Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Euzenat, J.; Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching (2010) 0.06
    0.061533142 = product of:
      0.123066284 = sum of:
        0.123066284 = sum of:
          0.096012786 = weight(_text_:commerce in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.096012786 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32931858 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04991929 = queryNorm
              0.29154986 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
          0.027053498 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027053498 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04991929 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies are viewed as the silver bullet for many applications, but in open or evolving systems, different parties can adopt different ontologies. This increases heterogeneity problems rather than reducing heterogeneity. This book proposes ontology matching as a solution to the problem of semantic heterogeneity, offering researchers and practitioners a uniform framework of reference to currently available work. The techniques presented apply to database schema matching, catalog integration, XML schema matching and more. Ontologies tend to be found everywhere. They are viewed as the silver bullet for many applications, such as database integration, peer-to-peer systems, e-commerce, semantic web services, or social networks. However, in open or evolving systems, such as the semantic web, different parties would, in general, adopt different ontologies. Thus, merely using ontologies, like using XML, does not reduce heterogeneity: it just raises heterogeneity problems to a higher level. Euzenat and Shvaiko's book is devoted to ontology matching as a solution to the semantic heterogeneity problem faced by computer systems. Ontology matching aims at finding correspondences between semantically related entities of different ontologies. These correspondences may stand for equivalence as well as other relations, such as consequence, subsumption, or disjointness, between ontology entities. Many different matching solutions have been proposed so far from various viewpoints, e.g., databases, information systems, artificial intelligence. With Ontology Matching, researchers and practitioners will find a reference book which presents currently available work in a uniform framework. In particular, the work and the techniques presented in this book can equally be applied to database schema matching, catalog integration, XML schema matching and other related problems. The objectives of the book include presenting (i) the state of the art and (ii) the latest research results in ontology matching by providing a detailed account of matching techniques and matching systems in a systematic way from theoretical, practical and application perspectives.
    Date
    20. 6.2012 19:08:22
  2. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.05
    0.046249624 = product of:
      0.09249925 = sum of:
        0.09249925 = product of:
          0.27749774 = sum of:
            0.27749774 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27749774 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42321628 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  3. Chen, H.: Semantic research for digital libraries (1999) 0.04
    0.036004797 = product of:
      0.07200959 = sum of:
        0.07200959 = product of:
          0.14401919 = sum of:
            0.14401919 = weight(_text_:commerce in 1247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14401919 = score(doc=1247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32931858 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.4373248 = fieldWeight in 1247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1247)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this era of the Internet and distributed, multimedia computing, new and emerging classes of information systems applications have swept into the lives of office workers and people in general. From digital libraries, multimedia systems, geographic information systems, and collaborative computing to electronic commerce, virtual reality, and electronic video arts and games, these applications have created tremendous opportunities for information and computer science researchers and practitioners. As applications become more pervasive, pressing, and diverse, several well-known information retrieval (IR) problems have become even more urgent. Information overload, a result of the ease of information creation and transmission via the Internet and WWW, has become more troublesome (e.g., even stockbrokers and elementary school students, heavily exposed to various WWW search engines, are versed in such IR terminology as recall and precision). Significant variations in database formats and structures, the richness of information media (text, audio, and video), and an abundance of multilingual information content also have created severe information interoperability problems -- structural interoperability, media interoperability, and multilingual interoperability.
  4. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.03
    0.033035446 = product of:
      0.06607089 = sum of:
        0.06607089 = product of:
          0.19821267 = sum of:
            0.19821267 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19821267 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42321628 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  5. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.02
    0.023671811 = product of:
      0.047343623 = sum of:
        0.047343623 = product of:
          0.094687246 = sum of:
            0.094687246 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094687246 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  6. Miller, E.; Schloss. B.; Lassila, O.; Swick, R.R.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) : model and syntax (1997) 0.02
    0.021002797 = product of:
      0.042005595 = sum of:
        0.042005595 = product of:
          0.08401119 = sum of:
