Search (70 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  1. Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000) 0.05
    0.04643757 = product of:
      0.09287514 = sum of:
        0.09287514 = sum of:
          0.043474134 = weight(_text_:libraries in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043474134 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.049401004 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049401004 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.03
    0.033169694 = product of:
      0.06633939 = sum of:
        0.06633939 = sum of:
          0.031052953 = weight(_text_:libraries in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031052953 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.035286434 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035286434 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.03
    0.033169694 = product of:
      0.06633939 = sum of:
        0.06633939 = sum of:
          0.031052953 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031052953 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.035286434 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035286434 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  4. Lorenz, B.; Steffens, M.: Systematik und Schlagwortnormdatei zwischen Universalität und Individualität (1997) 0.02
    0.024700502 = product of:
      0.049401004 = sum of:
        0.049401004 = product of:
          0.09880201 = sum of:
            0.09880201 = weight(_text_:22 in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09880201 = score(doc=5819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 5.2001 19:22:37
  5. Bourdon, F.: Funktionale Anforderungen an bibliographische Datensätze und ein internationales Nummernsystem für Normdaten : wie weit kann Normierung durch Technik unterstützt werden? (2001) 0.02
    0.021171859 = product of:
      0.042343717 = sum of:
        0.042343717 = product of:
          0.084687434 = sum of:
            0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 6888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084687434 = score(doc=6888,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6888, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 12:30:22
  6. Leth, P.: Subject access - the Swedish approach (2007) 0.02
    0.021171859 = product of:
      0.042343717 = sum of:
        0.042343717 = product of:
          0.084687434 = sum of:
            0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084687434 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  7. Hengel, C.: Mapping name authorities : the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) (2007) 0.02
    0.021171859 = product of:
      0.042343717 = sum of:
        0.042343717 = product of:
          0.084687434 = sum of:
            0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084687434 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  8. Goossens, P.: Authority control : trends and challenges (2007) 0.02
    0.021171859 = product of:
      0.042343717 = sum of:
        0.042343717 = product of:
          0.084687434 = sum of:
            0.084687434 = weight(_text_:22 in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084687434 = score(doc=1290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  9. Cree, J.S.: Data conversion and migration at the libraries of the Home Office and the Department of the Environment (1997) 0.02
    0.020830952 = product of:
      0.041661903 = sum of:
        0.041661903 = product of:
          0.08332381 = sum of:
            0.08332381 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08332381 = score(doc=2175,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4869494 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the experience of data conversion and migration at the libraries of the Home Office (HO) and the Dept. of the Environment (DoE), UK. Both HO and DoE libraries had changed from Anglo-American code cataloguing to AACR2 cataloguing in the mid-1970s. Both libraries were selective in identifying records for conversion initially to BLAISE-LOCAS. Conversion to integrated library systems from BLAISE-LOCAS MARC tapes produced problems in both libraries with location/holdings fields which were largely resolved at HO, but not resolved at DoE. HO experienced problems converting to a system with fixed field lengths. HO converted subject keywords to form a rudimentary, non-standard thesaurus which required the addition of Broader Term and Narrower Term to meet the challenge of computerized searching. DoE converted a non-thesaurus subject index to an authority file, but continued to maintain the index on a stand-alone DataEase application for use by cataloguers. Neither library converted acquisitions data
  10. McGrath, E.: Developing priorities for authority work at the University at Buffalo Libraries (1993) 0.02
    0.018824851 = product of:
      0.037649702 = sum of:
        0.037649702 = product of:
          0.075299405 = sum of:
            0.075299405 = weight(_text_:libraries in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075299405 = score(doc=557,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A sample was taken of the name and title provisional, or minimal level, authority records created by Blackwell North America, Inc., during its authority control processing in preparation for the implementation of NOTIS at the State Univerity of New York at Buffalo Libraries. Analysis of the sample showed that approximately 10 % of theses provisional records were created unnecessarily, while approximately 7 % had Library of Congress Name Authority File recordsestablished since the vendor's work was completed. The remaining 83 %, which will require original authority work in order to be upgraded to 'full' status, are categorized in such a manner as to determine the best approach to achieving the libraries' goal of absolute authority control.
  11. Handis, M.W.: Greek subject and name authorities, and the Library of Congress (2020) 0.02
    0.018824851 = product of:
      0.037649702 = sum of:
        0.037649702 = product of:
          0.075299405 = sum of:
            0.075299405 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075299405 = score(doc=5801,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Some international libraries are still using the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2nd edition revised, for cataloging even though the Library of Congress and other large libraries have retired it in favor of Resource Description and Access. One of these libraries is the National Library of Greece, which consults the Library of Congress database before establishing authorities. There are cultural differences in names and subjects between the Library of Congress and the National Library, but some National Library terms may be more appropriate for users than the Library of Congress-established forms.
  12. Wolverton Jr., R.E.: Authority control in academic libraries in the United States : a survey (2005) 0.02
    0.018631771 = product of:
      0.037263542 = sum of:
        0.037263542 = product of:
          0.074527085 = sum of:
            0.074527085 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074527085 = score(doc=5746,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 5746, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5746)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control is an important part of the cataloging process, but relatively little research has been conducted related to its practice in academic libraries. In addition, few studies have been conducted regarding staffing and training issues related to authority control. To examine these issues, a survey was developed and emailed to academic libraries at 258 institutions designated by the year 2000 Carnegie Classification as either Doctoral/Research Extensive or Intensive level. The survey consisted of questions relating to authority control practices and staffing and training issues related to authority control. One hundred ninety-three institutions responded for a return rate of 75 percent. The survey results indicate that authority control was practiced and highly valued by the vast majority of respondents and that many would like additional time, funding, and personnel to do more authority control work in their libraries.
  13. Bourdon, F.: Modeling authority data for libraries, archives, and museums : a project in progress at AFNOR (2004) 0.02
    0.017566202 = product of:
      0.035132404 = sum of:
        0.035132404 = product of:
          0.07026481 = sum of:
            0.07026481 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07026481 = score(doc=5690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 5690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To give a national basis to the considerations developed at IFLA with FRANAR, a working group devoted to modelling authority data was created in the framework of the French Organization for Standardization (AFNOR) in 2000. The Working Group aims at developing interoperability among libraries, archives and museums. Composition, goals, and the working plan of this Group are presented.
  14. Goldrnan, H.; Smith, D.M.: Name authority in a NOTIS environment : Auburn University Libraries (1989) 0.02
    0.015370426 = product of:
      0.030740852 = sum of:
        0.030740852 = product of:
          0.061481703 = sum of:
            0.061481703 = weight(_text_:libraries in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061481703 = score(doc=442,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    During the years 1984-85, the arrival of an integrated automated library system (NOTIS) forced Auburn University Libraries to reevaluate the status of its name authority system. Central to the evaluation process was the preservation of the major investment made in the card name authority file as a result of AACR2. To achieve this, a process of migrating the valuable information from the card file into an online environment was developed. The final result of this process was a new authority structure with current and potential capabilities superior to the previous manual system.
  15. Kimura, M.: ¬A comparison of recorded authority data elements and the RDA Framework in Chinese character cultures (2015) 0.02
    0.015370426 = product of:
      0.030740852 = sum of:
        0.030740852 = product of:
          0.061481703 = sum of:
            0.061481703 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061481703 = score(doc=2619,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 2619, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2619)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To investigate which authority data elements are recorded by libraries in the Chinese character cultural sphere (e.g., Japan, Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, and Vietnam), data elements recorded by each library were examined and compared to authority data elements defined in the standard Resource Description and Access (RDA) design. Recommendations were then made to libraries within this cultural sphere to improve and internationally standardize their authority data. In addition, suggestions are provided to modify RDA in an effort to increase compatibility with authority data in the Chinese character cultural sphere.
  16. Abrahamse, B.: Corporate bodies : access points and authority control (2021) 0.02
    0.015370426 = product of:
      0.030740852 = sum of:
        0.030740852 = product of:
          0.061481703 = sum of:
            0.061481703 = weight(_text_:libraries in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061481703 = score(doc=698,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of authorship is central to how libraries organize their collections. But libraries do not only collect resources created by individuals, they also collect documents issued by organizations. Library catalogers use the concept of a "corporate body" to treat organizations as authors for the purpose of making their documents discoverable to users. This essay looks at the key features of establishing authorized access points (AAPs) and applying authority control for corporate bodies. It examines how practices with regard to corporate bodies have changed over time and considers the changes catalogers might expect to see in the future.
  17. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01
    0.014114574 = product of:
      0.028229147 = sum of:
        0.028229147 = product of:
          0.056458294 = sum of:
            0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056458294 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Danowski, P.; Pfeifer, B.: Wikipedia und Normdateien : Wege der Vernetzung am Beispiel der Kooperation mit der Personennamendatei (2007) 0.01
    0.014114574 = product of:
      0.028229147 = sum of:
        0.028229147 = product of:
          0.056458294 = sum of:
            0.056458294 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056458294 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2011 11:54:22
  19. Balikova, M.: Multilingual Subject Access to Catalogues of National Libraries (MSAC) : Czech Republic's collaboration with Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Macedonia, Lithuania and Latvia (2005) 0.01
    0.013887302 = product of:
      0.027774604 = sum of:
        0.027774604 = product of:
          0.055549208 = sum of:
            0.055549208 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055549208 = score(doc=4349,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.32463294 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Czech authority file of topical terms is intended to form a base for multilingual controlled vocabulary. The aim of the proposal is to provide users of online library catalogues and internet services of cooperating institutions with an indexing and retrieval tool which enables multilingual and cross-domain searching ("one-stop" seamless searching). The goal of the project is to establish a multilingual subject approach to catalogues of participating libraries (Czechia, Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Slovakia, and Slovenia). In practice this means that a user in any of these countries would enter a query in his local language and receive hits from all the catalogues. The initiative is complying with the main goals currently defined by IFLA for the activity of Indexing and Classification Section, it means: Changing Roles of Subject Access Tools (Berlin), Implementation and Adaptation of Global Tools for Subject Access to Local Needs (Buenos Aires), and Cataloguing and Subject Tools for Global Access: International Partnerships (Oslo).
    Content
    The aim of this initiative is to provide the users of online library catalogues and information gateways of cooperating libraries with a prototype for multilingual subject searching in online environment. Library collections of these libraries are large and without any doubt very valuable for researchers throughout Europe. What is needed is a standardized, authorized indexing and retrieval tool which would bring together all their catalogues and databases and enable multilingual subject searching. At the beginning of the project, a number of factors affecting subject indexing in current environment and cross-searching for subjects have been identified. These factors include - standardization of subject retrieval process and indexing and classification tools - subject retrieval methods - possibility of interoperability among different indexing and classification schemes - multilingualism issue - possibility to increase precision and recall trough Z39.50 protocol and its profiles and to apply authority control in subject retrieval process - need for cooperation
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
  20. Lavrenova, O.A.: National Authority File of the Russian Geographic Names (2005) 0.01
    0.013174651 = product of:
      0.026349302 = sum of:
        0.026349302 = product of:
          0.052698605 = sum of:
            0.052698605 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052698605 = score(doc=4345,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The development of the National Authority File of Geographic Names has been carried out by the Russian State Library (RSL) since 2003 in the framework of the Federal program called "Russian culture (2001-2005)". The file will be a part of the complex of the authority files for the network of Russian libraries (LIBNET). Its aim is to provide usage of standardized Russian geographic names in the library practice (cataloguing of the documents and information retrieval), established officially on the federal level. The Russian National Authority File for Geographical Names is identified by the code "rugeo" in the MARC 21 format for use in subfield $2 for subject/index term sources.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.

Years

Languages

  • e 53
  • d 14
  • a 2
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 62
  • el 12
  • b 2
  • m 1
  • More… Less…