Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: End-user interaction with thesauri : an evaluation of cognitive overlap in search term selection (2004) 0.03 
    0.034184385 = product of:
  0.06836877 = sum of:
    0.06836877 = product of:
      0.13673754 = sum of:
        0.13673754 = weight(_text_:perception in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13673754 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.42550856 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The use of thesaurus-enhanced search tools is an the increase. This paper provides an insight into end-users interaction with and perceptions of such tools. In particular the overlap between users' initial query formulation and thesaurus structures is investigated. This investigation involved the performance of genuine search tasks an the CAB Abstracts database by academic users in the domain of veterinary medicine. The perception of these users regarding the nature and usefulness of the terms suggested from the thesaurus during the search interaction is reported. The results indicated that around 80% of terms entered were matched either exactly or partially to thesaurus terms. Users found over 90% of the terms suggested to be close to their search topics and where terms were selected they indicated that around 50% were to support a 'narrowing down' activity. These findings have implications for the design of thesaurus-enhanced interfaces.
  2. Kless, D.; Milton, S.; Kazmierczak, E.; Lindenthal, J.: Thesaurus and ontology structure : formal and pragmatic differences and similarities (2015) 0.03 
    0.028486984 = product of:
  0.056973968 = sum of:
    0.056973968 = product of:
      0.113947935 = sum of:
        0.113947935 = weight(_text_:perception in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113947935 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.35459045 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Thesauri and other types of controlled vocabularies are increasingly re-engineered into ontologies described using the Web Ontology Language (OWL), particularly in the life sciences. This has led to the perception by some that thesauri are ontologies once they are described by using the syntax of OWL while others have emphasized the need to re-engineer a vocabulary to use it as ontology. This confusion is rooted in different perceptions of what ontologies are and how they differ from other types of vocabularies. In this article, we rigorously examine the structural differences and similarities between thesauri and meaning-defining ontologies described in OWL. Specifically, we conduct (a) a conceptual comparison of thesauri and ontologies, and (b) a comparison of a specific thesaurus and a specific ontology in the same subject field. Our results show that thesauri and ontologies need to be treated as 2 orthogonal kinds of models with superficially similar structures. An ontology is not a good thesaurus, nor is a thesaurus a good ontology. A thesaurus requires significant structural and other content changes to become an ontology, and vice versa.
  3. Amirhosseini, M.: Theoretical base of quantitative evaluation of unity in a thesaurus term network based on Kant's epistemology (2010) 0.03 
    0.028486984 = product of:
  0.056973968 = sum of:
    0.056973968 = product of:
      0.113947935 = sum of:
        0.113947935 = weight(_text_:perception in 5854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113947935 = score(doc=5854,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.35459045 = fieldWeight in 5854, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5854)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The quantitative evaluation of thesauri has been carried out much further since 1976. This type of evaluation is based on counting of special factors in thesaurus structure, some of which are counting preferred terms, non preferred terms, cross reference terms and so on. Therefore, various statistical tests have been proposed and applied for evaluation of thesauri. In this article, we try to explain some ratios in the field of unity quantitative evaluation in a thesaurus term network. Theoretical base of the ratios' indicators and indices construction, and epistemological thought in this type of quantitative evaluation, are discussed in this article. The theoretical base of quantitative evaluation is the epistemological thought of Immanuel Kant's Critique of pure reason. The cognition states of transcendental understanding are divided into three steps, the first is perception, the second combination and the third, relation making. Terms relation domains and conceptual relation domains can be analyzed with ratios. The use of quantitative evaluations in current research in the field of thesaurus construction prepares a basis for a restoration period. In modern thesaurus construction, traditional term relations are analyzed in detail in the form of new conceptual relations. Hence, the new domains of hierarchical and associative relations are constructed in the form of relations between concepts. The newly formed conceptual domains can be a suitable basis for quantitative evaluation analysis in conceptual relations.
  4. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.02 
    0.02374054 = product of:
  0.04748108 = sum of:
    0.04748108 = product of:
      0.09496216 = sum of:
        0.09496216 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09496216 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
  5. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.02 
    0.020349033 = product of:
  0.040698066 = sum of:
    0.040698066 = product of:
      0.08139613 = sum of:
        0.08139613 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08139613 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  6. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.02 
    0.020349033 = product of:
  0.040698066 = sum of:
    0.040698066 = product of:
      0.08139613 = sum of:
        0.08139613 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08139613 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  7. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.02 
    0.020349033 = product of:
  0.040698066 = sum of:
    0.040698066 = product of:
      0.08139613 = sum of:
        0.08139613 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08139613 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  8. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.02 
    0.020349033 = product of:
  0.040698066 = sum of:
    0.040698066 = product of:
      0.08139613 = sum of:
        0.08139613 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08139613 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  9. Riege, U.: Thesaurus und Klassifikation Sozialwissenschaften : Entwicklung der elektronischen Versionen (1998) 0.02 
    0.016957529 = product of:
  0.033915058 = sum of:
    0.033915058 = product of:
      0.067830116 = sum of:
        0.067830116 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067830116 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  10. Alkämper, H.: ¬Die Neugestaltung des Parlamentsthesaurus PARTHES (1998) 0.02 
    0.016957529 = product of:
  0.033915058 = sum of:
    0.033915058 = product of:
      0.067830116 = sum of:
        0.067830116 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067830116 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  11. Schenkel, M.: Vom Leitkartenthesaurus zum Online-Bibliotheksthesaurus : Die Revision des Dokumentationssystems der Bibliothek des Deutschen Bundestages (1949-1998) (1998) 0.02 
    0.016957529 = product of:
  0.033915058 = sum of:
    0.033915058 = product of:
      0.067830116 = sum of:
        0.067830116 = weight(_text_:22 in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067830116 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  12. Velasco, M.: Algoritmo de filtrado multitermino para la obtencion de relaciones jerarquicas en la construction automatica de un tesauro de descriptores (1999) 0.02 
    0.016957529 = product of:
  0.033915058 = sum of:
    0.033915058 = product of:
      0.067830116 = sum of:
        0.067830116 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067830116 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.1, S.34-49
  13. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.02 
    0.016957529 = product of:
  0.033915058 = sum of:
    0.033915058 = product of:
      0.067830116 = sum of:
        0.067830116 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067830116 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  14. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.01 
    0.013566022 = product of:
  0.027132044 = sum of:
    0.027132044 = product of:
      0.054264087 = sum of:
        0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054264087 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  15. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.01 
    0.013566022 = product of:
  0.027132044 = sum of:
    0.027132044 = product of:
      0.054264087 = sum of:
        0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054264087 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
  16. Heinzelin, D. de; ¬d'¬Hautcourt, F.; Pols, R.: ¬Un nouveaux thesaurus multilingue informatise relatif aux instruments de musique (1998) 0.01 
    0.013566022 = product of:
  0.027132044 = sum of:
    0.027132044 = product of:
      0.054264087 = sum of:
        0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054264087 = score(doc=932,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 932, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=932)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  17. Z39.19-1993: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual thesauri (1993) 0.01 
    0.013566022 = product of:
  0.027132044 = sum of:
    0.027132044 = product of:
      0.054264087 = sum of:
        0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054264087 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.180-181 (M. Hudon)
  18. Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018) 0.01 
    0.013566022 = product of:
  0.027132044 = sum of:
    0.027132044 = product of:
      0.054264087 = sum of:
        0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054264087 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 1.2019 19:04:22
  19. Eastman, C.M.: Overlaps in postings to thesaurus terms : a preliminary study (1988) 0.01 
    0.01187027 = product of:
  0.02374054 = sum of:
    0.02374054 = product of:
      0.04748108 = sum of:
        0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04748108 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:52:34
  20. Crouch, C.J.: ¬An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri (1990) 0.01 
    0.01187027 = product of:
  0.02374054 = sum of:
    0.02374054 = product of:
      0.04748108 = sum of:
        0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04748108 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.1996 3:39:53

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 23
  • d 8
  • f 4
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 31
  • el 2
  • m 2
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications