-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.03
0.026697718 = product of:
0.053395435 = sum of:
0.053395435 = product of:
0.21358174 = sum of:
0.21358174 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21358174 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3800265 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Widhalm, R.; Mueck, T.A.: Merging topics in well-formed XML topic maps (2003)
0.02
0.022123788 = product of:
0.044247575 = sum of:
0.044247575 = product of:
0.08849515 = sum of:
0.08849515 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08849515 = score(doc=2186,freq=5.0), product of:
0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.45489684 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- The Semantic Web - ISWC 2003. Eds. D. Fensel et al
- Year
- 2003
-
Kent, R.E.: ¬The IFF foundation for ontological knowledge organization (2003)
0.02
0.022123788 = product of:
0.044247575 = sum of:
0.044247575 = product of:
0.08849515 = sum of:
0.08849515 = weight(_text_:2003 in 5527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08849515 = score(doc=5527,freq=5.0), product of:
0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.45489684 = fieldWeight in 5527, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 37(2003) nos.1/2, S.187-203
- Year
- 2003
-
Paralic, J.; Kostial, I.: Ontology-based information retrieval (2003)
0.02
0.01999318 = product of:
0.03998636 = sum of:
0.03998636 = product of:
0.07997272 = sum of:
0.07997272 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07997272 = score(doc=1153,freq=3.0), product of:
0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.4110885 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
3.0 = termFreq=3.0
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Year
- 2003
-
Rindflesch, T.C.; Fizsman, M.: The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing : interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text (2003)
0.02
0.01843649 = product of:
0.03687298 = sum of:
0.03687298 = product of:
0.07374596 = sum of:
0.07374596 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07374596 = score(doc=2097,freq=5.0), product of:
0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.3790807 = fieldWeight in 2097, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2097)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36(2003) no.6), S.462-477
- Year
- 2003
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996)
0.02
0.015182908 = product of:
0.030365815 = sum of:
0.030365815 = product of:
0.06073163 = sum of:
0.06073163 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06073163 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.11-22
-
Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018)
0.02
0.015182908 = product of:
0.030365815 = sum of:
0.030365815 = product of:
0.06073163 = sum of:
0.06073163 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06073163 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
-
McGuinness, D.L.: Ontologies come of age (2003)
0.01
0.014280844 = product of:
0.028561687 = sum of:
0.028561687 = product of:
0.057123374 = sum of:
0.057123374 = weight(_text_:2003 in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057123374 = score(doc=3084,freq=3.0), product of:
0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.29363465 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
3.0 = termFreq=3.0
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Year
- 2003
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.01
0.012146326 = product of:
0.024292652 = sum of:
0.024292652 = product of:
0.048585303 = sum of:
0.048585303 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048585303 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
-
Giunchiglia, F.; Villafiorita, A.; Walsh, T.: Theories of abstraction (1997)
0.01
0.012146326 = product of:
0.024292652 = sum of:
0.024292652 = product of:
0.048585303 = sum of:
0.048585303 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048585303 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1.10.2018 14:13:22
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021)
0.01
0.012146326 = product of:
0.024292652 = sum of:
0.024292652 = product of:
0.048585303 = sum of:
0.048585303 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048585303 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Öttl, S.; Streiff, D.; Stettler, N.; Studer, M.: Aufbau einer Testumgebung zur Ermittlung signifikanter Parameter bei der Ontologieabfrage (2010)
0.01
0.01166026 = product of:
0.02332052 = sum of:
0.02332052 = product of:
0.04664104 = sum of:
0.04664104 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04664104 = score(doc=4257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.2397517 = fieldWeight in 4257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4257)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Der Einsatz von semantischen Technologien ist mittlerweile ein etabliertes Mittel zur Optimierung von Information-Retrieval-Systemen. Obwohl der Einsatz von Ontologien für verschiedene Anwendungsbereiche wie beispielsweise zur Query-Expansion (Bhogal et al. 2007), zur Strukturierung von Benutzeroberflächen bzw. zur Dialoggestaltung (z. B. Garcia & Sicilia 2003; Liu et al. 2005; Lopez et al. 2006; Paulheim 2009; Paulheim & Probst 2010), in Recommendersystemen (z. B. Taehee et al. 2006; Cantador et al. 2008; Middleton et al. 2001; Middleton et al. 2009) usw. rege erforscht wird, gibt es noch kaum Bestrebungen, die einzelnen Abfragemethodiken für Ontologien systematisch zu untersuchen. Bei der Abfrage von Ontologien geht es in erster Linie darum, Zusammenhänge zwischen Begriffen zu ermitteln, indem hierarchische (Classes und Individuals), semantische (Object Properties) und ergänzende (Datatype Properties) Beziehungen abgefragt oder logische Verknüpfungen abgeleitet werden. Hierbei werden sogenannte Reasoner für die Ableitungen und als Abfragesprache SPARQL (seltener auch XPath) eingesetzt. Ein weiterer, weniger oft eingesetzter, vielversprechender Ansatz findet sich bei Hoser et al. (2006) und Weng & Chang (2008), die Techniken der Sozialen Netzwerkanalyse zur Auswertung von Ontologien miteinsetzen (Semantic Network Analysis). Um die Abfrage von Ontologien sowie Kombinationen der unterschiedlichen Abfragemöglichkeiten systematisch untersuchen zu können, wurde am SII eine entsprechende Testumgebung entwickelt, die in diesem Beitrag genauer vorgestellt werden soll.
-
Pepper, S.; Arnaud, P.J.L.: Absolutely PHAB : toward a general model of associative relations (2020)
0.01
0.01166026 = product of:
0.02332052 = sum of:
0.02332052 = product of:
0.04664104 = sum of:
0.04664104 = weight(_text_:2003 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04664104 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.2397517 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- There have been many attempts at classifying the semantic modification relations (R) of N + N compounds but this work has not led to the acceptance of a definitive scheme, so that devising a reusable classification is a worthwhile aim. The scope of this undertaking is extended to other binominal lexemes, i.e. units that contain two thing-morphemes without explicitly stating R, like prepositional units, N + relational adjective units, etc. The 25-relation taxonomy of Bourque (2014) was tested against over 15,000 binominal lexemes from 106 languages and extended to a 29-relation scheme ("Bourque2") through the introduction of two new reversible relations. Bourque2 is then mapped onto Hatcher's (1960) four-relation scheme (extended by the addition of a fifth relation, similarity , as "Hatcher2"). This results in a two-tier system usable at different degrees of granularities. On account of its semantic proximity to compounding, metonymy is then taken into account, following Janda's (2011) suggestion that it plays a role in word formation; Peirsman and Geeraerts' (2006) inventory of 23 metonymic patterns is mapped onto Bourque2, confirming the identity of metonymic and binominal modification relations. Finally, Blank's (2003) and Koch's (2001) work on lexical semantics justifies the addition to the scheme of a third, superordinate level which comprises the three Aristotelean principles of similarity, contiguity and contrast.
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.01
0.010628035 = product of:
0.02125607 = sum of:
0.02125607 = product of:
0.04251214 = sum of:
0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04251214 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005)
0.01
0.010628035 = product of:
0.02125607 = sum of:
0.02125607 = product of:
0.04251214 = sum of:
0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04251214 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:58
-
Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010)
0.01
0.010628035 = product of:
0.02125607 = sum of:
0.02125607 = product of:
0.04251214 = sum of:
0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04251214 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:41:16
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.01
0.010628035 = product of:
0.02125607 = sum of:
0.02125607 = product of:
0.04251214 = sum of:
0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04251214 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Madalli, D.P.; Balaji, B.P.; Sarangi, A.K.: Music domain analysis for building faceted ontological representation (2014)
0.01
0.010628035 = product of:
0.02125607 = sum of:
0.02125607 = product of:
0.04251214 = sum of:
0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04251214 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.010628035 = product of:
0.02125607 = sum of:
0.02125607 = product of:
0.04251214 = sum of:
0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04251214 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Khoo, S.G.; Na, J.-C.: Semantic relations in information science (2006)
0.01
0.009894058 = product of:
0.019788116 = sum of:
0.019788116 = product of:
0.039576232 = sum of:
0.039576232 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039576232 = score(doc=1978,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.20343605 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Linguists in the structuralist tradition (e.g., Lyons, 1977; Saussure, 1959) have asserted that concepts cannot be defined on their own but only in relation to other concepts. Semantic relations appear to reflect a logical structure in the fundamental nature of thought (Caplan & Herrmann, 1993). Green, Bean, and Myaeng (2002) noted that semantic relations play a critical role in how we represent knowledge psychologically, linguistically, and computationally, and that many systems of knowledge representation start with a basic distinction between entities and relations. Green (2001, p. 3) said that "relationships are involved as we combine simple entities to form more complex entities, as we compare entities, as we group entities, as one entity performs a process on another entity, and so forth. Indeed, many things that we might initially regard as basic and elemental are revealed upon further examination to involve internal structure, or in other words, internal relationships." Concepts and relations are often expressed in language and text. Language is used not just for communicating concepts and relations, but also for representing, storing, and reasoning with concepts and relations. We shall examine the nature of semantic relations from a linguistic and psychological perspective, with an emphasis on relations expressed in text. The usefulness of semantic relations in information science, especially in ontology construction, information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and text summarization is discussed. Research and development in information science have focused on concepts and terms, but the focus will increasingly shift to the identification, processing, and management of relations to achieve greater effectiveness and refinement in information science techniques. Previous chapters in ARIST on natural language processing (Chowdhury, 2003), text mining (Trybula, 1999), information retrieval and the philosophy of language (Blair, 2003), and query expansion (Efthimiadis, 1996) provide a background for this discussion, as semantic relations are an important part of these applications.
