(doc=2318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2318)
0.004353387 = weight(_text_:a in 2318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004353387 = score(doc=2318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2318)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Type
- a
