-
Stuart, E.: Flickr: organizing and tagging images online (2019)
0.04
0.03812232 = product of:
0.19061159 = sum of:
0.19061159 = weight(_text_:analog in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19061159 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32627475 = queryWeight, product of:
7.5537524 = idf(docFreq=62, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.58420575 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.5537524 = idf(docFreq=62, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Flickr was launched when digital cameras first began to outsell analog cameras, and people were drawn to the site for the opportunities it offered them to store, organize, and share their images, as well as for the connections that could be made with other like-minded people. This article examines the links between Flickr's success and how images are organized within the site, as well as the types of people and organizations that use Flickr and their motivations for doing so. Factors that have contributed to Flickr's demise in popularity will be explored, and the article finishes with some suggestions for how Flickr could develop in the future, along with some conclusions for image organization.
-
Hänger, C.; Krätzsch, C.; Niemann, C.: Was vom Tagging übrig blieb : Erkenntnisse und Einsichten aus zwei Jahren Projektarbeit (2011)
0.01
0.013615112 = product of:
0.06807556 = sum of:
0.06807556 = weight(_text_:analog in 4519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06807556 = score(doc=4519,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32627475 = queryWeight, product of:
7.5537524 = idf(docFreq=62, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.2086449 = fieldWeight in 4519, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.5537524 = idf(docFreq=62, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4519)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- - Struktur der Tags Der Vergleich von zwei großen Tagging-Systemen hat große Ähnlichkeiten in der grammatikalischen Struktur der Tagging-Daten ergeben. Es werden mehrheitlich Substantive bzw. Eigennamen zur Erschließung sowie auch Verben zur Organisation der Quellen eingesetzt. Systembedingt kann außerdem eine große Menge von Wortkombinationen und Wortneuschöpfungen konstatiert werden, die aus den unterschiedlichsten Beweggründen und für sehr unterschiedliche Zwecke gebildet werden. Nur ein geringer Teil der Tags entspricht den formalen Kriterien kontrollierter Vokabulare. Eine besondere Hierarchisierung der Tags innerhalb eines Tagging-Systems über den Indikator der Häufigkeit der Nutzung hinaus hat sich nicht ergeben. In inhaltlicher Hinsicht hat sich eine klare Dominanz informatiknaher bzw. naturwissenschaftlicher Disziplinen gezeigt, wobei es sich hierbei um systemspezifische Präferenzen handelt. Insgesamt ist eine klare Tendenz zu zunehmender inhaltlicher Diversifikation in den Tagging-Systemen zu erkennen, was mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit der wachsenden Akzeptanz durch breitere Nutzergruppen zuzuschreiben ist. - Qualität der Tags Bei der Evaluation der Qualität der Tags bestätigte sich die Einschätzung, dass sich die Verschlagwortung mittels Tagging von jener durch Fachreferenten grundsätzlich unterscheidet. Nur ein kleiner Teil der Konzepte wurde in den beiden Systemen semantisch identisch oder wenigstens analog vergeben. Grundsätzlich liegen für eine Ressource fast immer mehr Tags als Schlagwörter vor, die zudem wesentlich häufiger exklusiv im Tagging-System zu finden sind. Diese Tatsache berührt jedoch nicht den inhaltlichen Erschließungsgrad einer Quelle, der sich trotz einer geringeren Anzahl an SWD-Schlagwörtern pro Ressource in beiden Systemen als gleichwertig gezeigt hat. Dennoch ist das Ausmaß der semantischen Abdeckung des Taggings überraschend, da sie der allgemeinen Erwartungshaltung von einer deutlich höheren Qualität der Verschlagwortung durch die professionelle Inhaltserschließung teilweise widerspricht. Diese Erwartung ist zumindest bezüglich der inhaltlichen Dimension zu relativieren.
-
Wang, J.; Clements, M.; Yang, J.; Vries, A.P. de; Reinders, M.J.T.: Personalization of tagging systems (2010)
0.01
0.0061965953 = product of:
0.030982977 = sum of:
0.030982977 = product of:
0.061965954 = sum of:
0.061965954 = weight(_text_:history in 4229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061965954 = score(doc=4229,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 4229, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4229)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Social media systems have encouraged end user participation in the Internet, for the purpose of storing and distributing Internet content, sharing opinions and maintaining relationships. Collaborative tagging allows users to annotate the resulting user-generated content, and enables effective retrieval of otherwise uncategorised data. However, compared to professional web content production, collaborative tagging systems face the challenge that end-users assign tags in an uncontrolled manner, resulting in unsystematic and inconsistent metadata. This paper introduces a framework for the personalization of social media systems. We pinpoint three tasks that would benefit from personalization: collaborative tagging, collaborative browsing and collaborative search. We propose a ranking model for each task that integrates the individual user's tagging history in the recommendation of tags and content, to align its suggestions to the individual user preferences. We demonstrate on two real data sets that for all three tasks, the personalized ranking should take into account both the user's own preference and the opinion of others.
-
Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008)
0.00
0.004681723 = product of:
0.023408616 = sum of:
0.023408616 = product of:
0.046817232 = sum of:
0.046817232 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046817232 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.00
0.004138098 = product of:
0.02069049 = sum of:
0.02069049 = product of:
0.04138098 = sum of:
0.04138098 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04138098 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Trant, J.; Bearman, D.: Social terminology enhancement through vernacular engagement : exploring collaborative annotation to encourage interaction with museum collections (2005)
0.00
0.0041310634 = product of:
0.020655317 = sum of:
0.020655317 = product of:
0.041310634 = sum of:
0.041310634 = weight(_text_:history in 1185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041310634 = score(doc=1185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.20559052 = fieldWeight in 1185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- From their earliest encounters with the Web, museums have seen an opportunity to move beyond uni-directional communication into an environment that engages their users and reflects a multiplicity of perspectives. Shedding the "Unassailable Voice" (Walsh 1997) in favor of many "Points of View" (Sledge 1995) has challenged traditional museum approaches to the creation and delivery of content. Novel approaches are required in order to develop and sustain user engagement (Durbin 2004). New models of exhibit creation that democratize the curatorial functions of object selection and interpretation offer one way of opening up the museum (Coldicutt and Streten 2005). Another is to use the museum as a forum and focus for community story-telling (Howard, Pratty et al. 2005). Unfortunately, museum collections remain relatively inaccessible even when 'made available' through searchable on-line databases. Museum documentation seldom satisfies the on-line access needs of the broad public, both because it is written using professional terminology and because it may not address what is important to - or remembered by - the museum visitor. For example, an exhibition now on-line at The Metropolitan Museum of Art acknowledges "Coco" Chanel only in the brief, textual introduction (The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2005a). All of the images of her delightful fashion designs are attributed to "Gabrielle Chanel" (The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2005a). Interfaces that organize collections along axes of time or place - such of that of the Timeline of Art History (The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2005e) - often fail to match users' world-views, despite the care that went into their structuring or their significant pedagogical utility. Critically, as professionals working with art museums we realize that when cataloguers and curators describe works of art, they usually do not include the "subject" of the image itself. Simply put, we rarely answer the question "What is it a picture of?" Unfortunately, visitors will often remember a work based on its visual characteristics, only to find that Web-based searches for any of the things they recall do not produce results.
-
Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008)
0.00
0.0040965076 = product of:
0.020482538 = sum of:
0.020482538 = product of:
0.040965077 = sum of:
0.040965077 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040965077 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 21. 6.2009 12:22:44
-
Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005)
0.00
0.0036146806 = product of:
0.018073402 = sum of:
0.018073402 = product of:
0.036146805 = sum of:
0.036146805 = weight(_text_:history in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036146805 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.1798917 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- A number of such utilities are presented here, together with an emergent new class of tools that caters more to the academic communities and that stores not only user-supplied tags, but also structured citation metadata terms wherever it is possible to glean this information from service providers. This provision of rich, structured metadata means that the user is provided with an accurate third-party identification of a document, which could be used to retrieve that document, but is also free to search on user-supplied terms so that documents of interest (or rather, references to documents) can be made discoverable and aggregated with other similar descriptions either recorded by the user or by other users. Matt Biddulph in an XML.com article last year, in which he reviews one of the better known social bookmarking tools, del.icio.us, declares that the "del.icio.us-space has three major axes: users, tags, and URLs". We fully support that assessment but choose to present this deconstruction in a reverse order. This paper thus first recaps a brief history of bookmarks, then discusses the current interest in tagging, moves on to look at certain social issues, and finally considers some of the feature sets offered by the new bookmarking tools. A general review of a number of common social bookmarking tools is presented in the annex. A companion paper describes a case study in more detail: the tool that Nature Publishing Group has made available to the scientific community as an experimental entrée into this field - Connotea; our reasons for endeavouring to provide such a utility; and experiences gained and lessons learned.
-
Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009)
0.00
0.0035112926 = product of:
0.017556462 = sum of:
0.017556462 = product of:
0.035112925 = sum of:
0.035112925 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112925 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 1. 8.2010 12:35:22
-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.00
0.0035112926 = product of:
0.017556462 = sum of:
0.017556462 = product of:
0.035112925 = sum of:
0.035112925 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112925 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009)
0.00
0.0035112926 = product of:
0.017556462 = sum of:
0.017556462 = product of:
0.035112925 = sum of:
0.035112925 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112925 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011)
0.00
0.0035112926 = product of:
0.017556462 = sum of:
0.017556462 = product of:
0.035112925 = sum of:
0.035112925 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112925 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
-
Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007)
0.00
0.0029260772 = product of:
0.014630386 = sum of:
0.014630386 = product of:
0.029260771 = sum of:
0.029260771 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260771 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008)
0.00
0.0029260772 = product of:
0.014630386 = sum of:
0.014630386 = product of:
0.029260771 = sum of:
0.029260771 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260771 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.00
0.0029260772 = product of:
0.014630386 = sum of:
0.014630386 = product of:
0.029260771 = sum of:
0.029260771 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260771 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012)
0.00
0.0029260772 = product of:
0.014630386 = sum of:
0.014630386 = product of:
0.029260771 = sum of:
0.029260771 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260771 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 25.12.2012 15:22:37
-
Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016)
0.00
0.0029260772 = product of:
0.014630386 = sum of:
0.014630386 = product of:
0.029260771 = sum of:
0.029260771 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260771 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 21. 4.2016 11:23:22
-
Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019)
0.00
0.0029260772 = product of:
0.014630386 = sum of:
0.014630386 = product of:
0.029260771 = sum of:
0.029260771 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029260771 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008)
0.00
0.0023408616 = product of:
0.011704308 = sum of:
0.011704308 = product of:
0.023408616 = sum of:
0.023408616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023408616 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008)
0.00
0.0023408616 = product of:
0.011704308 = sum of:
0.011704308 = product of:
0.023408616 = sum of:
0.023408616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023408616 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04319373 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
