Search (109 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985) 0.02
    0.018696144 = product of:
      0.065436505 = sum of:
        0.057740733 = weight(_text_:g in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057740733 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
        0.007695774 = weight(_text_:a in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007695774 = score(doc=1345,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
    Type
    a
  2. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.02
    0.018696144 = product of:
      0.065436505 = sum of:
        0.057740733 = weight(_text_:g in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057740733 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
        0.007695774 = weight(_text_:a in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007695774 = score(doc=1356,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
    Type
    a
  3. Stegentritt, E.: EMIR: Multilinguales Freitextretrieval Projekt (1992) 0.02
    0.01768492 = product of:
      0.06189722 = sum of:
        0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05266229 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
        0.0092349285 = weight(_text_:a in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0092349285 = score(doc=3149,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
    Type
    a
  4. Meunier, J.-G.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lebel, H.: ¬A call for enhanced representation of content as a means of improving online full-text retrieval (1987) 0.01
    0.014214042 = product of:
      0.049749143 = sum of:
        0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 2049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040418513 = score(doc=2049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 2049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2049)
        0.009330629 = weight(_text_:a in 2049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009330629 = score(doc=2049,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2049, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2049)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Given the phenomena of growth and diversification which affect both text databases and their users, it is essential to reflect on the nature of textual information and its representation within the very particular framework of interactive retrieval systems. The latter aim to correlate two types of conceptual structures, that of the user and that of the text, by way of a third structure - the interface. A typology of levels, of representation is proposed (typographical, lexical, statistical, linguistic, semiotic, and pragmatic). These representations, obtained by means of a multiplicity of strategies (intra-sentence, intratextual, intertextual) applied to different units of information and interrelated, render the interaction between diverse users and the database more flexible and more adaptable
    Type
    a
  5. Markey, K.; Atherton, P.; Newton, C.: ¬An analysis of controlled vocabulary and free text search statements in online searches (1980) 0.01
    0.012759356 = product of:
      0.044657744 = sum of:
        0.037039317 = product of:
          0.074078634 = sum of:
            0.074078634 = weight(_text_:p in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074078634 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076184273 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Kirkbride, P.: Full text, free text, and controlled vocabulary : strategic search planning (1991) 0.01
    0.012759356 = product of:
      0.044657744 = sum of:
        0.037039317 = product of:
          0.074078634 = sum of:
            0.074078634 = weight(_text_:p in 2941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074078634 = score(doc=2941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 2941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 2941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076184273 = score(doc=2941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2941)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Böhle, K.; Riehm, U.: German fulltexts in working contexts : empirical findings on how end-users make use of fulltext databases (1989) 0.01
    0.012185282 = product of:
      0.042648487 = sum of:
        0.035108197 = weight(_text_:u in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035108197 = score(doc=2877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
        0.007540288 = weight(_text_:a in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007540288 = score(doc=2877,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the result of a brief review of West German full text data bases and a user survey of over 40 users in the fields of medicine, law and economics. Questions common assumptions about the advantages and disadvantages of full text data bases.
    Type
    a
  8. Silva, E.M. da: Comparing the use of full text search between a conventional IR System and a DBMS (2018) 0.01
    0.012185282 = product of:
      0.042648487 = sum of:
        0.035108197 = weight(_text_:u in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035108197 = score(doc=4719,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
        0.007540288 = weight(_text_:a in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007540288 = score(doc=4719,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  9. Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986) 0.01
    0.011514188 = product of:
      0.040299654 = sum of:
        0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03464444 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.005655216 = weight(_text_:a in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005655216 = score(doc=2047,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Recently, a detailed evaluation of a large, operational full-text document retrieval system was reported in the literature. Values of precision and recall were estimated usind traditional statistical sampling methods and blind evaluation procedures. The results of this evaluation demonstrated that the system tested was retrieving less then 20% of the relevant documents when the searchers believed it was retrieving over 75% of the relevant documents. This evaluation is described including some data not reported in the original article. Also discussed are the implications which this study has for how the subjects of documents should be represented, as well as the importance of rigorous retrieval evaluations for the furtherhance of information retrieval research
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: An evaluation ... Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299; Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.648-656; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
    Type
    a
  10. Magennis, M.: Expert rule-based query expansion (1995) 0.01
    0.010662122 = product of:
      0.037317425 = sum of:
        0.030719671 = weight(_text_:u in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030719671 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
        0.0065977518 = weight(_text_:a in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0065977518 = score(doc=5181,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Examines how, for term based free text retrieval, Interactive Query Expansion (IQE) provides better retrieval performance tahn Automatic Query Expansion (AQE) but the performance of IQE depends on the strategy employed by the user to select expansion terms. The aim is to build an expert query expansion system using term selection rules based on expert users' strategies. It is expected that such a system will achieve better performance for novice or inexperienced users that either AQE or IQE. The procedure is to discover expert IQE users' term selection strategies through observation and interrogation, to construct a rule based query expansion (RQE) system based on these and to compare the resulting retrieval performance with that of comparable AQE and IQE systems
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  11. Mallinson, P.: Developments in free text retrieval systems (1993) 0.01
    0.009757837 = product of:
      0.03415243 = sum of:
        0.026456656 = product of:
          0.052913312 = sum of:
            0.052913312 = weight(_text_:p in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052913312 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007695774 = weight(_text_:a in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007695774 = score(doc=4931,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a typical traditional 1989 free text system and discusses developments in data storage, in search strategy and in the storage and retrieval of real time data. Outlines the following areas in which free text systems are likely to develop: standards; integration; dynamic data exchange; improved user interfaces; and better retrieval methods
    Type
    a
  12. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.008223863 = product of:
      0.028783519 = sum of:
        0.008706774 = weight(_text_:a in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008706774 = score(doc=7701,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.020076746 = product of:
          0.040153492 = sum of:
            0.040153492 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040153492 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
    Type
    a
  13. Rösener, C.: ¬Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen : Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Volltextdatenbanken (2005) 0.01
    0.0072208536 = product of:
      0.025272986 = sum of:
        0.023096293 = weight(_text_:g in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023096293 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.165991 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
        0.0021766934 = weight(_text_:a in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0021766934 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    5: Interaktion 5.1 Frage-Antwort- bzw. Dialogsysteme: Forschungen und Projekte 5.2 Darstellung und Visualisierung von Wissen 5.3 Das Dialogsystem im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 5.4 Ergebnisdarstellung und Antwortpräsentation im LeWi-Kontext 6: Testumgebungen und -ergebnisse 7: Ergebnisse und Ausblick 7.1 Ausgangssituation 7.2 Schlussfolgerungen 7.3 Ausblick Anhang A Auszüge aus der Grob- bzw. Feinklassifikation des BMM Anhang B MPRO - Formale Beschreibung der wichtigsten Merkmale ... Anhang C Fragentypologie mit Beispielsätzen (Auszug) Anhang D Semantische Merkmale im morphologischen Lexikon (Auszug) Anhang E Regelbeispiele für die Fragentypzuweisung Anhang F Aufstellung der möglichen Suchen im LeWi-Dialogmodul (Auszug) Anhang G Vollständiger Dialogbaum zu Beginn des Projektes Anhang H Statuszustände zur Ermittlung der Folgefragen (Auszug)
  14. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.01
    0.0069800382 = product of:
      0.024430133 = sum of:
        0.004353387 = weight(_text_:a in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004353387 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
        0.020076746 = product of:
          0.040153492 = sum of:
            0.040153492 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040153492 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
    Type
    a
  15. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.01
    0.0069800382 = product of:
      0.024430133 = sum of:
        0.004353387 = weight(_text_:a in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004353387 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
        0.020076746 = product of:
          0.040153492 = sum of:
            0.040153492 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040153492 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
    Type
    a
  16. Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002) 0.01
    0.0069800382 = product of:
      0.024430133 = sum of:
        0.004353387 = weight(_text_:a in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004353387 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
        0.020076746 = product of:
          0.040153492 = sum of:
            0.040153492 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040153492 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197
    Type
    a
  17. Muddamalle, M.R.: Natural language versus controlled vocabulary in information retrieval : a case study in soil mechanics (1998) 0.01
    0.006820479 = product of:
      0.023871675 = sum of:
        0.015873993 = product of:
          0.031747986 = sum of:
            0.031747986 = weight(_text_:p in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031747986 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007997682 = weight(_text_:a in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007997682 = score(doc=1795,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The effectiveness ot two information retrieval tools, namely, thesaurus and natural language, in an information retrieval system has been studies. A database SOILSC was created using a HP3000/58 series minicomputer and MINISIS software. Records of articles totalling 17.918 published in various journals, received in the Central Water and Power Research Station (CWPRS) library (Pune, India) since 1988, have been stored. The information needs of a soil mechanics group have been formulated using thesaurus and natural language into 81 search strategies. In consultation with the user, relevance of the retrieved documents was assessed and, recall (R) and precision (P) values were calculated. Since both thesaurus and natural language have shown identical performance in information retrieval, a combination of these two have been suggested for making searches and providing relevant information
    Type
    a
  18. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.01
    0.006582444 = product of:
      0.023038553 = sum of:
        0.013228328 = product of:
          0.026456656 = sum of:
            0.026456656 = weight(_text_:p in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026456656 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009810225 = weight(_text_:a in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009810225 = score(doc=4214,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.22966442 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
    Type
    a
  19. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017) 0.01
    0.006357835 = product of:
      0.022252422 = sum of:
        0.013228328 = product of:
          0.026456656 = sum of:
            0.026456656 = weight(_text_:p in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026456656 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009024095 = weight(_text_:a in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009024095 = score(doc=3868,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.
    Type
    a
  20. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2018) 0.01
    0.0061116945 = product of:
      0.02139093 = sum of:
        0.013228328 = product of:
          0.026456656 = sum of:
            0.026456656 = weight(_text_:p in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026456656 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008162601 = weight(_text_:a in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008162601 = score(doc=4300,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This article reports on an investigation of the search value that subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by professional indexers add to a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI). First, a similar methodology to that developed by Gross et al. (2015) was applied, with keyword searches representing a range of educational topics run on the AEI database with and without its subject indexing. The results indicated that AEI users would also lose, on average, about a quarter of hits per query. Second, an alternative research design was applied in which an experienced literature searcher was asked to find resources on a set of educational topics on an AEI database stripped of its subject indexing and then asked to search for additional resources on the same topics after the subject indexing had been reinserted. In this study, the proportion of additional resources that would have been lost had it not been for the subject indexing was again found to be about a quarter of the total resources found for each topic, on average.
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 106
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…