-
Moys, E.M.: Computer-assisted indexing of looseleaf supplements (1995)
0.09
0.09467231 = product of:
0.37868923 = sum of:
0.37868923 = weight(_text_:assisted in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.37868923 = score(doc=2966,freq=4.0), product of:
0.29897895 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
1.2666084 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7552447 = idf(docFreq=139, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2966)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Summarizes publishing practice and suggests a computer-assisted method of compiling supplementary indexes and dealing with with-drawels
-
Manley, S.; Harwood, N.: Bringing it home : learning to index books by correspondence (1997)
0.02
0.015070582 = product of:
0.060282327 = sum of:
0.060282327 = product of:
0.120564654 = sum of:
0.120564654 = weight(_text_:instruction in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.120564654 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.45899904 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Graduate School Correspondence Study Program offers 2 indexing courses: Basic indexing and Applied indexing. Basic indexing covers indexing techniques in the style used by the University of Chicago Press. The Applied indexing course is a short-form simulation of ehr experiences of a frelance indexer. Over 2.600 students have enrolled on these courses since their inception in the mid-1980s. Gives details of the contents of the courses, discusses the challenges for students and teachers and emphasizes the strength of individualized instruction provided by a correspondence course
-
Frame, A.: Indexers and publishers : their views on indexers and indexing (1996)
0.01
0.012917642 = product of:
0.051670566 = sum of:
0.051670566 = product of:
0.10334113 = sum of:
0.10334113 = weight(_text_:instruction in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10334113 = score(doc=3737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26266864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Second of 2 articles reporting the results of a 1995 questionnaire survey of UK indexers and editors, focusing on work practices, relations between editors and indexers, editors' and editors' expectations, and the value placed on various characteristics of indexers and indexing. Data from 146 indexers and 123 editors was analysed on the following topics: complexity of the index and satisfaction with the index produced; instruction given to indexers; problems with the index; editors' judgement of the acceptability of the index; why the index was remembered; and whether editors would use the indexers again. While a high level of satisfaction with the indexes produced on the part of both editors and indexers was reported, results would seem to indicate that sending written instructions to indexers before the proofs are sent gives the lowest percentage of problems with the finished index. Suggests taht editors should consistently tell indexers of any problems to enable indexers to correct what goes wrong
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.01199291 = product of:
0.04797164 = sum of:
0.04797164 = product of:
0.09594328 = sum of:
0.09594328 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09594328 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.01
0.01199291 = product of:
0.04797164 = sum of:
0.04797164 = product of:
0.09594328 = sum of:
0.09594328 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09594328 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.01
0.01199291 = product of:
0.04797164 = sum of:
0.04797164 = product of:
0.09594328 = sum of:
0.09594328 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09594328 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.01
0.01199291 = product of:
0.04797164 = sum of:
0.04797164 = product of:
0.09594328 = sum of:
0.09594328 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09594328 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.01
0.010493796 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = product of:
0.08395037 = sum of:
0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08395037 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.01
0.010493796 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = product of:
0.08395037 = sum of:
0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08395037 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.01
0.010493796 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = product of:
0.08395037 = sum of:
0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08395037 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.01
0.010493796 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = product of:
0.08395037 = sum of:
0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08395037 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.01
0.010493796 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = product of:
0.08395037 = sum of:
0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08395037 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.01
0.010493796 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = product of:
0.08395037 = sum of:
0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08395037 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.01
0.010493796 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = product of:
0.08395037 = sum of:
0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08395037 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.01
0.010493796 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = product of:
0.08395037 = sum of:
0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08395037 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.01
0.010493796 = product of:
0.041975185 = sum of:
0.041975185 = product of:
0.08395037 = sum of:
0.08395037 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08395037 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.01
0.008480268 = product of:
0.03392107 = sum of:
0.03392107 = product of:
0.06784214 = sum of:
0.06784214 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06784214 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.01
0.008480268 = product of:
0.03392107 = sum of:
0.03392107 = product of:
0.06784214 = sum of:
0.06784214 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06784214 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.01
0.007495569 = product of:
0.029982276 = sum of:
0.029982276 = product of:
0.059964553 = sum of:
0.059964553 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059964553 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.005996455 = product of:
0.02398582 = sum of:
0.02398582 = product of:
0.04797164 = sum of:
0.04797164 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04797164 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15498674 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425879 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
