-
Bates, M.J.: Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? (1990)
0.03
0.0345436 = product of:
0.086359 = sum of:
0.07683191 = weight(_text_:u in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07683191 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.57884544 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
0.009527093 = weight(_text_:a in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009527093 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Theme
- Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002)
0.03
0.031460106 = product of:
0.052433506 = sum of:
0.028811965 = weight(_text_:u in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028811965 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.0071453196 = weight(_text_:a in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071453196 = score(doc=54,freq=8.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.016476223 = product of:
0.032952446 = sum of:
0.032952446 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032952446 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Extensive literatures exist on information searching theory and techniques, as well as on the Bradford Distribution. This distribution, also known as "Bradford's Law of Scattering," tells us that information on a subject is dispersed in a characteristic and robust pattern that appears consistently across many different environments. This pattern may be expected to have important implications for information searching theory and techniques. Yet these two research literatures are rarely considered in relation to each other. It is the purpose of this article to distinguish three Bradford regions and speculate on the optimum searching techniques for each region. In the process, browsing, directed searching in databases, and the pursuit of various forms of links will all be considered. Implications of growth in size of a literature for optimal information organization and searching will also be addressed.
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
- Source
- Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019)
0.02
0.020048473 = product of:
0.05012118 = sum of:
0.044226594 = weight(_text_:g in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044226594 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.0058945883 = weight(_text_:a in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058945883 = score(doc=2265,freq=4.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The recent article by McKay et al. on browsing (2019) provides a valuable addition to the empirical literature of information science on this topic, and I read the descriptions of the various browsing cases with interest. However, the authors refer to my article on browsing (Bates, 2007) in ways that do not make sense to me and which do not at all conform to what I actually said.
- Content
- Bezug (Letter to the editor) zu: McKay, D., Chang, S.,, Smith, W., Buchanan, G.: The things we talk about when we talk about browsing: an empirical typology of library browsing behavior. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2019).
- Type
- a
-
White, H.D.; Bates, M.J.; Wilson, P.: For information specialists : interpretations of reference and bibliographic work (1992)
0.02
0.015163402 = product of:
0.07581701 = sum of:
0.07581701 = weight(_text_:g in 7742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07581701 = score(doc=7742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 7742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7742)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of documentation 50(1994) no.1, S.58-59. (G. Matthews); Journal of academic librarianship 20(1994) no.1, S.34 (G.D. Barber)
-
Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006)
0.01
0.013231588 = product of:
0.03307897 = sum of:
0.0058945883 = weight(_text_:a in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058945883 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.027184382 = product of:
0.054368764 = sum of:
0.054368764 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054368764 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:15:22
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students (1996)
0.01
0.010692738 = product of:
0.026731845 = sum of:
0.0047635464 = weight(_text_:a in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047635464 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
0.021968298 = product of:
0.043936595 = sum of:
0.043936595 = weight(_text_:22 in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043936595 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 14. 4.1997 20:22:55
- Type
- a
-
Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013)
0.01
0.007873848 = product of:
0.01968462 = sum of:
0.0059544328 = weight(_text_:a in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0059544328 = score(doc=1003,freq=8.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.013730187 = product of:
0.027460374 = sum of:
0.027460374 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027460374 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986)
0.00
0.0023578354 = product of:
0.011789177 = sum of:
0.011789177 = weight(_text_:a in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011789177 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Document familiarity, relevance, and Bradford's law : the Getty Online Searching Project report; no.5 (1996)
0.00
0.0021303229 = product of:
0.010651614 = sum of:
0.010651614 = weight(_text_:a in 6978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010651614 = score(doc=6978,freq=10.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 6978, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6978)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The Getty Online Searching Project studied the end user searching behaviour of 27 humanities scholars over a 2 year period. A number of scholars anticipated that they were already familiar with a percentage of records their searches retrieved. High document familiarity can be a significant factor in searching: Draws implications regarding the impact of high document familiarity on relevance and information retrieval theory. Makes speculations regarding high document familiarity and Bradford's law
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment (1989)
0.00
0.0019054186 = product of:
0.009527093 = sum of:
0.009527093 = weight(_text_:a in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009527093 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: System meets user : problems in matching subject search terms (1977)
0.00
0.0019054186 = product of:
0.009527093 = sum of:
0.009527093 = weight(_text_:a in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009527093 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Factors affecting subject catalog search success (1977)
0.00
0.0019054186 = product of:
0.009527093 = sum of:
0.009527093 = weight(_text_:a in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009527093 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use information search tactics online (1987)
0.00
0.0019054186 = product of:
0.009527093 = sum of:
0.009527093 = weight(_text_:a in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009527093 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Information science at the University of California at Berkeley in the 1960s : a memoir of student days (2004)
0.00
0.0019054186 = product of:
0.009527093 = sum of:
0.009527093 = weight(_text_:a in 7246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009527093 = score(doc=7246,freq=8.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7246, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7246)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The author's experiences as a master's and doctoral student at the University of California at Berkeley School of Library and Information Studies during a formative period in the history of information science, 1966-71, are described. The relationship between documentation and information science as experienced in that program is discussed, as well as the various influences, both social and intellectual, that shaped the author's understanding of information science at that time.
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Search techniques (1981)
0.00
0.0019054186 = product of:
0.009527093 = sum of:
0.009527093 = weight(_text_:a in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009527093 = score(doc=288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
0.0018640325 = product of:
0.009320162 = sum of:
0.009320162 = weight(_text_:a in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009320162 = score(doc=2883,freq=10.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
0.0018640325 = product of:
0.009320162 = sum of:
0.009320162 = weight(_text_:a in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009320162 = score(doc=207,freq=10.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: Information and knowledge : an evolutionary framework for information science (2005)
0.00
0.0018640325 = product of:
0.009320162 = sum of:
0.009320162 = weight(_text_:a in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009320162 = score(doc=158,freq=40.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Many definitions of information have been suggested throughout the history of information science. In this essay, the objective has been to provide a definition that is usable for the physical, biological and social meanings of the term, covering the various senses important to our field. Information has been defined as the pattern of organization of matter and energy. Information is everywhere except where there is total entropy. Living beings process, organize and ascribe meaning to information. Some pattern of organization that has been given meaning by a living being has been defined as information 2, while the above definition is information 1, when it is desirable to make the distinction. Knowledge has been defined as information given meaning and integrated with other contents of understanding. Meaning itself is rooted ultimately in biological survival. In the human being, extensive processing space in the brain has made possible the generation of extremely rich cultural and interpersonal meaning, which imbues human interactions. (In the short term, not all meaning that humans ascribe to information is the result of evolutionary processes. Our extensive brain processing space also enables us to hold beliefs for the short term that, over the long term, may actually be harmful to survival.) Data 1 has been defined as that portion of the entire information environment (including internal inputs) that is taken in, or processed, by an organism. Data 2 is that information that is selected or generated and used by human beings for research or other social purposes. This definition of information is not reductive--that is, it does not imply that information is all and only the most microscopic physical manifestation of matter and energy. Information principally exists for organisms at many emergent levels. A human being, for example, can see this account as tiny marks on a piece of paper, as letters of the alphabet, as words of the English language, as a sequence of ideas, as a genre of publication, as a philosophical position and so on. Thus, patterns of organization are not all equal in the life experience of animals. Some types of patterns are more important, some less so. Some parts of patterns are repetitive and can be compressed in mental storage. As mental storage space is generally limited and its maintenance costly to an animal, adaptive advantage accrues to the species that develops efficient storage. As a result, many species process elements of their environment in ways efficient and effective for their particular purposes; that is, as patterns of organization that are experienced as emergent wholes. We see a chair as a chair, not only as a pattern of light and dark. We see a string of actions by a salesperson as bait and switch, not just as a sequence of actions. We understand a series of statements as parts of a whole philosophical argument, not just as a series of sentences. The understanding of information embraced here recognizes and builds on the idea that these emergent wholes are efficient for storage and effective for the life purposes of human beings as successful animals (to date) on our planet. Thus, people experience their lives in terms of these emergent objects and relations, for the most part. Likewise, information is stored in retrieval systems in such a way that it can be represented to human beings in their preferred emergent forms, rather than in the pixels or bits in which the information is actually encoded within the information system.
- Content
- Auch unter: http://InformationR.net/ir/10-4/paper239.html. - Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643.
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬A tour of information science through the pages of JASIS (1999)
0.00
0.001684168 = product of:
0.00842084 = sum of:
0.00842084 = weight(_text_:a in 4316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00842084 = score(doc=4316,freq=4.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4316, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4316)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Type
- a
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The design of browsing and berrypicking : techniques for the online search interface (1989)
0.00
0.0016672412 = product of:
0.008336206 = sum of:
0.008336206 = weight(_text_:a in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008336206 = score(doc=2228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040536046 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Type
- a
