Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"x"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.01
    0.008237985 = product of:
      0.041189924 = sum of:
        0.041189924 = product of:
          0.1647597 = sum of:
            0.1647597 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1647597 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35178876 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  2. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.01
    0.0065903882 = product of:
      0.03295194 = sum of:
        0.03295194 = product of:
          0.13180776 = sum of:
            0.13180776 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13180776 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35178876 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  3. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.01
    0.0065903882 = product of:
      0.03295194 = sum of:
        0.03295194 = product of:
          0.13180776 = sum of:
            0.13180776 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13180776 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35178876 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  4. Gordon, T.J.; Helmer-Hirschberg, O.: Report on a long-range forecasting study (1964) 0.01
    0.0063604526 = product of:
      0.031802263 = sum of:
        0.031802263 = product of:
          0.063604526 = sum of:
            0.063604526 = weight(_text_:22 in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063604526 = score(doc=4204,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2018 13:24:08
    22. 6.2018 13:54:52
  5. Sebastian, Y.: Literature-based discovery by learning heterogeneous bibliographic information networks (2017) 0.00
    0.003932405 = product of:
      0.019662023 = sum of:
        0.019662023 = weight(_text_:u in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019662023 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  6. Garfield, E.: ¬An algorithm for translating chemical names to molecular formulas (1961) 0.00
    0.0036212734 = product of:
      0.018106367 = sum of:
        0.018106367 = product of:
          0.036212735 = sum of:
            0.036212735 = weight(_text_:l in 3465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036212735 = score(doc=3465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 3465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3465)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This dissertation discusses, explains, and demonstrates a new algorithm for translating chemica l nomenclature into molecular formulas. In order to place the study in its proper context and perspective the historical development of nomenclature is first discussed, aa well as other related aspects of the chemical information problem. The relationship of nomenclature to modern linguistic studies is then introduced. Tire relevance of structural linguistic procedures to the study of chemical nomenclature is shown. The methods of the linguist are illustrated by examples from chemical discourse. The algorithm is then explained, first for the human translator and then for use by a computer. Flow diagrams for the computer syntactic analysis, dictionary Iook-up routine, and furmula calculation routine are included. The sampling procedure for testing the algorithm is explained and finalIy, conclusions are drawn with respect to the general validity of the method and the dirsction that might be taken for future research. A summary of modern chemical nomenclature practice is appened primarily for use by the reader who is not familiar with chemical nomenclature.
  7. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.00
    0.003373139 = product of:
      0.016865695 = sum of:
        0.016865695 = product of:
          0.03373139 = sum of:
            0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373139 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  8. Ziemba, L.: Information retrieval with concept discovery in digital collections for agriculture and natural resources (2011) 0.00
    0.002897019 = product of:
      0.014485095 = sum of:
        0.014485095 = product of:
          0.02897019 = sum of:
            0.02897019 = weight(_text_:l in 4728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02897019 = score(doc=4728,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.17565648 = fieldWeight in 4728, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  9. Schmolz, H.: Anaphora resolution and text retrieval : a lnguistic analysis of hypertexts (2015) 0.00
    0.0028297836 = product of:
      0.014148918 = sum of:
        0.014148918 = product of:
          0.028297836 = sum of:
            0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028297836 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  10. Schmolz, H.: Anaphora resolution and text retrieval : a lnguistic analysis of hypertexts (2013) 0.00
    0.0028297836 = product of:
      0.014148918 = sum of:
        0.014148918 = product of:
          0.028297836 = sum of:
            0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028297836 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  11. Geisriegler, E.: Enriching electronic texts with semantic metadata : a use case for the historical Newspaper Collection ANNO (Austrian Newspapers Online) of the Austrian National Libraryhek (2012) 0.00
    0.0028109495 = product of:
      0.014054747 = sum of:
        0.014054747 = product of:
          0.028109495 = sum of:
            0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028109495 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3. 2.2013 18:00:22
  12. Makewita, S.M.: Investigating the generic information-seeking function of organisational decision-makers : perspectives on improving organisational information systems (2002) 0.00
    0.0028109495 = product of:
      0.014054747 = sum of:
        0.014054747 = product of:
          0.028109495 = sum of:
            0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028109495 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2022 12:16:58
  13. Kiren, T.: ¬A clustering based indexing technique of modularized ontologies for information retrieval (2017) 0.00
    0.0022487596 = product of:
      0.011243798 = sum of:
        0.011243798 = product of:
          0.022487596 = sum of:
            0.022487596 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022487596 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  14. Vocht, L. De: Exploring semantic relationships in the Web of Data : Semantische relaties verkennen in data op het web (2017) 0.00
    0.0018106367 = product of:
      0.009053184 = sum of:
        0.009053184 = product of:
          0.018106367 = sum of:
            0.018106367 = weight(_text_:l in 4232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018106367 = score(doc=4232,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.1097853 = fieldWeight in 4232, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4232)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  15. Oberhauser, O.: Card-Image Public Access Catalogues (CIPACs) : a critical consideration of a cost-effective alternative to full retrospective catalogue conversion (2002) 0.00
    9.904242E-4 = product of:
      0.004952121 = sum of:
        0.004952121 = product of:
          0.009904242 = sum of:
            0.009904242 = weight(_text_:h in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009904242 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ABI-Technik 21(2002) H.3, S.292 (E. Pietzsch): "Otto C. Oberhauser hat mit seiner Diplomarbeit eine beeindruckende Analyse digitalisierter Zettelkataloge (CIPACs) vorgelegt. Die Arbeit wartet mit einer Fülle von Daten und Statistiken auf, wie sie bislang nicht vorgelegen haben. BibliothekarInnen, die sich mit der Digitalisierung von Katalogen tragen, finden darin eine einzigartige Vorlage zur Entscheidungsfindung. Nach einem einführenden Kapitel bringt Oberhauser zunächst einen Überblick über eine Auswahl weltweit verfügbarer CIPACs, deren Indexierungsmethode (Binäre Suche, partielle Indexierung, Suche in OCR-Daten) und stellt vergleichende Betrachtungen über geographische Verteilung, Größe, Software, Navigation und andere Eigenschaften an. Anschließend beschreibt und analysiert er Implementierungsprobleme, beginnend bei Gründen, die zur Digitalisierung führen können: Kosten, Umsetzungsdauer, Zugriffsverbesserung, Stellplatzersparnis. Er fährt fort mit technischen Aspekten wie Scannen und Qualitätskontrolle, Image Standards, OCR, manueller Nacharbeit, Servertechnologie. Dabei geht er auch auf die eher hinderlichen Eigenschaften älterer Kataloge ein sowie auf die Präsentation im Web und die Anbindung an vorhandene Opacs. Einem wichtigen Aspekt, nämlich der Beurteilung durch die wichtigste Zielgruppe, die BibliotheksbenutzerInnen, hat Oberhauser eine eigene Feldforschung gewidmet, deren Ergebnisse er im letzten Kapitel eingehend analysiert. Anhänge über die Art der Datenerhebung und Einzelbeschreibung vieler Kataloge runden die Arbeit ab. Insgesamt kann ich die Arbeit nur als die eindrucksvollste Sammlung von Daten, Statistiken und Analysen zum Thema CIPACs bezeichnen, die mir bislang begegnet ist. Auf einen schön herausgearbeiteten Einzelaspekt, nämlich die weitgehende Zersplitterung bei den eingesetzten Softwaresystemen, will ich besonders eingehen: Derzeit können wir grob zwischen Komplettlösungen (eine beauftragte Firma führt als Generalunternehmung sämtliche Aufgaben von der Digitalisierung bis zur Ablieferung der fertigen Anwendung aus) und geteilten Lösungen (die Digitalisierung wird getrennt von der Indexierung und der Softwareerstellung vergeben bzw. im eigenen Hause vorgenommen) unterscheiden. Letztere setzen ein Projektmanagement im Hause voraus. Gerade die Softwareerstellung im eigenen Haus aber kann zu Lösungen führen, die kommerziellen Angeboten keineswegs nachstehen. Schade ist nur, daß die vielfältigen Eigenentwicklungen bislang noch nicht zu Initiativen geführt haben, die, ähnlich wie bei Public Domain Software, eine "optimale", kostengünstige und weithin akzeptierte Softwarelösung zum Ziel haben. Einige kritische Anmerkungen sollen dennoch nicht unerwähnt bleiben. Beispielsweise fehlt eine Differenzierung zwischen "Reiterkarten"-Systemen, d.h. solchen mit Indexierung jeder 20. oder 50. Karte, und Systemen mit vollständiger Indexierung sämtlicher Kartenköpfe, führt doch diese weitreichende Designentscheidung zu erheblichen Kostenverschiebungen zwischen Katalogerstellung und späterer Benutzung. Auch bei den statistischen Auswertungen der Feldforschung hätte ich mir eine feinere Differenzierung nach Typ des CIPAC oder nach Bibliothek gewünscht. So haben beispielsweise mehr als die Hälfte der befragten BenutzerInnen angegeben, die Bedienung des CIPAC sei zunächst schwer verständlich oder seine Benutzung sei zeitaufwendig gewesen. Offen beibt jedoch, ob es Unterschiede zwischen den verschiedenen Realisierungstypen gibt.