Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Woodward, H.: Cafe Jus : commercial and free electronic journals user study (1997) 0.05
    0.047739945 = product of:
      0.09547989 = sum of:
        0.09547989 = product of:
          0.19095978 = sum of:
            0.19095978 = weight(_text_:journals in 1592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19095978 = score(doc=1592,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.7442812 = fieldWeight in 1592, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    During 1996, the number of scholarly periodicals, either commercially published or free, available in electronic form increased rapidly. The Cafe Jus project took advantage of this critical mass of electronic journals to mount a user study with taught postgraduate students, research students and academic and research staff in various disciplines at Loughborough University. The main conclusions were that: low-level technical problems are still a deterrent to use of electronic journals; people prefer not to read at length on screen, but printing out is slow, commercial publishers tend to follow the lead of technology rather than consider the convenience of their users; at present there is a significant need for user training, exacerbated by the variety of publishers' interface and their speed of change; and free journals using HTML arre preferred to commercial journals using PDF for convenience of reading but are regarded as lower in academic quality
  2. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.03
    0.027692629 = product of:
      0.055385258 = sum of:
        0.055385258 = product of:
          0.110770516 = sum of:
            0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110770516 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  3. Wheelbarger, J.J.; Clouse, R.W.: ¬A comparision of a manual library reclassification project with a computer automated library reclassification project (1975) 0.02
    0.02423105 = product of:
      0.0484621 = sum of:
        0.0484621 = product of:
          0.0969242 = sum of:
            0.0969242 = weight(_text_:22 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0969242 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  4. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Local Area Networks and Wide Area Networks for libraries (1995) 0.02
    0.02423105 = product of:
      0.0484621 = sum of:
        0.0484621 = product of:
          0.0969242 = sum of:
            0.0969242 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0969242 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  5. Adler, R.; Ewing, J.; Taylor, P.: Citation statistics : A report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS) (2008) 0.02
    0.021349952 = product of:
      0.042699903 = sum of:
        0.042699903 = product of:
          0.08539981 = sum of:
            0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08539981 = score(doc=2417,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Using citation data to assess research ultimately means using citation-based statistics to rank things.journals, papers, people, programs, and disciplines. The statistical tools used to rank these things are often misunderstood and misused. - For journals, the impact factor is most often used for ranking. This is a simple average derived from the distribution of citations for a collection of articles in the journal. The average captures only a small amount of information about that distribution, and it is a rather crude statistic. In addition, there are many confounding factors when judging journals by citations, and any comparison of journals requires caution when using impact factors. Using the impact factor alone to judge a journal is like using weight alone to judge a person's health. - For papers, instead of relying on the actual count of citations to compare individual papers, people frequently substitute the impact factor of the journals in which the papers appear. They believe that higher impact factors must mean higher citation counts. But this is often not the case! This is a pervasive misuse of statistics that needs to be challenged whenever and wherever it occurs. -For individual scientists, complete citation records can be difficult to compare. As a consequence, there have been attempts to find simple statistics that capture the full complexity of a scientist's citation record with a single number. The most notable of these is the h-index, which seems to be gaining in popularity. But even a casual inspection of the h-index and its variants shows that these are naive attempts to understand complicated citation records. While they capture a small amount of information about the distribution of a scientist's citations, they lose crucial information that is essential for the assessment of research.
  6. Information for a new age : redefining the librarian (1995) 0.02
    0.020769471 = product of:
      0.041538943 = sum of:
        0.041538943 = product of:
          0.083077885 = sum of:
            0.083077885 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083077885 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.2, S.147 (A. Schultis)
  7. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.02
    0.020769471 = product of:
      0.041538943 = sum of:
        0.041538943 = product of:
          0.083077885 = sum of:
            0.083077885 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083077885 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  8. ¬The future of national bibliography (1997) 0.02
    0.020769471 = product of:
      0.041538943 = sum of:
        0.041538943 = product of:
          0.083077885 = sum of:
            0.083077885 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083077885 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Select newsletter 1998, no.22, S.8 (P. Robinson)
  9. Carey, K.; Stringer, R.: ¬The power of nine : a preliminary investigation into navigation strategies for the new library with special reference to disabled people (2000) 0.02
    0.020769471 = product of:
      0.041538943 = sum of:
        0.041538943 = product of:
          0.083077885 = sum of:
            0.083077885 = weight(_text_:22 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083077885 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  10. Intellectual property and the National Information Infrastructure : a preliminary draft of the report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1994) 0.02
    0.017307894 = product of:
      0.03461579 = sum of:
        0.03461579 = product of:
          0.06923158 = sum of:
            0.06923158 = weight(_text_:22 in 7306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06923158 = score(doc=7306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7306)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.1996 19:53:48
  11. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.017307894 = product of:
      0.03461579 = sum of:
        0.03461579 = product of:
          0.06923158 = sum of:
            0.06923158 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06923158 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  12. Calhoun, K.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools : Prepared for the Library of Congress (2006) 0.01
    0.014233301 = product of:
      0.028466603 = sum of:
        0.028466603 = product of:
          0.056933206 = sum of:
            0.056933206 = weight(_text_:journals in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056933206 = score(doc=5013,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.22190176 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The destabilizing influences of the Web, widespread ownership of personal computers, and rising computer literacy have created an era of discontinuous change in research libraries a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. The library catalog is such an asset. Today, a large and growing number of students and scholars routinely bypass library catalogs in favor of other discovery tools, and the catalog represents a shrinking proportion of the universe of scholarly information. The catalog is in decline, its processes and structures are unsustainable, and change needs to be swift. At the same time, books and serials are not dead, and they are not yet digital. Notwithstanding widespread expansion of digitization projects, ubiquitous e-journals, and a market that seems poised to move to e-books, the role of catalog records in discovery and retrieval of the world's library collections seems likely to continue for at least a couple of decades and probably longer. This report, commissioned by the Library of Congress (LC), offers an analysis of the current situation, options for revitalizing research library catalogs, a feasibility assessment, a vision for change, and a blueprint for action. Library decision makers are the primary audience for this report, whose aim is to elicit support, dialogue, collaboration, and movement toward solutions. Readers from the business community, particularly those that directly serve libraries, may find the report helpful for defining research and development efforts. The same is true for readers from membership organizations such as OCLC Online Computer Library Center, the Research Libraries Group, the Association for Research Libraries, the Council on Library and Information Resources, the Coalition for Networked Information, and the Digital Library Federation. Library managers and practitioners from all functional groups are likely to take an interest in the interview findings and in specific actions laid out in the blueprint.
  13. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.01
    0.0138463145 = product of:
      0.027692629 = sum of:
        0.027692629 = product of:
          0.055385258 = sum of:
            0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055385258 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  14. Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015) 0.01
    0.012115525 = product of:
      0.02423105 = sum of:
        0.02423105 = product of:
          0.0484621 = sum of:
            0.0484621 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0484621 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:13:38
  15. ELINOR : Electronic Library Project (1998) 0.01
    0.010384736 = product of:
      0.020769471 = sum of:
        0.020769471 = product of:
          0.041538943 = sum of:
            0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041538943 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
  16. McCormick, A.; Sutton, A.: Open learning and the Internet in public libraries (1998) 0.01
    0.010384736 = product of:
      0.020769471 = sum of:
        0.020769471 = product of:
          0.041538943 = sum of:
            0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041538943 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 18:55:19
  17. Positionspapier zur Weiterentwicklung der Bibliotheksverbünde als Teil einer überregionalen Informationsinfrastruktur (2011) 0.01
    0.008653947 = product of:
      0.017307894 = sum of:
        0.017307894 = product of:
          0.03461579 = sum of:
            0.03461579 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03461579 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2011 19:52:22
  18. Förderung von Informationsinfrastrukturen für die Wissenschaft : Ein Positionspapier der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (2018) 0.01
    0.008653947 = product of:
      0.017307894 = sum of:
        0.017307894 = product of:
          0.03461579 = sum of:
            0.03461579 = weight(_text_:22 in 4178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03461579 = score(doc=4178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2018 17:30:43
  19. Wehling, E.: Framing-Manual : Unser gemeinsamer freier Rundfunk ARD (2019) 0.01
    0.008653947 = product of:
      0.017307894 = sum of:
        0.017307894 = product of:
          0.03461579 = sum of:
            0.03461579 = weight(_text_:22 in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03461579 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2019 9:26:20
  20. Hochschule im digitalen Zeitalter : Informationskompetenz neu begreifen - Prozesse anders steuern (2012) 0.01
    0.0069231573 = product of:
      0.0138463145 = sum of:
        0.0138463145 = product of:
          0.027692629 = sum of:
            0.027692629 = weight(_text_:22 in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027692629 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05109862 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2012 17:22:26