Search (966 results, page 1 of 49)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.19
    0.18543017 = product of:
      0.46357542 = sum of:
        0.115893856 = product of:
          0.34768155 = sum of:
            0.34768155 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.34768155 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.34768155 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34768155 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.15
    0.15452515 = product of:
      0.38631284 = sum of:
        0.09657821 = product of:
          0.28973463 = sum of:
            0.28973463 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28973463 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.28973463 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28973463 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.13
    0.13046144 = product of:
      0.21743573 = sum of:
        0.048289105 = product of:
          0.14486732 = sum of:
            0.14486732 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14486732 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14486732 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14486732 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.024279313 = product of:
          0.048558626 = sum of:
            0.048558626 = weight(_text_:problems in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048558626 = score(doc=4997,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.322459 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  4. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.12
    0.121517956 = product of:
      0.3037949 = sum of:
        0.057946928 = product of:
          0.17384078 = sum of:
            0.17384078 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17384078 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.24584797 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24584797 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  5. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.11
    0.1081676 = product of:
      0.270419 = sum of:
        0.06760475 = product of:
          0.20281425 = sum of:
            0.20281425 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20281425 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.20281425 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20281425 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  6. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.09
    0.092715085 = product of:
      0.23178771 = sum of:
        0.057946928 = product of:
          0.17384078 = sum of:
            0.17384078 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17384078 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17384078 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17384078 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  7. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.08
    0.08101198 = product of:
      0.20252995 = sum of:
        0.038631286 = product of:
          0.115893856 = sum of:
            0.115893856 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.115893856 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16389866 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16389866 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  8. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.08
    0.07726257 = product of:
      0.19315642 = sum of:
        0.048289105 = product of:
          0.14486732 = sum of:
            0.14486732 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14486732 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14486732 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14486732 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  9. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.08
    0.07726257 = product of:
      0.19315642 = sum of:
        0.048289105 = product of:
          0.14486732 = sum of:
            0.14486732 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14486732 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14486732 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14486732 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  10. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.08
    0.07546808 = product of:
      0.18867019 = sum of:
        0.17384078 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17384078 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.014829405 = product of:
          0.02965881 = sum of:
            0.02965881 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02965881 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  11. Akerele, O.; David, A.; Osofisan, A.: Using the concepts of Case Based Reasoning and Basic Categories for enhancing adaptation to the user's level of knowledge in Decision Support System (2014) 0.05
    0.048487294 = product of:
      0.121218234 = sum of:
        0.02060168 = product of:
          0.04120336 = sum of:
            0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 1449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04120336 = score(doc=1449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 1449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1449)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.10061655 = sum of:
          0.07095774 = weight(_text_:etc in 1449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07095774 = score(doc=1449,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036484417 = queryNorm
              0.35906604 = fieldWeight in 1449, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1449)
          0.02965881 = weight(_text_:22 in 1449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02965881 = score(doc=1449,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036484417 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1449, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1449)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In most search systems, mapping queries with documents employs techniques such as vector space model, naïve Bayes, Bayesian theorem etc. to classify resulting documents. In this research studies, we are proposing the use of the concept of basic categories to representing the user's level of knowledge based on the concepts he employed during his search activities, so that the system could propose adapted results based on the observed user's level of knowledge. Our hypothesis is that this approach will enhance the decision support system for solving decisional problems in which information retrieval constitutes the backbone technical problem.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.05
    0.046357542 = product of:
      0.23178771 = sum of:
        0.23178771 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23178771 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036484417 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  13. Croft, W.B.; Metzler, D.; Strohman, T.: Search engines : information retrieval in practice (2010) 0.04
    0.042841177 = product of:
      0.10710294 = sum of:
        0.02060168 = product of:
          0.04120336 = sum of:
            0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 2605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04120336 = score(doc=2605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 2605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.086501256 = product of:
          0.17300251 = sum of:
            0.17300251 = weight(_text_:exercises in 2605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17300251 = score(doc=2605,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25947425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.6667425 = fieldWeight in 2605, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    For introductory information retrieval courses at the undergraduate and graduate level in computer science, information science and computer engineering departments. Written by a leader in the field of information retrieval, Search Engines: Information Retrieval in Practice, is designed to give undergraduate students the understanding and tools they need to evaluate, compare and modify search engines. Coverage of the underlying IR and mathematical models reinforce key concepts. The book's numerous programming exercises make extensive use of Galago, a Java-based open source search engine. SUPPLEMENTS / Extensive lecture slides (in PDF and PPT format) / Solutions to selected end of chapter problems (Instructors only) / Test collections for exercises / Galago search engine
  14. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.04
    0.040532265 = product of:
      0.10133066 = sum of:
        0.086501256 = product of:
          0.17300251 = sum of:
            0.17300251 = weight(_text_:exercises in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17300251 = score(doc=4190,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25947425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.6667425 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014829405 = product of:
          0.02965881 = sum of:
            0.02965881 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02965881 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    National exercises for the evaluation of research activity by universities are becoming regular practice in ever more countries. These exercises have mainly been conducted through the application of peer-review methods. Bibliometrics has not been able to offer a valid large-scale alternative because of almost overwhelming difficulties in identifying the true author of each publication. We will address this problem by presenting a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometric datasets for large-scale research assessments. The application proposed concerns the Italian university system, comprising 80 universities and a research staff of over 60,000 scientists. The key advantage of the proposed approach is the ease of implementation. The algorithms are of practical application and have considerably better scalability and expandability properties than state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches. Moreover, the performance in terms of precision and recall, which can be further improved, seems thoroughly adequate for the typical needs of large-scale bibliometric research assessments.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52
  15. Wang, Z.; Khoo, C.S.G.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Evaluation of the navigation effectiveness of an organizational taxonomy built on a general classification scheme and domain thesauri (2014) 0.03
    0.032706924 = product of:
      0.081767306 = sum of:
        0.02060168 = product of:
          0.04120336 = sum of:
            0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04120336 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.061165623 = product of:
          0.12233125 = sum of:
            0.12233125 = weight(_text_:exercises in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12233125 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25947425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.47145814 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an evaluation study of the navigation effectiveness of a multifaceted organizational taxonomy that was built on the Dewey Decimal Classification and several domain thesauri in the area of library and information science education. The objective of the evaluation was to detect deficiencies in the taxonomy and to infer problems of applied construction steps from users' navigation difficulties. The evaluation approach included scenario-based navigation exercises and postexercise interviews. Navigation exercise errors and underlying reasons were analyzed in relation to specific components of the taxonomy and applied construction steps. Guidelines for the construction of the hierarchical structure and categories of an organizational taxonomy using existing general classification schemes and domain thesauri were derived from the evaluation results.
  16. Eito-Brun, R.: Ontologies and the exchange of technical information : building a knowledge repository based on ECSS standards (2014) 0.03
    0.03232486 = product of:
      0.080812156 = sum of:
        0.013734453 = product of:
          0.027468907 = sum of:
            0.027468907 = weight(_text_:problems in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027468907 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.18241036 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.067077704 = sum of:
          0.047305163 = weight(_text_:etc in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047305163 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036484417 = queryNorm
              0.23937736 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
          0.019772539 = weight(_text_:22 in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019772539 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036484417 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The development of complex projects in the aerospace industry is based on the collaboration of geographically distributed teams and companies. In this context, the need of sharing different types of data and information is a key factor to assure the successful execution of the projects. In the case of European projects, the ECSS standards provide a normative framework that specifies, among other requirements, the different document types, information items and artifacts that need to be generated. The specification of the characteristics of these information items are usually incorporated as annex to the different ECSS standards, and they provide the intended purpose, scope, and structure of the documents and information items. In these standards, documents or deliverables should not be considered as independent items, but as the results of packaging different information artifacts for their delivery between the involved parties. Successful information integration and knowledge exchange cannot be based exclusively on the conceptual definition of information types. It also requires the definition of methods and techniques for serializing and exchanging these documents and artifacts. This area is not covered by ECSS standards, and the definition of these data schemas would improve the opportunity for improving collaboration processes among companies. This paper describes the development of an OWL-based ontology to manage the different artifacts and information items requested in the European Space Agency (ESA) ECSS standards for SW development. The ECSS set of standards is the main reference in aerospace projects in Europe, and in addition to engineering and managerial requirements they provide a set of DRD (Document Requirements Documents) with the structure of the different documents and records necessary to manage projects and describe intermediate information products and final deliverables. Information integration is a must-have in aerospace projects, where different players need to collaborate and share data during the life cycle of the products about requirements, design elements, problems, etc. The proposed ontology provides the basis for building advanced information systems where the information coming from different companies and institutions can be integrated into a coherent set of related data. It also provides a conceptual framework to enable the development of interfaces and gateways between the different tools and information systems used by the different players in aerospace projects.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  17. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.03
    0.02834487 = product of:
      0.070862174 = sum of:
        0.04120336 = product of:
          0.08240672 = sum of:
            0.08240672 = weight(_text_:problems in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08240672 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.5472311 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02965881 = product of:
          0.05931762 = sum of:
            0.05931762 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05931762 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  18. Open Knowledge Foundation: Prinzipien zu offenen bibliographischen Daten (2011) 0.03
    0.027474387 = product of:
      0.13737193 = sum of:
        0.13737193 = sum of:
          0.10241869 = weight(_text_:etc in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10241869 = score(doc=4399,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036484417 = queryNorm
              0.5182672 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
          0.03495324 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03495324 = score(doc=4399,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036484417 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    "Bibliographische Daten Um den Geltungsbereich der Prinzipien festzulegen, wird in diesem ersten Teil der zugrundeliegende Begriff bibliographischer Daten erläutert. Kerndaten Bibliographische Daten bestehen aus bibliographischen Beschreibungen. Eine bibliographische Beschreibung beschreibt eine bibliographische Ressource (Artikel, Monographie etc. - ob gedruckt oder elektronisch) zum Zwecke 1. der Identifikation der beschriebenen Ressource, d.h. des Zeigens auf eine bestimmte Ressource in der Gesamtheit aller bibliographischer Ressourcen und 2. der Lokalisierung der beschriebenen Ressource, d.h. eines Hinweises, wo die beschriebene Ressource aufzufinden ist. Traditionellerweise erfüllte eine Beschreibung beide Zwecke gleichzeitig, indem sie Information lieferte über: Autor(en) und Herausgeber, Titel, Verlag, Veröffentlichungsdatum und -ort, Identifizierung des übergeordneten Werks (z.B. einer Zeitschrift), Seitenangaben. Im Web findet Identifikation statt mittels Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) wie z.B. URNs oder DOIs. Lokalisierung wird ermöglicht durch HTTP-URIs, die auch als Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) bezeichnet werden. Alle URIs für bibliographische Ressourcen fallen folglich unter den engen Begriff bibliographischer Daten. Sekundäre Daten Eine bibliographische Beschreibung kann andere Informationen enthalten, die unter den Begriff bibliographischer Daten fallen, beispielsweise Nicht-Web-Identifikatoren (ISBN, LCCN, OCLC etc.), Angaben zum Urheberrechtsstatus, administrative Daten und mehr; diese Daten können von Bibliotheken, Verlagen, Wissenschaftlern, Online-Communities für Buchliebhaber, sozialen Literaturverwaltungssystemen und Anderen produziert sein. Darüber hinaus produzieren Bibliotheken und verwandte Institutionen kontrollierte Vokabulare zum Zwecke der bibliographischen Beschreibung wie z. B. Personen- und Schlagwortnormdateien, Klassifikationen etc., die ebenfalls unter den Begriff bibliographischer Daten fallen."
    Date
    22. 3.2011 18:22:29
  19. Schaat, S.: Von der automatisierten Manipulation zur Manipulation der Automatisierung (2019) 0.03
    0.026831081 = product of:
      0.13415541 = sum of:
        0.13415541 = sum of:
          0.094610326 = weight(_text_:etc in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.094610326 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036484417 = queryNorm
              0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
          0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039545078 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.036484417 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    "Wir kennen das bereits von Google, Facebook und Amazon: Unser Internet-Verhalten wird automatisch erfasst, damit uns angepasste Inhalte präsentiert werden können. Ob uns diese Inhalte gefallen oder nicht, melden wir direkt oder indirekt zurück (Kauf, Klick etc.). Durch diese Feedbackschleife lernen solche Systeme immer besser, was sie uns präsentieren müssen, um unsere Bedürfnisse anzusprechen, und wissen implizit dadurch auch immer besser, wie sie unsere Bedürfniserfüllung - zur Konsumtion - manipulieren können."
    Date
    19. 2.2019 17:22:00
  20. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.02
    0.023620725 = product of:
      0.05905181 = sum of:
        0.034336135 = product of:
          0.06867227 = sum of:
            0.06867227 = weight(_text_:problems in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06867227 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.024715675 = product of:
          0.04943135 = sum of:
            0.04943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04943135 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    We present a short survey of the literature on indexing and retrieval of mathematical knowledge, with pointers to 72 papers and tentative taxonomies of both retrieval problems and recurring techniques.
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57

Languages

  • e 744
  • d 206
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 813
  • m 91
  • el 87
  • s 32
  • x 18
  • r 11
  • b 6
  • i 2
  • n 2
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications