Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Pickens, K.: ¬The relationship of bibliographic database design to the structure of information : a case study in education (1994) 0.04
    0.039278112 = product of:
      0.13747339 = sum of:
        0.038911756 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038911756 = score(doc=6661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 6661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6661)
        0.09856163 = weight(_text_:case in 6661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09856163 = score(doc=6661,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.5495518 = fieldWeight in 6661, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6661)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographical databases employing a controlled vocabulary and a Boolean logic approach to retrieval remain the norm. The record structures for databases of this kind need to be designed in a way that reflects the underlying nature of the particular information they contain. Using education as a case study, a basic record structure is described. Possible extensions to this structure are discussed. Professionals in small libraries, working in a PC environment and with time and resource constraints, are the intended audience
  2. Boeder, R.: Database applications for libraries : an introduction (1996) 0.03
    0.02557299 = product of:
      0.08950546 = sum of:
        0.06739714 = weight(_text_:libraries in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06739714 = score(doc=340,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.5029192 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
        0.022108318 = product of:
          0.044216637 = sum of:
            0.044216637 = weight(_text_:22 in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044216637 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Overviews database applications in libraries. Explains the 2 basic types of databases, flat-file and relational, outlines the uses and advantages of relationship systems. Librarians can utilise a number of software packages for database management and design a database in cooperation with a programmer. The librarian needs to be involved in the conceptual and external level of database design. Offers advice on finding a database designer. Outlines ideas for library related applications of database software
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.25-28
  3. Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.02
    0.017434308 = product of:
      0.061020076 = sum of:
        0.038911756 = weight(_text_:libraries in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038911756 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
        0.022108318 = product of:
          0.044216637 = sum of:
            0.044216637 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044216637 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a summary of a more detailed study made of evaluation versions of these 2 US software packages, due to appear in 'C and L applications'. The packages are aimed at individual researchers, students and lecturers rather than libraries. Concludes that the cheaper package, EndNote, appears better suited to the students with occasional need for bibliographies, whereas the more complex (and expensive) Pro-Cite would suit a researcher or writer with a high output of professional papers. Pro-Cite could probably also be used by a small library as a means of creating a database
    Source
    Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
  4. Knauth, M.: Bibliographies made easy : a look at PRO-CITE (1989) 0.02
    0.017434308 = product of:
      0.061020076 = sum of:
        0.038911756 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038911756 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
        0.022108318 = product of:
          0.044216637 = sum of:
            0.044216637 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044216637 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24
  5. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.02
    0.01525502 = product of:
      0.053392567 = sum of:
        0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404779 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
        0.019344779 = product of:
          0.038689557 = sum of:
            0.038689557 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038689557 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
  6. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.02
    0.01525502 = product of:
      0.053392567 = sum of:
        0.03404779 = weight(_text_:libraries in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404779 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
        0.019344779 = product of:
          0.038689557 = sum of:
            0.038689557 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038689557 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  7. McMahon, T.E.: Procite 4: a look at the latest release in bibliographic management software (1998) 0.01
    0.01307573 = product of:
      0.045765053 = sum of:
        0.029183816 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029183816 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
        0.016581237 = product of:
          0.033162475 = sum of:
            0.033162475 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033162475 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    On Nov 26, 1997, Research Information Systems released its newest version of the ProCite bibliographic management software. The most notable change to the programme is the retooling for compatibility with Windows 95 and NT. In addition to the Windows 95 upgrade, ProCite added 2 new workforms. These forms allow users to capture information about Web pages and e-mail messages. This latest release builds on the Cite While You Write feature that allows users to link citations in a single manuscript to records in multiple databases. The program simplifies the generation of bibliographies and endnotes while allowing users to create bibliographic databases using 28 distinct workforms. Workforms cover a wide range of materials to patents. While there are a few idiosyncrasies users should be aware of, this product is a solid addition to the librarian's toolkit and should be considered by those libraries that have a need for a small but powerful programme to catalogue resources and create bibliographies
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  8. Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.01
    0.01307573 = product of:
      0.045765053 = sum of:
        0.029183816 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029183816 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
        0.016581237 = product of:
          0.033162475 = sum of:
            0.033162475 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033162475 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14285508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04079441 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 17:47:22
  9. Text retrieval systems for libraries : an overview (1992) 0.01
    0.011117646 = product of:
      0.07782351 = sum of:
        0.07782351 = weight(_text_:libraries in 804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07782351 = score(doc=804,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.5807211 = fieldWeight in 804, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=804)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  10. Keitz, W. von: Documentazione internazionale con CDS/ISIS : un progetto della University of Library and Information Studies di Stoccarda (1995) 0.01
    0.010654304 = product of:
      0.074580126 = sum of:
        0.074580126 = weight(_text_:studies in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074580126 = score(doc=5509,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1627809 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.45816267 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Stuttgart University of Library and Information Studies has collected interesting data from a questionnaire based study of CDS/ISIS retrieval system application. Replies from 34 worldwide users, all with Internet access, suggest that CDS/ISIS is mostly used with stand-alone PCs, and that there is much interest in the possible use of CDS/ISIS on UNIX platforms. In 19 cases, CDS/ISIS application s relate to library functions, while in the areas of technology, medicine and the environment most databases are CDS/ISIS-structured and designed for local or internal use. The study also provides data on areas such as CDS/ISIS user groups and development programmes
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: International documentation with CDS/ISIS: a project by the University of Library and Information Studies of Stuttgart
  11. Kushwoh, S.S.; Gautam, J.N.; Singh, R.: Migration from CDS / ISIS to KOHA : a case study of data conversion from CCF to MARC 21 (2009) 0.01
    0.010560175 = product of:
      0.073921226 = sum of:
        0.073921226 = weight(_text_:case in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073921226 = score(doc=2279,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.41216385 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Standards are important for quality and interoperability in any system. Bibliographic record creation standards such as MARC 21 (Machine Readable Catalogue), CCF (Common Communication Format), UNIMARC (Universal MARC) and their local variations, are in practice all across the library community. ILMS (Integrated Library Management Systems) are using these standards for the design of databases and the creation of bibliographic records. Their use is important for uniformity of the system and bibliographic data, but there are problems when a library wants to switch over from one system to another using different standards. This paper discusses migration from one record standard to another, mapping of data and related issues. Data exported from CDS/ISIS CCF based records to KOHA MARC 21 based records are discussed as a case study. This methodology, with few modifications, can be applied for migration of data in other bibliographicformats too. Freeware tools can be utilized for migration.
  12. Khurshid, Z.: Cataloguing on microcomputer (1994) 0.01
    0.009826703 = product of:
      0.06878692 = sum of:
        0.06878692 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06878692 = score(doc=1586,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.51328975 = fieldWeight in 1586, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1586)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes microcomputer based software and CD-ROM products which enable libraries to automate their cataloguing functions on microcomputer. Presents features of a few sample cataloguing products. Claims that this information should be helpful to cataloguing managers in their selection of such software. Discusses the potential implications for libraries in developing countries
  13. Dyer, H. u. A. Gunson (Comp.): ¬A directory of library and information retrieval software for microcomputers (1990) 0.01
    0.009826703 = product of:
      0.06878692 = sum of:
        0.06878692 = weight(_text_:libraries in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06878692 = score(doc=816,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.51328975 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    PRECIS
    Libraries / Applications of microcomputer systems / Software packages
    Subject
    Libraries / Applications of microcomputer systems / Software packages
  14. Chowdhury, G.G.; Chowdhury, S.: Text retrieval and library management software in India (1994) 0.01
    0.009628164 = product of:
      0.06739714 = sum of:
        0.06739714 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06739714 = score(doc=1542,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.5029192 = fieldWeight in 1542, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1542)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Computerized text retrieval and library management systems have not yet taken a desired shape in Indian libraries, though efforts are being made in this direction. Reviews the current situation in Indian libraries by means of a survey of 10 selected indigenous software packages. Briefly discusses the underlying framework and text retrieval and library management facilities in these packages and concludes that CDS/ISIS along with SANJAY with sonme further modifications, might prove to be the most suitable package for most Indian libraries
  15. Kulkarni, M.; Gupta, V.K.; Viswanathan, T.: ¬An automatic index generation and information retrieval system for bibliographic database developed at the Indian National Scientific Documentation Centre (1996) 0.01
    0.0087117 = product of:
      0.0609819 = sum of:
        0.0609819 = weight(_text_:case in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0609819 = score(doc=4525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17934912 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Information processing is concerned with the representation, storage, organization and access of data. In the case of online databases, it is expected that the information should be retrieved as fast as possible. The query time depends upon how the information has been stored in the database, that is the record structure and associated indexes, as well as the file organization. Based on these concepts, information retrieval software has been developed at the Indian National Scientific Documentation Centre (INSDOC) for bibliographic databases. Describes the salient features of this software
  16. Ravi, A.S.; Hariharan, A.; Sadananda, R.B.: Production of a union catalogue using CDS/ISIS and Ventura : some experiences in India. DTP catalog of conference proceedings in Indian scientific and technical libraries (1992) 0.01
    0.008338233 = product of:
      0.058367632 = sum of:
        0.058367632 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058367632 = score(doc=5045,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 5045, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5045)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  17. Beiser, K.: CardMaster Plus (1993) 0.01
    0.008338233 = product of:
      0.058367632 = sum of:
        0.058367632 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058367632 = score(doc=5692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 5692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5692)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 13(1993) no.5, S.50-51
  18. Biggs, D.R.: ProCite in libraries : applications in bibliographic database management (1995) 0.01
    0.008338233 = product of:
      0.058367632 = sum of:
        0.058367632 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058367632 = score(doc=5694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 5694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5694)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  19. Eversberg, B.: 13 years of allegro : questions, demands, users (1994) 0.01
    0.007861363 = product of:
      0.055029534 = sum of:
        0.055029534 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055029534 = score(doc=3307,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 3307, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3307)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Allegro is a database system designed for variable data, developed since 1980 at Braunschweig Technical University Library. It is specifically adaptable to library needs and can accomodate formats like MARC, including authority control. Provides a brief background to the development of computers in libraries since the 1970s. After 13 years of development, Allegro covers systems from very small single user databases to state libraries and large multi-user applications. Discusses design philosophy, systems requirements, software principles, data structures, functions, openness, security, availability, performance, flexibility, user interface, resources and 10 community profiles of Allegro users
  20. Hanson, T.: Pro-Cite version 2 : a review (1993) 0.01
    0.0069485283 = product of:
      0.048639696 = sum of:
        0.048639696 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048639696 = score(doc=5553,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13401186 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04079441 = queryNorm
            0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 5553, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5553)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Health libraries review. 10(1993) no.1, S.46-49