Search (78 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Libraries and Google (2005) 0.01 
    0.005533172 = product of:
  0.01383293 = sum of:
    0.009831011 = weight(_text_:u in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009831011 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.07235568 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
    0.0040019182 = product of:
      0.0080038365 = sum of:
        0.0080038365 = weight(_text_:h in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0080038365 = score(doc=1973,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.077639036 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Editor
    Miller, W. u. R.M. Pellen
    Footnote
    Co-published simultaneously as Internet reference services quarterly, vol. 10(1005), nos. 3/4 Rez. in: ZfBB 54(2007) H.2, S.98-99 (D. Lewandowski): "Google und Bibliotheken? Meist hat man leider den Eindruck, dass hier eher ein oder gedacht wird. Dies sehen auch die Herausgeber des vorliegenden Bandes und nehmen deshalb neben Beiträgen zur Diskussion um die Rolle der Bibliotheken im Zeitalter von Google auch solche auf, die Tipps zur Verwendung unterschiedlicher Google-Dienste geben. Die allgemeine Diskussion um Google und die Bibliotheken dreht sich vor allem um die Rolle, die Bibliotheken (mit ihren Informationsportalen) noch spielen können, wenn ihre Nutzer sowieso bei Google suchen, auch wenn die Bibliotheksangebote (zumindest von den Bibliothekaren) als überlegen empfunden werden. Auch wenn die Nutzer geschult werden, greifen sie doch meist lieber zur einfachen Recherchemöglichkeit bei Google oder anderen Suchmaschinen - vielleicht lässt sich die Situation am besten mit dem Satz eines im Buch zitierten Bibliothekars ausdrücken: »Everyone starts with Google except librarians.« (5.95) Sollen die Bibliotheken nun Google die einfache Recherche ganz überlassen und sich auf die komplexeren Suchfragen konzentrieren? Oder verlieren sie dadurch eine Nutzerschaft, die sich mittlerweile gar nicht mehr vorstellen kann, dass man mit anderen Werkzeugen als Suchmaschinen bessere Ergebnisse erzielen kann? Diese sicherlich für die Zukunft der Bibliotheken maßgebliche Frage wird in mehreren Beiträgen diskutiert, wobei auffällt, dass die jeweiligen Autoren keine klare Antwort bieten können, wie Bibliotheken ihre Quellen so präsentieren können, dass die Nutzer mit der Recherche so zufrieden sind, dass sie freiwillig in den Bibliotheksangeboten anstatt in Google recherchieren. Den Schwerpunkt des Buchs machen aber nicht diese eher theoretischen Aufsätze aus, sondern solche, die sich mit konkreten Google-Diensten beschäftigen. Aufgrund ihrer Nähe zu den Bibliotheksangeboten bzw. den Aufgaben der Bibliotheken sind dies vor allem Google Print und Google Scholar, aber auch die Google Search Appliance. Bei letzterer handelt es sich um eine integrierte Hard- und Softwarelösung, die die Indexierung von Inhalten aus unterschiedlichen Datenquellen ermöglicht. Der Aufsatz von Mary Taylor beschreibt die Vor- und Nachteile des Systems anhand der praktischen Anwendung in der University of Nevada.
    Weitere Rez. in JASIST 59(2008) H.9, S.1531-1533 (J. Satyanesan): "Libraries and Google is an interesting and enlightening compilation of 18 articles on Google and its impact on libraries. The topic is very current, debatable, and thought provoking. Google has profoundly empowered individuals and transformed access to information and librarians are very much concerned about its popularity and visibility. In this book, the leading authorities discuss the usefulness of Google, its influence and potential menace to libraries, and its implications for libraries and the scholarly communication. They offer practical suggestions to cope with the changing situation. The articles are written from different perspective and express all shades of opinion, both hopeful and fearful. One can discern varied moods-apprehension, resignation, encouragement, and motivation-on the part of the librarians. This is an important book providing a wealth of information for the 21st century librarian. There is a section called "Indexing, Abstracting & Website/Internet Coverage," which lists major indexing and abstracting services and other tools for bibliographic access. The format of the articles is uniform with an introduction, key words, and with the exception of two articles the rest have summaries and conclusions. References and notes of varying lengths are included in each article. This book has been copublished simultaneously as Internet Reference Quarterly, 10(3/4), 2005. Although there are single articles written on Google and libraries, this is the first book-length treatment of the topic.
  2. Umstätter, W.; Wagner-Döbler, R.; Löffler, K.: Einführung in die Katalogkunde : Vom Zettelkatalog zur Suchmaschine (2005) 0.01 
    0.005261614 = product of:
  0.0131540345 = sum of:
    0.006126661 = product of:
      0.012253322 = sum of:
        0.012253322 = weight(_text_:h in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012253322 = score(doc=4880,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.118860014 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0070273736 = product of:
      0.014054747 = sum of:
        0.014054747 = weight(_text_:22 in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014054747 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 1.2006 19:45:49
    Footnote
    Rez. in: VÖB-Mitteilungen 58(2005) H.3, S.100-102 (O. Oberhauser): "... Ich kann mich des Eindrucks nicht erwehren, dass für dieses Buch weder ein inhaltliches noch ein didaktisches Konzept vorgelegen hat. Vielfach scheint es nämlich (auch in stilistischer Hinsicht), als hätten die Autoren hier all ihr Material mit Bezug zum Thema - Vorlesungsunterlagen, Teile früherer Publikationen, Manuskripte, Exzerpte usw. - agglomeriert und nicht rigoros nachbearbeitet. Somit erschließt sich die unbestreitbare Fülle des vorfindbaren Materials leider nur unzureichend. Vermutlich wird man ihr umso eher etwas abgewinnen können, je mehr man vom Thema bereits weiß und infolgedessen die Zusammenhänge selbst herzustellen vermag. Als Lehrbuch im klassischen Sinn ist der Band m.E. dagegen wohl nur bedingt geeignet"
    Weitere Rez. in: BuB 58(2006) H.1, S.80-82 (H. Wiesenmüller): "Wenn überhaupt, dann werden Fortgeschrittene einen Nutzen von der Lektüre haben - doch kann das der Sinn einer »Einführung« sein? Eine überzeugende Neubearbeitung des »Löflier« hätte zweifellos das Zeug zu einem neuen bibliothekskundlichen Klassiker gehabt - schade, dass die Chance vertan wurde."
  3. Bragg, D.P.; Zhu, L.: Shelflist in an online environment : experience at Washington State University Libraries (2006) 0.01 
    0.0050697834 = product of:
  0.025348917 = sum of:
    0.025348917 = product of:
      0.050697833 = sum of:
        0.050697833 = weight(_text_:l in 3319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050697833 = score(doc=3319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 3319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3319)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  4. Angelus, A.; Eichhorn-Berndt, C.; Schnelling, H.: Digitalisierung des Realkataloges (Hartwig-Katalog) der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt und seine Visualisierung im Internet (2000) 0.00 
    0.0048023015 = product of:
  0.024011508 = sum of:
    0.024011508 = product of:
      0.048023015 = sum of:
        0.048023015 = weight(_text_:h in 4470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048023015 = score(doc=4470,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 4470, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4470)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 34(2000) H.3, S.422-434
  5. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.00 
    0.00477034 = product of:
  0.023851698 = sum of:
    0.023851698 = product of:
      0.047703397 = sum of:
        0.047703397 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047703397 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  6. Esser, R.: Gesamtnachweis der an der ETH-Zürich vorhandenen Literatur (2000) 0.00 
    0.0045276536 = product of:
  0.022638267 = sum of:
    0.022638267 = product of:
      0.045276534 = sum of:
        0.045276534 = weight(_text_:h in 4469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045276534 = score(doc=4469,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 4469, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 34(2000) H.3, S.374-375
  7. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.00 
    0.004497519 = product of:
  0.022487596 = sum of:
    0.022487596 = product of:
      0.04497519 = sum of:
        0.04497519 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04497519 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.00 
    0.004497519 = product of:
  0.022487596 = sum of:
    0.022487596 = product of:
      0.04497519 = sum of:
        0.04497519 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04497519 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.00 
    0.004497519 = product of:
  0.022487596 = sum of:
    0.022487596 = product of:
      0.04497519 = sum of:
        0.04497519 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04497519 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Condron, L.: Management by action : how we're embracing new cataloging work at Tufts (2001) 0.00 
    0.0043455283 = product of:
  0.02172764 = sum of:
    0.02172764 = product of:
      0.04345528 = sum of:
        0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 5430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04345528 = score(doc=5430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 5430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  11. Whitney , C.; Schiff, L.: ¬The Melvyl Recommender Project : developing library recommendation services (2006) 0.00 
    0.0043455283 = product of:
  0.02172764 = sum of:
    0.02172764 = product of:
      0.04345528 = sum of:
        0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04345528 = score(doc=1173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  12. Voss, J.: LibraryThing : Web 2.0 für Literaturfreunde und Bibliotheken (2007) 0.00 
    0.0042258413 = product of:
  0.010564603 = sum of:
    0.0035372295 = product of:
      0.007074459 = sum of:
        0.007074459 = weight(_text_:h in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007074459 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0070273736 = product of:
      0.014054747 = sum of:
        0.014054747 = weight(_text_:22 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014054747 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 10:36:23
    Source
    Mitteilungsblatt der Bibliotheken in Niedersachsen und Sachsen-Anhalt. 2007, H.137, S.12-13
  13. Gentzen, C.: Zentralkatalog und Retrokonversion der Buchbestände des Stadtmuseums Berlin (2002) 0.00 
    0.0039616968 = product of:
  0.019808484 = sum of:
    0.019808484 = product of:
      0.03961697 = sum of:
        0.03961697 = weight(_text_:h in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03961697 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 36(2002) H.6, S.722-727
  14. Buschey, D.; Halle, A.; Harms, R.: Zwanzig Jahre Retrokonversion and der SUB Göttingen : Ein Zwischenbericht (2001) 0.00 
    0.0039616968 = product of:
  0.019808484 = sum of:
    0.019808484 = product of:
      0.03961697 = sum of:
        0.03961697 = weight(_text_:h in 6510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03961697 = score(doc=6510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 6510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6510)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 35(2001) H.9, S.1089-1102
  15. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.00 
    0.003935329 = product of:
  0.019676646 = sum of:
    0.019676646 = product of:
      0.039353292 = sum of:
        0.039353292 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039353292 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
  16. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.00 
    0.003935329 = product of:
  0.019676646 = sum of:
    0.019676646 = product of:
      0.039353292 = sum of:
        0.039353292 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039353292 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Condron, L.: Management by action : how we're embracing new cataloging work at Tufts (2000) 0.00 
    0.0036212734 = product of:
  0.018106367 = sum of:
    0.018106367 = product of:
      0.036212735 = sum of:
        0.036212735 = weight(_text_:l in 5390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036212735 = score(doc=5390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 5390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5390)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  18. Eversberg, B.: Zur Theorie der Bibliothekskataloge und Suchmaschinen (2003) 0.00 
    0.00339574 = product of:
  0.0169787 = sum of:
    0.0169787 = product of:
      0.0339574 = sum of:
        0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 5466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0339574 = score(doc=5466,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 5466, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5466)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Die Bibliothek zwischen Autor und Leser: 92 Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Augsburg 2002. Hrsg.: H. Benkert u.a
  19. Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.003373139 = product of:
  0.016865695 = sum of:
    0.016865695 = product of:
      0.03373139 = sum of:
        0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03373139 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Oberhauser, O.: Teil 2: Ergebnisse der Befragung : Web-Umfrage zur Benutzung von Card-Image Online-Katalogen (2002) 0.00 
    0.0028297836 = product of:
  0.014148918 = sum of:
    0.014148918 = product of:
      0.028297836 = sum of:
        0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028297836 = score(doc=983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 36(2002) H.8/9, S.1065-1090

Authors

Languages

  • d 49
  • e 29

Types

  • a 74
  • m 4
  • b 3
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications