Search (61 results, page 1 of 4)

0.1487487 = product of:
  0.2974974 = sum of:
    0.07437435 = product of:
      0.22312303 = sum of:
        0.22312303 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22312303 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22312303 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22312303 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.

0.07748537 = product of:
  0.15497074 = sum of:
    0.051210128 = weight(_text_:data in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051210128 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.1037606 = sum of:
      0.05934933 = weight(_text_:processing in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05934933 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046827413 = queryNorm
          0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.044411276 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044411276 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046827413 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Source

Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore

0.069985814 = product of:
  0.13997163 = sum of:
    0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036211025 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.1037606 = sum of:
      0.05934933 = weight(_text_:processing in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05934933 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046827413 = queryNorm
          0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.044411276 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044411276 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046827413 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Source

Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore

0.04172619 = product of:
  0.08345238 = sum of:
    0.05173004 = weight(_text_:data in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05173004 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
    0.03172234 = product of:
      0.06344468 = sum of:
        0.06344468 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06344468 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Discusses the costs and benefits of documents information systems (involving text and images) and some design methodological aspects that arise from the documentary nature of the data. Reports details of a case study involving a specific document information system introduced at Press Ltd, a company in the Netherlands

Source

Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297

0.03908867 = product of:
  0.07817734 = sum of:
    0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036211025 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
    0.041966315 = product of:
      0.08393263 = sum of:
        0.08393263 = weight(_text_:processing in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08393263 = score(doc=1192,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.4427661 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The Promenade image retrieval system us described in terms of its design, development and architecture. Design, development and implementation issues are discussed in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. A preliminary usability study is presented and the data resulting from the preliminary study are analysed and discussed. Efficiency in terms of response time due to network delays, database processing, application processing and image characteristcs and display is discussed. Response time results frome 40 queries made to the image database are presented and discussed. The results of theses studies demonstrate where improvements in the system need to be made in order ro improve usability and response time

0.03764897 = product of:
  0.07529794 = sum of:
    0.04138403 = weight(_text_:data in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04138403 = score(doc=807,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
    0.033913903 = product of:
      0.067827806 = sum of:
        0.067827806 = weight(_text_:processing in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067827806 = score(doc=807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Parsytec Computer GmbH, Germany, has developed PrasyForm to help integrate document management systems and wirkflow systems by automating data capture into the document management system through the application of cognitive automation, i.e. the automation of simple, repetitive tasks where human recognition is unnecessary. It combines greyscale image processing, self-training intelligent character recognition readers (OCR) and associative database matching techniques

0.03380727 = product of:
  0.06761454 = sum of:
    0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036211025 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
    0.031403515 = product of:
      0.06280703 = sum of:
        0.06280703 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06280703 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Records management has appeared lately in France to designate the management of organizational documents and electronic data an enterprise must retain as proof of its activities and transactions. An international standard is under discussion to address issues concerned with retention. At the same time, some information professionals are finding themselves increasingly involved with active company records, since the role of records manager requires skills found in the professions of archivists, information scientist and quality controller. Presents examples which pose the question, is records management in fact a new profession or simply a new form of a familiar job?

Date

1. 8.1996 22:01:00
31.12.1998 15:32:22

0.03338095 = product of:
  0.0667619 = sum of:
    0.04138403 = weight(_text_:data in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04138403 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
    0.025377871 = product of:
      0.050755743 = sum of:
        0.050755743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050755743 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The successful implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) requires a previous design based on a methodology that includes key steps as follows: capture of critical information and analysis of the current document situation: functional and/or technical options that involve the treatment of the document fonds considered; document management applications design (data, text, images, audio, video) under a functional, technical and economic focus; global and modular project defined as a strategic EDMS plan

Date

11. 2.1999 21:02:22

0.023530604 = product of:
  0.04706121 = sum of:
    0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02586502 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
    0.021196188 = product of:
      0.042392377 = sum of:
        0.042392377 = weight(_text_:processing in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042392377 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Important legacy paper documents are digitized and collected in online accessible archives. This enables the preservation, sharing, and significantly the searching of these documents. The text contents of these document images can be transcribed automatically using OCR systems and then stored in an information retrieval system. However, OCR systems make errors in character recognition which have previously been shown to impact on document retrieval behaviour. In particular relevance feedback query-expansion methods, which are often effective for improving electronic text retrieval, are observed to be less reliable for retrieval of scanned document images. Our experimental examination of the effects of character recognition errors on an ad hoc OCR retrieval task demonstrates that, while baseline information retrieval can remain relatively unaffected by transcription errors, relevance feedback via query expansion becomes highly unstable. This paper examines the reason for this behaviour, and introduces novel modifications to standard relevance feedback methods. These methods are shown experimentally to improve the effectiveness of relevance feedback for errorful OCR transcriptions. The new methods combine similar recognised character strings based on term collection frequency and a string edit-distance measure. The techniques are domain independent and make no use of external resources such as dictionaries or training data.

Source

Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.3, S.633-649

0.023530604 = product of:
  0.04706121 = sum of:
    0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02586502 = score(doc=4115,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
    0.021196188 = product of:
      0.042392377 = sum of:
        0.042392377 = weight(_text_:processing in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042392377 = score(doc=4115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

We investigated agency satisfaction with an electronic record management system (ERMS) that supports the electronic creation, archival, processing, transmittal, and sharing of records (documents) among autonomous government agencies. A factor model, explaining agency satisfaction with ERMS functionalities, offers hypotheses, which we tested empirically with a large-scale survey that involved more than 1,600 government agencies in Taiwan. The data showed a good fit to our model and supported all the hypotheses. Overall, agency satisfaction with ERMS functionalities appears jointly determined by regulatory compliance, job relevance, and satisfaction with support services. Among the determinants we studied, agency satisfaction with support services seems the strongest predictor of agency satisfaction with ERMS functionalities. Regulatory compliance also has important influences on agency satisfaction with ERMS, through its influence on job relevance and satisfaction with support services. Further analyses showed that satisfaction with support services partially mediated the impact of regulatory compliance on satisfaction with ERMS functionalities, and job relevance partially mediated the influence of regulatory compliance on satisfaction with ERMS functionalities. Our findings have important implications for research and practice, which we also discuss.

0.020863095 = product of:
  0.04172619 = sum of:
    0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02586502 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
    0.01586117 = product of:
      0.03172234 = sum of:
        0.03172234 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03172234 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.018105512 = product of:
  0.07242205 = sum of:
    0.07242205 = weight(_text_:data in 2487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07242205 = score(doc=2487,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 2487, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2487)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Classification

ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
ST 271 I44 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme / INFORMIX

RVK

ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
ST 271 I44 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme / INFORMIX

0.018105512 = product of:
  0.07242205 = sum of:
    0.07242205 = weight(_text_:data in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07242205 = score(doc=1130,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Seit mehr als 30 Jahren wird versucht, die Durchführung von Managementaufgaben durch computergestützte Informationssysteme zu verbessern. Doch die meisten der bislang entwickelten Ansätze haben mehr versprochen, als sie zu leisten in der Lage waren. Jan Holthuis entwickelt einen Ansatz für eine aufgabenadäquate Datenhaltung in einem Data Warehouse. Dadurch wird eine sinnvolle Integration heterogener managementrelevanter Informationen aus internen und externen Quellen in eine bestehende betriebliche Informationsverarbeitung möglich

RSWK

Management / Data-warehouse-Konzept (21)

Subject

Management / Data-warehouse-Konzept (21)

0.016690476 = product of:
  0.03338095 = sum of:
    0.020692015 = weight(_text_:data in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020692015 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
    0.012688936 = product of:
      0.025377871 = sum of:
        0.025377871 = weight(_text_:22 in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025377871 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

22. 4.2003 11:45:36

Theme

Data Mining

0.014685151 = product of:
  0.058740605 = sum of:
    0.058740605 = product of:
      0.11748121 = sum of:
        0.11748121 = weight(_text_:processing in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11748121 = score(doc=6564,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.61974347 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Only 10% of information used by an organisation is in electronic form hence the need to examine ways of processing and loading paper documents automatically in an electronic database. Discusses the principles of a document image processing (DIP) system; the difference between text retrieval and DIP; text retrieval systems and concept retrieval. Describes the TOPIC intelligent text retrieval system based on concept retrieval. Covers the TYPO operator developed for mispellings, character transpositions and 'dirty' text retrieved as output form OCR processes. Refers to an electronic news clipping service application

0.014631464 = product of:
  0.058525857 = sum of:
    0.058525857 = weight(_text_:data in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058525857 = score(doc=987,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.3952563 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reviews the range of statutory regulations which impact the means by which data is stored; the conditions under which such storage must occur and the rules regarding the release of such information. Focuses on data protection and intellectual property implications for electronic record keeping

0.014631464 = product of:
  0.058525857 = sum of:
    0.058525857 = weight(_text_:data in 6675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058525857 = score(doc=6675,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.3952563 = fieldWeight in 6675, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6675)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Defines cryptography and related terminology, and examines the design and operation of an encryption algorithm, using the example of the US Data Encryption Standard (DES). Describes public key cryptosystems, emphasising their revolutionary nature. Considers storage and transmission applications of cryptography in records management, including the Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) area. Proposes some novel applications (such as a virtual records centre). Suggests that although the law gas yet to catch up with developments in cryptography, when it does cryptography will become central to file management

0.01293251 = product of:
  0.05173004 = sum of:
    0.05173004 = weight(_text_:data in 981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05173004 = score(doc=981,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 981, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=981)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

With the proliferation of electronic data one of the key problems is identifying and organizing electronic records for retention and retrieval. Defines electronic records and sets out strategies for management of electronic records. Covers: policy, information and assett analysis, retention scheduling, inactive records, indexing and retrieval, version control, standards, and electronic mail

0.01293251 = product of:
  0.05173004 = sum of:
    0.05173004 = weight(_text_:data in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05173004 = score(doc=3398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Looks at a range of techniques which offer intelligent mechanisms for managing documents in a wide area network. Describes differing techniques for increasing bandwidth, reducing data traffic, synchronizing documentation, achieving partial synchronization, audit trails, navigation, distribution control and security

0.01293251 = product of:
  0.05173004 = sum of:
    0.05173004 = weight(_text_:data in 3145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05173004 = score(doc=3145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 3145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3145)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

An important recent development in information retrieval is the integration of several technologies (images, text, graphical data) into powerful, user friendly, text and image multimedia information systems. Provides examples of selected commercial developments such as the Topic System (by Verity, California)