-
Bornmann, L.: Scientific peer review (2011)
0.04
0.040562358 = product of:
0.12168707 = sum of:
0.12168707 = product of:
0.24337414 = sum of:
0.24337414 = weight(_text_:2011 in 1600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24337414 = score(doc=1600,freq=5.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
1.2153795 = fieldWeight in 1600, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.197-245
- Year
- 2011
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.04
0.038072195 = product of:
0.11421658 = sum of:
0.11421658 = sum of:
0.08691934 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691934 = score(doc=4186,freq=5.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.4340641 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.027297242 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027297242 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.217-229
- Year
- 2011
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.03
0.032907944 = product of:
0.09872383 = sum of:
0.09872383 = sum of:
0.065967135 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065967135 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.32943147 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.03275669 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03275669 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Opthof, T.: Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time : principles for comparing sets of documents (2011)
0.02
0.017383866 = product of:
0.052151598 = sum of:
0.052151598 = product of:
0.104303196 = sum of:
0.104303196 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104303196 = score(doc=4485,freq=5.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.5208769 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1370-1381
- Year
- 2011
-
Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? : a new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing (2011)
0.02
0.017383866 = product of:
0.052151598 = sum of:
0.052151598 = product of:
0.104303196 = sum of:
0.104303196 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104303196 = score(doc=4767,freq=5.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.5208769 = fieldWeight in 4767, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.1954-1962
- Year
- 2011
-
Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011)
0.01
0.014486557 = product of:
0.04345967 = sum of:
0.04345967 = product of:
0.08691934 = sum of:
0.08691934 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691934 = score(doc=4132,freq=5.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.4340641 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.61-71
- Year
- 2011
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors : an alternative research design with policy implications (2011)
0.01
0.014486557 = product of:
0.04345967 = sum of:
0.04345967 = product of:
0.08691934 = sum of:
0.08691934 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691934 = score(doc=4919,freq=5.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.4340641 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2133-2146
- Year
- 2011
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings : the Leiden ranking 2011/2012 (2013)
0.01
0.01295717 = product of:
0.038871508 = sum of:
0.038871508 = product of:
0.077743016 = sum of:
0.077743016 = weight(_text_:2011 in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077743016 = score(doc=1007,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.38823873 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Since the 1990s, with the heightened competition and the strong growth of the international higher education market, an increasing number of rankings have been created that measure the scientific performance of an institution based on data. The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012 (LR) was published early in 2012. Starting from Goldstein and Spiegelhalter's (1996) recommendations for conducting quantitative comparisons among institutions, in this study we undertook a reformulation of the LR by means of multilevel regression models. First, with our models we replicated the ranking results; second, the reanalysis of the LR data showed that only 5% of the PPtop10% total variation is attributable to differences between universities. Beyond that, about 80% of the variation between universities can be explained by differences among countries. If covariates are included in the model the differences among most of the universities become meaningless. Our findings have implications for conducting university rankings in general and for the LR in particular. For example, with Goldstein-adjusted confidence intervals, it is possible to interpret the significance of differences among universities meaningfully: Rank differences among universities should be interpreted as meaningful only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.01
0.010918897 = product of:
0.03275669 = sum of:
0.03275669 = product of:
0.06551338 = sum of:
0.06551338 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06551338 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.0072792647 = product of:
0.021837793 = sum of:
0.021837793 = product of:
0.043675587 = sum of:
0.043675587 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043675587 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
0.01
0.0054594483 = product of:
0.016378345 = sum of:
0.016378345 = product of:
0.03275669 = sum of:
0.03275669 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03275669 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:44:17
