Search (27280 results, page 2 of 1364)

  1. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.15
    0.15003273 = product of:
      0.330072 = sum of:
        0.034278043 = product of:
          0.13711217 = sum of:
            0.13711217 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13711217 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.13711217 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13711217 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.012341722 = weight(_text_:of in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012341722 = score(doc=855,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.009227889 = weight(_text_:on in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009227889 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.13711217 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13711217 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    
    Abstract
    Converting UDC numbers manually to a complex format such as the one mentioned above is an unrealistic expectation; supporting building these representations, as far as possible automatically, is a well-founded requirement. An additional advantage of this approach is that the existing records could also be processed and converted. In my dissertation I would like to prove also that it is possible to design and implement an algorithm that is able to convert pre-coordinated UDC numbers into the introduced format by identifying all their elements and revealing their whole syntactic structure as well. In my dissertation I will discuss a feasible way of building a UDC-specific XML schema for describing the most detailed and complicated UDC numbers (containing not only the common auxiliary signs and numbers, but also the different types of special auxiliaries). The schema definition is available online at: http://piros.udc-interpreter.hu#xsd. The primary goal of my research is to prove that it is possible to support building, retrieving, and analyzing UDC numbers without compromises, by taking the whole syntactic richness of the scheme by storing the UDC numbers reserving the meaning of pre-coordination. The research has also included the implementation of a software that parses UDC classmarks attended to prove that such solution can be applied automatically without any additional effort or even retrospectively on existing collections.
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  2. Lorca, P.; Andrées, J. de; Martínez, A.B.: Size and culture as determinants of the web policy of listed firms : the case of web accessibility in Western European countries (2012) 0.14
    0.14330123 = product of:
      0.3152627 = sum of:
        0.06316024 = weight(_text_:higher in 4981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06316024 = score(doc=4981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34821182 = fieldWeight in 4981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4981)
        0.111231856 = weight(_text_:effect in 4981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.111231856 = score(doc=4981,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.6081582 = fieldWeight in 4981, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4981)
        0.01939093 = weight(_text_:of in 4981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01939093 = score(doc=4981,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 4981, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4981)
        0.105819434 = weight(_text_:innovations in 4981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105819434 = score(doc=4981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.45071742 = fieldWeight in 4981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4981)
        0.015660247 = weight(_text_:on in 4981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015660247 = score(doc=4981,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 4981, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4981)
      0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    
    Abstract
    Web accessibility (WA) is an innovation in Web design; it can be considered as part of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy of the firms. As adoption of innovations and CSR commitment are linked with firm size and national culture/legislation, we hypothesize that size and national culture/legislation, may have an effect on WA level. The authors studied an international sample made up of companies included in EUROSTOXX600 (The STOXX Europe 600 Index). The main results suggest that both size and culture have a significant effect on WA. Large firms as well as Anglo-Saxon companies are more prone to have higher WA levels. A deeper analysis, which was done through the estimation of quantile regression equations, showed that the influence of size is significant for companies trying to excel or for those trying to avoid the worst WA. However, the effect of size is significant only in the lowest part of the conditional distribution.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.392-405
  3. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.14
    0.13917078 = product of:
      0.38271964 = sum of:
        0.04113365 = product of:
          0.1645346 = sum of:
            0.1645346 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1645346 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.1645346 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1645346 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.012516791 = weight(_text_:of in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012516791 = score(doc=862,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.1645346 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1645346 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  4. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.14
    0.13813849 = product of:
      0.50650775 = sum of:
        0.04113365 = product of:
          0.1645346 = sum of:
            0.1645346 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1645346 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.23268706 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23268706 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.23268706 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23268706 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  5. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.13
    0.13461924 = product of:
      0.49360383 = sum of:
        0.054844867 = product of:
          0.21937947 = sum of:
            0.21937947 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21937947 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.21937947 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21937947 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
        0.21937947 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21937947 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  6. Bell, H.K.: History of indexing societies : Pt.6: 1988-91 (2000) 0.13
    0.1305453 = product of:
      0.4786661 = sum of:
        0.022390716 = weight(_text_:of in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022390716 = score(doc=506,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
        0.14515643 = weight(_text_:great in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14515643 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.74654293 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
        0.31111896 = sum of:
          0.25497678 = weight(_text_:britain in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.25497678 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25769958 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                0.034531306 = queryNorm
              0.98943424 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
          0.05614218 = weight(_text_:22 in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05614218 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.034531306 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    History of the Society of Indexers (Great Britain) and other societies of indexers
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.35-38
  7. Wu, J.-C.J.; Liu, H.-P.: Technological innovation assessment of business-to business electronic marketplaces (2006) 0.13
    0.12814043 = product of:
      0.35238618 = sum of:
        0.017701415 = weight(_text_:of in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017701415 = score(doc=5118,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
        0.12925315 = weight(_text_:technological in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12925315 = score(doc=5118,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7044614 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
        0.18328466 = weight(_text_:innovations in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18328466 = score(doc=5118,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7806655 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
        0.022146935 = weight(_text_:on in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022146935 = score(doc=5118,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Business opportunities created by the Internet economy and new business methods have triggered the development of the electronic or e-marketplace, and vice versa. To generate competitive new products/services, Internet firms need to have access to detailed technological innovations to compete. Despite the wealth of literature on e-marketplaces, research on patent analyses in e-marketplaces is scarce. The patent is a crucial indicator of the technological competitiveness of a company or a nation. This study provides a preliminary step in depicting a holistic picture of technological innovations associated with e-marketplace patents. This study analyzes patents issued during the period of 1990-2002 from major databases; hence, it provides the first empirical study on e-marketplaces and related innovations holistically. A comprehensive set of statistical patent analyses and a discussion on e-marketplaces' technology by means of a patent map analysis are presented.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.8, S.1093-1104
  8. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.13
    0.12804545 = product of:
      0.352125 = sum of:
        0.027422434 = product of:
          0.109689735 = sum of:
            0.109689735 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109689735 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.15512471 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15512471 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.014453146 = weight(_text_:of in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014453146 = score(doc=5820,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.26765788 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.15512471 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15512471 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
    This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
    Imprint
    Pittsburgh, PA : Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Language Technologies Institute
  9. ¬The Aslib directory of information resources in the United Kingdom (1998) 0.13
    0.12647386 = product of:
      0.4637375 = sum of:
        0.009329465 = weight(_text_:of in 1299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009329465 = score(doc=1299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 1299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1299)
        0.24192737 = weight(_text_:great in 1299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24192737 = score(doc=1299,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            1.2442381 = fieldWeight in 1299, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1299)
        0.21248066 = product of:
          0.42496133 = sum of:
            0.42496133 = weight(_text_:britain in 1299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42496133 = score(doc=1299,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.25769958 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                1.6490571 = fieldWeight in 1299, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    LCSH
    Special libraries / Great Britain / Directories
    Information services / Great Britain / Directories
    Subject
    Special libraries / Great Britain / Directories
    Information services / Great Britain / Directories
  10. Batt, C.: Information technology in public libraries (1994) 0.13
    0.12549663 = product of:
      0.4601543 = sum of:
        0.014927144 = weight(_text_:of in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014927144 = score(doc=772,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
        0.23703945 = weight(_text_:great in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23703945 = score(doc=772,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            1.2190994 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
        0.20818768 = product of:
          0.41637537 = sum of:
            0.41637537 = weight(_text_:britain in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.41637537 = score(doc=772,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.25769958 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                1.6157395 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Up to date information from every public library in the United Kingdom, it identifies trends in the use of IT in every area of public library activity
    COMPASS
    Libraries / Use of / Computers
    Great Britain
    LCSH
    Public libraries / Great Britain / Automation
    Information technology / Great Britain
    Subject
    Public libraries / Great Britain / Automation
    Information technology / Great Britain
    Libraries / Use of / Computers
    Great Britain
  11. Read, S.: ¬The new guide to working from home (1995) 0.13
    0.1254523 = product of:
      0.45999175 = sum of:
        0.014764623 = weight(_text_:on in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014764623 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
        0.23703945 = weight(_text_:great in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23703945 = score(doc=780,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            1.2190994 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
        0.20818768 = product of:
          0.41637537 = sum of:
            0.41637537 = weight(_text_:britain in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.41637537 = score(doc=780,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.25769958 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                1.6157395 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Working from home means here, making an index at home. Detailed practical guidance on starting and conducting a business is given
    LCSH
    Home / based businesses / Great Britain
    Small business / Great Britain
    New business enterprises / Great Britain
    Subject
    Home / based businesses / Great Britain
    Small business / Great Britain
    New business enterprises / Great Britain
  12. White, R.W.: Interactions with search systems (2016) 0.12
    0.12461829 = product of:
      0.27416024 = sum of:
        0.05263353 = weight(_text_:higher in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05263353 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2901765 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
        0.011426214 = weight(_text_:of in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011426214 = score(doc=3612,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.21160212 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
        0.07616316 = weight(_text_:technological in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07616316 = score(doc=3612,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.41510788 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
        0.12470941 = weight(_text_:innovations in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12470941 = score(doc=3612,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.5311756 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
        0.009227889 = weight(_text_:on in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009227889 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    
    Abstract
    Information seeking is a fundamental human activity. In the modern world, it is frequently conducted through interactions with search systems. The retrieval and comprehension of information returned by these systems is a key part of decision making and action in a broad range of settings. Advances in data availability coupled with new interaction paradigms, and mobile and cloud computing capabilities, have created a broad range of new opportunities for information access and use. In this comprehensive book for professionals, researchers, and students involved in search system design and evaluation, search expert Ryen White discusses how search systems can capitalize on new capabilities and how next-generation systems must support higher order search activities such as task completion, learning, and decision making. He outlines the implications of these changes for the evolution of search evaluation, as well as challenges that extend beyond search systems in areas such as privacy and societal benefit.
