Search (377 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.07
    0.07246362 = product of:
      0.10869542 = sum of:
        0.021452487 = weight(_text_:information in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021452487 = score(doc=3283,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
        0.08724293 = sum of:
          0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03795776 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04928517 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 10th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, MTSR 2016, held in Göttingen, Germany, in November 2016. The 26 full papers and 6 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 67 submissions. The papers are organized in several sessions and tracks: Digital Libraries, Information Retrieval, Linked and Social Data, Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures, Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment, Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications, European and National Projects.
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
  2. Liechti, O.; Sifer, M.J.; Ichikawa, T.: Structured graph format : XML metadata for describing Web site structure (1998) 0.07
    0.06983921 = product of:
      0.104758814 = sum of:
        0.017515881 = weight(_text_:information in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017515881 = score(doc=3597,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
        0.08724293 = sum of:
          0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03795776 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
          0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04928517 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    To improve searching, filtering and processing of information on the Web, a common effort is made in the direction of metadata, defined as machine understandable information about Web resources or other things. In particular, the eXtensible Markup Language (XML) aims at providing a common syntax to emerging metadata formats. Proposes the Structured Graph Format (SGF) an XML compliant markup language based on structured graphs, for capturing Web sites' structure. Presents SGMapper, a client-site tool, which aims to facilitate navigation in large Web sites by generating highly interactive site maps using SGF metadata
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 30(1998) nos.1/7, S.11-21
  3. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.07
    0.06983921 = product of:
      0.104758814 = sum of:
        0.017515881 = weight(_text_:information in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017515881 = score(doc=2848,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
        0.08724293 = sum of:
          0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03795776 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
          0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04928517 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
  4. Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008) 0.07
    0.06884654 = product of:
      0.1032698 = sum of:
        0.015013612 = weight(_text_:information in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015013612 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
        0.08825619 = sum of:
          0.046011757 = weight(_text_:systems in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046011757 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
          0.04224443 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04224443 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997) 0.07
    0.06641902 = product of:
      0.09962853 = sum of:
        0.012385598 = weight(_text_:information in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012385598 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
        0.08724293 = sum of:
          0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03795776 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
          0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04928517 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Examines techniques that discover features in sets of pre-categorized documents, such that similar documents can be found on the WWW. Examines techniques which will classifiy training examples with high accuracy, then explains why this is not necessarily useful. Describes a method for extracting word clusters from the raw document features. Results show that the clustering technique is successful in discovering word groups in personal Web pages which can be used to find similar information on the WWW
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1147-1156
  6. Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000) 0.07
    0.06641902 = product of:
      0.09962853 = sum of:
        0.012385598 = weight(_text_:information in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012385598 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
        0.08724293 = sum of:
          0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03795776 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04928517 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.06
    0.05621129 = product of:
      0.08431693 = sum of:
        0.035031762 = weight(_text_:information in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035031762 = score(doc=4407,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
        0.04928517 = product of:
          0.09857034 = sum of:
            0.09857034 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09857034 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
    Source
    Government information quarterly. 18(2001) S.155-165
  8. Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018) 0.05
    0.04988515 = product of:
      0.07482772 = sum of:
        0.012511344 = weight(_text_:information in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012511344 = score(doc=4218,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
        0.06231638 = sum of:
          0.027112689 = weight(_text_:systems in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027112689 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.03520369 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03520369 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.5, S.633-646
  9. Madsen, M.S.; Fogg, I.; Ruggles, C.: Metadata systems : integrative information technologies (1994) 0.04
    0.041819304 = product of:
      0.06272896 = sum of:
        0.024771197 = weight(_text_:information in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024771197 = score(doc=1055,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
        0.03795776 = product of:
          0.07591552 = sum of:
            0.07591552 = weight(_text_:systems in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07591552 = score(doc=1055,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata systems are concerned with the management of data which describes other data (datasets, catalogues, or actual database management systems) and are presently the subject of intensive research. Metadata systems can be used to store richly detailed forms of information, perform seamless wide ranging searches of information distributed across networks, and to integrate information stored in disparate repositories. Describes a model design and methods of implementation derived from the experience of the Leicester University Metadata Project. The approach utilizes the incorporation of semantic metadata in addition to resource metadata, resulting in a generally more powerful system than existing global directory services. Feature of the class of design is flexibility or implementation, with the ability to provide a coherent metadata system functioning above heterogeneous autonomous distributed databases
  10. Rice, R.: Applying DC to institutional data repositories (2008) 0.04
    0.039908122 = product of:
      0.05986218 = sum of:
        0.010009075 = weight(_text_:information in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010009075 = score(doc=2664,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
        0.049853105 = sum of:
          0.02169015 = weight(_text_:systems in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02169015 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.1358164 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
          0.028162954 = weight(_text_:22 in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028162954 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    DISC-UK DataShare (2007-2009), a project led by the University of Edinburgh and funded by JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee, UK), arises from an existing consortium of academic data support professionals working in the domain of social science datasets (Data Information Specialists Committee-UK). We are working together across four universities with colleagues engaged in managing open access repositories for e-prints. Our project supports 'early adopter' academics who wish to openly share datasets and presents a model for depositing 'orphaned datasets' that are not being deposited in subject-domain data archives/centres. Outputs from the project are intended to help to demystify data as complex objects in repositories, and assist other institutional repository managers in overcoming barriers to incorporating research data. By building on lessons learned from recent JISC-funded data repository projects such as SToRe and GRADE the project will help realize the vision of the Digital Repositories Roadmap, e.g. the milestone under Data, "Institutions need to invest in research data repositories" (Heery and Powell, 2006). Application of appropriate metadata is an important area of development for the project. Datasets are not different from other digital materials in that they need to be described, not just for discovery but also for preservation and re-use. The GRADE project found that for geo-spatial datasets, Dublin Core metadata (with geo-spatial enhancements such as a bounding box for the 'coverage' property) was sufficient for discovery within a DSpace repository, though more indepth metadata or documentation was required for re-use after downloading. The project partners are examining other metadata schemas such as the Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) versions 2 and 3, used primarily by social science data archives (Martinez, 2008). Crosswalks from the DDI to qualified Dublin Core are important for describing research datasets at the study level (as opposed to the variable level which is largely out of scope for this project). DataShare is benefiting from work of of the DRIADE project (application profile development for evolutionary biology) (Carrier, et al, 2007), eBank UK (developed an application profile for crystallography data) and GAP (Geospatial Application Profile, in progress) in defining interoperable Dublin Core qualified metadata elements and their application to datasets for each partner repository. The solution devised at Edinburgh for DSpace will be covered in the poster.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.04
    0.038274534 = product of:
      0.057411797 = sum of:
        0.032769214 = weight(_text_:information in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032769214 = score(doc=4866,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
        0.024642585 = product of:
          0.04928517 = sum of:
            0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04928517 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.40-45
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  12. Cheung, W.; Hsu, C.: ¬The model-assisted global query system for multiple databases in distributed enterprises (1996) 0.04
    0.036216583 = product of:
      0.054324873 = sum of:
        0.021452487 = weight(_text_:information in 7279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021452487 = score(doc=7279,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 7279, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7279)
        0.032872386 = product of:
          0.06574477 = sum of:
            0.06574477 = weight(_text_:systems in 7279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06574477 = score(doc=7279,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.41167158 = fieldWeight in 7279, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Today's enterprises employ multiple information systems which are independently developed, locally administered, and are different in logical or physical design. To share information across organisational boundaries requires a global query system capable of providing online intelligent assistance to users. Conventional technologies such as schema based query languages and hard coded schema integration are insufficient. Develops a model assisted global query system using an online repository of enterprise metadata, the metadatabase, for global query formulation and processing with adaptiveness and open systems architecture. Presents a definition model for the metadata as a knowledge system. Analyzes the improvements of the new system in relation to the old. Tests a prototype system in a computer integrated manufacturing setting
    Source
    ACM transactions on information systems. 14(1996) no.4, S.421-470
  13. Lopatenko, A.: CERIF-2000 : Common European Research Information Format (2002) 0.04
    0.0360071 = product of:
      0.054010645 = sum of:
        0.035031762 = weight(_text_:information in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035031762 = score(doc=3614,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
        0.01897888 = product of:
          0.03795776 = sum of:
            0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03795776 = score(doc=3614,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    CERIF-2000 is a set of guidelines, as well metadata and database formats, developed during teh 1990's. The first version was drafted in 1991; the latest version in 2000. The basic idea behind CERIF is to publish a compendium of common practices of research information publication and use; establish clear guidelines for CRIS (Current Research Information System) development which may be helpful for CRIS developers and hosts; and set forth a metadata format for research information which assists research organizations in information exchange, thanks to its common information structure and use of vocabularies.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  14. Kashyap, V.; Sheth, A.: Information brokering across heterogeneous digital data : a metadata-based approach (2000) 0.04
    0.035845123 = product of:
      0.05376768 = sum of:
        0.021232454 = weight(_text_:information in 6390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021232454 = score(doc=6390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 6390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6390)
        0.032535225 = product of:
          0.06507045 = sum of:
            0.06507045 = weight(_text_:systems in 6390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06507045 = score(doc=6390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 6390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6390)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Series
    Advances in database systems
  15. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.04
    0.035264935 = product of:
      0.0528974 = sum of:
        0.017693711 = weight(_text_:information in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017693711 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
        0.03520369 = product of:
          0.07040738 = sum of:
            0.07040738 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07040738 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  16. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.04
    0.035264935 = product of:
      0.0528974 = sum of:
        0.017693711 = weight(_text_:information in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017693711 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
        0.03520369 = product of:
          0.07040738 = sum of:
            0.07040738 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07040738 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  17. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.04
    0.035264935 = product of:
      0.0528974 = sum of:
        0.017693711 = weight(_text_:information in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017693711 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
        0.03520369 = product of:
          0.07040738 = sum of:
            0.07040738 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07040738 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  18. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.04
    0.035120055 = product of:
      0.052680083 = sum of:
        0.024517128 = weight(_text_:information in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024517128 = score(doc=4867,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
        0.028162954 = product of:
          0.05632591 = sum of:
            0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05632591 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.35-39
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  19. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.04
    0.035120055 = product of:
      0.052680083 = sum of:
        0.024517128 = weight(_text_:information in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024517128 = score(doc=4869,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
        0.028162954 = product of:
          0.05632591 = sum of:
            0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05632591 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.46-48
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  20. Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998) 0.03
    0.03489175 = product of:
      0.052337624 = sum of:
        0.02769504 = weight(_text_:information in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02769504 = score(doc=5165,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
        0.024642585 = product of:
          0.04928517 = sum of:
            0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04928517 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
    Date
    9. 9.2000 17:22:23

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 331
  • el 39
  • m 24
  • s 16
  • n 4
  • b 2
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects