Search (254 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Rosman, G.; Meer, K.v.d.; Sol, H.G.: ¬The design of document information systems (1996) 0.06
    0.061530057 = product of:
      0.10255009 = sum of:
        0.06318085 = weight(_text_:g in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06318085 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
        0.0119088655 = weight(_text_:a in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0119088655 = score(doc=7750,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
        0.027460374 = product of:
          0.054920748 = sum of:
            0.054920748 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054920748 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040536046 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the costs and benefits of documents information systems (involving text and images) and some design methodological aspects that arise from the documentary nature of the data. Reports details of a case study involving a specific document information system introduced at Press Ltd, a company in the Netherlands
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297
    Type
    a
  2. Barbat, P.; Neste, E. van den; Drouhet, G.: Records management et archivistique française (1998) 0.05
    0.04717821 = product of:
      0.07863034 = sum of:
        0.044226594 = weight(_text_:g in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044226594 = score(doc=2988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
        0.0072193667 = weight(_text_:a in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072193667 = score(doc=2988,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
        0.027184382 = product of:
          0.054368764 = sum of:
            0.054368764 = weight(_text_:22 in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054368764 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040536046 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    An article in documentaliste 35(1998) no.1, presented the concept and contexts for the application of records management. This article, devoted to the experience of archivists, continues to focus on professional active and semi-active records management practices and their evolution in different countries and eras. P. Barbat analyzes the discovery in France in the 1960s of active records and the invlovement of both archivists and the departments actually generating the records in their management, and the impact this development has had on archival practices. Also discusses the impact that the international standard now being drafted by ISO will have on the profession. A government and a company archivist also describe their experience
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    21. 2.1999 15:22:35
    Type
    a
  3. Challenges in indexing electronic text and images (1994) 0.04
    0.041853644 = product of:
      0.06975607 = sum of:
        0.031590424 = weight(_text_:g in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031590424 = score(doc=2478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
        0.033955228 = weight(_text_:u in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033955228 = score(doc=2478,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.25581595 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
        0.00421042 = weight(_text_:a in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00421042 = score(doc=2478,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: KEISTNER, L.H.: User types and queries: impact on image access systems; BUSCH, J.A.: Thinking ambiguously: organizing source materials for historical research; LUNIN. L.F.: Analyzing art objects for an image database; MARCHIONINI, G.: Designing hypertexts: start with an index; MULVANY, N.: Online help systems: a multimedia indexing opportunity; LIEBSCHER, P.: Hypertext and indexing; SOERGEL, D.: Information structure management: a unified framework for indexing and searching in database, expert, information-retrieval, and hypermedia systems; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Knowledge-based systems for indexing; BAILEY, J.A.: Computing support for indexing at petroleum abstracts: design and benefits; BUCHAN, R.L.: Computerized development and use of NASA thesaurus; SILVESTER, J.P. u. M.T. GENUARDI: Machine-aided indexing from the analysis of natural lanhuage text; SMITH, P.J. et al.: Computerized tools to support document analysts; HARMAN, D.: Automatic indexing; WARNER, A.J.: The role of linguistic analysis in full-text retrieval; MASAND, B. et al: Text based applications on the connection machine
    Editor
    Fidel, R., T.B. Hahn, Rasmussen, E.M. u. P.J. Smith
  4. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.04
    0.03523849 = product of:
      0.05873081 = sum of:
        0.03361396 = weight(_text_:u in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03361396 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.0058945883 = weight(_text_:a in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058945883 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.019222261 = product of:
          0.038444523 = sum of:
            0.038444523 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038444523 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040536046 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
    Type
    a
  5. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.03
    0.034202598 = product of:
      0.057004325 = sum of:
        0.03361396 = weight(_text_:u in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03361396 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.004168103 = weight(_text_:a in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004168103 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.019222261 = product of:
          0.038444523 = sum of:
            0.038444523 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038444523 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040536046 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
    Type
    a
  6. Schmitz-Esser, W.: ¬Die Pressedatenbank für Text und Bild des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (1977) 0.03
    0.033184934 = product of:
      0.082962334 = sum of:
        0.07581701 = weight(_text_:g in 4756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07581701 = score(doc=4756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 4756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4756)
        0.0071453196 = weight(_text_:a in 4756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071453196 = score(doc=4756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4756)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    In diesem Aufsatz wird auch der Aufbau des G+J Index ausführlich erläutert
    Type
    a
  7. Linczak, G.; Fournier, C. von; Südkamp, N.: Von der Insellösung zum Klinikinformationssystem : Kooperation, Kommunikation, Standards im Virchow-Klinikum (1996) 0.03
    0.033184934 = product of:
      0.082962334 = sum of:
        0.07581701 = weight(_text_:g in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07581701 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
        0.0071453196 = weight(_text_:a in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071453196 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Rey-Mermet, G.: Informationsmanagement - Chancen ergreifen : Bericht über die 10. Internationale Fachkonferenz vom 14.-16. April 1999 in Basel (1999) 0.03
    0.033184934 = product of:
      0.082962334 = sum of:
        0.07581701 = weight(_text_:g in 3578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07581701 = score(doc=3578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 3578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3578)
        0.0071453196 = weight(_text_:a in 3578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071453196 = score(doc=3578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3578)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Type
    a
  9. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.03
    0.03175587 = product of:
      0.07938967 = sum of:
        0.07581701 = weight(_text_:g in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07581701 = score(doc=6386,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
        0.0035726598 = weight(_text_:a in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035726598 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Type
    a
  10. Peters, G.; Gaese, V.: ¬Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von G+J (2003) 0.03
    0.030509992 = product of:
      0.050849985 = sum of:
        0.035740484 = weight(_text_:g in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035740484 = score(doc=1507,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.23474671 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
        0.0041253525 = weight(_text_:a in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041253525 = score(doc=1507,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
        0.010984149 = product of:
          0.021968298 = sum of:
            0.021968298 = weight(_text_:22 in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021968298 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14195032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040536046 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Wir werden einmal die Grundlagen des Text-Mining-Systems bei IBM darstellen, dann werden wir das Projekt etwas umfangreicher und deutlicher darstellen, da kennen wir uns aus. Von daher haben wir zwei Teile, einmal Heidelberg, einmal Hamburg. Noch einmal zur Technologie. Text-Mining ist eine von IBM entwickelte Technologie, die in einer besonderen Ausformung und Programmierung für uns zusammengestellt wurde. Das Projekt hieß bei uns lange Zeit DocText Miner und heißt seit einiger Zeit auf Vorschlag von IBM DocCat, das soll eine Abkürzung für Document-Categoriser sein, sie ist ja auch nett und anschaulich. Wir fangen an mit Text-Mining, das bei IBM in Heidelberg entwickelt wurde. Die verstehen darunter das automatische Indexieren als eine Instanz, also einen Teil von Text-Mining. Probleme werden dabei gezeigt, und das Text-Mining ist eben eine Methode zur Strukturierung von und der Suche in großen Dokumentenmengen, die Extraktion von Informationen und, das ist der hohe Anspruch, von impliziten Zusammenhängen. Das letztere sei dahingestellt. IBM macht das quantitativ, empirisch, approximativ und schnell. das muss man wirklich sagen. Das Ziel, und das ist ganz wichtig für unser Projekt gewesen, ist nicht, den Text zu verstehen, sondern das Ergebnis dieser Verfahren ist, was sie auf Neudeutsch a bundle of words, a bag of words nennen, also eine Menge von bedeutungstragenden Begriffen aus einem Text zu extrahieren, aufgrund von Algorithmen, also im Wesentlichen aufgrund von Rechenoperationen. Es gibt eine ganze Menge von linguistischen Vorstudien, ein wenig Linguistik ist auch dabei, aber nicht die Grundlage der ganzen Geschichte. Was sie für uns gemacht haben, ist also die Annotierung von Pressetexten für unsere Pressedatenbank. Für diejenigen, die es noch nicht kennen: Gruner + Jahr führt eine Textdokumentation, die eine Datenbank führt, seit Anfang der 70er Jahre, da sind z.Z. etwa 6,5 Millionen Dokumente darin, davon etwas über 1 Million Volltexte ab 1993. Das Prinzip war lange Zeit, dass wir die Dokumente, die in der Datenbank gespeichert waren und sind, verschlagworten und dieses Prinzip haben wir auch dann, als der Volltext eingeführt wurde, in abgespeckter Form weitergeführt. Zu diesen 6,5 Millionen Dokumenten gehören dann eben auch ungefähr 10 Millionen Faksimileseiten, weil wir die Faksimiles auch noch standardmäßig aufheben.
    Date
    22. 4.2003 11:45:36
    Type
    a
  11. Wulf, F.: Bilder im Online-Zugriff : Datenbanktechnik für Bildagenturen (1994) 0.03
    0.030225653 = product of:
      0.07556413 = sum of:
        0.06722792 = weight(_text_:u in 4832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06722792 = score(doc=4832,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4832, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4832)
        0.008336206 = weight(_text_:a in 4832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008336206 = score(doc=4832,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4832, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4832)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Information und Medienvielfalt: 16. Online-Tagung der DGD, Frankfurt am Main, 17.-19.5.1994. Proceedings. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. R. Schmidt
    Type
    a
  12. Wettengel, M.; Brübach, N.; Herzog, G.: DIN-Arbeitsgremium "Archiv- und Schriftgutverwaltung" an der Erarbeitung der ISO 15489 beteiligt : Abstimmung über Norm-Entwurf läuft (2000) 0.03
    0.027654111 = product of:
      0.06913528 = sum of:
        0.06318085 = weight(_text_:g in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06318085 = score(doc=5472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
        0.0059544328 = weight(_text_:a in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059544328 = score(doc=5472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Type
    a
  13. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.03
    0.026463225 = product of:
      0.06615806 = sum of:
        0.06318085 = weight(_text_:g in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06318085 = score(doc=5863,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
        0.0029772164 = weight(_text_:a in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029772164 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Type
    a
  14. Bredow, F. von; Kampffmeyer, U.: DMS'98 - Ein voller Erfolg für die Dokumentenmanagement-Branche (1999) 0.03
    0.0259077 = product of:
      0.06476925 = sum of:
        0.05762393 = weight(_text_:u in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05762393 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
        0.0071453196 = weight(_text_:a in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071453196 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Type
    a
  15. Booms, U.: Daten, User und Producer : Multifunktionale Anforderungen an die Datenbanken bei Spiegel Online (2003) 0.03
    0.0259077 = product of:
      0.06476925 = sum of:
        0.05762393 = weight(_text_:u in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05762393 = score(doc=1510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
        0.0071453196 = weight(_text_:a in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071453196 = score(doc=1510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Type
    a
  16. O'Shea, G.; Roberts, D.: Living in a digital world : recognising the electronic and post-custodial realities (1996) 0.02
    0.024478516 = product of:
      0.06119629 = sum of:
        0.050544675 = weight(_text_:g in 7165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050544675 = score(doc=7165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.331982 = fieldWeight in 7165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7165)
        0.010651614 = weight(_text_:a in 7165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010651614 = score(doc=7165,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 7165, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7165)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the reality of the archival management of electronic records and the digital world as a whole. Discusses issues surrounding the keeping of electronic records and examines the fundamental question of where records should be kept in the electronic age. Considers post custodial ideas and strategies by means of case studies and concludes with a discussion of whether, in a digital world, location really matters
    Type
    a
  17. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.02
    0.0233566 = product of:
      0.058391497 = sum of:
        0.04828649 = product of:
          0.19314596 = sum of:
            0.19314596 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19314596 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34366506 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040536046 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.010105007 = weight(_text_:a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010105007 = score(doc=2918,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
    Type
    a
  18. Beastall, G.: Records management meets knowledge gathering (1998) 0.02
    0.02291254 = product of:
      0.05728135 = sum of:
        0.050544675 = weight(_text_:g in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050544675 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.331982 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
        0.006736672 = weight(_text_:a in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006736672 = score(doc=2754,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information technology developments during the last 2 decades, including the development of the Internet and particulary the WWW, have crested problems and opportunities for records managers. The knowledge contained in records must be captured into the organization's memory it it is to be managed and shared for company prosperity. Explores some of these problems and opportunities, and proposes a 3 phase strategy for managing records and knowledge in the current, and likely future, technological environment
    Type
    a
  19. Spitz, A.L.; Wilcox, L.D.: Classification techniques applied to the recognition of office documents (1988) 0.02
    0.022576315 = product of:
      0.056440786 = sum of:
        0.048019946 = weight(_text_:u in 137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048019946 = score(doc=137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13273303 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=137)
        0.00842084 = weight(_text_:a in 137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00842084 = score(doc=137,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 137, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=137)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the process of developing a document recognition network service, techniques were developed for the segmentation and classification of text, line drawing graphics and pictures
    Source
    Wissensorganisation im Wandel: Dezimalklassifikation - Thesaurusfragen - Warenklassifikation. Proc. 11. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Aachen, 29.6.-1.7.1987. Hrsg.: H.-J. Hermes u. J. Hölzl
    Type
    a
  20. Langosch, G.: ¬Das Konzept entscheidet über den Erfolg : Elektronische Archivierungssysteme bei Banken und Versicherungen (1995) 0.02
    0.02212329 = product of:
      0.055308223 = sum of:
        0.050544675 = weight(_text_:g in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050544675 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15225126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.331982 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
        0.0047635464 = weight(_text_:a in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047635464 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.046739966 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040536046 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

  • e 150
  • d 96
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 232
  • m 14
  • s 5
  • el 2
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…