Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Visualisierung"
  1. Spero, S.: LCSH is to thesaurus as doorbell is to mammal : visualizing structural problems in the Library of Congress Subject Headings (2008) 0.03
    0.02880378 = product of:
      0.07200945 = sum of:
        0.060340498 = weight(_text_:great in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060340498 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
        0.011668953 = product of:
          0.023337906 = sum of:
            0.023337906 = weight(_text_:22 in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023337906 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) has been developed over the course of more than a century, predating the semantic web by some time. Until the 1986, the only concept-toconcept relationship available was an undifferentiated "See Also" reference, which was used for both associative (RT) and hierarchical (BT/NT) connections. In that year, in preparation for the first release of the headings in machine readable MARC Authorities form, an attempt was made to automatically convert these "See Also" links into the standardized thesaural relations. Unfortunately, the rule used to determine the type of reference to generate relied on the presence of symmetric links to detect associatively related terms; "See Also" references that were only present in one of the related terms were assumed to be hierarchical. This left the process vulnerable to inconsistent use of references in the pre-conversion data, with a marked bias towards promoting relationships to hierarchical status. The Library of Congress was aware that the results of the conversion contained many inconsistencies, and intended to validate and correct the results over the course of time. Unfortunately, twenty years later, less than 40% of the converted records have been evaluated. The converted records, being the earliest encountered during the Library's cataloging activities, represent the most basic concepts within LCSH; errors in the syndetic structure for these records affect far more subordinate concepts than those nearer the periphery. Worse, a policy of patterning new headings after pre-existing ones leads to structural errors arising from the conversion process being replicated in these newer headings, perpetuating and exacerbating the errors. As the LCSH prepares for its second great conversion, from MARC to SKOS, it is critical to address these structural problems. As part of the work on converting the headings into SKOS, I have experimented with different visualizations of the tangled web of broader terms embedded in LCSH. This poster illustrates several of these renderings, shows how they can help users to judge which relationships might not be correct, and shows just exactly how Doorbells and Mammals are related.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Julien, C.-A.; Leide, J.E.; Bouthillier, F.: Controlled user evaluations of information visualization interfaces for text retrieval : literature review and meta-analysis (2008) 0.02
    0.01810215 = product of:
      0.09051075 = sum of:
        0.09051075 = weight(_text_:great in 1718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09051075 = score(doc=1718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 1718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1718)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This review describes experimental designs (users, search tasks, measures, etc.) used by 31 controlled user studies of information visualization (IV) tools for textual information retrieval (IR) and a meta-analysis of the reported statistical effects. Comparable experimental designs allow research designers to compare their results with other reports, and support the development of experimentally verified design guidelines concerning which IV techniques are better suited to which types of IR tasks. The studies generally use a within-subject design with 15 or more undergraduate students performing browsing to known-item tasks on sets of at least 1,000 full-text articles or Web pages on topics of general interest/news. Results of the meta-analysis (N = 8) showed no significant effects of the IV tool as compared with a text-only equivalent, but the set shows great variability suggesting an inadequate basis of comparison. Experimental design recommendations are provided which would support comparison of existing IV tools for IR usability testing.
  3. Osiñska, V.: Visual analysis of classification scheme (2010) 0.02
    0.015085125 = product of:
      0.075425625 = sum of:
        0.075425625 = weight(_text_:great in 4068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075425625 = score(doc=4068,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 4068, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4068)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a novel methodology to visualize a classification scheme. It is demonstrated with the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Computing Classification System (CCS). The collection derived from the ACM digital library, containing 37,543 documents classified by CCS. The assigned classes, subject descriptors, and keywords were processed in a dataset to produce a graphical representation of the documents. The general conception is based on the similarity of co-classes (themes) proportional to the number of common publications. The final number of all possible classes and subclasses in the collection was 353 and therefore the similarity matrix of co-classes had the same dimension. A spherical surface was chosen as the target information space. Classes and documents' node locations on the sphere were obtained by means of Multidimensional Scaling coordinates. By representing the surface on a plane like a map projection, it is possible to analyze the visualization layout. The graphical patterns were organized in some colour clusters. For evaluation of given visualization maps, graphics filtering was applied. This proposed method can be very useful in interdisciplinary research fields. It allows for a great amount of heterogeneous information to be conveyed in a compact display, including topics, relationships among topics, frequency of occurrence, importance and changes of these properties over time.
  4. Rolling, L.: ¬The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies (1985) 0.01
    0.012068099 = product of:
      0.060340498 = sum of:
        0.060340498 = weight(_text_:great in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060340498 = score(doc=3646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2424797 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The use of diagrams to express relationships in classification is not new. Many classificationists have used this approach, but usually in a minor display to make a point or for part of a difficult relational situation. Ranganathan, for example, used diagrams for some of his more elusive concepts. The thesaurus in particular and subject headings in general, with direct and indirect crossreferences or equivalents, need many more diagrams than normally are included to make relationships and even semantics clear. A picture very often is worth a thousand words. Rolling has used directed graphs (arrowgraphs) to join terms as a practical method for rendering relationships between indexing terms lucid. He has succeeded very weIl in this endeavor. Four diagrams in this selection are all that one needs to explain how to employ the system; from initial listing to completed arrowgraph. The samples of his work include illustration of off-page connectors between arrowgraphs. The great advantage to using diagrams like this is that they present relations between individual terms in a format that is easy to comprehend. But of even greater value is the fact that one can use his arrowgraphs as schematics for making three-dimensional wire-and-ball models, in which the relationships may be seen even more clearly. In fact, errors or gaps in relations are much easier to find with this methodology. One also can get across the notion of the threedimensionality of classification systems with such models. Pettee's "hand reaching up and over" (q.v.) is not a figment of the imagination. While the actual hand is a wire or stick, the concept visualized is helpful in illuminating the three-dimensional figure that is latent in all systems that have cross-references or "broader," "narrower," or, especially, "related" terms. Classification schedules, being hemmed in by the dimensions of the printed page, also benefit from such physical illustrations. Rolling, an engineer by conviction, was the developer of information systems for the Cobalt Institute, the European Atomic Energy Community, and European Coal and Steel Community. He also developed and promoted computer-aided translation at the Commission of the European Communities in Luxembourg. One of his objectives has always been to increase the efficiency of mono- and multilingual thesauri for use in multinational information systems.
  5. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.: ¬A user term visualization analysis based on a social question and answer log (2013) 0.01
    0.010560473 = product of:
      0.052802365 = sum of:
        0.052802365 = weight(_text_:education in 2715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052802365 = score(doc=2715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.260262 = fieldWeight in 2715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2715)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The authors of this paper investigate terms of consumers' diabetes based on a log from the Yahoo!Answers social question and answers (Q&A) forum, ascertain characteristics and relationships among terms related to diabetes from the consumers' perspective, and reveal users' diabetes information seeking patterns. In this study, the log analysis method, data coding method, and visualization multiple-dimensional scaling analysis method were used for analysis. The visual analyses were conducted at two levels: terms analysis within a category and category analysis among the categories in the schema. The findings show that the average number of words per question was 128.63, the average number of sentences per question was 8.23, the average number of words per response was 254.83, and the average number of sentences per response was 16.01. There were 12 categories (Cause & Pathophysiology, Sign & Symptom, Diagnosis & Test, Organ & Body Part, Complication & Related Disease, Medication, Treatment, Education & Info Resource, Affect, Social & Culture, Lifestyle, and Nutrient) in the diabetes related schema which emerged from the data coding analysis. The analyses at the two levels show that terms and categories were clustered and patterns were revealed. Future research directions are also included.
  6. Cao, N.; Sun, J.; Lin, Y.-R.; Gotz, D.; Liu, S.; Qu, H.: FacetAtlas : Multifaceted visualization for rich text corpora (2010) 0.01
    0.010560473 = product of:
      0.052802365 = sum of:
        0.052802365 = weight(_text_:education in 3366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052802365 = score(doc=3366,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.260262 = fieldWeight in 3366, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3366)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Documents in rich text corpora usually contain multiple facets of information. For example, an article about a specific disease often consists of different facets such as symptom, treatment, cause, diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention. Thus, documents may have different relations based on different facets. Powerful search tools have been developed to help users locate lists of individual documents that are most related to specific keywords. However, there is a lack of effective analysis tools that reveal the multifaceted relations of documents within or cross the document clusters. In this paper, we present FacetAtlas, a multifaceted visualization technique for visually analyzing rich text corpora. FacetAtlas combines search technology with advanced visual analytical tools to convey both global and local patterns simultaneously. We describe several unique aspects of FacetAtlas, including (1) node cliques and multifaceted edges, (2) an optimized density map, and (3) automated opacity pattern enhancement for highlighting visual patterns, (4) interactive context switch between facets. In addition, we demonstrate the power of FacetAtlas through a case study that targets patient education in the health care domain. Our evaluation shows the benefits of this work, especially in support of complex multifaceted data analysis.
  7. Beagle, D.: Visualizing keyword distribution across multidisciplinary c-space (2003) 0.01
    0.006336284 = product of:
      0.03168142 = sum of:
        0.03168142 = weight(_text_:education in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03168142 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.1561572 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    But what happens to this awareness in a digital library? Can discursive formations be represented in cyberspace, perhaps through diagrams in a visualization interface? And would such a schema be helpful to a digital library user? To approach this question, it is worth taking a moment to reconsider what Radford is looking at. First, he looks at titles to see how the books cluster. To illustrate, I scanned one hundred books on the shelves of a college library under subclass HT 101-395, defined by the LCC subclass caption as Urban groups. The City. Urban sociology. Of the first 100 titles in this sequence, fifty included the word "urban" or variants (e.g. "urbanization"). Another thirty-five used the word "city" or variants. These keywords appear to mark their titles as the heart of this discursive formation. The scattering of titles not using "urban" or "city" used related terms such as "town," "community," or in one case "skyscrapers." So we immediately see some empirical correlation between keywords and classification. But we also see a problem with the commonly used search technique of title-keyword. A student interested in urban studies will want to know about this entire subclass, and may wish to browse every title available therein. A title-keyword search on "urban" will retrieve only half of the titles, while a search on "city" will retrieve just over a third. There will be no overlap, since no titles in this sample contain both words. The only place where both words appear in a common string is in the LCC subclass caption, but captions are not typically indexed in library Online Public Access Catalogs (OPACs). In a traditional library, this problem is mitigated when the student goes to the shelf looking for any one of the books and suddenly discovers a much wider selection than the keyword search had led him to expect. But in a digital library, the issue of non-retrieval can be more problematic, as studies have indicated. Micco and Popp reported that, in a study funded partly by the U.S. Department of Education, 65 of 73 unskilled users searching for material on U.S./Soviet foreign relations found some material but never realized they had missed a large percentage of what was in the database.
  8. Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002) 0.01
    0.0058344766 = product of:
      0.029172383 = sum of:
        0.029172383 = product of:
          0.058344766 = sum of:
            0.058344766 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058344766 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30. 5.2010 16:22:35
  9. Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016) 0.01
    0.0058344766 = product of:
      0.029172383 = sum of:
        0.029172383 = product of:
          0.058344766 = sum of:
            0.058344766 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058344766 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  10. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.00
    0.004950718 = product of:
      0.02475359 = sum of:
        0.02475359 = product of:
          0.04950718 = sum of:
            0.04950718 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04950718 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
  11. Trunk, D.: Semantische Netze in Informationssystemen : Verbesserung der Suche durch Interaktion und Visualisierung (2005) 0.00
    0.004084134 = product of:
      0.020420669 = sum of:
        0.020420669 = product of:
          0.040841337 = sum of:
            0.040841337 = weight(_text_:22 in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040841337 = score(doc=2500,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30. 1.2007 18:22:41
  12. Palm, F.: QVIZ : Query and context based visualization of time-spatial cultural dynamics (2007) 0.00
    0.0035006858 = product of:
      0.01750343 = sum of:
        0.01750343 = product of:
          0.03500686 = sum of:
            0.03500686 = weight(_text_:22 in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03500686 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  13. Thissen, F.: Screen-Design-Handbuch : Effektiv informieren und kommunizieren mit Multimedia (2001) 0.00
    0.0035006858 = product of:
      0.01750343 = sum of:
        0.01750343 = product of:
          0.03500686 = sum of:
            0.03500686 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03500686 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:35:21
  14. Osinska, V.; Bala, P.: New methods for visualization and improvement of classification schemes : the case of computer science (2010) 0.00
    0.0035006858 = product of:
      0.01750343 = sum of:
        0.01750343 = product of:
          0.03500686 = sum of:
            0.03500686 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03500686 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:36:46
  15. Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I.: Informationsvisualisierung und Retrieval im Fokus der Infromationspraxis (2013) 0.00
    0.0035006858 = product of:
      0.01750343 = sum of:
        0.01750343 = product of:
          0.03500686 = sum of:
            0.03500686 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03500686 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    4. 2.2015 9:22:39
  16. Thissen, F.: Screen-Design-Manual : Communicating Effectively Through Multimedia (2003) 0.00
    0.0029172383 = product of:
      0.014586192 = sum of:
        0.014586192 = product of:
          0.029172383 = sum of:
            0.029172383 = weight(_text_:22 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029172383 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:29:25
  17. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.00
    0.0029172383 = product of:
      0.014586192 = sum of:
        0.014586192 = product of:
          0.029172383 = sum of:
            0.029172383 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029172383 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
  18. Wu, K.-C.; Hsieh, T.-Y.: Affective choosing of clustering and categorization representations in e-book interfaces (2016) 0.00
    0.0029172383 = product of:
      0.014586192 = sum of:
        0.014586192 = product of:
          0.029172383 = sum of:
            0.029172383 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029172383 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  19. Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018) 0.00
    0.0029172383 = product of:
      0.014586192 = sum of:
        0.014586192 = product of:
          0.029172383 = sum of:
            0.029172383 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029172383 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9.12.2018 16:22:25
  20. Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018) 0.00
    0.0029172383 = product of:
      0.014586192 = sum of:
        0.014586192 = product of:
          0.029172383 = sum of:
            0.029172383 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029172383 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    21.12.2018 17:22:13

Languages

Types