            0.08401119 = weight(_text_:commerce in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08401119 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32931858 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.25510612 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RDF - the Resource Description Framework - is a foundation for processing metadata; it provides interoperability between applications that exchange machine-understandable information on the Web. RDF emphasizes facilities to enable automated processing of Web resources. RDF metadata can be used in a variety of application areas; for example: in resource discovery to provide better search engine capabilities; in cataloging for describing the content and content relationships available at a particular Web site, page, or digital library; by intelligent software agents to facilitate knowledge sharing and exchange; in content rating; in describing collections of pages that represent a single logical "document"; for describing intellectual property rights of Web pages, and in many others. RDF with digital signatures will be key to building the "Web of Trust" for electronic commerce, collaboration, and other applications. Metadata is "data about data" or specifically in the context of RDF "data describing web resources." The distinction between "data" and "metadata" is not an absolute one; it is a distinction created primarily by a particular application. Many times the same resource will be interpreted in both ways simultaneously. RDF encourages this view by using XML as the encoding syntax for the metadata. The resources being described by RDF are, in general, anything that can be named via a URI. The broad goal of RDF is to define a mechanism for describing resources that makes no assumptions about a particular application domain, nor defines the semantics of any application domain. The definition of the mechanism should be domain neutral, yet the mechanism should be suitable for describing information about any domain. This document introduces a model for representing RDF metadata and one syntax for expressing and transporting this metadata in a manner that maximizes the interoperability of independently developed web servers and clients. The syntax described in this document is best considered as a "serialization syntax" for the underlying RDF representation model. The serialization syntax is XML, XML being the W3C's work-in-progress to define a richer Web syntax for a variety of applications. RDF and XML are complementary; there will be alternate ways to represent the same RDF data model, some more suitable for direct human authoring. Future work may lead to including such alternatives in this document.
  7. Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007) 0.02
    0.020290123 = product of:
      0.040580247 = sum of:
        0.040580247 = product of:
          0.08116049 = sum of:
            0.08116049 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08116049 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  8. Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008) 0.02
    0.020290123 = product of:
      0.040580247 = sum of:
        0.040580247 = product of:
          0.08116049 = sum of:
            0.08116049 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08116049 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2008 19:30:41
  9. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.02
    0.016908437 = product of:
      0.033816874 = sum of:
        0.033816874 = product of:
          0.06763375 = sum of:
            0.06763375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06763375 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  10. Celli, F. et al.: Enabling multilingual search through controlled vocabularies : the AGRIS approach (2016) 0.02
    0.016908437 = product of:
      0.033816874 = sum of:
        0.033816874 = product of:
          0.06763375 = sum of:
            0.06763375 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06763375 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  11. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.01
    0.014347285 = product of:
      0.02869457 = sum of:
        0.02869457 = product of:
          0.05738914 = sum of:
            0.05738914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05738914 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  12. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.01
    0.014347285 = product of:
      0.02869457 = sum of:
        0.02869457 = product of:
          0.05738914 = sum of:
            0.05738914 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05738914 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  13. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Marinai, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Report on execution and results of the interoperability tests (2008) 0.01
    0.013526749 = product of:
      0.027053498 = sum of:
        0.027053498 = product of:
          0.054106995 = sum of:
            0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054106995 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  14. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.01
    0.013526749 = product of:
      0.027053498 = sum of:
        0.027053498 = product of:
          0.054106995 = sum of:
            0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054106995 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  15. Hubrich, J.: CrissCross: SWD-DDC-Mapping (2008) 0.01
    0.013526749 = product of:
      0.027053498 = sum of:
        0.027053498 = product of:
          0.054106995 = sum of:
            0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054106995 = score(doc=2175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 10:35:21
  16. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Thesauri KOS analysis and selected thesaurus mapping methodology on the project case-study (2007) 0.01
    0.013526749 = product of:
      0.027053498 = sum of:
        0.027053498 = product of:
          0.054106995 = sum of:
            0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054106995 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  17. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.01
    0.01195607 = product of:
      0.02391214 = sum of:
        0.02391214 = product of:
          0.04782428 = sum of:
            0.04782428 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04782428 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  18. Si, L.: Encoding formats and consideration of requirements for mapping (2007) 0.01
    0.011835906 = product of:
      0.023671811 = sum of:
        0.023671811 = product of:
          0.047343623 = sum of:
            0.047343623 = weight(_text_:22 in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047343623 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:27
  19. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Building a Terminology Network for Search : the KoMoHe project (2008) 0.01
    0.011835906 = product of:
      0.023671811 = sum of:
        0.023671811 = product of:
          0.047343623 = sum of:
            0.047343623 = weight(_text_:22 in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047343623 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  20. Petras, V.: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen : eine Fallstudie (2010) 0.01
    0.011835906 = product of:
      0.023671811 = sum of:
        0.023671811 = product of:
          0.047343623 = sum of:
            0.047343623 = weight(_text_:22 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047343623 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

Years

Languages

  • e 33
  • d 11

Types

  • a 29
  • el 14
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…