-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.05
0.05157588 = product of:
0.1289397 = sum of:
0.10553108 = weight(_text_:computers in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10553108 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22709264 = queryWeight, product of:
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.464705 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.023408616 = product of:
0.046817232 = sum of:
0.046817232 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046817232 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Describes an experiment comparing the performance of automatic full-text indexing software for personal computers with the human intellectual assignment of indexing terms in each document in a collection. Considers the times required to index the document, to retrieve documents satisfying 5 typical foreseen information needs, and the recall and precision ratios of searching. The software used is QuickFinder facility in WordPerfect 6.1 for Windows
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.02
0.019415775 = product of:
0.097078875 = sum of:
0.097078875 = sum of:
0.061965954 = weight(_text_:history in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061965954 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.035112925 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112925 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In this article recording evidence for data values in addition to the values themselves in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata is proposed, with the aim of improving the expressiveness and reliability of those records and metadata. Recorded evidence indicates why and how data values are recorded for elements. Recording the history of changes in data values is also proposed, with the aim of reinforcing recorded evidence. First, evidence that can be recorded is categorized into classes: identifiers of rules or tasks, action descriptions of them, and input and output data of them. Dates of recording values and evidence are an additional class. Then, the relative usefulness of evidence classes and also levels (i.e., the record, data element, or data value level) to which an individual evidence class is applied, is examined. Second, examples that can be viewed as recorded evidence in existing bibliographic records and current cataloging rules are shown. Third, some examples of bibliographic records and descriptive metadata with notes of evidence are demonstrated. Fourth, ways of using recorded evidence are addressed.
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Moreiro-González, J.-A.; Bolaños-Mejías, C.: Folksonomy indexing from the assignment of free tags to setup subject : a search analysis into the domain of legal history (2018)
0.01
0.010327659 = product of:
0.051638294 = sum of:
0.051638294 = product of:
0.10327659 = sum of:
0.10327659 = weight(_text_:history in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10327659 = score(doc=4640,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The behaviour and lexical quality of the folksonomies is examined by comparing two online social networks: Library-Thing (for books) and Flickr (for photos). We presented a case study that combines quantitative and qualitative elements, singularized by the lexical and functional framework. Our query was made by "Legal History" and by the synonyms "Law History" and "History of Law." We then examined the relevance, consistency and precision of the tags attached to the retrieved documents, in addition to their lexical composition. We identified the difficulties caused by free tagging and some of the folksonomy solutions that have been found to solve them. The results are presented in comparative tables, giving special attention to related tags within each retrieved document. Although the number of ambiguous or inconsistent tags is not very large, these do nevertheless represent the most obvious problem to search and retrieval in folksonomies. Relevance is high when the terms are assigned by especially competent taggers. Even with less expert taggers, ambiguity is often successfully corrected by contextualizing the concepts within related tags. A propinquity to associative and taxonomic lexical semantic knowledge is reached via contextual relationships.
-
Boll, J.J.: DDC classification rules : an outline history and comparison of two sets of rules (1988)
0.01
0.007229361 = product of:
0.036146805 = sum of:
0.036146805 = product of:
0.07229361 = sum of:
0.07229361 = weight(_text_:history in 404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07229361 = score(doc=404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.01
0.0070225853 = product of:
0.035112925 = sum of:
0.035112925 = product of:
0.07022585 = sum of:
0.07022585 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07022585 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Rowley, J.: ¬The controlled versus natural indexing languages debate revisited : a perspective on information retrieval practice and research (1994)
0.01
0.0051638293 = product of:
0.025819147 = sum of:
0.025819147 = product of:
0.051638294 = sum of:
0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 7151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051638294 = score(doc=7151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 7151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7151)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This article revisits the debate concerning controlled and natural indexing languages, as used in searching the databases of the online hosts, in-house information retrieval systems, online public access catalogues and databases stored on CD-ROM. The debate was first formulated in the early days of information retrieval more than a century ago but, despite significant advance in technology, remains unresolved. The article divides the history of the debate into four eras. Era one was characterised by the introduction of controlled vocabulary. Era two focused on comparisons between different indexing languages in order to assess which was best. Era three saw a number of case studies of limited generalisability and a general recognition that the best search performance can be achieved by the parallel use of the two types of indexing languages. The emphasis in Era four has been on the development of end-user-based systems, including online public access catalogues and databases on CD-ROM. Recent developments in the use of expert systems techniques to support the representation of meaning may lead to systems which offer significant support to the user in end-user searching. In the meantime, however, information retrieval in practice involves a mixture of natural and controlled indexing languages used to search a wide variety of different kinds of databases
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.00
0.0040965076 = product of:
0.020482538 = sum of:
0.020482538 = product of:
0.040965077 = sum of:
0.040965077 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040965077 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.00
0.0040965076 = product of:
0.020482538 = sum of:
0.020482538 = product of:
0.040965077 = sum of:
0.040965077 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040965077 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000)
0.00
0.0035112926 = product of:
0.017556462 = sum of:
0.017556462 = product of:
0.035112925 = sum of:
0.035112925 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112925 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006)
0.00
0.0029260772 = product of:
0.014630386 = sum of:
0.014630386 = product of:
0.029260771 = sum of:
0.029260771 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260771 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014)
0.00
0.0029260772 = product of:
0.014630386 = sum of:
0.014630386 = product of:
0.029260771 = sum of:
0.029260771 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260771 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.00
0.0011704308 = product of:
0.005852154 = sum of:
0.005852154 = product of:
0.011704308 = sum of:
0.011704308 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011704308 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
