Search (3751 results, page 1 of 188)

  1. Gordon, T.J.; Helmer-Hirschberg, O.: Report on a long-range forecasting study (1964) 0.15 
    0.15066686 = product of:
  0.30133373 = sum of:
    0.30133373 = sum of:
      0.22132397 = weight(_text_:opinions in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22132397 = score(doc=4204,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.6121956 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
      0.08000977 = weight(_text_:22 in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08000977 = score(doc=4204,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Description of an experimental trend-predicting exercise covering a time period as far as 50 years into the future. The Delphi technique is used in soliciting the opinions of experts in six areas: scientific breakthroughs, population growth, automation, space progress, probability and prevention of war, and future weapon systems. Possible objections to the approach are also discussed.
    Date
    22. 6.2018 13:24:08
    22. 6.2018 13:54:52
  2. Murray, I.: Funding access to the Internet in public libraries : a review article (1998) 0.14 
    0.1389497 = product of:
  0.2778994 = sum of:
    0.2778994 = sum of:
      0.22132397 = weight(_text_:opinions in 3529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22132397 = score(doc=3529,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.6121956 = fieldWeight in 3529, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3529)
      0.05657545 = weight(_text_:22 in 3529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05657545 = score(doc=3529,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3529, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3529)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The decision to provide access to the Internet for members of the public raises some issues, in particular how a service is to be funded. Gives examples of current practice and draws broad conclusions from a sample of opinions voiced by members of the public. It puts forward s SWOT methodology as one possible approach to assist in identifying the crucial factors in the implementation of an Internet public access service emphasising what factors must be obtained to result in a cost effective service
    Date
    8. 5.1999 19:48:22
  3. Aringhieri, R.; Damiani, E.; De Capitani di Vimercati, S.; Paraboschi, S.; Samarati, P.: Fuzzy techniques for trust and reputation management in anonymous peer-to-peer systems (2006) 0.14 
    0.13859054 = product of:
  0.2771811 = sum of:
    0.2771811 = sum of:
      0.23474951 = weight(_text_:opinions in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23474951 = score(doc=5279,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.6493315 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
      0.04243159 = weight(_text_:22 in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04243159 = score(doc=5279,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Peer-to-peer (P2P) applications are rapidly gaining acceptance among users of Internet-based services, especially because of their capability of exchanging resources while preserving the anonymity of both requesters and providers. However, concerns have been raised about the possibility that malicious users can exploit the network to spread tampered-with resources (e.g., malicious programs and viruses). A considerable amount of research has thus focused on the development of trust and reputation models in P2P networks. In this article, we propose to use fuzzy techniques in the design of reputation systems based on collecting and aggregating peers' opinions. Fuzzy techniques are used in the evaluation and synthesis of all the opinions expressed by peers. The behavior of the proposed system is described by comparison with probabilistic approaches.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:06:18
  4. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.12 
    0.121580996 = product of:
  0.24316199 = sum of:
    0.24316199 = sum of:
      0.19365847 = weight(_text_:opinions in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19365847 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.5356712 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
      0.04950352 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04950352 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    An awareness exists among Italian librarians of the need for an established code of ethics for library reference services. Considers the principles that such a code should incorporate; the US Commitment to Information services, for example, affirms users' rights of access to library books and resources, regardless of content and opinions expressed. Censoship is opposed and people are not barred from library use for ethnis, social or religious reasons. An ethical code would require library staff to be impartial, give attention and respect to users, allocate time properly, and avoid prejudice. Discusses the problems of library ethics which arise when user requests relate to sensitive topics e.g. euthansia, cocaine refining
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  5. Ku, L.-W.; Ho, H.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Opinion mining and relationship discovery using CopeOpi opinion analysis system (2009) 0.12 
    0.11549212 = product of:
  0.23098424 = sum of:
    0.23098424 = sum of:
      0.19562459 = weight(_text_:opinions in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19562459 = score(doc=2938,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.54110956 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
      0.03535966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03535966 = score(doc=2938,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We present CopeOpi, an opinion-analysis system, which extracts from the Web opinions about specific targets, summarizes the polarity and strength of these opinions, and tracks opinion variations over time. Objects that yield similar opinion tendencies over a certain time period may be correlated due to the latent causal events. CopeOpi discovers relationships among objects based on their opinion-tracking plots and collocations. Event bursts are detected from the tracking plots, and the strength of opinion relationships is determined by the coverage of these plots. To evaluate opinion mining, we use the NTCIR corpus annotated with opinion information at sentence and document levels. CopeOpi achieves sentence- and document-level f-measures of 62% and 74%. For relationship discovery, we collected 1.3M economics-related documents from 93 Web sources over 22 months, and analyzed collocation-based, opinion-based, and hybrid models. We consider as correlated company pairs that demonstrate similar stock-price variations, and selected these as the gold standard for evaluation. Results show that opinion-based and collocation-based models complement each other, and that integrated models perform the best. The top 25, 50, and 100 pairs discovered achieve precision rates of 1, 0.92, and 0.79, respectively.
  6. Brabazon, T.: ¬The Google effect : Googling, Blogging, Wikis and the flattening of expertise (2006) 0.10 
    0.104212284 = product of:
  0.20842457 = sum of:
    0.20842457 = sum of:
      0.16599298 = weight(_text_:opinions in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16599298 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.4591467 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
      0.04243159 = weight(_text_:22 in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04243159 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article presents the consequences to librarians and teachers for the flattening of expertise, or the Google Effect. As blogs continue to fill the Web with the bizarre daily rituals and opinions of people who we would never bother speaking to at a party, let alone invite into our homes, there has never been a greater need to stress the importance of intelligence, education, credentials and credibility. The problem is not only accuracy, but also the mediocrity initiated through the Google Effect. The concern is not with the banality of information - there has always been a plurality of sources in the analogue environment. The concern is the lack of literacy skills and strategies to sort the trash from the relevant. This paper addresses not only the social choices about computer use and information literacy, but the intellectual choices we make in our professional lives as teachers and librarians. In such a time, the Google Effect raises stark questions about the value of reading, research, writing and scholarship.
    Date
    16. 3.2019 16:22:08
  7. Lorentzen, D.G.: Bridging polarised Twitter discussions : the interactions of the users in the middle (2021) 0.10 
    0.104212284 = product of:
  0.20842457 = sum of:
    0.20842457 = sum of:
      0.16599298 = weight(_text_:opinions in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16599298 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.4591467 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
      0.04243159 = weight(_text_:22 in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04243159 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of the paper is to analyse the interactions of bridging users in Twitter discussions about vaccination. Design/methodology/approach Conversational threads were collected through filtering the Twitter stream using keywords and the most active participants in the conversations. Following data collection and anonymisation of tweets and user profiles, a retweet network was created to find users bridging the main clusters. Four conversations were selected, ranging from 456 to 1,983 tweets long, and then analysed through content analysis. Findings Although different opinions met in the discussions, a consensus was rarely built. Many sub-threads involved insults and criticism, and participants seemed not interested in shifting their positions. However, examples of reasoned discussions were also found. Originality/value The study analyses conversations on Twitter, which is rarely studied. The focus on the interactions of bridging users adds to the uniqueness of the paper.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Park, Y.J.: ¬A socio-technological model of search information divide in US cities (2021) 0.10 
    0.104212284 = product of:
  0.20842457 = sum of:
    0.20842457 = sum of:
      0.16599298 = weight(_text_:opinions in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16599298 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.4591467 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
      0.04243159 = weight(_text_:22 in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04243159 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of the paper is to analyse the interactions of bridging users in Twitter discussions about vaccination. Design/methodology/approach Conversational threads were collected through filtering the Twitter stream using keywords and the most active participants in the conversations. Following data collection and anonymisation of tweets and user profiles, a retweet network was created to find users bridging the main clusters. Four conversations were selected, ranging from 456 to 1,983 tweets long, and then analysed through content analysis. Findings Although different opinions met in the discussions, a consensus was rarely built. Many sub-threads involved insults and criticism, and participants seemed not interested in shifting their positions. However, examples of reasoned discussions were also found. Originality/value The study analyses conversations on Twitter, which is rarely studied. The focus on the interactions of bridging users adds to the uniqueness of the paper.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.10411799 = sum of:
  0.08290219 = product of:
    0.24870656 = sum of:
      0.24870656 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24870656 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44252416 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.021215795 = product of:
    0.04243159 = sum of:
      0.04243159 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04243159 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  10. Richter lehnen Zwangsffilter für Bibliotheken ab (2002) 0.10 
    0.096829236 = product of:
  0.19365847 = sum of:
    0.19365847 = product of:
      0.38731694 = sum of:
        0.38731694 = weight(_text_:opinions in 1217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38731694 = score(doc=1217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052196696 = queryNorm
            1.0713423 = fieldWeight in 1217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: www.ala.org/cipa/cipatrial9.html und für das Urteil: www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/02D0415P.htm
  11. Cox, A.M.: Flickr: a case study of Web2.0 (2008) 0.09 
    0.086843565 = product of:
  0.17368713 = sum of:
    0.17368713 = sum of:
      0.13832746 = weight(_text_:opinions in 2569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13832746 = score(doc=2569,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.38262224 = fieldWeight in 2569, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2569)
      0.03535966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03535966 = score(doc=2569,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2569, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2569)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The "photosharing" site Flickr is one of the most commonly cited examples used to define Web2.0. This paper aims to explore where Flickr's real novelty lies, examining its functionality and its place in the world of amateur photography. Several optimistic views of the impact of Flickr such as its facilitation of citizen journalism, "vernacular creativity" and in learning as an "affinity space" are evaluated. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws on a wide range of sources including published interviews with its developers, user opinions expressed in forums, telephone interviews and content analysis of user profiles and activity. Findings - Flickr's development path passes from an innovative social game to a relatively familiar model of a web site, itself developed through intense user participation but later stabilising with the reassertion of a commercial relationship to the membership. The broader context of the impact of Flickr is examined by looking at the institutions of amateur photography and particularly the code of pictorialism promoted by the clubs and industry during the twentieth century. The nature of Flickr as a benign space is premised on the way the democratic potential of photography is controlled by such institutions. The limits of optimistic claims about Flickr are identified in the way that the system is designed to satisfy commercial purposes, continuing digital divides in access and the low interactivity and criticality on Flickr. Originality/value - Flickr is an interesting source of change, but can only be understood in the perspective of long-term development of the hobby and wider social processes. By setting Flickr in such a broad context, its significance and that of Web2.0 more generally can be fully assessed.
    Date
    30.12.2008 19:38:22
  12. Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010) 0.09 
    0.086843565 = product of:
  0.17368713 = sum of:
    0.17368713 = sum of:
      0.13832746 = weight(_text_:opinions in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13832746 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.38262224 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
      0.03535966 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03535966 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A huge number of informal messages are posted every day in social network sites, blogs, and discussion forums. Emotions seem to be frequently important in these texts for expressing friendship, showing social support or as part of online arguments. Algorithms to identify sentiment and sentiment strength are needed to help understand the role of emotion in this informal communication and also to identify inappropriate or anomalous affective utterances, potentially associated with threatening behavior to the self or others. Nevertheless, existing sentiment detection algorithms tend to be commercially oriented, designed to identify opinions about products rather than user behaviors. This article partly fills this gap with a new algorithm, SentiStrength, to extract sentiment strength from informal English text, using new methods to exploit the de facto grammars and spelling styles of cyberspace. Applied to MySpace comments and with a lookup table of term sentiment strengths optimized by machine learning, SentiStrength is able to predict positive emotion with 60.6% accuracy and negative emotion with 72.8% accuracy, both based upon strength scales of 1-5. The former, but not the latter, is better than baseline and a wide range of general machine learning approaches.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:29:23
  13. Bhattacharya, S.; Yang, C.; Srinivasan, P.; Boynton, B.: Perceptions of presidential candidates' personalities in twitter (2016) 0.09 
    0.086843565 = product of:
  0.17368713 = sum of:
    0.17368713 = sum of:
      0.13832746 = weight(_text_:opinions in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13832746 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.38262224 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
      0.03535966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03535966 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Political sentiment analysis using social media, especially Twitter, has attracted wide interest in recent years. In such research, opinions about politicians are typically divided into positive, negative, or neutral. In our research, the goal is to mine political opinion from social media at a higher resolution by assessing statements of opinion related to the personality traits of politicians; this is an angle that has not yet been considered in social media research. A second goal is to contribute a novel retrieval-based approach for tracking public perception of personality using Gough and Heilbrun's Adjective Check List (ACL) of 110 terms describing key traits. This is in contrast to the typical lexical and machine-learning approaches used in sentiment analysis. High-precision search templates developed from the ACL were run on an 18-month span of Twitter posts mentioning Obama and Romney and these retrieved more than half a million tweets. For example, the results indicated that Romney was perceived as more of an achiever and Obama was perceived as somewhat more friendly. The traits were also aggregated into 14 broad personality dimensions. For example, Obama rated far higher than Romney on the Moderation dimension and lower on the Machiavellianism dimension. The temporal variability of such perceptions was explored.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:25:47
  14. Li, L.; He, D.; Zhang, C.; Geng, L.; Zhang, K.: Characterizing peer-judged answer quality on academic Q&A sites : a cross-disciplinary case study on ResearchGate (2018) 0.09 
    0.086843565 = product of:
  0.17368713 = sum of:
    0.17368713 = sum of:
      0.13832746 = weight(_text_:opinions in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13832746 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.38262224 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
      0.03535966 = weight(_text_:22 in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03535966 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose Academic social (question and answer) Q&A sites are now utilised by millions of scholars and researchers for seeking and sharing discipline-specific information. However, little is known about the factors that can affect their votes on the quality of an answer, nor how the discipline might influence these factors. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach Using 1,021 answers collected over three disciplines (library and information services, history of art, and astrophysics) in ResearchGate, statistical analysis is performed to identify the characteristics of high-quality academic answers, and comparisons were made across the three disciplines. In particular, two major categories of characteristics of the answer provider and answer content were extracted and examined. Findings The results reveal that high-quality answers on academic social Q&A sites tend to possess two characteristics: first, they are provided by scholars with higher academic reputations (e.g. more followers, etc.); and second, they provide objective information (e.g. longer answer with fewer subjective opinions). However, the impact of these factors varies across disciplines, e.g., objectivity is more favourable in physics than in other disciplines. Originality/value The study is envisioned to help academic Q&A sites to select and recommend high-quality answers across different disciplines, especially in a cold-start scenario where the answer has not received enough judgements from peers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  15. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.09 
    0.08676499 = sum of:
  0.069085166 = product of:
    0.20725548 = sum of:
      0.20725548 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20725548 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44252416 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.01767983 = product of:
    0.03535966 = sum of:
      0.03535966 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03535966 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18278393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052196696 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  16. Horton, F.W.: Some speculations on knowing, learning and artificial intelligence (1995) 0.08 
    0.08299649 = product of:
  0.16599298 = sum of:
    0.16599298 = product of:
      0.33198595 = sum of:
        0.33198595 = weight(_text_:opinions in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33198595 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052196696 = queryNorm
            0.9182934 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Provocative opinions offered to start and enliven a dialogue between representatives from the field of artificial intelligence and library and information science
  17. World guide : facts, figures, maps, opinions (1995) 0.08 
    0.08299649 = product of:
  0.16599298 = sum of:
    0.16599298 = product of:
      0.33198595 = sum of:
        0.33198595 = weight(_text_:opinions in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33198595 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052196696 = queryNorm
            0.9182934 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Conrad, J.G.; Dabney, D.P.: ¬The structure of judical opinions : identifying internal components and their relationships (1998) 0.08 
    0.08299649 = product of:
  0.16599298 = sum of:
    0.16599298 = product of:
      0.33198595 = sum of:
        0.33198595 = weight(_text_:opinions in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33198595 = score(doc=144,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052196696 = queryNorm
            0.9182934 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Empirical research on basic components of American judicial opinions has only scratched the surface. Lack of sufficient legal experts and adequate computational resources are but two reasons responsible for this deficiency. Aided by a team of expert attorney-editors, we have undertaken a three-phase study to uncover fundamental components of judicial opinions found in American case law. We hypothesized that after years of working closely with thousands of judicial opinions, expert attorneys would develop a refined and internalized schema of the content and structure of legal cases. In this study participants were permitted to describe both concept-related and format-related components. The resultant components are reported on in this paper. Additional experiments currently underway further validate and refine this set of components and apply them to new search paradigms
  19. Lee, S.; Ha, T.; Lee, D.; Kim, J.H.: Understanding the majority opinion formation process in online environments : an exploratory approach to Facebook (2018) 0.08 
    0.08299649 = product of:
  0.16599298 = sum of:
    0.16599298 = product of:
      0.33198595 = sum of:
        0.33198595 = weight(_text_:opinions in 5050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33198595 = score(doc=5050,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3615249 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052196696 = queryNorm
            0.9182934 = fieldWeight in 5050, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5050)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Majority opinions are often observed in the process of social interaction in online communities, but few studies have addressed this issue with empirical data. To identify an appropriate theoretical lens for explaining majority opinions in online environments, this study investigates the skewness statistic, which indicates how many "Likes" are skewed to major comments on a Facebook post; 3489 posts are gathered from the New York Times Facebook page for 100 days. Results show that time is not an influential factor for skewness increase, but the number of comments has a logarithmic relation to skewness increase. Regression models and Chow tests show that this relationship differs depending on topic contents, but majority opinions are significant in overall. These results suggest that the bandwagon effect due to social affordance can be a suitable mechanism for explaining majority opinion formation in an online environment and that majority opinions in online communities can be misperceived due to overestimation.
  20. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.08290219 = product of:
  0.16580439 = sum of:
    0.16580439 = product of:
      0.49741313 = sum of:
        0.49741313 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49741313 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44252416 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052196696 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3141
  • m 350
  • el 169
  • s 141
  • b 39
  • x 36
  • i 24
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications