Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Taniguchi, S."
  1. Taniguchi, S.: Current status of cataloging and classification education in Japan (2005) 0.04
    0.039474797 = product of:
      0.059212193 = sum of:
        0.04522703 = weight(_text_:development in 5752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04522703 = score(doc=5752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.28246516 = fieldWeight in 5752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5752)
        0.013985164 = product of:
          0.041955493 = sum of:
            0.041955493 = weight(_text_:29 in 5752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041955493 = score(doc=5752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5752)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper provides an overview of the current status of cataloging and classification (C&C) education in Japan and looks forward to the development in the near future. First, the current status of library and information science (LIS) education and its major issues are briefly reviewed. Second, the situation of C&C practice in Japanese libraries is briefly reviewed, since it affects C&C education. Third, the present situation and issues in C&C education are examined and described under two categories: education in LIS schools and education in LIS programs offered by other colleges and universities. Finally, on-the-job training and continuing education in the C&C domain are discussed.
    Date
    29. 9.2008 19:04:28
  2. Taniguchi, S.: Design of cataloging rules using conceptual modeling of cataloging process (2004) 0.01
    0.010768341 = product of:
      0.03230502 = sum of:
        0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03230502 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes a method to design cataloging rules by utilizing conceptual modeling of the cataloging process and also by applying the concept "orientedness." It also proposes a general model for the cataloging process at the conceptual level, which is independent of any situation/system or cataloging code. A design method is made up of the following phases, including the development of a general model. Functional and non-functional requirements are first specified by use of orientedness. Also, cataloger tasks are defined, which are constituents of the cataloging process. Second, a core model is built, which consists of (1) basic event patterns under each task, (2) action patterns applicable to each event, and (3) orientedness involved in an event-action pair. Third, the core model is propagated to reflect the characteristics of an individual data element and also a certain class of materials. Finally, the propagated model is defined by choosing pairs of event and action patterns in the model white referring to orientedness indicated in each event-action pair, in order to match a particular situation. As a result, a set of event-action pairs reflecting specific requirements through categories of orientedness is obtained, and consistent and scalable design can, therefore, be attained.
  3. Taniguchi, S.: ¬A system for supporting evidence recording in bibliographic records (2006) 0.01
    0.010768341 = product of:
      0.03230502 = sum of:
        0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03230502 = score(doc=282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Recording evidence for data values, in addition to the values themselves, in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata has been proposed in a previous study. Recorded evidence indicates why and how data values are recorded for elements. As a continuation of that study, this article first proposes a scenario in which a cataloger and a system interact with each other in recording evidence in bibliographic records for books, with the aim of minimizing costs and effort in recording evidence. Second, it reports on prototype system development in accordance with the scenario. The system (1) searches a string, corresponding to the data value entered by a cataloger or extracted from the Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC) record, within the scanned and optical character recognition (OCR)-converted title page and verso of the title page of an item being cataloged; (2) identifies the place where the string appears within the source of information; (3) identifies the procedure being used to form the value entered or recorded; and finally (4) displays the place and procedure identified for the data value as its candidate evidence. Third, this study reports on an experiment conducted to examine the system's performance. The results of the experiment show the usefulness of the system and the validity of the proposed scenario.
  4. Taniguchi, S.: Understanding RDA as a DC application profile (2013) 0.01
    0.0053276825 = product of:
      0.015983047 = sum of:
        0.015983047 = product of:
          0.04794914 = sum of:
            0.04794914 = weight(_text_:29 in 1906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04794914 = score(doc=1906,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1906, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1906)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:05:09
  5. Taniguchi, S.: Viewing RDA from FRBR and FRAD : does RDA represent a different conceptual model? (2012) 0.00
    0.0046617216 = product of:
      0.013985164 = sum of:
        0.013985164 = product of:
          0.041955493 = sum of:
            0.041955493 = weight(_text_:29 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041955493 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:12:56
  6. Taniguchi, S.: Aggregate and component entities in RDA : model and description (2013) 0.00
    0.0046617216 = product of:
      0.013985164 = sum of:
        0.013985164 = product of:
          0.041955493 = sum of:
            0.041955493 = weight(_text_:29 in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041955493 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:02:49
  7. Taniguchi, S.: User tasks in the RDA-based model (2013) 0.00
    0.0046617216 = product of:
      0.013985164 = sum of:
        0.013985164 = product of:
          0.041955493 = sum of:
            0.041955493 = weight(_text_:29 in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041955493 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:14:26
  8. Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.00
    0.0039598173 = product of:
      0.011879452 = sum of:
        0.011879452 = product of:
          0.035638355 = sum of:
            0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035638355 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04384008 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    18. 6.2005 13:16:22