Search (446 results, page 2 of 23)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. McDonald, C.; Schmalz, M.; Monheim, A.; Keating, S.; Lewin, K.; Jin, C.; Lee, H.: Describing, organizing, and maintaining video game development artifacts (2021) 0.02 
    0.022918588 = product of:
  0.05729647 = sum of:
    0.00848935 = product of:
      0.0169787 = sum of:
        0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0169787 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.04880712 = product of:
      0.09761424 = sum of:
        0.09761424 = weight(_text_:lee in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09761424 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.3949033 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
  2. Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023) 0.02 
    0.021890938 = product of:
  0.10945469 = sum of:
    0.10945469 = sum of:
      0.0813452 = weight(_text_:lee in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0813452 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.32908607 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
      0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028109495 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:43:02
  3. Singh, A.; Sinha, U.; Sharma, D.k.: Semantic Web and data visualization (2020) 0.02 
    0.020880042 = product of:
  0.052200105 = sum of:
    0.019662023 = weight(_text_:u in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019662023 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
    0.032538082 = product of:
      0.065076165 = sum of:
        0.065076165 = weight(_text_:lee in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065076165 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.26326886 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    With the terrific growth of data volume and data being produced every second on millions of devices across the globe, there is a desperate need to manage the unstructured data available on web pages efficiently. Semantic Web or also known as Web of Trust structures the scattered data on the Internet according to the needs of the user. It is an extension of the World Wide Web (WWW) which focuses on manipulating web data on behalf of Humans. Due to the ability of the Semantic Web to integrate data from disparate sources and hence makes it more user-friendly, it is an emerging trend. Tim Berners-Lee first introduced the term Semantic Web and since then it has come a long way to become a more intelligent and intuitive web. Data Visualization plays an essential role in explaining complex concepts in a universal manner through pictorial representation, and the Semantic Web helps in broadening the potential of Data Visualization and thus making it an appropriate combination. The objective of this chapter is to provide fundamental insights concerning the semantic web technologies and in addition to that it also elucidates the issues as well as the solutions regarding the semantic web. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight the semantic web architecture in detail while also comparing it with the traditional search system. It classifies the semantic web architecture into three major pillars i.e. RDF, Ontology, and XML. Moreover, it describes different semantic web tools used in the framework and technology. It attempts to illustrate different approaches of the semantic web search engines. Besides stating numerous challenges faced by the semantic web it also illustrates the solutions.
  4. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.02 
    0.020284036 = product of:
  0.05071009 = sum of:
    0.0169787 = product of:
      0.0339574 = sum of:
        0.0339574 = weight(_text_:h in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0339574 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.03373139 = product of:
      0.06746278 = sum of:
        0.06746278 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06746278 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
  5. Drew, L.: ¬Der freie Wille und die Algorithmen (2020) 0.02 
    0.020144662 = product of:
  0.100723304 = sum of:
    0.100723304 = sum of:
      0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 5793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028297836 = score(doc=5793,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 5793, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5793)
      0.07242547 = weight(_text_:l in 5793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07242547 = score(doc=5793,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494254 = queryNorm
          0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 5793, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5793)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.4, S.43-47
  6. Püschel, M.: ¬Der Gutenberg des 20 Jahrhunderts (2020) 0.02 
    0.01952285 = product of:
  0.09761424 = sum of:
    0.09761424 = product of:
      0.19522849 = sum of:
        0.19522849 = weight(_text_:lee in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19522849 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.7898066 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Kaum weniger bedeutsam als die Erfindung des Buchdrucks: Vor 30 Jahren stellte Tim Berners-Lee die erste Webseite der Welt online.
  7. Menzel, S.; Schnaitter, H.; Zinck, J.; Petras, V.; Neudecker, C.; Labusch, K.; Leitner, E.; Rehm, G.: Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND : das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten (2021) 0.02 
    0.019098824 = product of:
  0.04774706 = sum of:
    0.007074459 = product of:
      0.014148918 = sum of:
        0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014148918 = score(doc=373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0406726 = product of:
      0.0813452 = sum of:
        0.0813452 = weight(_text_:lee in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0813452 = score(doc=373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.32908607 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Named Entities (benannte Entitäten) - wie Personen, Organisationen, Orte, Ereignisse und Werke - sind wichtige inhaltstragende Komponenten eines Dokuments und sind daher maßgeblich für eine gute inhaltliche Erschließung. Die Erkennung von Named Entities, deren Auszeichnung (Annotation) und Verfügbarmachung für die Suche sind wichtige Instrumente, um Anwendungen wie z. B. die inhaltliche oder semantische Suche in Texten, dokumentübergreifende Kontextualisierung oder das automatische Textzusammenfassen zu verbessern. Inhaltlich präzise und nachhaltig erschlossen werden die erkannten Named Entities eines Dokuments allerdings erst, wenn sie mit einer oder mehreren Quellen verknüpft werden (Grundprinzip von Linked Data, Berners-Lee 2006), die die Entität eindeutig identifizieren und gegenüber gleichlautenden Entitäten disambiguieren (vergleiche z. B. Berlin als Hauptstadt Deutschlands mit dem Komponisten Irving Berlin). Dazu wird die im Dokument erkannte Entität mit dem Entitätseintrag einer Normdatei oder einer anderen zuvor festgelegten Wissensbasis (z. B. Gazetteer für geografische Entitäten) verknüpft, gewöhnlich über den persistenten Identifikator der jeweiligen Wissensbasis oder Normdatei. Durch die Verknüpfung mit einer Normdatei erfolgt nicht nur die Disambiguierung und Identifikation der Entität, sondern es wird dadurch auch Interoperabilität zu anderen Systemen hergestellt, in denen die gleiche Normdatei benutzt wird, z. B. die Suche nach der Hauptstadt Berlin in verschiedenen Datenbanken bzw. Portalen. Die Entitätenverknüpfung (Named Entity Linking, NEL) hat zudem den Vorteil, dass die Normdateien oftmals Relationen zwischen Entitäten enthalten, sodass Dokumente, in denen Named Entities erkannt wurden, zusätzlich auch im Kontext einer größeren Netzwerkstruktur von Entitäten verortet und suchbar gemacht werden können
  8. Praxishandbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement (2021) 0.02 
    0.017725114 = product of:
  0.044312783 = sum of:
    0.03440854 = weight(_text_:u in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03440854 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
    0.009904242 = product of:
      0.019808484 = sum of:
        0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019808484 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Editor
    Putnings, M., H. Neuroth u. J. Neumann
  9. Reimer, U.: Empfehlungssysteme (2023) 0.02 
    0.017725114 = product of:
  0.044312783 = sum of:
    0.03440854 = weight(_text_:u in 519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03440854 = score(doc=519,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 519, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=519)
    0.009904242 = product of:
      0.019808484 = sum of:
        0.019808484 = weight(_text_:h in 519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019808484 = score(doc=519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=519)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Mit der wachsenden Informationsflut steigen die Anforderungen an Informationssysteme, aus der Menge potenziell relevanter Information die in einem bestimmten Kontext relevanteste zu selektieren. Empfehlungssysteme spielen hier eine besondere Rolle, da sie personalisiert - d. h. kontextspezifisch und benutzerindividuell - relevante Information herausfiltern können. Definition: Ein Empfehlungssystem empfiehlt einem Benutzer bzw. einer Benutzerin in einem definierten Kontext aus einer gegebenen Menge von Empfehlungsobjekten eine Teilmenge als relevant. Empfehlungssysteme machen Benutzer auf Objekte aufmerksam, die sie möglicherweise nie gefunden hätten, weil sie nicht danach gesucht hätten oder sie in der schieren Menge an insgesamt relevanter Information untergegangen wären.
  10. Information : a reader (2022) 0.02 
    0.017073559 = product of:
  0.042683896 = sum of:
    0.024577528 = weight(_text_:u in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024577528 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
    0.018106367 = product of:
      0.036212735 = sum of:
        0.036212735 = weight(_text_:l in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036212735 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Editor
    Hayot, E., A. Detwyler u. L. Pao
  11. Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020) 0.02 
    0.016903365 = product of:
  0.04225841 = sum of:
    0.014148918 = product of:
      0.028297836 = sum of:
        0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028297836 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.028109495 = product of:
      0.05621899 = sum of:
        0.05621899 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05621899 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    17. 1.2020 22:15:11
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.2, S.12-17
  12. Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021) 0.02 
    0.016903365 = product of:
  0.04225841 = sum of:
    0.014148918 = product of:
      0.028297836 = sum of:
        0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028297836 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.028109495 = product of:
      0.05621899 = sum of:
        0.05621899 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05621899 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Biographed
    Maturana, H.
    Date
    7. 5.2021 22:10:24
  13. Eyert, F.: Mathematische Wissenschaftskommunikation in der digitalen Gesellschaft (2023) 0.02 
    0.016903365 = product of:
  0.04225841 = sum of:
    0.014148918 = product of:
      0.028297836 = sum of:
        0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028297836 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.028109495 = product of:
      0.05621899 = sum of:
        0.05621899 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05621899 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25
  14. Felgner, U.: ¬Die Begriffe der Äquivalenz, der Gleichheit und der Identität (2020) 0.02 
    0.016599515 = product of:
  0.041498788 = sum of:
    0.029493032 = weight(_text_:u in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029493032 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
    0.012005754 = product of:
      0.024011508 = sum of:
        0.024011508 = weight(_text_:h in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024011508 = score(doc=348,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl. die Ergänzung zur Verfügbarkeit unter Open access unter: Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 123(2021) H.3, S.217-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s13291-020-00214-0.
    Source
    Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 122(2020) H.2, S.109-129
  15. Ilhan, A.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.: Data privacy-related behavior and concerns of activity tracking technology users from Germany and the USA (2021) 0.02 
    0.015452909 = product of:
  0.038632274 = sum of:
    0.024577528 = weight(_text_:u in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024577528 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
    0.014054747 = product of:
      0.028109495 = sum of:
        0.028109495 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028109495 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose This investigation aims to examine the differences and similarities between activity tracking technology users from two regions (the USA and Germany) in their intended privacy-related behavior. The focus lies on data handling after hypothetical discontinuance of use, data protection and privacy policy seeking, and privacy concerns. Design/methodology/approach The data was collected through an online survey in 2019. In order to identify significant differences between participants from Germany and the USA, the chi-squared test and the Mann-Whitney U test were applied. Findings The intensity of several privacy-related concerns was significantly different between the two groups. The majority of the participants did not inform themselves about the respective data privacy policies or terms and conditions before installing an activity tracking application. The majority of the German participants knew that they could request the deletion of all their collected data. In contrast, only 35% out of 68 participants from the US knew about this option. Research limitations/implications This study intends to raise awareness about managing the collected health and fitness data after stopping to use activity tracking technologies. Furthermore, to reduce privacy and security concerns, the involvement of the government, companies and users is necessary to handle and share data more considerably and in a sustainable way. Originality/value This study sheds light on users of activity tracking technologies from a broad perspective (here, participants from the USA and Germany). It incorporates not only concerns and the privacy paradox but (intended) user behavior, including seeking information on data protection and privacy policy and handling data after hypothetical discontinuance of use of the technology.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  16. Ma, L.: Information, platformized (2023) 0.02 
    0.015437335 = product of:
  0.038593337 = sum of:
    0.02172764 = product of:
      0.04345528 = sum of:
        0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04345528 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016865695 = product of:
      0.03373139 = sum of:
        0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03373139 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:01:47
  17. Li, G.; Siddharth, L.; Luo, J.: Embedding knowledge graph of patent metadata to measure knowledge proximity (2023) 0.02 
    0.015437335 = product of:
  0.038593337 = sum of:
    0.02172764 = product of:
      0.04345528 = sum of:
        0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04345528 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016865695 = product of:
      0.03373139 = sum of:
        0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03373139 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:06:55
  18. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.02 
    0.015437335 = product of:
  0.038593337 = sum of:
    0.02172764 = product of:
      0.04345528 = sum of:
        0.04345528 = weight(_text_:l in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04345528 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016865695 = product of:
      0.03373139 = sum of:
        0.03373139 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03373139 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
  19. Fassbender, J.: Register / Indexe (2023) 0.02 
    0.015192953 = product of:
  0.037982382 = sum of:
    0.029493032 = weight(_text_:u in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029493032 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
    0.00848935 = product of:
      0.0169787 = sum of:
        0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0169787 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Der Fokus dieses Artikels liegt auf der Indexerstellung von Publikationen, d. h. der detaillierten Indexierung der Inhalte von Dokumenten statt der Indexierung auf Dokumentebene, welche sich auf das Gesamtthema von Dokumenten beschränkt. Zu letzterer zählen z. B. das Hauptthema von Artikeln, die Sachkatalogisierung von Büchern oder die Erschließung von Objekten in der Museumsdokumentation. Die Worte Index und Register werden synonym benutzt. Das Wort Index ist nicht nur ein Homonym aus unterschiedlichen Bereichen (z. B. Finanzwesen, Mathematik), sondern auch ein Polysem im Publikationswesen, da es in romanischen Sprachen sowohl Inhaltsverzeichnis als auch Register meinen kann. Während im Finanzwesen, Mathematik u. a. die Pluralform Indizes benutzt wird, ist im bibliographischen Sinn Indexe der korrekte Plural (engl.: indexes), es sei denn, es geht um Indices zu alten Werken in lateinischer Sprache (index rerum, index nominum, index verborum). Etymologie, Bedeutung und Plural des Wortes Index erläutert Wellisch ausführlich.
  20. Neuroth, H.: Forschungsdaten (2023) 0.02 
    0.015192953 = product of:
  0.037982382 = sum of:
    0.029493032 = weight(_text_:u in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029493032 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494254 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
    0.00848935 = product of:
      0.0169787 = sum of:
        0.0169787 = weight(_text_:h in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0169787 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494254 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Der Begriff Forschungsdaten wird mittlerweile völlig selbstverständlich in verschiedenen Kontexten genutzt, trotzdem ist es schwierig, eine einheitliche und abgestimmte Definition zu finden. In den Leitlinien zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG 2015) findet sich eine umfassende Beschreibung, welche Forschungsobjekte Gegenstand der wissenschaftlichen Tätigkeit sein können und als Forschungsdaten gelten: Forschungsdaten sind eine wesentliche Grundlage für das wissenschaftliche Arbeiten. Die Vielfalt solcher Daten entspricht der Vielfalt unterschiedlicher wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen, Erkenntnisinteressen und Forschungsverfahren. Zu Forschungsdaten zählen u. a. Messdaten, Laborwerte, audiovisuelle Informationen, Texte, Surveydaten, Objekte aus Sammlungen oder Proben, die in der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit entstehen, entwickelt oder ausgewertet werden. Methodische Testverfahren, wie Fragebögen, Software und Simulationen können ebenfalls zentrale Ergebnisse wissenschaftlicher Forschung darstellen und sollten daher ebenfalls unter den Begriff Forschungsdaten gefasst werden. (S. 1)

Authors

Languages

  • e 238
  • d 206
  • m 2
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 403
  • el 74
  • m 26
  • s 8
  • p 4
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications