-
Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013)
0.05
0.049066424 = product of:
0.09813285 = sum of:
0.09813285 = sum of:
0.06338805 = weight(_text_:networks in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06338805 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.051289067 = queryNorm
0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.034744803 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034744803 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051289067 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:34:49
-
Yan, E.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.R.: P-Rank: an indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks (2011)
0.04
0.042522 = product of:
0.085044 = sum of:
0.085044 = product of:
0.170088 = sum of:
0.170088 = weight(_text_:networks in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.170088 = score(doc=4349,freq=10.0), product of:
0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.051289067 = queryNorm
0.70112437 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ranking scientific productivity and prestige are often limited to homogeneous networks. These networks are unable to account for the multiple factors that constitute the scholarly communication and reward system. This study proposes a new informetric indicator, P-Rank, for measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks containing articles, authors, and journals. P-Rank differentiates the weight of each citation based on its citing papers, citing journals, and citing authors. Articles from 16 representative library and information science journals are selected as the dataset. Principle Component Analysis is conducted to examine the relationship between P-Rank and other bibliometric indicators. We also compare the correlation and rank variances between citation counts and P-Rank scores. This work provides a new approach to examining prestige in scholarly communication networks in a more comprehensive and nuanced way.
-
Jiang, X.; Sun, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhuge, H.; Lapshinova-Koltunski, E.; Yao, J.: Exploiting heterogeneous scientific literature networks to combat ranking bias : evidence from the computational linguistics area (2016)
0.02
0.022411061 = product of:
0.044822123 = sum of:
0.044822123 = product of:
0.089644246 = sum of:
0.089644246 = weight(_text_:networks in 3017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089644246 = score(doc=3017,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.051289067 = queryNorm
0.369525 = fieldWeight in 3017, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3017)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is important to help researchers find valuable papers from a large literature collection. To this end, many graph-based ranking algorithms have been proposed. However, most of these algorithms suffer from the problem of ranking bias. Ranking bias hurts the usefulness of a ranking algorithm because it returns a ranking list with an undesirable time distribution. This paper is a focused study on how to alleviate ranking bias by leveraging the heterogeneous network structure of the literature collection. We propose a new graph-based ranking algorithm, MutualRank, that integrates mutual reinforcement relationships among networks of papers, researchers, and venues to achieve a more synthetic, accurate, and less-biased ranking than previous methods. MutualRank provides a unified model that involves both intra- and inter-network information for ranking papers, researchers, and venues simultaneously. We use the ACL Anthology Network as the benchmark data set and construct the gold standard from computer linguistics course websites of well-known universities and two well-known textbooks. The experimental results show that MutualRank greatly outperforms the state-of-the-art competitors, including PageRank, HITS, CoRank, Future Rank, and P-Rank, in ranking papers in both improving ranking effectiveness and alleviating ranking bias. Rankings of researchers and venues by MutualRank are also quite reasonable.
-
Ding, Y.: Topic-based PageRank on author cocitation networks (2011)
0.02
0.019016415 = product of:
0.03803283 = sum of:
0.03803283 = product of:
0.07606566 = sum of:
0.07606566 = weight(_text_:networks in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07606566 = score(doc=4348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24259318 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.051289067 = queryNorm
0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.013897921 = product of:
0.027795842 = sum of:
0.027795842 = product of:
0.055591684 = sum of:
0.055591684 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055591684 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051289067 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014)
0.01
0.013897921 = product of:
0.027795842 = sum of:
0.027795842 = product of:
0.055591684 = sum of:
0.055591684 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055591684 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051289067 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 9.2014 14:45:22
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.01
0.012284143 = product of:
0.024568286 = sum of:
0.024568286 = product of:
0.04913657 = sum of:
0.04913657 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04913657 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051289067 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
-
Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012)
0.01
0.008686201 = product of:
0.017372401 = sum of:
0.017372401 = product of:
0.034744803 = sum of:
0.034744803 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034744803 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17960557 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051289067 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 6.2012 14:22:34
