-
D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011)
0.04
0.040532265 = product of:
0.10133066 = sum of:
0.086501256 = product of:
0.17300251 = sum of:
0.17300251 = weight(_text_:exercises in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17300251 = score(doc=4190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25947425 = queryWeight, product of:
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.6667425 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014829405 = product of:
0.02965881 = sum of:
0.02965881 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02965881 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- National exercises for the evaluation of research activity by universities are becoming regular practice in ever more countries. These exercises have mainly been conducted through the application of peer-review methods. Bibliometrics has not been able to offer a valid large-scale alternative because of almost overwhelming difficulties in identifying the true author of each publication. We will address this problem by presenting a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometric datasets for large-scale research assessments. The application proposed concerns the Italian university system, comprising 80 universities and a research staff of over 60,000 scientists. The key advantage of the proposed approach is the ease of implementation. The algorithms are of practical application and have considerably better scalability and expandability properties than state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches. Moreover, the performance in terms of precision and recall, which can be further improved, seems thoroughly adequate for the typical needs of large-scale bibliometric research assessments.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:06:52
-
Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004)
0.04
0.038986538 = product of:
0.09746634 = sum of:
0.077693805 = product of:
0.15538761 = sum of:
0.15538761 = weight(_text_:problems in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15538761 = score(doc=132,freq=16.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
1.0318688 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the cataloging literature to collect problems that have been identified with the MARC 21 format. The problems are sorted into (1) problems that are not the fault of MARC 21; (2) problems that perhaps are not problems at all; (3) problems that are connected with the current shared cataloging environment; and 4) other problems with MARC 21 and vendor implementation of it. The author makes recommendations to deal with the true MARC 21 problems that remain after this analysis.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Khurshid, Z.: Arabic script materials : cataloging issues and problems (2002)
0.03
0.030672893 = product of:
0.07668223 = sum of:
0.04120336 = product of:
0.08240672 = sum of:
0.08240672 = weight(_text_:problems in 5474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08240672 = score(doc=5474,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.5472311 = fieldWeight in 5474, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03547887 = product of:
0.07095774 = sum of:
0.07095774 = weight(_text_:etc in 5474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07095774 = score(doc=5474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.35906604 = fieldWeight in 5474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Some of the problems in the cataloging of Arabic script materials are due to the peculiarities of Arabic books not generally found in European or American imprints, such as the lack of a chief source of information, missing date of publication, mixing up the term impression with edition, etc. Other problems result from the difficulties in determining the form of Arabic personal and corporate names, lack of standard Arabic subject headings, poor coverage of Islamic and Arabic literature, history, culture, customs, and religion in Western classification systems, limitation of the MARC format in dealing with the requirements of Arabic script materials, and the lower standard of cataloging education and training. The paper discusses all of these problems in detail and highlights various attempts, both successful and unsuccessful, made to resolve them.
-
Languages of the world : cataloguing issues and problems (1993)
0.03
0.02834487 = product of:
0.070862174 = sum of:
0.04120336 = product of:
0.08240672 = sum of:
0.08240672 = weight(_text_:problems in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08240672 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.5472311 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02965881 = product of:
0.05931762 = sum of:
0.05931762 = weight(_text_:22 in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05931762 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 15. 6.1996 18:06:22
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004)
0.03
0.025331676 = product of:
0.06332919 = sum of:
0.05097135 = product of:
0.1019427 = sum of:
0.1019427 = weight(_text_:exercises in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1019427 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25947425 = queryWeight, product of:
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.39288178 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0123578375 = product of:
0.024715675 = sum of:
0.024715675 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024715675 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Olson, C.: Cataloging Southeast Asian language materials : the case of the Thai language (1996)
0.02
0.023572532 = product of:
0.05893133 = sum of:
0.041630354 = product of:
0.08326071 = sum of:
0.08326071 = weight(_text_:problems in 5112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08326071 = score(doc=5112,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.55290204 = fieldWeight in 5112, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5112)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017300973 = product of:
0.034601945 = sum of:
0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 5112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034601945 = score(doc=5112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5112)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Cataloging and accessing non-roman languages, such as the languages in the JACKPHY group, have been better served because of the inclusion of vernacular languages in their bibliographic records. However, Southeast Asian languages such as Thai, Lao or even Burmese present other problems for catalogers because only romanized versions of these languages are present in current bibliographic records. The problems in cataloging and accessing the materials in these languages occur not only because of the romanization system but also due to the nature of the languages themselves. This paper presents a number of problems related to the cataloging of Thai language materials.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.10-28
