Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Aufstellungssysteme Wissenschaftl. Bibliotheken"
  1. Hyman, R.J.: Shelf access in libraries (1982) 0.04
    0.035088256 = product of:
      0.14035302 = sum of:
        0.0566983 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0566983 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
        0.08365472 = weight(_text_:studies in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08365472 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Series
    ALA studies in librarianship; no.9
  2. Lorenz, B.: ¬The Regensburg Classification Scheme : users and partners (1995) 0.02
    0.01873292 = product of:
      0.07493168 = sum of:
        0.05345567 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05345567 = score(doc=2886,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
        0.021476014 = product of:
          0.042952027 = sum of:
            0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042952027 = score(doc=2886,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Description of the history and development of the home-made Regensburg Classification Scheme since 1964 and its notation which has been built according to the one of the Library of Congress. Although not intended in the beginning, the scheme has become the common tool for a number of Bavarian libraries since 1970 and also of libraries in Switzerland (since 1986) and the socalled new German states (after 1990). The individual schedules are listed and also the classification aids published with the scheme's progressing. Concludingly future plans are outlined
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.158-161
  3. Rider, A.F.: Rider's International Classification for the arrangement of books on the shelves of general libraries (1961) 0.01
    0.010022938 = product of:
      0.080183506 = sum of:
        0.080183506 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080183506 = score(doc=6162,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.6159477 = fieldWeight in 6162, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6162)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 24(1963) no.1, S.77-78 (M.F. Tauber)
  4. Pflug, G.: Classification in the libraries of the German Federal Republic (1982) 0.01
    0.009449717 = product of:
      0.07559773 = sum of:
        0.07559773 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07559773 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.5807211 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  5. Ratcliffe, F.W.: Problems of open access in large academic libraries (1968) 0.01
    0.009449717 = product of:
      0.07559773 = sum of:
        0.07559773 = weight(_text_:libraries in 7361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07559773 = score(doc=7361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.5807211 = fieldWeight in 7361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7361)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  6. Haykin, D.J.: Book classification and the problem of change (1955) 0.01
    0.009449717 = product of:
      0.07559773 = sum of:
        0.07559773 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07559773 = score(doc=6231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.5807211 = fieldWeight in 6231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6231)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    College and research libraries. 16(1955) no.4, S.370-374
  7. Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986) 0.01
    0.008268503 = product of:
      0.06614802 = sum of:
        0.06614802 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06614802 = score(doc=1524,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
  8. Lorenz, B.: Überlegungen zur Verbundklassifikation (1996) 0.01
    0.0063469075 = product of:
      0.05077526 = sum of:
        0.05077526 = weight(_text_:case in 5212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05077526 = score(doc=5212,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 5212, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5212)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Analogie in der Wissenrepräsentation: Case-based Reasoning und räumliche Modelle. 4. Tagung der deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Trier, 17.-20. Oktober 1995. Hrsg.: H. Czap u.a
  9. Zuckerstätter, B.: Klassifikation und Beschlagwortung : zur Verwendung von Schlagwörtern in Aufstellungsklassifikationen (2012) 0.00
    0.0043570166 = product of:
      0.034856133 = sum of:
        0.034856133 = weight(_text_:studies in 594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034856133 = score(doc=594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=594)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Wien, Univ., Lehrgang Library and Information Studies, Master-Thesis, 2012
  10. Waldhör, A.: Erstellung einer Konkordanz zwischen Basisklassifikation (BK) und Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) für den Fachbereich Recht (2012) 0.00
    0.0043570166 = product of:
      0.034856133 = sum of:
        0.034856133 = weight(_text_:studies in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034856133 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Wien, Univ., Lehrgang Library and Information Studies, Master-Thesis, 2012
  11. Clarke, R.I.: Library classification systems in the U.S. : basic ideas and examples (2021) 0.00
    0.0041342513 = product of:
      0.03307401 = sum of:
        0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03307401 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This article offers a basic introduction to classification in the context of librarianship in the United States with an aim toward filling gaps in formal education and practical experience. The article defines the concept of classification and discusses the goals and purposes of classification, both functional and intellectual. Overviews of two common classification systems frequently used in U.S. libraries are presented: Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), Library of Congress Classification (LCC), as well as an introduction to a group of classifications known as "reader-interest classifications."
  12. Werr, N.; Ball, R.: ¬Die "neue" Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) oder die Zukunft eines Erfolgsmodells (2009) 0.00
    0.0011744695 = product of:
      0.009395756 = sum of:
        0.009395756 = product of:
          0.018791512 = sum of:
            0.018791512 = weight(_text_:22 in 3040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018791512 = score(doc=3040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:00:39
  13. Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (2002) 0.00
    0.0010066881 = product of:
      0.008053505 = sum of:
        0.008053505 = product of:
          0.01610701 = sum of:
            0.01610701 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01610701 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 17:56:19

Languages

Types