-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of knowledge based bibliographic retrieval systems (1985)
0.07
0.06836877 = product of:
0.13673754 = sum of:
0.13673754 = product of:
0.27347508 = sum of:
0.27347508 = weight(_text_:perception in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27347508 = score(doc=2088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.8510171 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Arastoopoor, S.; Fattahi, R.: Users' perception of aboutness and ofness in images : an approach to subject indexing based on Ervin Panofsky's theory and users'' view (2012)
0.05
0.049340907 = product of:
0.098681815 = sum of:
0.098681815 = product of:
0.19736363 = sum of:
0.19736363 = weight(_text_:perception in 872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19736363 = score(doc=872,freq=6.0), product of:
0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.6141687 = fieldWeight in 872, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=872)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is widely accepted that subject indexing of an image is based on a two-dimensional approach. The first is the ofness and the second focuses on aboutness of the image. Assigning a suitable set of subject tags based on these two groups depends, to a great deal, on users' perception of the image. This study aims at analyzing users' perception of aboutness and ofness of images. 25 in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted in two phases. In the first phase a collection of 10 widely known photographs were given to the interviewees and they were asked to assign subject tags (as many as they wanted) to each image. In the second phase some facts regarding each image were given to him / her to assign further tags (again as many as they wanted) or even modify their previous tags. The results show that the interviewees do focus both on ofness and aboutness in subject tagging; but it seems that they emphasize more on aboutness in describing images. On the other hand, as soon as the interviewees were able to distinguish the iconographical ofness, they could speak of iconographical and iconological aboutness. The results also show that subject indexers must focus on the iconographical level, especially regarding those tags which represent the ofness at this level.
-
Yoon, J.W.: Utilizing quantitative users' reactions to represent affective meanings of an image (2010)
0.04
0.040286683 = product of:
0.080573365 = sum of:
0.080573365 = product of:
0.16114673 = sum of:
0.16114673 = weight(_text_:perception in 3584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16114673 = score(doc=3584,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.50146663 = fieldWeight in 3584, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Emotional meaning is critical for users to retrieve relevant images. However, because emotional meanings are subject to the individual viewer's interpretation, they are considered difficult to implement when designing image retrieval systems. With the intent of making an image's emotional messages more readily accessible, this study aims to test a new approach designed to enhance the accessibility of emotional meanings during the image search process. This approach utilizes image searchers' emotional reactions, which are quantitatively measured. Broadly used quantitative measurements for emotional reactions, Semantic Differential (SD) and Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), were selected as tools for gathering users' reactions. Emotional representations obtained from these two tools were compared with three image perception tasks: searching, describing, and sorting. A survey questionnaire with a set of 12 images was administered to 58 participants, which were tagged with basic emotions. Results demonstrated that the SAM represents basic emotions on 2-dimensional plots (pleasure and arousal dimensions), and this representation consistently corresponded to the three image perception tasks. This study provided experimental evidence that quantitative users' reactions can be a useful complementary element of current image retrieval/indexing systems. Integrating users' reactions obtained from the SAM into image browsing systems would reduce the efforts of human indexers as well as improve the effectiveness of image retrieval systems.
-
Shatford, S.: Analyzing the subject of a picture : a theoretical approach (1986)
0.04
0.03988178 = product of:
0.07976356 = sum of:
0.07976356 = product of:
0.15952712 = sum of:
0.15952712 = weight(_text_:perception in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15952712 = score(doc=354,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.49642664 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper suggests a theoretical basis for identifying and classifying the kinds of subjects a picture may have, using previously developed principles of cataloging and classification, and concepts taken from the philosophy of art, from meaning in language, and from visual perception. The purpose of developing this theoretical basis is to provide the reader with a means for evaluating, adapting, and applying presently existing indexing languages, or for devising new languages for pictorial materials; this paper does not attempt to invent or prescribe a particular indexing language.
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.02
0.016957529 = product of:
0.033915058 = sum of:
0.033915058 = product of:
0.067830116 = sum of:
0.067830116 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067830116 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.01
0.013566022 = product of:
0.027132044 = sum of:
0.027132044 = product of:
0.054264087 = sum of:
0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054264087 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021)
0.01
0.013566022 = product of:
0.027132044 = sum of:
0.027132044 = product of:
0.054264087 = sum of:
0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054264087 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.01
0.011990783 = product of:
0.023981566 = sum of:
0.023981566 = product of:
0.04796313 = sum of:
0.04796313 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04796313 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996)
0.01
0.010174517 = product of:
0.020349033 = sum of:
0.020349033 = product of:
0.040698066 = sum of:
0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040698066 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.01
0.010174517 = product of:
0.020349033 = sum of:
0.020349033 = product of:
0.040698066 = sum of:
0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040698066 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006)
0.01
0.010174517 = product of:
0.020349033 = sum of:
0.020349033 = product of:
0.040698066 = sum of:
0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040698066 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002)
0.01
0.0050872583 = product of:
0.010174517 = sum of:
0.010174517 = product of:
0.020349033 = sum of:
0.020349033 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020349033 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 9.2005 14:22:19
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.00
0.0033915055 = product of:
0.006783011 = sum of:
0.006783011 = product of:
0.013566022 = sum of:
0.013566022 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013566022 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05006422 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
