-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.08
0.07960726 = product of:
0.15921453 = sum of:
0.15921453 = sum of:
0.074527085 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074527085 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084687434 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
- Imprint
- Englewood, CO : Libraries Unlimited
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.06
0.062212706 = product of:
0.12442541 = sum of:
0.12442541 = sum of:
0.064542346 = weight(_text_:libraries in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064542346 = score(doc=101,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.3771894 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.059883066 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059883066 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.05
0.053071506 = product of:
0.10614301 = sum of:
0.10614301 = sum of:
0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049684722 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056458294 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Over the past year, innumerable discussions on the relationship between traditional library OPACs and the newly burgeoning World WideWeb have occured in many libraries and in virtually every library related discussion list. Rumors and speculation abound, some insisting that SGML will replace USMARC "soon," others maintaining that OPACs that haven't migrated to the Web will go the way of the dinosaurs.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.05
0.04643757 = product of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043474134 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.05
0.04643757 = product of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043474134 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996)
0.05
0.04643757 = product of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043474134 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Theses and dissertations as electronic files transferred from the student author to the Graduate School to the Library may well be the first major source of electronic texts that many libraries encounter. To prepare for this potential influx of electronic texts, an ad hoc task force considered work flow and cataloging guidelines. The author suggests expanding current theses cataloging and taking advantage of online information prepared by authors so that the bibliographic records provide OPACS with much more valuable information than does traditional theses cataloging. This should not require a lot of extra work.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125
-
Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012)
0.05
0.04643757 = product of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.09287514 = sum of:
0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043474134 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049401004 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 11:08:22
-
Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002)
0.04
0.03980363 = product of:
0.07960726 = sum of:
0.07960726 = sum of:
0.037263542 = weight(_text_:libraries in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037263542 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042343717 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
- Imprint
- Greenwood Village, Co. : Libraries Unlimited
-
Stoker, D.: Computer cataloguing in retrospect (1997)
0.04
0.03960097 = product of:
0.07920194 = sum of:
0.07920194 = sum of:
0.043915503 = weight(_text_:libraries in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043915503 = score(doc=605,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.25664487 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
0.035286434 = weight(_text_:22 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035286434 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Pays tribute to the recent advances in the ability to access computerized catalogues from the desktop via the Internet but emphasizes that there are problems still to be overcome before the ideal of universal access to catalogue records for UK libraries is achieved. Advances in computerized cataloguing over the past 40 years have been an obstacle to retrospective cataloguing in a coherent and standardized manner which even the adoption of common standards for information retrieval and the Z39.50 protocol have failed to prevent. Many libraries with modern methods for cataloguing new materials still have earlier sequences of records on microfiche or other hard copy format. Other specialized collections are such that they have never been catalogued to professional standards or in a convenient format. Illustrates the point with reference to practical searching of catalogues in Aberystwyth, Wales, and to 2 studies of the logistical and financial issues of a programme of retrospective cataloguing as reported in BLRIC report 53. Discusses the proposed UK coordinating body and coordinated natioanl prgramme, to select which catalogues should be converted, set priorities for work, ensure maintenance of requisite standards, and arrange collaboration between neighbouring or related institutions
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012)
0.04
0.03960097 = product of:
0.07920194 = sum of:
0.07920194 = sum of:
0.043915503 = weight(_text_:libraries in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043915503 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.25664487 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.035286434 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035286434 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
- Date
- 27. 9.2012 14:22:00
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008)
0.04
0.038956933 = product of:
0.077913865 = sum of:
0.077913865 = sum of:
0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049684722 = score(doc=2666,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.028229147 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028229147 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Many libraries and other cultural institutions are incorporating Web 2.0 features and enhanced metadata into their catalogs (Trant 2006). These value-added elements include those typically found in commercial and social networking sites, such as book jacket images, reviews, and usergenerated tags. One such site that libraries are exploring as a model is LibraryThing (www.librarything.com) LibraryThing is a social networking site that allows users to "catalog" their own book collections. Members can add tags and reviews to records for books, as well as engage in online discussions. In addition to its service for individuals, LibraryThing offers a feebased service to libraries, where institutions can add LibraryThing tags, recommendations, and other features to their online catalog records. This poster will present data analyzing the quality and quantity of the metadata that a large academic library would expect to gain if utilizing such a service, focusing on the overlap between titles found in the library's catalog and in LibraryThing's database, and on a comparison between the controlled subject headings in the former and the user-generated tags in the latter. During February through April 2008, a random sample of 383 titles from the University of Minnesota Libraries catalog was searched in LibraryThing. Eighty works, or 21 percent of the sample, had corresponding records available in LibraryThing. Golder and Huberman (2006) outline the advantages and disadvantages of using controlled vocabulary for subject access to information resources versus the growing trend of tags supplied by users or by content creators. Using the 80 matched records from the sample, comparisons were made between the user-supplied tags in LibraryThing (social tags) and the subject headings in the library catalog records (controlled vocabulary system). In the library records, terms from all 6XX MARC fields were used. To make a more meaningful comparison, controlled subject terms were broken down into facets according to their headings and subheadings, and each unique facet counted separately. A total of 227 subject terms were applied to the 80 catalog records, an average of 2.84 per record. In LibraryThing, 698 tags were applied to the same 80 titles, an average of 8.73 per title. The poster will further explore the relationships between the terms applied in each source, and identify where overlaps and complementary levels of access occur.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Managing cataloging and the organization of information : philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century (2000)
0.03
0.03408732 = product of:
0.06817464 = sum of:
0.06817464 = sum of:
0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043474134 = score(doc=238,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.024700502 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024700502 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in ZfBB 51(2004) H.1, S.54-55 (G. Pflug): "Unter dem wachsenden Einfluss der Informationstechnologie auf den Bibliotheksbereich nimmt die Katalogisierung eine Schlüsselstellung ein. Das vorliegende Werk gliedert sich in zwei Teile. Der erste Abschnitt ist mit »National Libraries« überschrieben, befasst sich jedoch nur mit der Library of Congress und der National Library of Canada. Ihm folgen Artikel über »Libraries around the world«. Dabei fälltjedoch auf, dass diese Studien zwar Bibliotheken in Großbritannien, Australien, Mittel- und Südamerika und selbst Afrika (Botswana) behandeln, nicht jedoch aus Kontinentaleuropa, trotz entsprechender Aktivitäten etwa in den Niederlanden, in Frankreich oder den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Nur DOBIS/LIBIS wird erwähnt, aber nur, weil es für kurze Zeit die kanadische Entwicklung beeinflusst hat. Im zweiten Teil kommen Katalogisierungsfachleute aus vier Spezial- und neun akademischen Bibliotheken - ausschließlich aus Nordamerika und Großbritannien - zu Wort. So enthält das Werk in 22 Beispielen Berichte über individuelle und regionale Lösungen. Dabei steht die Frage im Vordergrund, zu welchen Änderungen in der Katalogisierungs- und Sacherschließungspraxis die neuen elektronischen Techniken geführt haben. So streben z.B. die englischen Hochschulbibliotheken ein koordiniertes System an. Mit dem Übergang der British Library zu MARC 21 wird das Katalogsystem in Großbritannien nachhaltig beeinflusst - um nur zwei nahe liegende Beispiele zu nennen. Insgesamt werden drei Aspekte behandelt, die Automatisierungstechnik; die dabei einzusetzende Kooperation und das Outsourcing - nicht nur durch Übernahme von Daten anderer Bibliotheken oder durch Verbundsysteme, vor allem der Library of Congress, sondern auch durch Buchhandelsfirmen wie Blackwell North America Authority Control Service. In der Frage der Sacherschließung befassen sich die Beiträge mit den im amerikanischen Bereich üblichen Klassifikationssystemen, vor allem der Colon Classification, Dewey in seinen beiden Formen oder der Library of Congress Classification. Für die deutsche Diskussion sind diese Aspekte vor allem wegen des Übergangs der Deutschen Bibliothek in ihrer Nationalbibliografie zur DDC von großem Interesse (vgl. Magda Heiner-Freiling: Die DDC in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie. In Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 15. 2003, Nr. 3, S. 8-13). Doch stellen auch die unterschiedlichen Überlegungen zur alphabetischen Katalogisierung, verbunden mit den da zugehörigen Datenbanken, einen interessanten Beitrag zur augenblicklichen Diskussion in Deutschland dar, da auch hier seit einigen Jahren die Katalogisierung nach RAK und ihre Ablösung eine lebhafte Diskussion ausgelöst hat, wie unter anderem der zusammenfassende Beitrag von Elisabeth Niggemann in: Dialog mit Bibliotheken (15. 2003, Nr. 2, S. 4-8) zeigt. Auch die angloamerikanischen und die mit ihnen zum Beispiel in Mexiko, Südamerika oder Australien verbundenen Bibliotheken - das zeigt das Buch deutlich - diskutieren die Frage der alphabetischen Katalogisierung kontrovers. So werden z.B. neben den dominanten AACR-Regeln mit ihrer Weiterentwicklung mehr als zehn andere Katalogisierungssysteme und rund 20 Online-Datenbanken behandelt. Damit liefert das Buch für die Diskussion in Deutschland und die anstehenden Entscheidungen in seiner Grundtendenz wie in den unterschiedlichen-auch widersprüchlichen-Aspekten dereinzelnen Beiträge wertvolle Anregungen."
- Issue
- Part I: National libraries, libraries around the world.
-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.03
0.033169694 = product of:
0.06633939 = sum of:
0.06633939 = sum of:
0.031052953 = weight(_text_:libraries in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031052953 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.035286434 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035286434 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979)
0.03
0.028229147 = product of:
0.056458294 = sum of:
0.056458294 = product of:
0.11291659 = sum of:
0.11291659 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11291659 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3.10.2000 20:48:22
-
Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998)
0.03
0.028229147 = product of:
0.056458294 = sum of:
0.056458294 = product of:
0.11291659 = sum of:
0.11291659 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11291659 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
-
Voss, J.: LibraryThing : Web 2.0 für Literaturfreunde und Bibliotheken (2007)
0.02
0.024348084 = product of:
0.048696168 = sum of:
0.048696168 = sum of:
0.031052953 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031052953 = score(doc=1847,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
0.017643217 = weight(_text_:22 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017643217 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Zusammenarbeit mit Bibliotheken Bereits früh setzte sich Tim Spalding für eine Zusammenarbeit mit Bibliotheken ein. Zum Eintragen von neuen Büchern in LibraryThing können zahlreiche Bibliothekskataloge ausgewählt werden, die via Z39.50 eingebunden werden - seit Oktober 2006 ist auch der GBV dabei. Im April 2007 veröffentlichte Tim Spalding mit LibraryThing for Libraries ein Reihe von Webservices, die Bibliotheken in ihre OPACs einbinden können.4 Ein Webservice ist eine Funktion, die von anderen Programmen über das Web aufgerufen werden kann und Daten zurückliefert. Bereits seit Juni 2006 können über verschiedene offene LibraryThing-Webservices unter Anderem zu einer gegebenen ISBN die Sprache und eine Liste von ISBNs anderer Auflagen und Übersetzungen ermittelt werden, die zum gleichen Werk gehören (thinglSBN). Damit setzt LibraryThing praktisch einen Teil der Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) um, die in bibliothekswissenschaftlichen Fachkreisen bereits seit Anfang der 1990er diskutiert werden, aber bislang nicht so Recht ihre Umsetzung in Katalogen gefunden haben. Die Information darüber, welche Bücher zum gleichen Werk gehören, wird von der LibraryThing-Community bereitgestellt; jeder Benutzer kann einzelne Ausgaben mit einem Klick zusammenführen oder wieder trennen. Vergleiche mit dem ähnlichen Dienst xISBN von OCLC zeigen, dass sich thinglSBN und xISBN gut ergänzen, allerdings bietet LibraryThing seinen Webservice im Gegensatz zu OCLC kostenlos an. Neben Empfehlungen von verwandten Büchern ist es im Rahmen von LibraryThing for Libraries auch möglich, die von den Nutzern vergebenen Tags in den eigenen Katalog einzubinden. Ein Nachteil dabei ist allerdings die bisherige Übermacht der englischen Sprache und dass nur selbständige Titel mit ISBN berücksichtigt werden. Die VZG prüft derzeit, in welcher Form LibraryThing for Libraries am besten in GBV-Bibliotheken umgesetzt werden kann. Es spricht allerdings für jede einzelne Bibliothek nichts dagegen, schon jetzt damit zu experimentieren, wie der eigene OPAC mit zusätzlichen Links und Tags von LibraryThing aussehen könnte. Darüber hinaus können sich auch Bibliotheken mit einem eigenen Zugang als Nutzer in LibraryThing beteiligen. So stellt beispielsweise die Stadtbücherei Nordenham bereits seit Ende 2005 ihre Neuzugänge im Erwachsenenbestand in einer Sammlung bei LibraryThing ein.
Beispiel für die Anwendung von LibraryThing for Libraries im Katalog des Waterford Institute of Technology (): Zu einer ISBN werden auf Basis der in LibraryThing gesammelten Daten andere Auflagen und Übersetzungen, ähnliche Bücher und Tags eingeblendet. Soziale Software lebt vom Mitmachen Vieles spricht dafür, dass LibraryThing auf dem besten Weg ist, sich zu einem der wichtigsten Web 2.0-Dienste für die Zusammenarbeit mit Bibliotheken zu entwickeln. Wie schon bei Wikipedia gibt es allerdings noch viel zu oft Berührungsängste und die Vorstellung, dass sich diese Dienste erst durch Hilfe von Außen in der eigenen Einrichtung einführen ließen. Soziale Software lebt jedoch von der Zusammenarbeit und dem freien Austausch von Gedanken und Informationen. Deshalb hilft nur eins: Ausprobieren und Mitmachen. Ebenso wie Wikipedia schwer zu beurteilen ist, ohne selbst mit anderen Wikipedianern einen Artikel erstellt und diskutiert zu haben, erschließt sich LibraryThing erst vollständig durch eine eigene dort angelegte Büchersammlung. Zum Kennenlernen reicht der kostenlose Zugang und mit 15 $ Jahresgebühr können auch Bibliotheken problemlos bis zu 5.000 Medieneinheiten pro Sammlung einstellen. Wenn Sie erstmal mehr mit Library-Thing vertraut sind, werden Ihnen sicherlich weitere Einsatzmöglichkeiten für Ihre Einrichtung und deren Nutzer einfallen. LibraryThing entwickelt sich beständig weiter und dürfte noch für einige Überraschungen gut sein.
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 10:36:23
-
Burch, V.J.: ¬The divided catalog : Duke University Library Catalog faces the future (1942)
0.02
0.021737067 = product of:
0.043474134 = sum of:
0.043474134 = product of:
0.08694827 = sum of:
0.08694827 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08694827 = score(doc=3071,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 3071, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3071)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- College and research libraries. 3(1941/42) no.3, S.219-223
-
Doering, W.: Managing the transition to a new catalog : tips for smotth sailing (2000)
0.02
0.021737067 = product of:
0.043474134 = sum of:
0.043474134 = product of:
0.08694827 = sum of:
0.08694827 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08694827 = score(doc=3382,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 3382, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3382)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 20(2000) no.7, S,20-22,24
-
Bryant, P.: Making the most of our libraries (1997)
0.02
0.021737067 = product of:
0.043474134 = sum of:
0.043474134 = product of:
0.08694827 = sum of:
0.08694827 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08694827 = score(doc=2439,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of the 2 studies: "Retrospective conversion of library catalogues in institutions of higher education in the United Kingdom: a study of the justification for a national programme" and "Retrospective conversion for libraries in the UK other than those funded by the Higher Education Funding Councils". The latter study was on behalf of libraries other than national ones: public; learned and scientific society; professional; and religious. Covers: the scale of UK retrospective conversion issues, opportunities and need for a national strategy; retrospective conversion in an international context; conversion of library catalogues in UK higher education institutions; and catalogues in other UK libraries
-
Feldman, S.: ¬The key to online catalogs that work? (1999)
0.02
0.021737067 = product of:
0.043474134 = sum of:
0.043474134 = product of:
0.08694827 = sum of:
0.08694827 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08694827 = score(doc=6467,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.052088603 = queryNorm
0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 6467, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6467)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.16-18