-
Frohnsdorff, G.: Facts? of publication : cataloging problems posed by deceptive information (1999)
0.02
0.023572532 = product of:
0.05893133 = sum of:
0.041630354 = product of:
0.08326071 = sum of:
0.08326071 = weight(_text_:problems in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08326071 = score(doc=108,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.55290204 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017300973 = product of:
0.034601945 = sum of:
0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034601945 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- False imprint information and other deceptive publication details present problems for catalogers. In this article, I describe different types of misleading information, including fictitions names of publishers, incorrect places of publication, and false dates; mention possible reasons for deception, including fear of prosecution, and emphasize the need for catalogers to be suspicious when handling certain types of material. Erotic printed materials and bootleg sound recordings are discussed in detail, and examples of misleading information in each medium and explanations of how cataloging rules address or fail to address specific circumstances are included. Catalogers need to be aware of both the potential problems associated with certain types of materials and the types of reference sources to consult when dealing with those materials.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Seaman, D.M.: Selection, access, and control in a library of electronic texts (1996)
0.02
0.020516803 = product of:
0.05129201 = sum of:
0.03399104 = product of:
0.06798208 = sum of:
0.06798208 = weight(_text_:problems in 6733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06798208 = score(doc=6733,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.4514426 = fieldWeight in 6733, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017300973 = product of:
0.034601945 = sum of:
0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 6733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034601945 = score(doc=6733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The Electronic Text Center, Virginia University, has been mounting SGML full text databases online since 1992 and is actively building a user community around this Internet based resource. Reports the Library's efforts to integrate these databases into the training, cataloguing, preservation and collection development areas of the library's operations with particular reference to problems such as: the desire for software and platform independent texts; and attempts to solve the cataloguing problems involving SGML bibliographic records using such techniques as the Text Encoding Initiative
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Nistor, V.; Micle, M.: Normele ISBD(M) si ISBD(S) in modele si exercitii : reguli de aplicare a ISBD(M): indrumar practic de seminar (2002)
0.02
0.020388542 = product of:
0.1019427 = sum of:
0.1019427 = product of:
0.2038854 = sum of:
0.2038854 = weight(_text_:exercises in 4140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2038854 = score(doc=4140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25947425 = queryWeight, product of:
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.78576356 = fieldWeight in 4140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4140)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: ISBD (M) and ISBD (S) in examples and exercises
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Pebbles for the mosais of cataloging expertise : what do problems in expert systems for cataloging reveal about cataloging expertise? (1999)
0.02
0.020205026 = product of:
0.050512563 = sum of:
0.03568316 = product of:
0.07136632 = sum of:
0.07136632 = weight(_text_:problems in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07136632 = score(doc=103,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.47391602 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014829405 = product of:
0.02965881 = sum of:
0.02965881 = weight(_text_:22 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02965881 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Twenty-five years of research in expert systems for descriptive cataloging and related areas are reviewed. Researchers who developed prototype expert cataloging systems in the 1980s found that cataloging rules are extremely comprehensive and complicated, but still insufficient to permit these systems accurate cataloging results. Those researchers also identified smaller areas that need to be pursued for successful implementation of expert cataloging systems. Subsequent research has focused on narrower areas. Cataloging rules were studied and more was learned about problems with their logic structure and organization. Another focus was optical reading of bibliographic elements in documents. Categories of responsibility and graphic design continue to pose problems. The visual characteristics of documents were studied to understand more about the automatic recognition of bibliographic elements necessary for the bibliographic description of documents. The systematic study of the cataloging process, necessary for development of expert systems, may result in improvement of manual working procedures and enrich the education of new catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Thomas, A.R.: ¬The Work-Wide Web : a cataloging career for every librarian? (1997)
0.02
0.018896578 = product of:
0.047241446 = sum of:
0.027468907 = product of:
0.054937813 = sum of:
0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054937813 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Reviews the consequences of the traditional division of library staff into Technical Services and Reader Services and if decreased interest in cataloguing by library managers. Notes ways in which non cataloguers have had limited involvement in cataloguing. Describes different forms of a holistic approach to library practice and suggests advantages of a holistic work plan. Considers problems of a holistic work plan, advances some solutions and identifies implications for education in cataloguing in library schools
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.5-22
-
Hoffmann, H.: Cataloguing interactive multimedia using the new guidelines (1996)
0.02
0.018896578 = product of:
0.047241446 = sum of:
0.027468907 = product of:
0.054937813 = sum of:
0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 7231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054937813 = score(doc=7231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 7231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7231)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 7231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=7231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7231)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Considers the new Guidelines for bibliographic description of interactive multimedia published by the ALA in 1994. Examines the current and future status of the Guidelines and discusses the problems involved in applying them to the media coming into the library at La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.17-20
-
Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996)
0.02
0.018896578 = product of:
0.047241446 = sum of:
0.027468907 = product of:
0.054937813 = sum of:
0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054937813 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Argues that the current understanding of main entry is the chief access point for the work in a physical item being described by a bibliographic record. Explains the justification for main entries while drawing attention to the few related problems as they relate to OPACs
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
-
Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997)
0.02
0.018896578 = product of:
0.047241446 = sum of:
0.027468907 = product of:
0.054937813 = sum of:
0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054937813 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- One of the most common errors in cataloguing library materials involves miscoding of the nonfiling indicator of title fields. Notes the extent of the problem and its negative effect on searching in the library's online catalogue and surveys how librarians have approached solutions to the problems. Describes how the major library automation system address this problem
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Crocetti, L.: AACR2 in edizione italiana (1997)
0.02
0.018896578 = product of:
0.047241446 = sum of:
0.027468907 = product of:
0.054937813 = sum of:
0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054937813 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- An introduction to the Italian-language version of the AACR, which incorporates revisions made in 1993. Describes for reader unfamiliar with AACR2 the aims, structure and content of the rules, commenting on some problems of translating them into Italian. Cites extracts from 'The most concise AACR2 (M. Gorman)'
- Date
- 29. 7.1998 10:22:48
-
Rolland-Thomas, P.: AACR2: one step towards an international code (1983)
0.02
0.018896578 = product of:
0.047241446 = sum of:
0.027468907 = product of:
0.054937813 = sum of:
0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054937813 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, second edition, aim at universal applicability. Some problems brought forth through the translation process and the laws in the workability of rules in a nonEnglish working language are examined. This leads to acknowledge the failure of AACR2 to acquire an international adaptability. Enquiry into the needs of potential users is advised.
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 19:12:22
-
Kincy, C.P.; Layne, S.S.: Making the move to RDA : a self-study primer for catalogers (2014)
0.02
0.016556807 = product of:
0.082784034 = sum of:
0.082784034 = product of:
0.16556807 = sum of:
0.16556807 = weight(_text_:etc in 2012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16556807 = score(doc=2012,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.83782077 = fieldWeight in 2012, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2012)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- LCSH
- Resource description & access / Handbooks, manuals, etc
Descriptive cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc
- Subject
- Resource description & access / Handbooks, manuals, etc
Descriptive cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc
-
Ayres, F.H.; Nielsen, L.P.S.; Ridley, M.J.: Bibliographic management : a new approach using the manifestations concept and the Bradford OPAC (1996)
0.02
0.016534507 = product of:
0.04133627 = sum of:
0.024035294 = product of:
0.048070587 = sum of:
0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048070587 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017300973 = product of:
0.034601945 = sum of:
0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034601945 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The Bradford OPAC is an experimental prototype OPAC, with a graphical user interface, based on the manifestation concept. It was designed to study some of the problems in catalogues where there are many versions of the same work or complex multipart works. In place of the main entry based approach of one complete record for each item, the OPAC groups together into sets items that are manifestations of the same work. Users are presented with shorter lists of different intellectual works. Items in a set can be sorted, searched and displayed according to user supplied criteria
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.3-28
-
Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996)
0.02
0.016534507 = product of:
0.04133627 = sum of:
0.024035294 = product of:
0.048070587 = sum of:
0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 6737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048070587 = score(doc=6737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 6737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6737)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017300973 = product of:
0.034601945 = sum of:
0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 6737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034601945 = score(doc=6737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6737)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Reviews issues related to the cataloguing of Internet resources and considers short term and long term directions for cataloguing and the gereal provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. Discusses the strengths and weaknesses of using a library catalogue model to improve access to Internet resources. Based on experience gained through 2 OCLC Internet cataloguing projects, recommends continued application of library cataloguing standard and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogues, cataloguing and libraries in general will continue to evolve. Points to problems inherent in the MARC field 856
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004)
0.02
0.016534507 = product of:
0.04133627 = sum of:
0.024035294 = product of:
0.048070587 = sum of:
0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048070587 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017300973 = product of:
0.034601945 = sum of:
0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034601945 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
