Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01 
    0.01465486 = product of:
  0.03663715 = sum of:
    0.024279313 = product of:
      0.048558626 = sum of:
        0.048558626 = weight(_text_:problems in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048558626 = score(doc=5775,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.322459 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0123578375 = product of:
      0.024715675 = sum of:
        0.024715675 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024715675 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
  2. Stauber, D.M.: Facing the text : content and structure in book indexing (2004) 0.01 
    0.010769009 = product of:
  0.02692252 = sum of:
    0.012139657 = product of:
      0.024279313 = sum of:
        0.024279313 = weight(_text_:problems in 5040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024279313 = score(doc=5040,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.1612295 = fieldWeight in 5040, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.014782863 = product of:
      0.029565725 = sum of:
        0.029565725 = weight(_text_:etc in 5040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029565725 = score(doc=5040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.14961085 = fieldWeight in 5040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Facing the Text falls into what I call the third wave of books about back-of-the-book indexing. Each of these waves overlaps, but generally the first consists of the general manuals on indexing books (and other media): Booth, Knight, Mulvany, and Wellisch, along with chapter 18 of the Chicago Manual of Style, 15th ed. These set out the fundamental principles, conventions, or rules of indexing in a mostly impersonal, dispassionate tone. The second wave carried manuals on indexing in specific disciplines and genres: biography, medicine, law, psychology, history, genealogy, etc. The third wave, exemplified by Stauber's Facing the Text and Smith and Kells' Inside Indexing, delves into what goes through the mind of the indexer "facing the text" and putting together an index based on it. The tone is personal and subjective, the authors taking the reader through their own perceptions of the stages of indexing a book, the inevitable problems and subsequent decision making, expressed through their own reactions and reasoning. Facing the Text is not a manual where the newcomer to indexing can find immediate answers to specific problems: the first and second waves of books on indexing are designed to provide those. It's a book for the professional indexer or academic author indexing more than one book; its effect is to hone skills and refine working habits, to increase efficiency and effectiveness, to create indexes that make faithful, logical sense of the text. Newcomers, including first-time academic-author indexers, should begin with the last chapter "Inside an Indexer's Brain," then the second-to-last chapter, "Process"; in fact, I would suggest that any reader begin with "Inside an Indexer's Brain," for its introduction to the terminology and the overall look at indexing, from the first to the last page of the text to be indexed. As one would expect, the index to Facing the Text is comprehensive; in fact, exhaustive, and admirably detailed. The personable, conversational tone continues here, with entries such as "Subheadings/creating as you go" and "Notes to yourself." Of course, "Being stuck" is there as is, and also helpfully doubleposted as "Stuckness strategies." Finally, and on a relatively small note, this is a nicely designed book. Not only is it laid out for looks, it's laid out for use. The type is a friendly size, and the complex structure of headings, subheadings, and sub-subheadings is rendered immediately intelligible by the well-chosen fonts. My only criticism concerns the tightness of the binding; manuals should lie flat, without having to be anchored on each side with paperweights."
  3. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.01 
    0.007909016 = product of:
  0.039545078 = sum of:
    0.039545078 = product of:
      0.079090156 = sum of:
        0.079090156 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079090156 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  4. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.01 
    0.007909016 = product of:
  0.039545078 = sum of:
    0.039545078 = product of:
      0.079090156 = sum of:
        0.079090156 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079090156 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  5. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.01 
    0.007909016 = product of:
  0.039545078 = sum of:
    0.039545078 = product of:
      0.079090156 = sum of:
        0.079090156 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079090156 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  6. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.01 
    0.007909016 = product of:
  0.039545078 = sum of:
    0.039545078 = product of:
      0.079090156 = sum of:
        0.079090156 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079090156 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  7. Frame, A.: Indexers and publishers : their views on indexers and indexing (1996) 0.01 
    0.0071366318 = product of:
  0.03568316 = sum of:
    0.03568316 = product of:
      0.07136632 = sum of:
        0.07136632 = weight(_text_:problems in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07136632 = score(doc=3737,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.47391602 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Second of 2 articles reporting the results of a 1995 questionnaire survey of UK indexers and editors, focusing on work practices, relations between editors and indexers, editors' and editors' expectations, and the value placed on various characteristics of indexers and indexing. Data from 146 indexers and 123 editors was analysed on the following topics: complexity of the index and satisfaction with the index produced; instruction given to indexers; problems with the index; editors' judgement of the acceptability of the index; why the index was remembered; and whether editors would use the indexers again. While a high level of satisfaction with the indexes produced on the part of both editors and indexers was reported, results would seem to indicate that sending written instructions to indexers before the proofs are sent gives the lowest percentage of problems with the finished index. Suggests taht editors should consistently tell indexers of any problems to enable indexers to correct what goes wrong
  8. Diedrichs, R.: Arbeitsbericht AG Indexierung der Konferenz für Regelwerksfragen (2000) 0.01 
    0.007095774 = product of:
  0.03547887 = sum of:
    0.03547887 = product of:
      0.07095774 = sum of:
        0.07095774 = weight(_text_:etc in 5526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07095774 = score(doc=5526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.35906604 = fieldWeight in 5526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5526)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Vor dem Hintergrund der zunehmenden Verbreitung von Suchmaschinen für bibliothekarische Datenbanken - KvK, KOBV, etc. - ergeben sich aus der unterschiedlichen Konstruktion der angegangenen Indexsysteme einige Probleme: - inkonsistente Suchergebnisse bei scheinbar gleichen Suchschlüsseln Autor: Müller-Udenscheid -> müller, Udenscheid, mueller? - Titelstichworte: sind Zusätze zum Sachtitel indexiert oder nicht? - unterschiedliche Suchschlüssel: Beschränkung auf die kleinste gemeinsame Schnittmenge. Die Verwendung einer einheitlichen Oberfläche gaukelt an dieser Stelle aber konsistente Ergebnisse vor. Auf Grund dieser Ausgangslage hat die KM eine Arbeitsgruppe eingesetzt, die Empfehlungen für eine einheitliche Indexierung bibliothekarischer Datenbanken erarbeiten soll. Diese Arbeitsgruppe hat sich bisher dreimal getroffen und Entwürfe für erste Festlegungen erarbeitet.
  9. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01 
    0.0069203894 = product of:
  0.034601945 = sum of:
    0.034601945 = product of:
      0.06920389 = sum of:
        0.06920389 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06920389 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  10. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.01 
    0.0069203894 = product of:
  0.034601945 = sum of:
    0.034601945 = product of:
      0.06920389 = sum of:
        0.06920389 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06920389 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  11. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.01 
    0.0069203894 = product of:
  0.034601945 = sum of:
    0.034601945 = product of:
      0.06920389 = sum of:
        0.06920389 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06920389 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  12. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01 
    0.0069203894 = product of:
  0.034601945 = sum of:
    0.034601945 = product of:
      0.06920389 = sum of:
        0.06920389 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06920389 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  13. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.01 
    0.0069203894 = product of:
  0.034601945 = sum of:
    0.034601945 = product of:
      0.06920389 = sum of:
        0.06920389 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06920389 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  14. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.01 
    0.0069203894 = product of:
  0.034601945 = sum of:
    0.034601945 = product of:
      0.06920389 = sum of:
        0.06920389 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06920389 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  15. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.01 
    0.0069203894 = product of:
  0.034601945 = sum of:
    0.034601945 = product of:
      0.06920389 = sum of:
        0.06920389 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06920389 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  16. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.01 
    0.0069203894 = product of:
  0.034601945 = sum of:
    0.034601945 = product of:
      0.06920389 = sum of:
        0.06920389 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06920389 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  17. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.01 
    0.0069203894 = product of:
  0.034601945 = sum of:
    0.034601945 = product of:
      0.06920389 = sum of:
        0.06920389 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06920389 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  18. Bowman, J.H.: One index or two? : some observations on integrated indexes to classical Greek texts (1993) 0.01 
    0.006867227 = product of:
  0.034336135 = sum of:
    0.034336135 = product of:
      0.06867227 = sum of:
        0.06867227 = weight(_text_:problems in 6350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06867227 = score(doc=6350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 6350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6350)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The principle features and problems of indexes which include Greek words in Greek letters and their different methods are described and some of the advantages of an integrated index are stated
  19. Jones, R.: Indexing the British Medical Journal (1994) 0.01 
    0.0067982078 = product of:
  0.03399104 = sum of:
    0.03399104 = product of:
      0.06798208 = sum of:
        0.06798208 = weight(_text_:problems in 7924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06798208 = score(doc=7924,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.4514426 = fieldWeight in 7924, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    As a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) contains a wide range of subject matter, and many types of information need to be incorporated in its semi-annual index, Index Medicus vocabulary can be used for clinical articles, but non-clinical matter presents problems of soft language. A weekly publication, the BMJ runs to about 1.600 pages a volume; so succint indexing is important, as is keeping to schedule. The number of authors and the vagueness of the journal users present particular problems that can be ameliorated by the design of the index. Medicine is a useful adjunct for subject access. Both the journal and the index have changed during a decade in which social and political aspects of medicine have assumed greater importance
  20. Bernhardt, R.: Erstellung von Registern (1971) 0.01 
    0.0067982078 = product of:
  0.03399104 = sum of:
    0.03399104 = product of:
      0.06798208 = sum of:
        0.06798208 = weight(_text_:problems in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06798208 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.4514426 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The paper deals with procedures and problems arising when computers are used as tools in the production of indexes. The following steps of the procedure are explained and studied: 1) Correction of machine-readable records; 2) Production of index entries. Here, various methods and forms (KWIC, KWOC, rotation method) and dictionary use are described and discussed, and information about their advantages and disadvantages is given; 3) Sorting and cumulation of index entries; 4) Output and setting, output feasibilities are detailed. Emphasis is also laid on the problems arising from the non-satisfactory links of the processing chain: data recording, limited fonts, and choice of index terms.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 38
  • d 4

Types

  • a 36
  • m 6
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications