-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Noesis : perception and every day classification (2008)
0.06
0.056973968 = product of:
0.113947935 = sum of:
0.113947935 = product of:
0.22789587 = sum of:
0.22789587 = weight(_text_:perception in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22789587 = score(doc=2509,freq=8.0), product of:
0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.7091809 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Perception is a crucial element in the viability of any knowledge organization system because it acts as a filter that provides contextual information about phenomena, including potential categorical membership. Perception is moderated culturally, but "social" systems exercise little or no cultural conformity. "Every day classification" is rife throughout human experience; but classification arises as a system of formal constraints that embody cultural assumptions about the categories that are the products of human cognition. Noesis is a perceptual component of Husserl's phenomenological approach to human experience. How we perceive a thing is filtered by our experiential feelings about it. The purpose of this research is to increase understanding of the role of cognition in every day classification by developing a fuller profile of perception. Photographs of mailboxes (a mundane, every-day example) from different locales are compared to demonstrate the noetic process. Tag clouds are analyzed to demonstrate the kinds of perceptual differences that suggest different user perceptions among those contributing tags.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: On sameness and difference : an editorial (2008)
0.04
0.03696575 = product of:
0.0739315 = sum of:
0.0739315 = sum of:
0.056973968 = weight(_text_:perception in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056973968 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.17729522 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
0.016957529 = weight(_text_:22 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016957529 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "1. What is? Many of us equate the principle activity of knowledge organization with that of ontology, which at its essence is the revelation of the structure of a domain. Among the essential choices that must be made in the construction of ontology are those involving "IsA" relationships. "What is a" is the primary question that defines what belongs inside a set and what, therefore, does not. Employing Dahlberg's concept-theoretic is one approach to defining the elements that belong in a set, although there are many other approaches as well. Whatever method is used, once a set is constituted its members will be considered to be like each other in some way, in other words, they are thought to be the same in some manner, or to some degree. Which leads naturally to the question of how alike must two entities be to be declared the same? Or its correlate, how dissimilar must they be to be declared different? Pondering this question led me to think about musical works that are of the genre "variations on a theme by X." In such works a composer uses a musical mnemonic-a melody usually-to draw listeners into the aural experience, and then, subsequent iterations all contain this original mnemonic but surround it or manipulate it in various ways. The result is always iterative but never boring because each iteration is subtly (or not so subtly) different from the last. And the technique allows the character of the original to be explored fully as well as for it to be reinterpreted by the current composer. In the end it is not so unlike, although a lot more interesting than, multiple citations by an author of another's works- say, like the way each time I cite Patrick Wilson it comes out a little differently. Same but different. Sameness and difference turn out to be essential philosophical positions. Many of the philosophical points of view brought to bear on knowledge organization suggest one or more points of view about this essential question. Semiotics (for example) suggests that signs are always being interpreted anew, phenomenology suggests entities might appear differently as a matter of their individual perception. All points of view are useful because they all shed light on formerly dark corners of the essential questions in knowledge organization.
- Date
- 12. 6.2008 20:18:22
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Works as signs, symbols,and canons : The epistemology of the work (2001)
0.03
0.034184385 = product of:
0.06836877 = sum of:
0.06836877 = product of:
0.13673754 = sum of:
0.13673754 = weight(_text_:perception in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13673754 = score(doc=1119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.42550856 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Works are key entities in the universe of recorded knowledge. Works are those deliberate creations (known variously as opera, oeuvres, Werke, etc.) that constitute individual sets of created conceptions that stand as the formal records of knowledge. In the information retrieval domain, the work as opposed to the document, has only recently received focused attention. In this paper, the definition of the work as an entity for information retrieval is examined. A taxonomic definition (that is, a definition built around a taxonomy) is presented. An epistemological perspective aids in understanding the components of the taxonomic definition. Works, thus defined as entities for information retrieval, are seen to constitute sets of varying instantiations of abstract creations. These variant instantiations must be explicitly identified in future systems for documentary information retrieval. An expanded perception of works, such as that presented in this paper, helps us understand the variety of ways in which mechanisms for their control and retrieval might better be shaped in future.
-
Beak, J.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Contours of knowledge : core and granularity in the evolution of the DCMI domain (2014)
0.01
0.010174517 = product of:
0.020349033 = sum of:
0.020349033 = product of:
0.040698066 = sum of:
0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 1415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040698066 = score(doc=1415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1415)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Classification interaction demonstrated empirically (2014)
0.01
0.010174517 = product of:
0.020349033 = sum of:
0.020349033 = product of:
0.040698066 = sum of:
0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 1420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040698066 = score(doc=1420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1420)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Leazer, G.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families in the library catalog : a qualitative analysis and grounded theory (1999)
0.01
0.008478764 = product of:
0.016957529 = sum of:
0.016957529 = product of:
0.033915058 = sum of:
0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033915058 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Shifting intension in knowledge organization : an editorial (2012)
0.01
0.008478764 = product of:
0.016957529 = sum of:
0.016957529 = product of:
0.033915058 = sum of:
0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033915058 = score(doc=630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:09:49
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ISKO 12's bookshelf - evolving intension : an editorial (2013)
0.01
0.008478764 = product of:
0.016957529 = sum of:
0.016957529 = product of:
0.033915058 = sum of:
0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033915058 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:43:34
-
Graf, A.M.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Race & ethnicity in the Encyclopedia of Milwaukee : a case study in the use of domain analysis (2014)
0.01
0.008478764 = product of:
0.016957529 = sum of:
0.016957529 = product of:
0.033915058 = sum of:
0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033915058 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Friedman, A.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Nodes and arcs : concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization (2013)
0.01
0.006783011 = product of:
0.013566022 = sum of:
0.013566022 = product of:
0.027132044 = sum of:
0.027132044 = weight(_text_:22 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027132044 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Treude, L.: Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation: über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung. In: LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx.
