Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Salton, G.; Lesk, M.E.: Computer evaluation of indexing and text processing (1968) 0.00

0.0035694437 = product of:
  0.014277775 = sum of:
    0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014277775 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote: Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.60-84.

Lesk, M.E.; Salton, G.: Relevance assements and retrieval system evaluation (1969) 0.00
```
0.0029446408 = product of:
  0.011778563 = sum of:
    0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011778563 = score(doc=4151,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Two widerly used criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems are, respectively, the recall and the precision. Since the determiniation of these measures is dependent on a distinction between documents which are relevant to a given query and documents which are not relevant to that query, it has sometimes been claimed that an accurate, generally valid evaluation cannot be based on recall and precision measure. A study was made to determine the effect of variations in relevance assesments do not produce significant variations in average recall and precision. It thus appears that properly computed recall and precision data may represent effectiveness indicators which are gemerally valid for many distinct user classes.

Source

Information storage and retrieval. 4(1969), S.343-359