Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Smiraglia, R.P.: Noesis : perception and every day classification (2008) 0.06
    0.056973968 = product of:
      0.113947935 = sum of:
        0.113947935 = product of:
          0.22789587 = sum of:
            0.22789587 = weight(_text_:perception in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22789587 = score(doc=2509,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.7091809 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Perception is a crucial element in the viability of any knowledge organization system because it acts as a filter that provides contextual information about phenomena, including potential categorical membership. Perception is moderated culturally, but "social" systems exercise little or no cultural conformity. "Every day classification" is rife throughout human experience; but classification arises as a system of formal constraints that embody cultural assumptions about the categories that are the products of human cognition. Noesis is a perceptual component of Husserl's phenomenological approach to human experience. How we perceive a thing is filtered by our experiential feelings about it. The purpose of this research is to increase understanding of the role of cognition in every day classification by developing a fuller profile of perception. Photographs of mailboxes (a mundane, every-day example) from different locales are compared to demonstrate the noetic process. Tag clouds are analyzed to demonstrate the kinds of perceptual differences that suggest different user perceptions among those contributing tags.
  2. Howarth, L.C.: Creating pathways to memory : enhancing life histories through category clusters (2008) 0.03
    0.028486984 = product of:
      0.056973968 = sum of:
        0.056973968 = product of:
          0.113947935 = sum of:
            0.113947935 = weight(_text_:perception in 2281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113947935 = score(doc=2281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.35459045 = fieldWeight in 2281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    For individuals whose memory and language are intact, making sense of unfamiliar information or objects is a process of matching what is unknown, to what is known through previous learning or experience. The unfamiliar is linked to clusters or categories of the familiar, identifying what is "like" or "nearly like" and excluding all others (De Mey 1982). Most commonly, these are categories on which there is general agreement, sometimes collocated under established terms, labels, or shared naming devices. Classification systems are built on the basis of shared understandings of human knowledge and culture. When memory and/or language are impaired, how does such contextualizing and categorizing occur? Since perception is individual, can a person with cognitive impairment "make sense" of information, an object, a situation, using alternative modes of expression that are less or not language-dependent? This paper reports on preliminary results from a pilot study undertaken as part of exploratory mixed methods research examining the sense-making, sorting, categorization, and recall strategies of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) resulting from early stage dementia.
  3. Vickery, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing (1985) 0.02
    0.022789588 = product of:
      0.045579176 = sum of:
        0.045579176 = product of:
          0.09115835 = sum of:
            0.09115835 = weight(_text_:perception in 3636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09115835 = score(doc=3636,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.28367236 = fieldWeight in 3636, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3636)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    - adding a relational term ("operator") to identify and join terms; - indicating grammatical case with terms where this would help clarify relationships; and - analyzing elementary terms to reveal fundamental categories where needed. He further added that a standard order for showing relational factors was highly desirable. Eventually, some years later, he was able to suggest such an order. This was accepted by his peers in the Classification Research Group, and utilized by Derek Austin in PRECIS (q.v.). Vickery began where Farradane began - with perception (a sound base according to current cognitive psychology). From this came further recognition of properties, parts, constituents, organs, effects, reactions, operations (physical and mental), added to the original "identity," "difference," "class membership," and "species." By defining categories more carefully, Vickery arrived at six (in addition to space (geographic) and time): - personality, thing, substance (e.g., dog, bicycle, rose) - part (e.g., paw, wheel, leaf) - substance (e.g., copper, water, butter) - action (e.g., scattering) - property (e.g., length, velocity) - operation (e.g., analysis, measurement) Thus, as early as 1953, the foundations were already laid for research that ultimately produced very sophisticated systems, such as PRECIS.
  4. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.02
    0.020349033 = product of:
      0.040698066 = sum of:
        0.040698066 = product of:
          0.08139613 = sum of:
            0.08139613 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08139613 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  5. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.02
    0.020349033 = product of:
      0.040698066 = sum of:
        0.040698066 = product of:
          0.08139613 = sum of:
            0.08139613 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08139613 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  6. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.02
    0.020349033 = product of:
      0.040698066 = sum of:
        0.040698066 = product of:
          0.08139613 = sum of:
            0.08139613 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08139613 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  7. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  8. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  9. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  10. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  11. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.01187027 = product of:
      0.02374054 = sum of:
        0.02374054 = product of:
          0.04748108 = sum of:
            0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04748108 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  12. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01
    0.01187027 = product of:
      0.02374054 = sum of:
        0.02374054 = product of:
          0.04748108 = sum of:
            0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04748108 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.01187027 = product of:
      0.02374054 = sum of:
        0.02374054 = product of:
          0.04748108 = sum of:
            0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04748108 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
  14. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.010174517 = product of:
      0.020349033 = sum of:
        0.020349033 = product of:
          0.040698066 = sum of:
            0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040698066 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  15. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01
    0.010174517 = product of:
      0.020349033 = sum of:
        0.020349033 = product of:
          0.040698066 = sum of:
            0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040698066 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  16. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01
    0.010174517 = product of:
      0.020349033 = sum of:
        0.020349033 = product of:
          0.040698066 = sum of:
            0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040698066 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  17. Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014) 0.01
    0.010174517 = product of:
      0.020349033 = sum of:
        0.020349033 = product of:
          0.040698066 = sum of:
            0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040698066 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  18. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.01
    0.010174517 = product of:
      0.020349033 = sum of:
        0.020349033 = product of:
          0.040698066 = sum of:
            0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040698066 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  19. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01
    0.010174517 = product of:
      0.020349033 = sum of:
        0.020349033 = product of:
          0.040698066 = sum of:
            0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040698066 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  20. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.01
    0.008478764 = product of:
      0.016957529 = sum of:
        0.016957529 = product of:
          0.033915058 = sum of:
            0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033915058 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22