    LCSH
    Search engines / Technological innovations
    Subject
    Search engines / Technological innovations
  13. Stone, P.: JANET : a report on its use for libraries (1990) 0.12
    0.12447857 = product of:
      0.34231606 = sum of:
        0.011311376 = weight(_text_:of in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011311376 = score(doc=778,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
        0.012919044 = weight(_text_:on in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012919044 = score(doc=778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
        0.16934916 = weight(_text_:great in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16934916 = score(doc=778,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.87096673 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
        0.14873648 = product of:
          0.29747295 = sum of:
            0.29747295 = weight(_text_:britain in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29747295 = score(doc=778,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.25769958 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                1.15434 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    The Joint Academic Network (JANET) was inaugurated in 1984, combining the functions of several previous academic and research networks. It is a private X.25 packet-switched network, managed by the Network Executive, and funded by the Computer Board for the Universities and Research Counsils. JANET now provides a data communicatons infrastructure, an internet, between the local area networks of over 100 universities, polytechnics, research institutions, and others, including the British Library. Discusses the information services available to the academic community, the role of libraries (particularly the British Library) in providing them, and the techniques available.
    LCSH
    Information networks / Great Britain
    PRECIS
    Great Britain / Information retrieval services / Networks
    Subject
    Information networks / Great Britain
    Great Britain / Information retrieval services / Networks
  14. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.12
    0.12232335 = product of:
      0.26911137 = sum of:
        0.027422434 = product of:
          0.109689735 = sum of:
            0.109689735 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109689735 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.109689735 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109689735 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.014927144 = weight(_text_:of in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014927144 = score(doc=701,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.0073823114 = weight(_text_:on in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073823114 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.097201325 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.109689735 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109689735 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    
    Abstract
    By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  15. Digital library development : the view from Kanazawa (2006) 0.12
    0.11990018 = product of:
      0.2637804 = sum of:
        0.07293116 = weight(_text_:higher in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07293116 = score(doc=6732,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.4020804 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
        0.015386548 = weight(_text_:of in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015386548 = score(doc=6732,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.28494355 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
        0.060930524 = weight(_text_:technological in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060930524 = score(doc=6732,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3320863 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
        0.09976752 = weight(_text_:innovations in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09976752 = score(doc=6732,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.42494047 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
        0.014764623 = weight(_text_:on in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014764623 = score(doc=6732,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
      0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    
    Abstract
    The influence of digital technology on higher education libraries is discussed by recognised experts. The Kanazawa institute of Technology is Japan's largest institution of higher education specialising in engineering and technology. It is a world leader and collaborator in electronic initiatives, often in the forefront of systems design and telecommunications advancement. It is also the site of an annual symposium series on digital library development. The authors have pulled together an International cadre of leading thinkers and experimenters, all of whom have participated in these symposia, to provide their considered opinions concerning the influence of digital technology on teaching and learning in general, and the role of the library in the educational enterprise in particular. Their contributions have, in turn, been arranged into four thematic groupings, which range from envisioning the future, and facing major challenges, to creating projects and programmes, and developing digital libraries. An informative read for anyone involved in higher education.
    Content
    Papers presented from 1999 to 2003 at the Kanazawa Institute of Technology (KIT) International Roundtable on Library and Information Science. - Inhalt: The future according to the past : future library issues in historical perspective / Stanley Chodorow -- The emergence of digital scholarship : new models for librarians, scholars, and publishers / John Unsworth -- Information technology and teaching : are they friends or foes? / Richard A. Detweiler -- Document delivery in the digital library / C. Lee Jones -- Climb every mountain : developing organizational capacity for the realization of digital libraries / Winston Tabb -- The research library as publisher : new roles in a new environment for scholarly communication / Carol A. Mandel -- Copyright in the United States and Japan : storming the barriers to access / Paula Kaufman -- Reading and interactivity in the digital library : creating an experience that transcends paper / Catherine C. Marshall -- JSTOR : offering access to an archives of scholarly journal literature / Kevin M. Guthrie -- The continuing evolution of the University of Virginia Library's digital initiatives / Karin Wittenborg -- Digitization and change in mathematics scholarship / Sarah E. Thomas -- Realities and choices for academic libraries in a networked world / Betty G. Bengtson -- Creating the digital library : the importance of faculty collaboration / James G. Neal -- Collections in the digital library / Abby Smith -- Library space in the digital age / Nicholas C. Burckel -- The place of libraries in a digital age / David M. Levy.
    LCSH
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Technological innovations / Congresses
    Subject
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Technological innovations / Congresses
  16. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.12
    0.11779183 = product of:
      0.43190336 = sum of:
        0.04798926 = product of:
          0.19195704 = sum of:
            0.19195704 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19195704 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.19195704 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19195704 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.19195704 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19195704 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  17. Teo, H.-H.; Wang, X.; Wei, K.-K.; Sia, C.-L.; Lee, M.K.O.: Organizational learning capacity and attitude toward complex technological innovations : an empirical study (2006) 0.12
    0.11766846 = product of:
      0.32358825 = sum of:
        0.06316024 = weight(_text_:higher in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06316024 = score(doc=4927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34821182 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
        0.012516791 = weight(_text_:of in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012516791 = score(doc=4927,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
        0.064626575 = weight(_text_:technological in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064626575 = score(doc=4927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3522307 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
        0.18328466 = weight(_text_:innovations in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18328466 = score(doc=4927,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7806655 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Recent studies have found organizational learning capacity to be a key factor in influencing organizational assimilation and exploitation of knowledge-intensive innovations. Despite its increasing importance, the impact of organizational learning capacity an technology assimilation is not well understood. Distilling from extant works an organizational learning and technology assimilation, this study identifies four components of organizational learning capacity, namely, systems orientation, organizational climate for learning orientation, knowledge acquisition and utilization orientation, and information sharing and dissemination orientation. The authors subject these components to structural equation modeling analyses to better understand their structure and dimensionality. The analyses strongly support the proposed four major dimensions underlying organizational learning capacity. Organizational learning capacity, as a higher-order factor, has a significant impact an attitude towards organizational adoption of knowledge-intensive innovations. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.2, S.264-279
  18. Fiction in libraries (1986) 0.12
    0.116841815 = product of:
      0.64263 = sum of:
        0.34213698 = weight(_text_:great in 7462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34213698 = score(doc=7462,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            1.7596185 = fieldWeight in 7462, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7462)
        0.30049303 = product of:
          0.60098606 = sum of:
            0.60098606 = weight(_text_:britain in 7462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.60098606 = score(doc=7462,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.25769958 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                2.332119 = fieldWeight in 7462, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    LCSH
    Libraries / Great Britain / Special collections / Fiction collections
    Public libraries / Great Britain
    Fiction in libraries / Great Britain
    PRECIS
    Great Britain / Public libraries / Stock: Fiction
    Subject
    Libraries / Great Britain / Special collections / Fiction collections
    Public libraries / Great Britain
    Fiction in libraries / Great Britain
    Great Britain / Public libraries / Stock: Fiction
  19. Peters, J.: ¬The IT literate user (1996) 0.12
    0.11659934 = product of:
      0.25651854 = sum of:
        0.07368694 = weight(_text_:higher in 7321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07368694 = score(doc=7321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.4062471 = fieldWeight in 7321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7321)
        0.07492303 = weight(_text_:effect in 7321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07492303 = score(doc=7321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 7321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7321)
        0.019591875 = weight(_text_:of in 7321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019591875 = score(doc=7321,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 7321, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7321)
        0.07539768 = weight(_text_:technological in 7321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07539768 = score(doc=7321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.41093582 = fieldWeight in 7321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7321)
        0.012919044 = weight(_text_:on in 7321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012919044 = score(doc=7321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 7321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7321)
      0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the major influences behind the creation of information technology (IT) literate library users in academic libraries, examines current practices in higher education libraries in imparting IT skills and considers the implications for the future of libraries of an increasingly IT literate population. Considers the effect of a number for factors, including: technological change: the Follett Report; social change; the degree ot IT literacy of library users; IT standards; role of library and information services staff; convergence of the practices of different institutions; learner support; information strategies; and the virtual library. Concludes that the IT literate user will be a powerful influence on the future of libraries and education generally
  20. Webster, F.: Theories of the information society (1995) 0.11
    0.11465566 = product of:
      0.42040408 = sum of:
        0.01865893 = weight(_text_:of in 836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01865893 = score(doc=836,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 836, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=836)
        0.15232632 = weight(_text_:technological in 836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15232632 = score(doc=836,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.83021575 = fieldWeight in 836, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=836)
        0.24941882 = weight(_text_:innovations in 836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24941882 = score(doc=836,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            1.0623512 = fieldWeight in 836, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=836)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    COMPASS
    Society / Effects of / Information technology
    LCSH
    Communication / Technological innovations
    Series
    International library of sociology
    Subject
    Communication / Technological innovations
    Society / Effects of / Information technology

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications