Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0059490725 = product of:
  0.02379629 = sum of:
    0.02379629 = weight(_text_:information in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02379629 = score(doc=3383,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Discusses the kind of database quality problems regularly encountered. Describes the work currently being undertaken in this field by EUSIDIC (European Association of Information Services), by SCOUG (Southern California Online User Group) and by the Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) itself, which is investigating the idea of database labelling as a solution to the quality issue

Source

Library and information briefings. 1995, no.62, S.1-14

0.0051002675 = product of:
  0.02040107 = sum of:
    0.02040107 = weight(_text_:information in 3878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02040107 = score(doc=3878,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 3878, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3878)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

With the increased use of local area networks, CD-ROMs and the Internet, an enormous amount of traditional material is becoming available. Quality issues are therefore becoming even more vital. Describes a methodology being evaluated by The Centre for Information Quality (CIQM) whereby databases can be quantitatively labelled by their producers, so that users can judge how much reliance can be place on them. At the same time, each label bacomes a database specific standard to which its information provider must adhere. This may be a route to responsible information supply

Imprint

Oxford : Learned Information

Source

Online information 95: Proceedings of the 19th International online information meeting, London, 5-7 December 1995. Ed.: D.I. Raitt u. B. Jeapes

0.003606434 = product of:
  0.014425736 = sum of:
    0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014425736 = score(doc=6768,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports on a Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) BLRRD funded project which investigated the quality of databases in general use in the UK. Gives a literature review of quality in library and information services. Reports the results of a CIQM questionnaire survey on the quality problems of databases and their affect on users. Carries out databases evaluations of: INSPEC on ESA-IRS, INSPEC on KR Data-Star, INSPEC on UMI CD-ROM, BNB on CD-ROM, and Information Science Abstracts Plus CD-ROM. Sets out a methodology for evaluation of bibliographic databases

0.003606434 = product of:
  0.014425736 = sum of:
    0.014425736 = weight(_text_:information in 7264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014425736 = score(doc=7264,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 7264, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7264)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Discusses the issue of quality as applied to databases. Describes the role of the Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) set up by the Library Association and the UK Online User Group (UKOLUG), in acting as a clearing house to which database users could report problems relating to the quality of any aspect of a database being used. The Centre compiles statistics on database quality issues which can then be forwarded to the database producers and hosts. Champions the use of standardized database labels which include not only basic information about the database but also a quality assurance statement

Imprint

Bournemouth : University Library and Information Services

0.0033653039 = product of:
  0.013461215 = sum of:
    0.013461215 = weight(_text_:information in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013461215 = score(doc=3384,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports on a meeting held on 4 May 95 with the Library Association and members of the information industry which was organised to report on the work of the Centre for Information Quality Management, UK, on a database labelling methodology for assuring database quality to users. Describes database labelling, reports on a survey of database user satisfaction and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of database labelling

0.0029745363 = product of:
  0.011898145 = sum of:
    0.011898145 = weight(_text_:information in 5658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011898145 = score(doc=5658,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5658, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5658)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports the work of the Centre for Information Quality Management, UK, (CIQM), in improving database quality. Discusses general database quality issues, the database labelling concept advocated by CIQM (a mini specification which contains parameters which measure the database as it now is), and progress in encouraging database producers to use labelling to accredit their databases

0.002379629 = product of:
  0.009518516 = sum of:
    0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518516 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Discusses the application of the Platform for Internet Content Selection (PICS) methodology, developed in response to the US Communications Decency Act, 1996 (to enable indecent sites to be circumnavigated), as a means of labelling databases, particularly those incorporating metadata. Describes the potential for PICS in the labelling and describing of databases available via the Internet and WWW. Notes the place of PICS in relation to the activities and recommendations of the Centre for Information Quality Management

0.0017847219 = product of:
  0.0071388874 = sum of:
    0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071388874 = score(doc=824,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Abstracts from 7 Internet subject trees (Euroferret, Excite, Infoseek, Lycos Top 5%, Magellan, WebCrawler, Yahoo!), 5 Internet subject gateways (ADAM, EEVL, NetFirst, OMNI, SOSIG), and 3 online databases (ERIC, ISI, LISA) were examined for their subject content, treatment of various enriching features, physical properties such as overall length, anf their readability. Considerable differences were measured, and consistent similarities among abstracts from each type of source were demonstrated. Internet subject tree abstracts were generally the shortest, and online database abstracts the longest. Subject tree and online database abstracts were the most informative, but the level of coverage of document features such as tables, bibliographies, and geographical constraints were disappointingly poor. On balance, the Internet gateways appeared to be providing the most satisfactory abstracts. The authors discuss the continuing role in networked information retrieval of abstracts and their functional analoques such as metadata