Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bates, M.J."
  1. Bates, M.J.: ¬The Getty End-User Online Searching Project in the humanities, report no.6 : overview and conclusions (1996) 0.02
    0.017229345 = product of:
      0.05168803 = sum of:
        0.05168803 = weight(_text_:development in 7261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05168803 = score(doc=7261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.32281733 = fieldWeight in 7261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7261)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Over a 2 year period, the Getty Information Institute (formerly the Getty Art History Information Program) sponsored and carried out a major study of end user online searching by humanities scholars. Complete logs of the searches and output were captured, and the 27 scholars involved were interviewed in depth. Reviews the study and its results, with particular emphasis on matters of interest to academic librarians. Implications are drawn for academic library reference service and collection development, as well as for cataloguing in the online and digital environment
  2. Bates, M.J.; Wilde, D.N.; Siegfried, S.: ¬An analysis of search terminology used by humanities scholars : the Getty online searching project report number 1 (1993) 0.01
    0.010768341 = product of:
      0.03230502 = sum of:
        0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03230502 = score(doc=2707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Getty art history information program carried out a two-year project to study how humanities scholars operate as end users of online databases. Visiting scholars at the Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities in Santa Monica, California, were offered the opportunity to so unlimited subsidized searching of DIALOG databases. This first report from the project analyzes the vocabulary terms twenty-two scholars used in their natural language descriptions of their information needs and in their online searches. The data were extracted from 165 natural language statements and 1.068 search terms. Vocabulary categories used by humanities scholars were found to differ markedly from those used in the sciences, a fact that imposes distinctive demands on thesaurus development and the design of online information systems. Humanities scholars searched for far more named individuals, geographical terms, chronological terms, and discipline terms than was the case in a comparative science sample. The analysis provides substantial support for the growing perception that information needs of humanities scholars are distinct from those of scholars in other fields, and that the design of information-providing systems for these scholars must take their unique qualitites into account
  3. Bates, M.J.: Defining the information disciplines in encyclopedia development (2007) 0.01
    0.010768341 = product of:
      0.03230502 = sum of:
        0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 3400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03230502 = score(doc=3400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 3400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Bates, M.J.: Hjoerland's critique of Bates' work on defining information (2008) 0.01
    0.010768341 = product of:
      0.03230502 = sum of:
        0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03230502 = score(doc=4773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In a recent article, Birger Hjørland (2007) critiqued the author's efforts in defining and conceptualizing information as a core concept in information science (Bates, 2005, 2006). It is argued that Hjørland has seriously misrepresented and confused the actual line of argument in those articles. Specifics of that case are presented, and the reader is urged to return to the original Bates articles to understand her claims. In those articles, Bates attempted to develop a broad conception of information, as well as a number of subtypes of information, for use in the field of information science. The development of information was related to evolutionary processes, with emergence as a significant theme.
  5. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.01
    0.0065333657 = product of:
      0.019600097 = sum of:
        0.019600097 = product of:
          0.058800288 = sum of:
            0.058800288 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058800288 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
  6. Bates, M.J.: Information search tactics (1979) 0.01
    0.0053276825 = product of:
      0.015983047 = sum of:
        0.015983047 = product of:
          0.04794914 = sum of:
            0.04794914 = weight(_text_:29 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04794914 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    As part of the study of human information search strategy, the concept of the search tactic, or move made to futher a search, is introduced. 29 search tactics are named, defined, and discussed in 4 categories: monitoring, file structure, search formulation, and term. Implications of the search tactics for research in search strategy are considered. The search tactics are inteded to be practically useful in information searching. This approach to searching is designed to be general, yet nontrivial; it is applicable to both bibliographic and reference searches and in both manual and on-line systems
  7. Bates, M.J.: Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students (1996) 0.01
    0.0052797566 = product of:
      0.01583927 = sum of:
        0.01583927 = product of:
          0.047517806 = sum of:
            0.047517806 = weight(_text_:22 in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047517806 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14. 4.1997 20:22:55
  8. Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019) 0.00
    0.0046617216 = product of:
      0.013985164 = sum of:
        0.013985164 = product of:
          0.041955493 = sum of:
            0.041955493 = weight(_text_:29 in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041955493 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25. 6.2019 11:13:29
  9. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.00
    0.0039598173 = product of:
      0.011879452 = sum of:
        0.011879452 = product of:
          0.035638355 = sum of:
            0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035638355 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
  10. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.00
    0.003299848 = product of:
      0.009899544 = sum of:
        0.009899544 = product of:
          0.029698629 = sum of:
            0.029698629 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029698629 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.