Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

0.018274479 = product of:
  0.054823436 = sum of:
    0.054823436 = weight(_text_:development in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054823436 = score(doc=131,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.34239948 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In this paper, after an introduction about problems of multilingual information languages, the rules and recommendations of the Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri for non-equivalence and partial equivalence of terms in different languages are discussed. Artificial terms are not very useful in searching, because most users are not willing to use a thesaurus to find the right descriptor. On the other hand indexers need guidance on how to index and therefore need a thesaurus with all desirable and necessary relations. It is suggested that bibliographic online systems can take over some of the functions for the searcher from the thesaurus and that a few new relations could be helpful to an indexer

0.015075676 = product of:
  0.04522703 = sum of:
    0.04522703 = weight(_text_:development in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04522703 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.28246516 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR, 1998), the study commissioned by IFLA, brings revolutionary changes in the way we see modern computer catalogues. The catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a copy of a card catalogue, but as an interconnected network of related information. Implications of the new model for the future development of catalogues are discussed. Special attention is given to access points and relationships between entities and the changes those will bring into both the formal and subject cataloguing, and authority files.

0.0112000555 = product of:
  0.033600166 = sum of:
    0.033600166 = product of:
      0.10080049 = sum of:
        0.10080049 = weight(_text_:22 in 6405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10080049 = score(doc=6405,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 6405, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6405)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.15-22

0.009239574 = product of:
  0.027718721 = sum of:
    0.027718721 = product of:
      0.08315616 = sum of:
        0.08315616 = weight(_text_:22 in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08315616 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Open. 22(1990) no.1, S.11-15

0.009239574 = product of:
  0.027718721 = sum of:
    0.027718721 = product of:
      0.08315616 = sum of:
        0.08315616 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08315616 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330

0.008614672 = product of:
  0.025844015 = sum of:
    0.025844015 = weight(_text_:development in 3963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025844015 = score(doc=3963,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.16140866 = fieldWeight in 3963, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3963)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

"1. Introduction Multilingual and crosslingual access to information is receiving more and more attention. Maybe the most important reason for this development is the Internet. There are estimations that about half of its users are people with a mother tongue other than English and that this proportion is growing. Crosslingual access in this context means the possibility to get free text access to information using another (natural) language than the language of the information itself. This type of access is important for users with a good passive knowledge of a language but with only a small active vocabulary of the same language, e.g. a Englishman who can read Russian, but has difficulties in formulating adequate search request in that language. Crosslingual access can also be valuable for monolingual users who can automatically or manually have translations of foreign language documents. The search requests will be translated or converted into the language of the information. Multilingual access assumes that the instruments used for access, the controlled information languages, are available in more than one language. An classic example is the Englishman who uses his English edition of the Universal Decimal Classification to search the catalogue of a library in China, although the classification of the library is done using a Chinese edition. In this case the searching and the classifying results in a notation that is the same irrespective which language edition was used for indexing. Another possibility is the use of a multilingual thesaurus or subject headings list, such the trilingual edition of the Library of Congress Subject Headings built at the Royal Library in Brussels (Belgium) or the Macrothesaurus of the OECD. Here, words are the access points - in one language into which each search request will be converted, or, alternatively, into all the languages involved. Multilingual information languages and guidelines an how to build them are the subject of this paper. Particular attention will be paid to multilingual thesauri."

0.007991524 = product of:
  0.023974571 = sum of:
    0.023974571 = product of:
      0.07192371 = sum of:
        0.07192371 = weight(_text_:29 in 6230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07192371 = score(doc=6230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Buletin asociatia bibliotecarilor din învatamant - Romania. 11(2000) no.2, S.29-32

0.003995762 = product of:
  0.011987286 = sum of:
    0.011987286 = product of:
      0.035961855 = sum of:
        0.035961855 = weight(_text_:29 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035961855 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.78-86

0.0026638412 = product of:
  0.0079915235 = sum of:
    0.0079915235 = product of:
      0.02397457 = sum of:
        0.02397457 = weight(_text_:29 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02397457 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

29. 8.2004 13:47:31