Search (215 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Inhaltsbezogene Suche von Bildern und Videosequenzen in digitalen multimedialen Archiven : Beiträge eines Workshops der KI'98 am 16./17.9.1998 in Bremen (1998) 0.06
    0.060680896 = product of:
      0.10619156 = sum of:
        0.018519659 = product of:
          0.037039317 = sum of:
            0.037039317 = weight(_text_:p in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037039317 = score(doc=10,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040418513 = score(doc=10,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
        0.043444175 = weight(_text_:u in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043444175 = score(doc=10,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.35814235 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
        0.0038092136 = weight(_text_:a in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0038092136 = score(doc=10,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    Enthält die Fachbeiträge eines Workshops zum Thema "Inhaltsbezogene Suche von Bildern und Videosequenzen in digitalen multimedialen Archiven", der am 16. u. 17.9.1998 im Rahmen der Tagung KI'98 an der Universität Bremen stattfand
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SPECHT, G.: Architekturen von Multimedia-Datenbanksystemen zur Speicherung von Bildern und Videos; MALSY, M. u.a.: Unterstützung des strutkturierten Zugriffs auf MPEG Videos in einem Multimedia-Datenbankmanagementsystem; ARLT, B. u. R.W. BRAUSE: Image encoding by independent principal components; DITTMANN, J. u.a.: Objektverfolgung und Szenenerkennung in Video auf Basis von Kantendetektion; THOMAS, P.: Verteilte digitale Medienarchivsysteme für kooperative Fernsehproduktion; DAMMEYER, A. u.a.: Videoanalyse mit DiVA
  2. ¬The economics of the information society (1997) 0.05
    0.053121116 = product of:
      0.12394927 = sum of:
        0.046192586 = weight(_text_:g in 392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046192586 = score(doc=392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.331982 = fieldWeight in 392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=392)
        0.070216395 = weight(_text_:u in 392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070216395 = score(doc=392,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.57884544 = fieldWeight in 392, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=392)
        0.007540288 = weight(_text_:a in 392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007540288 = score(doc=392,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 392, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=392)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: FENOULHET, T.R.: The regulatory dynamics of the information society; FORAY, D. u. R. COWAN: The economics and codification and the diffusion of knowledge in the information age; HULTEN, C.R.: The macro policy environment of information society investments; FERNÉ, G.: Information infrastructures and employment case studies; MINGES, M. u. T. KELLY: The economic impact of the information society; DRYDEN, J.: Policy implications of the development and impacts of information society; DUMORT, A. u. T. FENOULHET: Towards a policy framework for the knowledge-based economy
    Editor
    Dumort, A. u. J. Dryden
  3. Montasser-Kohsari, G.; Kirstein, P.; Goudal, P.: Online access to multimedia documents : second phase (1995) 0.03
    0.032197252 = product of:
      0.07512692 = sum of:
        0.026190752 = product of:
          0.052381504 = sum of:
            0.052381504 = weight(_text_:p in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052381504 = score(doc=2428,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.3932592 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040418513 = score(doc=2428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
        0.008517661 = weight(_text_:a in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008517661 = score(doc=2428,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Final report of a British Library supported conducted at University College, London, computer science department, the aim of which was to build a demonstration and test bed facility for online access to a large electronic library of multimedia documents. The project was a pilot experiment in the use of a database of compound documents (text and images) in the Open Document Architecture format. The database used is part of the contents of information in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Discusses the overall view of the project with particular reference to the WAIS information retrieval server which was developed and used
  4. Philip, G.; Hazlett, S.-A.: Service quality of industrial information services (1996) 0.03
    0.03085556 = product of:
      0.07199631 = sum of:
        0.026190752 = product of:
          0.052381504 = sum of:
            0.052381504 = weight(_text_:p in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052381504 = score(doc=654,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.3932592 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040418513 = score(doc=654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
        0.005387042 = weight(_text_:a in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005387042 = score(doc=654,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on an empirical investigation to measure the quality of the information services that are available to the commercial and industrial sectors in Northern Ireland. Examines the quality management practices of the business information providers and evaluates the quality of information and support as perceived by the business community. Develops and tests a new general survey instrument (P-C-P), as an alternative to SERVQUAL, that hat the ability to measure the quality gap that exists between the customers' expectations of these information services and their perceptions of the actual service that is received
  5. Wätjen, H.-J.; Diekmann, B.; Möller, G.; Carstensen, K.-U.: Bericht zum DFG-Projekt: GERHARD : German Harvest Automated Retrieval and Directory (1998) 0.03
    0.029035995 = product of:
      0.10162598 = sum of:
        0.057740733 = weight(_text_:g in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057740733 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
        0.043885246 = weight(_text_:u in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043885246 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  6. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.03
    0.028401142 = product of:
      0.09940399 = sum of:
        0.06928888 = weight(_text_:g in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06928888 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
        0.030115116 = product of:
          0.060230233 = sum of:
            0.060230233 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060230233 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  7. Burkart, M.; Wersig, G.: ¬Die Nutzung der DK in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Österreich : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage im Sommer 1981 im Auftrag der Gesellschaft für Information und Dokumentation (1982) 0.03
    0.025272988 = product of:
      0.08845545 = sum of:
        0.080837026 = weight(_text_:g in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080837026 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076184273 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Location
    A
  8. Burkart-Sabsoub, M.; Wersig, G.; Blohm, W.: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage im Sommer 1981 : ¬Die Nutzung der DK in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Österreich (1982) 0.03
    0.025272988 = product of:
      0.08845545 = sum of:
        0.080837026 = weight(_text_:g in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080837026 = score(doc=3144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
        0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076184273 = score(doc=3144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Location
    A
  9. Goldsmith, G.; Williams, P.W.: Online searching made simple : a microcomputer interface for inexperienced users (1986) 0.03
    0.025272988 = product of:
      0.08845545 = sum of:
        0.080837026 = weight(_text_:g in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080837026 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
        0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076184273 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  10. Montasser-Kohsari, G.; Kirstein, P.; Golds, D.: Online access to multimedia documents (1994) 0.02
    0.024449361 = product of:
      0.05704851 = sum of:
        0.015873993 = product of:
          0.031747986 = sum of:
            0.031747986 = weight(_text_:p in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031747986 = score(doc=1094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03464444 = score(doc=1094,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
        0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006530081 = score(doc=1094,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the project C-ODAI, undertaken at University College London, Computer Science Department, the aim of which was to build a demonstration and test bed facility for online access to a large electronic library of multimedia documents. The project was a pilot experiment in the use of a database of compound documents (text and images) in the Open Document Architecture (ODA) format. The database used is part of the contents of the periodicals of the American Chemical Society (ACS). Discusses the overall view of the project and the tools which have been implemented to deal with juke box storage and conversion of different data, and early results of user tests. The project forms part of the ACS/PODA project, funded jointly by the CEC under the ESPRIT PODA-SAX project, and by the British Library Research and Development Department
  11. Doyle, L.B.: Indexing and abstracting by association : Part 1 (1962) 0.02
    0.024117224 = product of:
      0.08441028 = sum of:
        0.031747986 = product of:
          0.06349597 = sum of:
            0.06349597 = weight(_text_:p in 1927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06349597 = score(doc=1927,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 1927, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1927)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 1927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05266229 = score(doc=1927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1927)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.25-38
  12. Landry, P.; Zumer, M.; Clavel-Merrin, G.: Report on cross-language subject access options (2006) 0.02
    0.02362967 = product of:
      0.055135895 = sum of:
        0.015873993 = product of:
          0.031747986 = sum of:
            0.031747986 = weight(_text_:p in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031747986 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03464444 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
        0.0046174643 = weight(_text_:a in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046174643 = score(doc=2433,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This report presents the results of desk-top based study of projects and initiatives in the area of linking and mapping subject tools. While its goal is to provide areas of further study for cross-language subject access in the European Library, and specifically the national libraries of the Ten New Member States, it is not restricted to cross-language mappings since some of the tools used to create links across thesauri or subject headings in the same language may also be appropriate for cross-language mapping. Tools reviewed have been selected to represent a variety of approaches (e.g. subject heading to subject heading, thesaurus to thesaurus, classification to subject heading) reflecting the variety of subject access tools in use in the European Library. The results show that there is no single solution that would be appropriate for all libraries but that parts of several initiatives may be applicable on a technical, organisational or content level.
  13. Empfehlungen für Planung und Einrichtung von Terminologiedatenbanken (1994) 0.02
    0.023228796 = product of:
      0.08130078 = sum of:
        0.046192586 = weight(_text_:g in 8810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046192586 = score(doc=8810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.331982 = fieldWeight in 8810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8810)
        0.035108197 = weight(_text_:u in 8810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035108197 = score(doc=8810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 8810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8810)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Editor
    Schmitz, K.-D., G. Budin u. C. Galinski
  14. Sacherschließung : Zentrale Dienstleistungen und Nutzung von Fremdleistungen. Kolloquium des Dbi am 13.-14.2.1984 in Königstein (o.J.) 0.02
    0.021521652 = product of:
      0.07532578 = sum of:
        0.048994634 = weight(_text_:g in 2399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048994634 = score(doc=2399,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.35212007 = fieldWeight in 2399, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2399)
        0.026331145 = weight(_text_:u in 2399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026331145 = score(doc=2399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2399)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    Auf diesem Kolloquium wurde die Entscheidung getroffen, RSWK in der Deutschen Bibliothek für Produktion zentraler Dienstleistungen im Bereich der Sacherschließung (u.a. für die Deutsche Bibliographie) zu nutzen; vgl. den Bericht von C. Müller im Bibliotheksdienst 18(1984) u. H.D. Gebauer: DBI-Kolloquium zur Sacherschließung in: Mitteilungsblatt. Verband der Bibliotheken des Landes NW N.F. 34(1984) S.158-159. - Dieser Band wird von G. Heinrich in ihrem Beitrag in 'Neue Regelwerke zum Schlagwortkatalog' unter Nr.45 als 'im Druck' zitiert mit folgenden Beiträgen: Frankenberger, R.: Kooperative verbale Sacherschließung nach RSWK im Bayerischen Verbund; Galsterer, B. Stellenwert zentraler Sacherschließung für Öffentliche Bibliotheken; Geisselmann, F.: Aus der Arbeit der UB Augsburg an der Standardschlagwortliste; Junginger, F.: Gibt es eine tragfähige Basis für eine kooperative Sacherschließung?; Kelm, B.: Aus der Arbeit der Deutschen Bibliothek an der Standardschlagwortliste; Maaßen, B,: Die Verknüpfung der Einzelschlagwörter zu Ketten, insbesondere nach dem PRECIS-Kurzregelwerk; Pflug, G.: Die Dienstleistungen der Deutschen Bibliothek im Bereich Sacherschließung; Poll, R.: Kettenbildung nach RSWK; Rothbart, O.-R.: Die Dienstleistungen im Bereich Sacherschließung für Öffentliche Bibliotheken aus der Sicht der ekz. - Nach dem Stand der Erkenntnisse (1992) ist nicht damit zu rechnen, daß dieser Bericht jemals erscheinen wird.
  15. Külper, U.; Will, G.: ¬Das Projekt Bücherschatz : interdisziplinäre und partizipative Entwicklung eines kindgerechten Bibliotheks-Online-Kataloges (1996) 0.02
    0.020325197 = product of:
      0.07113819 = sum of:
        0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040418513 = score(doc=4725,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
        0.030719671 = weight(_text_:u in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030719671 = score(doc=4725,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  16. Wu, G.; Robinson, B.: SGML support for secure document systems (1994) 0.02
    0.019190311 = product of:
      0.06716609 = sum of:
        0.057740733 = weight(_text_:g in 974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057740733 = score(doc=974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=974)
        0.00942536 = weight(_text_:a in 974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00942536 = score(doc=974,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 974, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=974)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a thorough background to the key issues in document security and a detailed discussion of the Secure SGML Document System (SSDS), involving the use of SGML. Defines a document processing regime, suitable for both military and commercial environments, which allows secure multilevel access to collections of SGML documents
  17. Euzenat, J.; Bach, T.Le; Barrasa, J.; Bouquet, P.; Bo, J.De; Dieng, R.; Ehrig, M.; Hauswirth, M.; Jarrar, M.; Lara, R.; Maynard, D.; Napoli, A.; Stamou, G.; Stuckenschmidt, H.; Shvaiko, P.; Tessaris, S.; Acker, S. Van; Zaihrayeu, I.: State of the art on ontology alignment (2004) 0.02
    0.01911108 = product of:
      0.04459252 = sum of:
        0.014966144 = product of:
          0.029932288 = sum of:
            0.029932288 = weight(_text_:p in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029932288 = score(doc=172,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.023096293 = weight(_text_:g in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023096293 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.165991 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
        0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006530081 = score(doc=172,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    In this document we provide an overall view of the state of the art in ontology alignment. It is organised as a description of the need for ontology alignment, a presentation of the techniques currently in use for ontology alignment and a presentation of existing systems. The state of the art is not restricted to any discipline and consider as some form of ontology alignment the work made on schema matching within the database area for instance. Heterogeneity problems on the semantic web can be solved, for some of them, by aligning heterogeneous ontologies. This is illustrated through a number of use cases of ontology alignment. Aligning ontologies consists of providing the corresponding entities in these ontologies. This process is precisely defined in deliverable D2.2.1. The current deliverable presents the many techniques currently used for implementing this process. These techniques are classified along the many features that can be found in ontologies (labels, structures, instances, semantics). They resort to many different disciplines such as statistics, machine learning or data analysis. The alignment itself is obtained by combining these techniques towards a particular goal (obtaining an alignment with particular features, optimising some criterion). Several combination techniques are also presented. Finally, these techniques have been experimented in various systems for ontology alignment or schema matching. Several such systems are presented briefly in the last section and characterized by the above techniques they rely on. The conclusion is that many techniques are available for achieving ontology alignment and many systems have been developed based on these techniques. However, few comparisons and few integration is actually provided by these implementations. This deliverable serves as a basis for considering further action along these two lines. It provide a first inventory of what should be evaluated and suggests what evaluation criterion can be used.
    Content
    This document is part of a research project funded by the IST Programme of the Commission of the European Communities as project number IST-2004-507482.
  18. Clavel, G.; Dale, P.; Heiner-Freiling, M.; Kunz, M.; Landry, P.; MacEwan, A.; Naudi, M.; Oddy, P.; Saget, A.: CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access : final report (1999) 0.02
    0.018115994 = product of:
      0.04227065 = sum of:
        0.016038496 = product of:
          0.032076992 = sum of:
            0.032076992 = weight(_text_:p in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032076992 = score(doc=6067,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.24082111 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.020209257 = weight(_text_:g in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020209257 = score(doc=6067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.14524212 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
        0.006022896 = weight(_text_:a in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006022896 = score(doc=6067,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.14100032 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This final report defines the problem of multilingual subject access, summarises the work carried out by the CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access from autumn 1997 until February 1999 and its results, identifies and discusses issues to be resolved, and presents a proposal for a prototype to the directors of the institutions concerned. For a summary of results, and the proposal, see 'CoBRA+ working group on multilingual subject access: proposals for discussion, March 18th 1999. This report will be distributed to members of the CENL and posted on the GABRIEL website. Genevieve Clavel has compiled it on the basis of the group's reports, discussions within the group and comments provided by the partners.
    Content
    Backgrund to the study: The question of multilingual access to bibliographic databases affects not only searchers in countries in which several languages are spoken such as Switzerland, but also all those who search material in databases containing material in more than one language, which is the case in the majority of scientific or research databases. he growth of networks means that we can easily access catalogues outside our own immediate circle - in another town, another country, another continent. In doing so we encounter problems concerning not only search interfaces, but also concerning subject access or even author access in another language. In France for example, each document, independently of the language in which it has been written, is indexed using a French-language subject heading language. Thus, in order to search by subject headings for documents written in English or German, held in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, the researcher from abroad has to master the French language. In theory, the indexer should be able to analyse a document and assign headings in his/her native language, while the user should be able to search in his/her native language. The language of the document itself should have no influence on the language of the subject heading language used for indexing nor on the language used for searching. (Practically speaking of course, there are restrictions, since there is a limit to the number of languages in which subject headings languages could be maintained and thus in which the user may search.) In the example below, we are concerned with three languages: German, French and English. If we can imagine a system in which there are equivalents among subject headings in these three languages, the following scenario may be envisaged: a German-speaking indexer will use German-language subject headings to index all the documents received, regardless of the language in which they are written. The user may search for these documents by entering subject headings in German, but also in French or in English, thanks to the equivalents that have been established, in French or in English without the necessity to know the other languages or the structure of the other SHLs. Ideally, this approach should not be confined to one database, but would allow the different databases to be brought together in virtual system: an English-speaking user in London should be able to search the database of the Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt using English-language headings, and retrieving documents which have been indexed using the German subject headings' list.
  19. ¬The future of national bibliography (1997) 0.02
    0.017675173 = product of:
      0.061863102 = sum of:
        0.031747986 = product of:
          0.06349597 = sum of:
            0.06349597 = weight(_text_:p in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06349597 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.030115116 = product of:
          0.060230233 = sum of:
            0.060230233 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060230233 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Select newsletter 1998, no.22, S.8 (P. Robinson)
  20. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.02
    0.01755263 = product of:
      0.040956136 = sum of:
        0.020209257 = weight(_text_:g in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020209257 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.14524212 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
        0.015359836 = weight(_text_:u in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015359836 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
        0.005387042 = weight(_text_:a in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005387042 = score(doc=1800,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 165
  • d 47
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 24
  • m 3
  • s 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…