-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.05
0.04702112 = product of:
0.14106336 = sum of:
0.14106336 = sum of:
0.09004147 = weight(_text_:history in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09004147 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.051021885 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051021885 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.04
0.041143484 = product of:
0.123430446 = sum of:
0.123430446 = sum of:
0.07878629 = weight(_text_:history in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07878629 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.04464415 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04464415 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
Avram, H.D.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1961-1974 (2009)
0.04
0.041143484 = product of:
0.123430446 = sum of:
0.123430446 = sum of:
0.07878629 = weight(_text_:history in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07878629 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.04464415 = weight(_text_:22 in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04464415 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The MARC Program of the Library of Congress, led during its formative years by the author of this entry, was a landmark in the history of automation. Technical procedures, standards, and formatting for the catalog record were experimented with and developed in modern form in this project. The project began when computers were mainframe, slow, and limited in storage. So little was known then about many aspects of automation of library information resources that the MARC project can be seen as a pioneering effort with immeasurable impact.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:53
-
Weiss, P.J.: Everything you always wanted to know about format integration, but were afraid to ask (1994)
0.02
0.02251037 = product of:
0.06753111 = sum of:
0.06753111 = product of:
0.13506222 = sum of:
0.13506222 = weight(_text_:history in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13506222 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.6167716 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Examines the impetus, history, effects and implementation of format integration of the USMARC bibliographic formats
-
Duchemin, P.-Y.: BN OPALINE : the map database in the Department des Cartes et Plans de la Bibliothèque Nationale: history (1993)
0.02
0.021222979 = product of:
0.06366894 = sum of:
0.06366894 = product of:
0.12733787 = sum of:
0.12733787 = weight(_text_:history in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12733787 = score(doc=916,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.5814978 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Provides a brief history of the Department des Cartes et Plans de la Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris before going on to discuss the computerization of its collections. Describes the computer format for cartographic documents which the Department has developed, INTERMARC(C), which is an extension of INTERMARC, the French version of MARC. Then discusses BN-OPALINE, the Department's computerized system for cartographic materials, and its functionality. Finally looks to the future and the Department's hope to create a national union catalogue of cartographic documents
-
Studwell, W.E.; Rast, E.K.: Format integration and spatial data : a preliminary view (1993)
0.02
0.01875864 = product of:
0.056275915 = sum of:
0.056275915 = product of:
0.11255183 = sum of:
0.11255183 = weight(_text_:history in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11255183 = score(doc=6698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Provides a brief history and explains the principle of format integration. Gives 2 examples of monographic map records taken from the OCLC database. Explains significant or substantial differences between the present fixed fields and the projected fields for both these examples
-
Bourne, R.: Common MARC, or vivent les differences? (1996)
0.02
0.01875864 = product of:
0.056275915 = sum of:
0.056275915 = product of:
0.11255183 = sum of:
0.11255183 = weight(_text_:history in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11255183 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Investigates the history of the machine readable catalogue (MARC). Compares US and UK attitudes to MARC and raises the fact that US and UK standards are incompatible. Suggests that the 2 should be able to integrate and gives reasons for this
-
Bourne, R.: Common MARC, or 'vivent les differences'? (1996)
0.02
0.01875864 = product of:
0.056275915 = sum of:
0.056275915 = product of:
0.11255183 = sum of:
0.11255183 = weight(_text_:history in 6727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11255183 = score(doc=6727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 6727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6727)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Investigates the history of the machine readable catalogue and the role of the MARC format. Compares US and UK attitiudes to MARC and raises the issue of the incompatibility of the US and British standards. Suggests that they should be able to integrate, giving reasons for this
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.02
0.018038962 = product of:
0.054116886 = sum of:
0.054116886 = product of:
0.10823377 = sum of:
0.10823377 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10823377 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.017007295 = product of:
0.051021885 = sum of:
0.051021885 = product of:
0.10204377 = sum of:
0.10204377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10204377 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Williams, R.D.: MARC: thirty years and still going ... (1995)
0.02
0.015006913 = product of:
0.045020737 = sum of:
0.045020737 = product of:
0.09004147 = sum of:
0.09004147 = weight(_text_:history in 4020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09004147 = score(doc=4020,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 4020, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4020)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Traces the history of the MARC formats, for computerized bibliographic records and computerized cataloguing, from the initial work of the Library of Congress in the early 60s through to the various stages of development of the MARC Pilot Project (1966 to 1968); MARC2 (1968 to 1974); Distribution Service (1968); Retrospective Conversion (1968 to 1970); the Committee on Representation in Machine-Readable Form of Bibliographic Information (MARBI) and the USMARC Advisory Group; and the expansion, linkage and integration stages (1980 to the present)
-
Willer, M.: Formats and cataloguing rules : developments for cataloguing electronic resources (1999)
0.02
0.015006913 = product of:
0.045020737 = sum of:
0.045020737 = product of:
0.09004147 = sum of:
0.09004147 = weight(_text_:history in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09004147 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Following a brief history of cataloguing and the MARC record format, describes current challenges in developing suitable international formats and cataloguing rules for dealing with electronic resources. Extensive references to the past and current literature provide an overview of the problems faced. Notes the role of the ISBD, Z39.50 protocol and the integration of Internet objects into the online catalogue
-
Campos, F.M.: UNIMARC: the virtual format in the virtual age (1998)
0.02
0.015006913 = product of:
0.045020737 = sum of:
0.045020737 = product of:
0.09004147 = sum of:
0.09004147 = weight(_text_:history in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09004147 = score(doc=5175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Focuses on the history of the UNIMARC format which was designed as a communication tool among the various national formats used for computerized bibliographic records. Explains the function of UNIMARC and ISBDs in bringing together automated versions of catalogues without greatly compromising individual or local characteristics. Gives examples of European projects which have resulted in products which illustrate the value of UNIMARC and discusses its application to electronic media and future in international networks
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.014881384 = product of:
0.04464415 = sum of:
0.04464415 = product of:
0.0892883 = sum of:
0.0892883 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0892883 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000)
0.01
0.014881384 = product of:
0.04464415 = sum of:
0.04464415 = product of:
0.0892883 = sum of:
0.0892883 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0892883 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26. 8.2000 19:22:35
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.01
0.014881384 = product of:
0.04464415 = sum of:
0.04464415 = product of:
0.0892883 = sum of:
0.0892883 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0892883 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.01
0.014881384 = product of:
0.04464415 = sum of:
0.04464415 = product of:
0.0892883 = sum of:
0.0892883 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0892883 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Beall, J.; Mitchell, J.S.: History of the representation of the DDC in the MARC Classification Format (2010)
0.01
0.013264361 = product of:
0.03979308 = sum of:
0.03979308 = product of:
0.07958616 = sum of:
0.07958616 = weight(_text_:history in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07958616 = score(doc=3568,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.3634361 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article explores the history of the representation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) in the Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC) formats, with a special emphasis on the development of the MARC classification format. Until 2009, the format used to represent the DDC has been a proprietary one that predated the development of the MARC classification format. The need to replace the current editorial support system, the desire to deliver DDC data in a variety of formats to support different uses, and the increasingly global context of editorial work with translation partners around the world prompted the Dewey editorial team, along with OCLC research and development colleagues, to rethink the underlying representation of the DDC and choose the MARC 21 formats for classification and authority data. The discussion is framed with quotes from the writings of Nancy J. Williamson, whose analysis of the content of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) schedules played a key role in shaping the original MARC classification format.
-
Spicher, K.M.: ¬The development of the MARC format (1996)
0.01
0.0131310485 = product of:
0.039393146 = sum of:
0.039393146 = product of:
0.07878629 = sum of:
0.07878629 = weight(_text_:history in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07878629 = score(doc=5574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21898255 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The use of computerized cataloguing data requires a commitment on the part of libraries to the standardization of data elements and record formats. Early computerized formats were initiated by several research libraries to serve the needs of particular university systems. In developing MARC, the LoC drew on the experiences of these libraries in establishing a standard acceptable to the research library community for the interchange of bibliographic data. Discusses early computerized formats influencing MARC, the origins of the MARC Pilot Project, and design factors influencing the evolution of the format through MARC2. Research was based on primary sources documenting the early history of MARC, including unpublished documents in the LoC archives
-
Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998)
0.01
0.012755471 = product of:
0.038266413 = sum of:
0.038266413 = product of:
0.076532826 = sum of:
0.076532826 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076532826 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16484147 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047072954 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 2. 8.2001 16:22:33
