Search (89 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.05
    0.053301066 = product of:
      0.1599032 = sum of:
        0.1599032 = sum of:
          0.12168707 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12168707 = score(doc=4198,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.60768974 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
          0.038216136 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038216136 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.363-374
    Year
    2011
  2. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.04
    0.038072195 = product of:
      0.11421658 = sum of:
        0.11421658 = sum of:
          0.08691934 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08691934 = score(doc=4635,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.4340641 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
          0.027297242 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027297242 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1614-1628
    Year
    2011
  3. Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019) 0.03
    0.032907944 = product of:
      0.09872383 = sum of:
        0.09872383 = sum of:
          0.065967135 = weight(_text_:2011 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065967135 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.32943147 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
          0.03275669 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03275669 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Anfang der 2000er Jahre entstanden in Reaktion auf unzureichende Zugangswege zu Fachliteratur und ausgelöst durch steigende Subskriptionsgebühren wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften erste illegale Dokumentensammlungen, sogenannte Schattenbibliotheken. Schattenbibliotheken sind Internetdienste, die ohne Zustimmung der RechteinhaberInnen Datenbanken mit wissenschaftlichen Volltexten erstellen, betreiben und allen Interessierten dadurch den Zugriff auf wissenschaftliche Literatur ermöglichen. Zu den meistgenutzten Schattenbibliotheken zählt Sci-Hub. Der Dienst wurde 2011 von Alexandra Elbakyan entwickelt und umfasste zum Zeitpunkt der Untersuchung mehr als 74 Millionen Dokumente. Die Akzeptanz dieser Dienste unter Forschenden und anderen Personengruppen, verschwimmende Grenzen in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung zu Open Access sowie mögliche Konsequenzen für bestehende legale Zugänge zu Fachliteratur beschäftigen nicht nur InformationswissenschaftlerInnen weltweit. In diesem Beitrag wird die Rolle des Phänomens Schattenbibliothek bei der wissenschaftlichen Informationsversorgung in Deutschland untersucht, insbesondere im Hinblick auf regionale Verteilungen von Downloads, Zugriffszeiten, Zusammenhängen zwischen der Größe bestimmter Personengruppen (Bevölkerungszahl, Anzahl wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeitender an Hochschulen) und den Downloadzahlen eines Bundeslands sowie den Eigenschaften der angefragten Dokumente (Themen, Verlage, Publikationsalter beim Zugriff).
    Date
    1. 1.2020 13:22:34
  4. Altenhöner, R.: Langzeitarchivierung in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek : Aktuelle Perspektiven (2011) 0.02
    0.023178488 = product of:
      0.069535464 = sum of:
        0.069535464 = product of:
          0.13907093 = sum of:
            0.13907093 = weight(_text_:2011 in 5145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13907093 = score(doc=5145,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.69450253 = fieldWeight in 5145, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5145)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 35(2011) H.1, S.10-14
    Year
    2011
  5. Weber-Wulff, D.; Köhler, K.: Plagiatserkennungssoftware 2010 (2011) 0.02
    0.023178488 = product of:
      0.069535464 = sum of:
        0.069535464 = product of:
          0.13907093 = sum of:
            0.13907093 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13907093 = score(doc=4501,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.69450253 = fieldWeight in 4501, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4501)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.4, S.159-166
    Year
    2011
  6. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.02
    0.021938628 = product of:
      0.06581588 = sum of:
        0.06581588 = sum of:
          0.04397809 = weight(_text_:2011 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04397809 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.21962099 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
          0.021837793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021837793 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  7. Morrison, H.; Borges, L.; Zhao, X.; Kakou, T.L.; Shanbhoug, A.N.: Change and growth in open access journal publishing and charging trends 2011-2021 (2022) 0.02
    0.020487085 = product of:
      0.061461255 = sum of:
        0.061461255 = product of:
          0.12292251 = sum of:
            0.12292251 = weight(_text_:2011 in 741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12292251 = score(doc=741,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.61385936 = fieldWeight in 741, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=741)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines trends in open access article processing charges (APCs) from 2011 to 2021, building on a 2011 study by Solomon and Björk. Two methods are employed, a modified replica and a status update of the 2011 journals. Data are drawn from multiple sources and datasets are available as open data. Most journals do not charge APCs; this has not changed. The global average per-journal APC increased slightly, from 906 to 958 USD, while the per-article average increased from 904 to 1,626 USD, indicating that authors choose to publish in more expensive journals. Publisher size, type, impact metrics and subject affect charging tendencies, average APC, and pricing trends. Half the journals from the 2011 sample are no longer listed in DOAJ in 2021, due to ceased publication or publisher de-listing. Conclusions include a caution about the potential of the APC model to increase costs beyond inflation. The university sector may be the most promising approach to economically sustainable no-fee OA journals. Universities publish many OA journals, nearly half of OA articles, tend not to charge APCs and when APCs are charged, the prices are very low on average.
  8. Gullath, B.; Ikas, W.-V.: Zum Nutzen von E-Zeitschriften, Datenbanken und Internet-Publikationen : Neue Wege im Ausbau der BSB-Forschungsdokumentation zu Handschriften und Seltenen Drucken (2011) 0.02
    0.020281179 = product of:
      0.060843535 = sum of:
        0.060843535 = product of:
          0.12168707 = sum of:
            0.12168707 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12168707 = score(doc=4643,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.60768974 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 58(2011) H.2, S.72-76
    Year
    2011
  9. Paal, S.; Eickeler, S.: Automatisierung vom Scan bis zum elektronischen Lesesaal (2011) 0.02
    0.020281179 = product of:
      0.060843535 = sum of:
        0.060843535 = product of:
          0.12168707 = sum of:
            0.12168707 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12168707 = score(doc=4897,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.60768974 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.8, S.351-354
    Year
    2011
  10. Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995) 0.02
    0.018198162 = product of:
      0.054594483 = sum of:
        0.054594483 = product of:
          0.10918897 = sum of:
            0.10918897 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10918897 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
  11. Oßwald, A.: Significant properties digitaler Objekte : Ergebnisse aus Fallstudien (2010) 0.02
    0.018140038 = product of:
      0.054420114 = sum of:
        0.054420114 = product of:
          0.10884023 = sum of:
            0.10884023 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10884023 = score(doc=4675,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.5435342 = fieldWeight in 4675, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  12. Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000) 0.02
    0.015441652 = product of:
      0.046324957 = sum of:
        0.046324957 = product of:
          0.092649914 = sum of:
            0.092649914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092649914 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    18. 6.2000 9:11:22
  13. Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993) 0.01
    0.0145585295 = product of:
      0.043675587 = sum of:
        0.043675587 = product of:
          0.08735117 = sum of:
            0.08735117 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08735117 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
  14. Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992) 0.01
    0.0145585295 = product of:
      0.043675587 = sum of:
        0.043675587 = product of:
          0.08735117 = sum of:
            0.08735117 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08735117 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
  15. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.01
    0.0145585295 = product of:
      0.043675587 = sum of:
        0.043675587 = product of:
          0.08735117 = sum of:
            0.08735117 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08735117 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  16. Zhang, Y.; Kudva, S.: E-books versus print books : readers' choices and preferences across contexts (2014) 0.01
    0.01295717 = product of:
      0.038871508 = sum of:
        0.038871508 = product of:
          0.077743016 = sum of:
            0.077743016 = weight(_text_:2011 in 1335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077743016 = score(doc=1335,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.38823873 = fieldWeight in 1335, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    With electronic book (e-book) sales and readership rising, are e-books positioned to replace print books? This study examines the preference for e-books and print books in the contexts of reading purpose, reading situation, and contextual variables such as age, gender, education level, race/ethnicity, income, community type, and Internet use. In addition, this study aims to identify factors that contribute to e-book adoption. Participants were a nationally representative sample of 2,986 people in the United States from the Reading Habits Survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project (http://pewinternet.org/Shared-Content/Data-Sets/2011/December-2011--Reading-Habits.aspx). While the results of this study support the notion that e-books have firmly established a place in people's lives, due to their convenience of access, e-books are not yet positioned to replace print books. Both print books and e-books have unique attributes and serve irreplaceable functions to meet people's reading needs, which may vary by individual demographic, contextual, and situational factors. At this point, the leading significant predictors of e-book adoption are the number of books read, the individual's income, the occurrence and frequency of reading for research topics of interest, and the individual's Internet use, followed by other variables such as race/ethnicity, reading for work/school, age, and education.
  17. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.01
    0.012868043 = product of:
      0.03860413 = sum of:
        0.03860413 = product of:
          0.07720826 = sum of:
            0.07720826 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07720826 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  18. Dechsling, R.: Softwaretypen : Datenbank, Hypertext oder linearer Text? (1994) 0.01
    0.012738712 = product of:
      0.038216136 = sum of:
        0.038216136 = product of:
          0.07643227 = sum of:
            0.07643227 = weight(_text_:22 in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07643227 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Börsenblatt. Nr.50 vom 24.6.1994, S.19-22
  19. Electronic publishing and electronic information communication (1996) 0.01
    0.012738712 = product of:
      0.038216136 = sum of:
        0.038216136 = product of:
          0.07643227 = sum of:
            0.07643227 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07643227 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247
  20. Schmitz, H.: Lese- und Lernstoff allerwege : NuvoMedia bietet 'RocketBook' an, Bertelsmann ist dabei (1998) 0.01
    0.012738712 = product of:
      0.038216136 = sum of:
        0.038216136 = product of:
          0.07643227 = sum of:
            0.07643227 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07643227 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    12. 2.1996 22:34:46

Years

Languages

  • d 51
  • e 37

Types

  • a 82
  • el 6
  • m 4
  • s 3
  • More… Less…